Satellites broke because it's looking for 1306.29 in the unlikely_periods. I've confirmed that it was there with the 20160330 seed, even (when I originally wrote the test and pushed it) but it's not there in today's. What to do? I could fail to require that one … perhaps it's a marginal case. It's a little odd though, because that's a pretty bad case in the univariate sense, and it would be nice to have because it's a case where the "GEO" label is wrong, rather than the period itself, and it's the only one of these. What if I increase models or iterations or both just a bit?
Satellites broke because it's looking for 1306.29 in the
unlikely_periods. I've confirmed that it was there with the 20160330
seed, even (when I originally wrote the test and pushed it) but it's not
there in today's. What to do? I could fail to require that one … perhaps
it's a marginal case. It's a little odd though, because that's a pretty
bad case in the univariate sense, and it would be nice to have because
it's a case where the "GEO" label is wrong, rather than the period
itself, and it's the only one of these. What if I increase models or
iterations or both just a bit?

probcomp/bdbcontrib,probcomp/bdbcontrib