HvD: There were some short comings in detecting the correct integer type for the ScaLAPACK interface. These came to light due to a user report on an error in a regular expression. When the expression was corrected wrong integer type detections became apparent. Partly this was due to the assumption that the test could only have two outcomes 4 or 8, whereas in reality the test could also  fail. This has now been adjusted. Now the test has three possible outcomes, 4, 8, or 0, where 0 means the test failed. Also the return codes from the shell functions have been changed to 1 when the shell function fails. This improved the integer type detection on, for example, chinook.
HvD: There were some short comings in detecting the correct integer type for
the ScaLAPACK interface. These came to light due to a user report on an error
in a regular expression. When the expression was corrected wrong integer type
detections became apparent. Partly this was due to the assumption that the test
could only have two outcomes 4 or 8, whereas in reality the test could also 
fail. This has now been adjusted. Now the test has three possible outcomes,
4, 8, or 0, where 0 means the test failed. Also the return codes from the
shell functions have been changed to 1 when the shell function fails. This
improved the integer type detection on, for example, chinook.





rangsimanketkaew/NWChem