I was convinced that it's ok to allow a second i8 return value to be returned in DL. LLVM's multiple-return-value support is not ABI-conforming; front-ends that wish to have code emitted that conforms to an ABI are currently expected to make arrangements for this on their own rather than assuming that multiple-return-values will automatically do the right thing. This commit doesn't fundamentally change this situation.
I was convinced that it's ok to allow a second i8 return value
to be returned in DL. LLVM's multiple-return-value support is
not ABI-conforming; front-ends that wish to have code emitted
that conforms to an ABI are currently expected to make
arrangements for this on their own rather than assuming that
multiple-return-values will automatically do the right thing.
This commit doesn't fundamentally change this situation.


git-svn-id: 0ff597fd157e6f4fc38580e8d64ab130330d2411@67588 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

apple/swift-llvm,dslab-epfl/asap,dslab-epfl/asap,llvm-mirror/llvm,chubbymaggie/asap,llvm-mirror/llvm,llvm-mirror/llvm,llvm-mirror/llvm,chubbymaggie/asap,GPUOpen-Drivers/llvm,dslab-epfl/asap,apple/swift-llvm,GPUOpen-Drivers/llvm,llvm-mirror/llvm,chubbymaggie/asap,llvm-mirror/llvm,chubbymaggie/asap,chubbymaggie/asap,chubbymaggie/asap,dslab-epfl/asap,apple/swift-llvm,apple/swift-llvm,GPUOpen-Drivers/llvm,apple/swift-llvm,apple/swift-llvm,GPUOpen-Drivers/llvm,apple/swift-llvm,GPUOpen-Drivers/llvm,dslab-epfl/asap,GPUOpen-Drivers/llvm,llvm-mirror/llvm,dslab-epfl/asap,GPUOpen-Drivers/llvm,apple/swift-llvm,GPUOpen-Drivers/llvm,dslab-epfl/asap,llvm-mirror/llvm,llvm-mirror/llvm