Docs: reintroduce misspelling in `valid-typeof` example (#9753)
Docs: reintroduce misspelling in `valid-typeof` example (#9753)

This example is intended to be an invalid `typeof` string, to illustrate that the rule reports an error if the user makes a typo like this. However, the spelling was inadvertently corrected in aedae9dfe027bf1e068680db678a070ebe737e56, so the documentation is now incorrect (it says that `valid-typeof` reports an error for that code, when in fact it does not).
onurtemizkan/eslint,eslint/eslint,eslint/eslint,BenoitZugmeyer/eslint,DavidAnson/eslint,Moeriki/eslint,platinumazure/eslint,Aladdin-ADD/eslint,ljharb/eslint,onurtemizkan/eslint,whitneyit/eslint,Moeriki/eslint,platinumazure/eslint,pvamshi/eslint,whitneyit/eslint,ljharb/eslint,pvamshi/eslint,BenoitZugmeyer/eslint,Trott/eslint,Aladdin-ADD/eslint,Trott/eslint,DavidAnson/eslint