We were calling to an undefined method. I was able to repro this by putting my patch in (http://codereview.chromium.org/345051) without adding shess's patch (http://codereview.chromium.org/362013). I'm not sure how to repro otherwise. Either way, I think this is actually what's intended to happen. Certainly better than what is there now.
We were calling to an undefined method. I was able to repro this by putting my
patch in (http://codereview.chromium.org/345051) without adding shess's patch
(http://codereview.chromium.org/362013). I'm not sure how to repro otherwise.
Either way, I think this is actually what's intended to happen. Certainly better
than what is there now.

BUG=none
TEST=none

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/355045

git-svn-id: http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src@31128 4ff67af0-8c30-449e-8e8b-ad334ec8d88c

Former-commit-id: e8290e41c896a7fa867bbab2d0653205d1a331c5
meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser,meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser,meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser,meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser,meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser,meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser,meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser,meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser,meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser,meego-tablet-ux/meego-app-browser