Do type substitution in the packed array support more narrowly because ILSpy type substitution is still totally busted
Do type substitution in the packed array support more narrowly because ILSpy type substitution is still totally busted

iskiselev/JSIL,iskiselev/JSIL,antiufo/JSIL,mispy/JSIL,hach-que/JSIL,antiufo/JSIL,antiufo/JSIL,volkd/JSIL,acourtney2015/JSIL,x335/JSIL,sq/JSIL,hach-que/JSIL,FUSEEProjectTeam/JSIL,sq/JSIL,TukekeSoft/JSIL,dmirmilshteyn/JSIL,TukekeSoft/JSIL,dmirmilshteyn/JSIL,iskiselev/JSIL,acourtney2015/JSIL,sander-git/JSIL,mispy/JSIL,FUSEEProjectTeam/JSIL,hach-que/JSIL,FUSEEProjectTeam/JSIL,iskiselev/JSIL,sq/JSIL,dmirmilshteyn/JSIL,TukekeSoft/JSIL,mispy/JSIL,sander-git/JSIL,dmirmilshteyn/JSIL,FUSEEProjectTeam/JSIL,sq/JSIL,hach-que/JSIL,mispy/JSIL,Trattpingvin/JSIL,acourtney2015/JSIL,sander-git/JSIL,sander-git/JSIL,Trattpingvin/JSIL,sq/JSIL,Trattpingvin/JSIL,x335/JSIL,volkd/JSIL,TukekeSoft/JSIL,volkd/JSIL,x335/JSIL,antiufo/JSIL,x335/JSIL,sander-git/JSIL,volkd/JSIL,volkd/JSIL,hach-que/JSIL,acourtney2015/JSIL,FUSEEProjectTeam/JSIL,acourtney2015/JSIL,iskiselev/JSIL,Trattpingvin/JSIL