there is a noticeable shift in the new imagery vs the previous reference. HOWEVER, that shift shows up when I compare the existing reference image against what I see when I request from WMS (url below).  The newer reference image looks much closer to what I see coming through WMS, so I'm thinking we're better now.
there is a noticeable shift in the new imagery vs the previous reference. HOWEVER, that shift shows up when I compare the existing reference image against what I see when I request from WMS (url below).  The newer reference image looks much closer to what I see coming through WMS, so I'm thinking we're better now.

https://gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov/wms/epsg3857/best/wms.cgi?service=WMS&version=1.3.0&request=GetMap&crs=EPSG:3857&layers=BlueMarble_ShadedRelief_Bathymetry&styles=default,default&format=image/png&transparent=true&bbox=-20037508.34278925,-20037508.34278925,20037508.34278925,20037508.34278925&width=1024&height=1024

nasa-gibs/onearth,nasa-gibs/onearth,nasa-gibs/onearth,nasa-gibs/onearth,nasa-gibs/onearth,nasa-gibs/onearth