Rollup merge of #86200 - qwerty01:clone-doc-update, r=JohnTitor
Rollup merge of #86200 - qwerty01:clone-doc-update, r=JohnTitor

Updates `Clone` docs for `Copy` comparison.

Quite a few people (myself included) have come under the impression that the difference between `Copy` and `Clone` is that `Copy` is cheap and `Clone` is expensive, where the actual difference is that `Copy` constrains the type to bit-wise copying, and `Clone` allows for more expensive operations. The source of this misconception is in the `Clone` docs, where the following line is in the description:

> Differs from `Copy` in that `Copy` is implicit and extremely inexpensive, while `Clone` is always explicit and may or may not be expensive.

The `Clone` documentation page also comes up before the `Copy` page on google when searching for "the difference between `Clone` and `Copy`".

This PR updates the documentation to clarify that "extremely inexpensive" means an "inexpensive bit-wise copy" to hopefully prevent future rust users from falling into this misunderstanding.

aidancully/rust,graydon/rust,graydon/rust,aidancully/rust,graydon/rust,graydon/rust,aidancully/rust,graydon/rust,aidancully/rust,aidancully/rust,aidancully/rust,graydon/rust