In the case of metareviews we can't use the reviewee. In this type of response, the reviewee is the person who submitted the review. Instead we have to use the person who submitted the content. An additional attribute should probably be added to each response type: content_provider. This would always contain the correct person for the content. I will investigate this in the near future.
In the case of metareviews we can't use the reviewee. In this type of response, the reviewee is the person who submitted the review. Instead we have to use the person who submitted the content. An additional attribute should probably be added to each response type: content_provider. This would always contain the correct person for the content. I will investigate this in the near future.

git-svn-id: f67d969b640da65cb7bc1d229e09fd6d2db44ae1@681 392d7b7b-3f31-0410-9dc3-c95a9635ea79

urmilparikh95/expertiza,urmilparikh95/expertiza,michaelamoran/expertiza,arpitashekhar/expertiza,redsock88/expertiza,sid5788/expertiza,expertiza/expertiza,rmmaily/expertiza,sid5788/expertiza,joshio1/expertiza,akshayjain114/expertiza,michaelamoran/expertiza,urmilparikh95/expertiza,mhhassan/expertiza,kira0992/expertiza,KunmiaoYang/expertiza,urmilparikh95/expertiza,joshio1/expertiza,joshio1/expertiza,akshayjain114/expertiza,kira0992/expertiza,arpitashekhar/expertiza,ApertureScienceInnovators/expertiza,michaelamoran/expertiza,expertiza/expertiza,KunmiaoYang/expertiza,mhhassan/expertiza,arpitashekhar/expertiza,rmmaily/expertiza,redsock88/expertiza,michaelamoran/expertiza,KunmiaoYang/expertiza,rmmaily/expertiza,sid5788/expertiza,akshayjain114/expertiza,mhhassan/expertiza,kira0992/expertiza,rmmaily/expertiza,arpitashekhar/expertiza,redsock88/expertiza,joshio1/expertiza,mhhassan/expertiza,ApertureScienceInnovators/expertiza,expertiza/expertiza,expertiza/expertiza,ApertureScienceInnovators/expertiza,sid5788/expertiza,akshayjain114/expertiza,KunmiaoYang/expertiza,redsock88/expertiza,kira0992/expertiza,ApertureScienceInnovators/expertiza