| 1 | |
| 00:00:05,900 --> 00:00:07,960 | |
| Assalamualaikum and good morning everyone. Welcome | |
| 2 | |
| 00:00:07,960 --> 00:00:10,640 | |
| back to English poetry at the Islamic University | |
| 3 | |
| 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:14,800 | |
| of Gaza. Today we move to a very interesting poet, | |
| 4 | |
| 00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:18,820 | |
| critic and a modernist. When we started this | |
| 5 | |
| 00:00:18,820 --> 00:00:22,680 | |
| course, I asked you for your favorite definition | |
| 6 | |
| 00:00:22,680 --> 00:00:26,500 | |
| of poetry and most of you opted for the | |
| 7 | |
| 00:00:26,500 --> 00:00:29,940 | |
| Wordsworthian definition, defining poetry as a | |
| 8 | |
| 00:00:29,940 --> 00:00:35,680 | |
| spontaneous overflow of powerful emotions. And I | |
| 9 | |
| 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:38,720 | |
| want that many people would stop here, giving this | |
| 10 | |
| 00:00:38,720 --> 00:00:42,080 | |
| definition, and this actually falls short because | |
| 11 | |
| 00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:44,340 | |
| there is a second part, there's a significant | |
| 12 | |
| 00:00:44,340 --> 00:00:48,000 | |
| part, actually 50% of what the definition is, | |
| 13 | |
| 00:00:48,100 --> 00:00:52,370 | |
| which is recollected in tranquility. This | |
| 14 | |
| 00:00:52,370 --> 00:00:55,470 | |
| recollection act of remembering and recalling | |
| 15 | |
| 00:00:55,470 --> 00:00:58,350 | |
| memories is significant. We're going to see this | |
| 16 | |
| 00:00:58,350 --> 00:01:01,290 | |
| in a bit. Before we talk about the features which | |
| 17 | |
| 00:01:01,290 --> 00:01:04,970 | |
| we in a way or another mentioned in the lectures | |
| 18 | |
| 00:01:04,970 --> 00:01:10,380 | |
| on William Blake. Let's see this canonical text. | |
| 19 | |
| 00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:12,520 | |
| I'm sure you're already familiar with this. Some | |
| 20 | |
| 00:01:12,520 --> 00:01:15,460 | |
| of you must have studied this before, but it's | |
| 21 | |
| 00:01:15,460 --> 00:01:18,620 | |
| always, always good to see how different people do | |
| 22 | |
| 00:01:18,620 --> 00:01:24,040 | |
| different things. In my way of studying poetry and | |
| 23 | |
| 00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:26,160 | |
| literature in general, I like to focus on the | |
| 24 | |
| 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:30,200 | |
| structure, on the form, on how the poets say what | |
| 25 | |
| 00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:34,110 | |
| they say rather than what they actually say. Some | |
| 26 | |
| 00:01:34,110 --> 00:01:39,050 | |
| critics would suggest that there are actually a | |
| 27 | |
| 00:01:39,050 --> 00:01:42,390 | |
| handful of themes out there. All poetry, all | |
| 28 | |
| 00:01:42,390 --> 00:01:44,930 | |
| literature, all writings can be summarized into a | |
| 29 | |
| 00:01:44,930 --> 00:01:49,890 | |
| handful of issues. I'm happy, I'm sad, she likes | |
| 30 | |
| 00:01:49,890 --> 00:01:52,830 | |
| me, she doesn't like me, life's good, life's bad. | |
| 31 | |
| 00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:58,060 | |
| And that's why we have poets, Arab poets, who | |
| 32 | |
| 00:01:58,060 --> 00:02:01,080 | |
| suggested almost 2,000 years ago that whatever | |
| 33 | |
| 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:04,360 | |
| they were doing was just repeating themselves and | |
| 34 | |
| 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:08,160 | |
| intertexting or borrowing or quoting other poets. | |
| 35 | |
| 00:02:08,340 --> 00:02:11,900 | |
| And this is 2,000 years ago. Ma arana naqulu illa | |
| 36 | |
| 00:02:11,900 --> 00:02:15,000 | |
| muaran aw muadan min lafdina makrooro. And Antara | |
| 37 | |
| 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,980 | |
| says, hal ghadara ash shuara wa min mutraddami. | |
| 38 | |
| 00:02:18,460 --> 00:02:21,800 | |
| Opening his muallaqa, his long poem, saying that, | |
| 39 | |
| 00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:25,350 | |
| what should I write about? everything I want to | |
| 40 | |
| 00:02:25,350 --> 00:02:29,170 | |
| speak about has already been spoken about by other | |
| 41 | |
| 00:02:29,170 --> 00:02:33,690 | |
| poets. But he doesn't just stop there and give us | |
| 42 | |
| 00:02:33,690 --> 00:02:40,030 | |
| that one line, the opening, because he knows he is | |
| 43 | |
| 00:02:40,030 --> 00:02:44,170 | |
| not, in a way, the idea is being repeated, but how | |
| 44 | |
| 00:02:44,170 --> 00:02:46,110 | |
| he is doing his poetry is totally different. | |
| 45 | |
| 00:02:46,330 --> 00:02:49,190 | |
| That's why every poem, every poet is a different | |
| 46 | |
| 00:02:49,190 --> 00:02:51,390 | |
| experience. Even by the same poet, you'll | |
| 47 | |
| 00:02:51,390 --> 00:02:55,820 | |
| experience different different things I have, like | |
| 48 | |
| 00:02:55,820 --> 00:02:57,480 | |
| when you study Tamim al-Barghouti, you'll find | |
| 49 | |
| 00:02:57,480 --> 00:03:00,580 | |
| that there are common features for his poetry, | |
| 50 | |
| 00:03:01,340 --> 00:03:05,160 | |
| right? But once you get into each poem, it's a | |
| 51 | |
| 00:03:05,160 --> 00:03:11,560 | |
| microcosm of its own world. One guy said to a | |
| 52 | |
| 00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:16,140 | |
| critic, I want to write poetry. I have so many | |
| 53 | |
| 00:03:16,140 --> 00:03:19,320 | |
| ideas. I want to write poetry, we do this | |
| 54 | |
| 00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:23,580 | |
| sometimes. I want to write poetry, I have so many | |
| 55 | |
| 00:03:23,580 --> 00:03:28,000 | |
| ideas. And the critic being a critic said, poetry | |
| 56 | |
| 00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:31,940 | |
| my friend is not made with ideas, but with words. | |
| 57 | |
| 00:03:34,340 --> 00:03:37,400 | |
| what words to choose, how to use the words, how to | |
| 58 | |
| 00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:40,280 | |
| word the words, how to order the words, how to | |
| 59 | |
| 00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:43,520 | |
| play with the words, how to use and recruit | |
| 60 | |
| 00:03:43,520 --> 00:03:47,480 | |
| literary devices and metaphorical language, | |
| 61 | |
| 00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:51,680 | |
| figures of speech. And that's why, again, I like | |
| 62 | |
| 00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:57,020 | |
| Samuel Coleridge's definition probably more. He | |
| 63 | |
| 00:03:57,020 --> 00:03:59,180 | |
| says in a way, it sounds a stupid definition, but | |
| 64 | |
| 00:03:59,180 --> 00:04:05,030 | |
| it's really deep. Poetry is the best words in the | |
| 65 | |
| 00:04:05,030 --> 00:04:10,890 | |
| best order. Poetry is the best words in the best | |
| 66 | |
| 00:04:10,890 --> 00:04:14,970 | |
| order, where he is focusing more on how the form | |
| 67 | |
| 00:04:14,970 --> 00:04:18,170 | |
| and the language should say what they should say. | |
| 68 | |
| 00:04:19,590 --> 00:04:21,350 | |
| Now, when we talk about William Wordsworth, we | |
| 69 | |
| 00:04:21,350 --> 00:04:23,510 | |
| talk about one of the most, again, important poets | |
| 70 | |
| 00:04:23,510 --> 00:04:27,450 | |
| of all times. We talk about the father or the | |
| 71 | |
| 00:04:27,450 --> 00:04:30,610 | |
| founder or the co-founder of Romanticism. Along | |
| 72 | |
| 00:04:30,610 --> 00:04:35,850 | |
| with Coleridge, they published what is known as | |
| 73 | |
| 00:04:35,850 --> 00:04:42,360 | |
| The Lyrical Ballads around 1798. And the book in a | |
| 74 | |
| 00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:44,760 | |
| short time sold out. There were no more copies | |
| 75 | |
| 00:04:44,760 --> 00:04:47,740 | |
| because people remember we said nanoclassicism was | |
| 76 | |
| 00:04:47,740 --> 00:04:49,680 | |
| already in decline and people were looking for | |
| 77 | |
| 00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:53,040 | |
| something different, something new. Coleridge | |
| 78 | |
| 00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:57,440 | |
| published only his Rymor Ancient Mariner and | |
| 79 | |
| 00:04:57,440 --> 00:04:59,560 | |
| Wordsworth published like I'm not sure how many | |
| 80 | |
| 00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:04,500 | |
| poems but a bunch of them. Now after two years | |
| 81 | |
| 00:05:04,500 --> 00:05:06,400 | |
| they say they said like okay let's | |
| 82 | |
| 00:05:08,900 --> 00:05:11,620 | |
| Let's tell people what we're doing. Let's define | |
| 83 | |
| 00:05:11,620 --> 00:05:14,640 | |
| poetry, define a poet and tell them what kind of | |
| 84 | |
| 00:05:14,640 --> 00:05:17,240 | |
| language, what kind of sensibility we're employing | |
| 85 | |
| 00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:17,560 | |
| here. | |
| 86 | |
| 00:05:23,880 --> 00:05:27,540 | |
| Coleridge, probably you know this already, | |
| 87 | |
| 00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:29,800 | |
| Coleridge was a drug addict. He was an opium | |
| 88 | |
| 00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:33,080 | |
| addict. He was high all the time. Not climbing | |
| 89 | |
| 00:05:33,080 --> 00:05:39,270 | |
| trees, but high. He didn't participate in writing | |
| 90 | |
| 00:05:39,270 --> 00:05:42,150 | |
| the introduction, which is now known as the | |
| 91 | |
| 00:05:42,150 --> 00:05:44,750 | |
| preface to the lyrical ballad. It was written, I'm | |
| 92 | |
| 00:05:44,750 --> 00:05:47,230 | |
| saying this because some people think that the | |
| 93 | |
| 00:05:47,230 --> 00:05:50,710 | |
| preface is what Romanticism is, and this is, to a | |
| 94 | |
| 00:05:50,710 --> 00:05:53,910 | |
| large extent, yes, if you consider words worth | |
| 95 | |
| 00:05:53,910 --> 00:05:59,020 | |
| everything in Romanticism, and this is wrong. And | |
| 96 | |
| 00:05:59,020 --> 00:06:02,000 | |
| I know many of you usually, I like feminism, I | |
| 97 | |
| 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:05,680 | |
| like post-colonialism, I like romanticism. And | |
| 98 | |
| 00:06:05,680 --> 00:06:07,980 | |
| then later on you find, you realize that there are | |
| 99 | |
| 00:06:07,980 --> 00:06:11,880 | |
| romanticisms, feminisms, and post-colonialisms. | |
| 100 | |
| 00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:15,860 | |
| Because when you study what a college is going to | |
| 101 | |
| 00:06:15,860 --> 00:06:18,880 | |
| be like, they share these common features, but | |
| 102 | |
| 00:06:18,880 --> 00:06:21,740 | |
| they're totally different. Look at Shelley, for | |
| 103 | |
| 00:06:21,740 --> 00:06:26,180 | |
| example, Percy Shelley. Lord Byron, Lord Byron, | |
| 104 | |
| 00:06:27,670 --> 00:06:30,470 | |
| hates Coleridge and William Wordsworth. He keeps | |
| 105 | |
| 00:06:30,470 --> 00:06:33,070 | |
| making fun of them all the time, mocking them. | |
| 106 | |
| 00:06:34,190 --> 00:06:40,130 | |
| This is the second generation. Now, so William | |
| 107 | |
| 00:06:40,130 --> 00:06:43,450 | |
| Wordsworth wrote the preface himself alone. This | |
| 108 | |
| 00:06:43,450 --> 00:06:45,710 | |
| is good again and bad because we have now | |
| 109 | |
| 00:06:45,710 --> 00:06:48,210 | |
| something, unlike the metaphysicals, they didn't | |
| 110 | |
| 00:06:48,210 --> 00:06:50,290 | |
| write anything to define their poetry, what they | |
| 111 | |
| 00:06:50,290 --> 00:06:52,390 | |
| were doing, to tell people about their new | |
| 112 | |
| 00:06:52,390 --> 00:06:52,950 | |
| sensibility. | |
| 113 | |
| 00:06:56,020 --> 00:06:58,000 | |
| But again, it's bad because some people think that | |
| 114 | |
| 00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:00,100 | |
| this is all what you need to know about | |
| 115 | |
| 00:07:00,100 --> 00:07:02,820 | |
| romanticism. This is also good because later on | |
| 116 | |
| 00:07:02,820 --> 00:07:06,760 | |
| Coleridge realized that, oh my God, I didn't | |
| 117 | |
| 00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:10,340 | |
| participate in this. And he wrote his own book | |
| 118 | |
| 00:07:10,340 --> 00:07:14,480 | |
| known as Biographia Literaria, or Literary | |
| 119 | |
| 00:07:14,480 --> 00:07:17,400 | |
| Biography. So it's good that we have two books by | |
| 120 | |
| 00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:24,000 | |
| these two amazing poets and critics. This poem, | |
| 121 | |
| 00:07:24,660 --> 00:07:28,740 | |
| some say, is the icon, the epitome of | |
| 122 | |
| 00:07:28,740 --> 00:07:32,160 | |
| neoclassicism, sorry, romanticism. It contains | |
| 123 | |
| 00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:35,480 | |
| almost every feature, as if he wrote this poem | |
| 124 | |
| 00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:38,600 | |
| just to show people how to write poetry in terms | |
| 125 | |
| 00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:41,800 | |
| of form, of language, of subject matter, of the | |
| 126 | |
| 00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:46,240 | |
| new sensibility, of the feelings and emotions and | |
| 127 | |
| 00:07:46,240 --> 00:07:47,940 | |
| imagination, individuality, as opposed to | |
| 128 | |
| 00:07:47,940 --> 00:07:53,120 | |
| everything that we had in neoclassical Iran. Okay, | |
| 129 | |
| 00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:57,400 | |
| so the poem is entitled with the daffodils the | |
| 130 | |
| 00:07:57,400 --> 00:08:01,580 | |
| daffodils Probably let's let's read the poem | |
| 131 | |
| 00:08:01,580 --> 00:08:04,460 | |
| together for the sake of time just one stanza | |
| 132 | |
| 00:08:04,460 --> 00:08:13,460 | |
| each, please I wandered lonely Okay, | |
| 133 | |
| 00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:18,220 | |
| can you say again and speak up I wandered lonely | |
| 134 | |
| 00:08:18,220 --> 00:08:22,840 | |
| as a cloud that floats high over hills and hills. | |
| 135 | |
| 00:08:23,460 --> 00:08:27,160 | |
| When all at once I saw a crowd, a host of golden | |
| 136 | |
| 00:08:27,160 --> 00:08:30,800 | |
| daffodils beside the lakes beneath the trees, | |
| 137 | |
| 00:08:31,220 --> 00:08:33,420 | |
| fluttering and dancing in the breeze. Thank you | |
| 138 | |
| 00:08:33,420 --> 00:08:34,560 | |
| very much. One more, please. | |
| 139 | |
| 00:08:49,970 --> 00:08:55,550 | |
| Thank you. Speak up. The waves beside them danced, | |
| 140 | |
| 00:08:55,710 --> 00:08:59,250 | |
| but they outdid the sparkling waves indeed. A poet | |
| 141 | |
| 00:08:59,250 --> 00:09:03,130 | |
| could not but be gay in such a tokened company. I | |
| 142 | |
| 00:09:03,130 --> 00:09:07,700 | |
| gazed and gazed, but little thought what Thank you | |
| 143 | |
| 00:09:07,700 --> 00:09:13,920 | |
| very much. One more, please. On my couch. | |
| 144 | |
| 00:09:23,020 --> 00:09:27,500 | |
| Very good. | |
| 145 | |
| 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:33,780 | |
| Very good. Okay, so I'll go into a journey through | |
| 146 | |
| 00:09:33,780 --> 00:09:36,880 | |
| this poem and show you how I like to usually do | |
| 147 | |
| 00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:41,240 | |
| things. But this is a poem that can be studied | |
| 148 | |
| 00:09:41,240 --> 00:09:43,020 | |
| from different ideas. You can start with the | |
| 149 | |
| 00:09:43,020 --> 00:09:44,880 | |
| features, looking for them, et cetera. But let's | |
| 150 | |
| 00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:48,260 | |
| do a close reading, reading between the words and | |
| 151 | |
| 00:09:48,260 --> 00:09:53,280 | |
| the lines. Now, the title itself, Daffodils, or | |
| 152 | |
| 00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:55,220 | |
| The Daffodils, suggests that | |
| 153 | |
| 00:09:58,220 --> 00:10:01,920 | |
| This is a poem that is rooted, or at least | |
| 154 | |
| 00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:06,600 | |
| inspired by nature. The daffodils, rather than | |
| 155 | |
| 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:09,460 | |
| paradise lost, paradise regained, rather than any | |
| 156 | |
| 00:10:09,460 --> 00:10:13,380 | |
| lofty subject matter, the fairy queen, they say on | |
| 157 | |
| 00:10:13,380 --> 00:10:16,560 | |
| criticism, they say on man, that's the daffodils. | |
| 158 | |
| 00:10:16,860 --> 00:10:21,640 | |
| Totally different from the neoclassical, the | |
| 159 | |
| 00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:24,570 | |
| neoclassicals who were writing before this. When | |
| 160 | |
| 00:10:24,570 --> 00:10:27,710 | |
| we read the poem, we realize that this is a poem | |
| 161 | |
| 00:10:27,710 --> 00:10:31,870 | |
| that is overwhelmed by nature and natural | |
| 162 | |
| 00:10:31,870 --> 00:10:36,990 | |
| elements. It's not a poem that uses nature as some | |
| 163 | |
| 00:10:36,990 --> 00:10:39,350 | |
| kind of decoration for the poem. Because some of | |
| 164 | |
| 00:10:39,350 --> 00:10:41,410 | |
| you will say, okay, Shakespeare used natural | |
| 165 | |
| 00:10:41,410 --> 00:10:44,210 | |
| elements. Marlowe used natural elements in his | |
| 166 | |
| 00:10:44,210 --> 00:10:46,730 | |
| poetry. What difference does it make? The | |
| 167 | |
| 00:10:46,730 --> 00:10:48,030 | |
| difference is actually | |
| 168 | |
| 00:10:51,260 --> 00:10:54,460 | |
| Existential, not just superficial, because in this | |
| 169 | |
| 00:10:54,460 --> 00:10:59,120 | |
| poem, in Wordsworth, nature is the poem. The poem | |
| 170 | |
| 00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:01,840 | |
| is for nature, nature inspires the poem, nature | |
| 171 | |
| 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:04,020 | |
| everything. Take nature from the poem and you | |
| 172 | |
| 00:11:04,020 --> 00:11:07,860 | |
| don't have a poem. But for Shakespeare, probably | |
| 173 | |
| 00:11:07,860 --> 00:11:09,800 | |
| for Marlow, if you take nature, you take the | |
| 174 | |
| 00:11:09,800 --> 00:11:11,820 | |
| decorations because he's saying that, come live | |
| 175 | |
| 00:11:11,820 --> 00:11:14,440 | |
| with me and be my love. I own everything around | |
| 176 | |
| 00:11:14,440 --> 00:11:16,980 | |
| me. He's not showing the relationship between him | |
| 177 | |
| 00:11:16,980 --> 00:11:19,840 | |
| and nature and how nature is impacting him, his | |
| 178 | |
| 00:11:19,840 --> 00:11:24,700 | |
| psychology, his everything here. So nature here, | |
| 179 | |
| 00:11:25,180 --> 00:11:27,160 | |
| this is about the impact of nature. The impact, | |
| 180 | |
| 00:11:27,220 --> 00:11:30,110 | |
| and again, I don't like to talk about themes | |
| 181 | |
| 00:11:30,110 --> 00:11:32,770 | |
| because sometimes they limit the meaning of the | |
| 182 | |
| 00:11:32,770 --> 00:11:35,290 | |
| poem. But yeah, there is this thing about how | |
| 183 | |
| 00:11:35,290 --> 00:11:37,810 | |
| nature is changing, is impacting him from one | |
| 184 | |
| 00:11:37,810 --> 00:11:42,030 | |
| thing to the other. And then the second thing, we | |
| 185 | |
| 00:11:42,030 --> 00:11:48,890 | |
| are struck with the I. I wandered lonely as a | |
| 186 | |
| 00:11:48,890 --> 00:11:51,330 | |
| cloud. And actually not only I, we have lonely and | |
| 187 | |
| 00:11:51,330 --> 00:11:57,170 | |
| we have the singularity of a cloud. I wondered | |
| 188 | |
| 00:11:57,170 --> 00:11:59,310 | |
| lonely as there is subjectivity here, there is | |
| 189 | |
| 00:11:59,310 --> 00:12:02,740 | |
| individualism. For romanticism, remember we said | |
| 190 | |
| 00:12:02,740 --> 00:12:05,260 | |
| that neoclassical poetry was poetry of the | |
| 191 | |
| 00:12:05,260 --> 00:12:08,600 | |
| collective, of everybody, for all, not for all | |
| 192 | |
| 00:12:08,600 --> 00:12:13,680 | |
| like in this sense where it talks, where it | |
| 193 | |
| 00:12:13,680 --> 00:12:17,800 | |
| considers poetry a practice that is, that can be | |
| 194 | |
| 00:12:17,800 --> 00:12:20,940 | |
| done by everybody, by any ordinary man with just, | |
| 195 | |
| 00:12:21,060 --> 00:12:23,980 | |
| or woman with just some comprehensive sensibility. | |
| 196 | |
| 00:12:24,460 --> 00:12:27,820 | |
| It means that you need to write poetry about | |
| 197 | |
| 00:12:27,820 --> 00:12:30,740 | |
| significant and lofty issues, issues that touch | |
| 198 | |
| 00:12:30,950 --> 00:12:34,170 | |
| Everybody. If your poem is about Adapodil, why | |
| 199 | |
| 00:12:34,170 --> 00:12:36,870 | |
| should I care? Adapodil is not important to me. | |
| 200 | |
| 00:12:37,570 --> 00:12:40,390 | |
| But God and Adam and Eve and the Queen, these | |
| 201 | |
| 00:12:40,390 --> 00:12:43,610 | |
| things are important to everybody. And then he | |
| 202 | |
| 00:12:43,610 --> 00:12:47,990 | |
| emphasizes this by saying lonely and then a cloud. | |
| 203 | |
| 00:12:48,110 --> 00:12:52,170 | |
| He's wondering, not like clouds or birds, | |
| 204 | |
| 00:12:52,250 --> 00:12:55,650 | |
| whatever, it's just one singularity. So when we | |
| 205 | |
| 00:12:55,650 --> 00:12:58,330 | |
| say there's subjectivity here, there is | |
| 206 | |
| 00:12:58,330 --> 00:13:03,980 | |
| individuality here, Don't get this mixed up with | |
| 207 | |
| 00:13:03,980 --> 00:13:06,900 | |
| every, not every I in a poem is individual I, | |
| 208 | |
| 00:13:06,980 --> 00:13:08,920 | |
| because some of the I's could be collective I's. | |
| 209 | |
| 00:13:09,020 --> 00:13:13,680 | |
| I, an I where the poet is assuming the role of the | |
| 210 | |
| 00:13:13,680 --> 00:13:17,220 | |
| spokesperson for everybody, like the we, okay? | |
| 211 | |
| 00:13:17,480 --> 00:13:19,800 | |
| Like where, for example, a poet speaks for all | |
| 212 | |
| 00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:23,460 | |
| lovers, for all poets, for all people, but with | |
| 213 | |
| 00:13:23,460 --> 00:13:26,240 | |
| William Wordsworth, and mostly the romantics, but | |
| 214 | |
| 00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:30,480 | |
| in particular, William Wordsworth, The I here is | |
| 215 | |
| 00:13:30,480 --> 00:13:34,320 | |
| actually the poet himself. Because for | |
| 216 | |
| 00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:38,360 | |
| romanticism, the poem is the poet. And the poet is | |
| 217 | |
| 00:13:38,360 --> 00:13:40,520 | |
| the poem. They are interchangeable. That's why | |
| 218 | |
| 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:42,980 | |
| when you discuss romanticism, remember we said | |
| 219 | |
| 00:13:42,980 --> 00:13:46,740 | |
| poetry for them is self-expression? You experience | |
| 220 | |
| 00:13:46,740 --> 00:13:50,320 | |
| something, you experience something that you | |
| 221 | |
| 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:52,500 | |
| experience yourself in a way or another. It | |
| 222 | |
| 00:13:52,500 --> 00:13:55,120 | |
| doesn't have to be a direct experience. We can | |
| 223 | |
| 00:13:55,120 --> 00:13:59,110 | |
| talk about this later on. And lonely, this is | |
| 224 | |
| 00:13:59,110 --> 00:14:03,050 | |
| loneliness. We'll see at the end how he was not | |
| 225 | |
| 00:14:03,050 --> 00:14:06,430 | |
| alone when he had this experience. But there's | |
| 226 | |
| 00:14:06,430 --> 00:14:09,590 | |
| somebody he is totally eradicating and erasing | |
| 227 | |
| 00:14:09,590 --> 00:14:12,530 | |
| from the poem. Is this anti-feminism? Is this? | |
| 228 | |
| 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:18,780 | |
| self-centeredness or is this and again emphasis on | |
| 229 | |
| 00:14:18,780 --> 00:14:21,400 | |
| individuality rather than society and community | |
| 230 | |
| 00:14:21,400 --> 00:14:25,860 | |
| which is a romantic feature when he says as a | |
| 231 | |
| 00:14:25,860 --> 00:14:29,560 | |
| cloud as is it's a simile thank you and a simile | |
| 232 | |
| 00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:35,220 | |
| is a metaphor where you use as or like just and in | |
| 233 | |
| 00:14:35,220 --> 00:14:39,540 | |
| general Similes are easier than metaphors. If he | |
| 234 | |
| 00:14:39,540 --> 00:14:46,980 | |
| said, I wandered lonely or I floated lonely, we'll | |
| 235 | |
| 00:14:46,980 --> 00:14:53,280 | |
| be asking, what does he mean? Why is he floating? | |
| 236 | |
| 00:14:53,500 --> 00:14:57,160 | |
| What, is he a bird? Is he a duck? Is he what? | |
| 237 | |
| 00:14:58,280 --> 00:15:01,620 | |
| Because the possibilities are open, but he just | |
| 238 | |
| 00:15:01,620 --> 00:15:04,060 | |
| closes the door here by saying that, I wandered | |
| 239 | |
| 00:15:04,060 --> 00:15:08,110 | |
| lonely as a cloud. That's the end of it. And this | |
| 240 | |
| 00:15:08,110 --> 00:15:10,650 | |
| is something some people might be interested in | |
| 241 | |
| 00:15:10,650 --> 00:15:14,070 | |
| doing research on. How, for example, the Nihilists | |
| 242 | |
| 00:15:14,070 --> 00:15:17,090 | |
| were more into metaphors, you know, make things | |
| 243 | |
| 00:15:17,090 --> 00:15:19,610 | |
| complex sometimes, elaborate. That's why we have | |
| 244 | |
| 00:15:19,610 --> 00:15:23,630 | |
| the conceit and the Elizabethan conceit. But here, | |
| 245 | |
| 00:15:23,950 --> 00:15:26,230 | |
| they go for the simple. We'll see this repeated | |
| 246 | |
| 00:15:26,230 --> 00:15:30,870 | |
| again later on as the stars. And then again, a | |
| 247 | |
| 00:15:30,870 --> 00:15:35,170 | |
| cloud, not clouds, emphasizing the singularity of | |
| 248 | |
| 00:15:35,170 --> 00:15:43,620 | |
| it. But why a cloud? Yeah? Why a cloud? Not a | |
| 249 | |
| 00:15:43,620 --> 00:15:51,160 | |
| tree, a bird, a cat, or a drone, or a plane, or a | |
| 250 | |
| 00:15:51,160 --> 00:15:56,640 | |
| kite, you know? A kite, paper kite. What does it | |
| 251 | |
| 00:15:56,640 --> 00:16:00,340 | |
| indicate possibly? Yeah? Maybe because it's up in | |
| 252 | |
| 00:16:00,340 --> 00:16:02,840 | |
| the sky and it's hard to reach. Thank you very | |
| 253 | |
| 00:16:02,840 --> 00:16:07,120 | |
| much. It's up in the sky. it's high up above | |
| 254 | |
| 00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:13,200 | |
| everything it has this bird's eye view that can it | |
| 255 | |
| 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:17,620 | |
| can look at at things below it can see things from | |
| 256 | |
| 00:16:17,620 --> 00:16:21,660 | |
| a comprehensive perspective it's up above that's | |
| 257 | |
| 00:16:21,660 --> 00:16:24,480 | |
| one and i think because it is moving slowly so | |
| 258 | |
| 00:16:24,480 --> 00:16:27,140 | |
| he's in a state when he is staring at everything | |
| 259 | |
| 00:16:27,140 --> 00:16:29,380 | |
| and imagining everything so he couldn't be like | |
| 260 | |
| 00:16:29,460 --> 00:16:32,120 | |
| But not necessarily, not all clouds move slowly, | |
| 261 | |
| 00:16:32,200 --> 00:16:34,180 | |
| but that could be part of it. Sometimes they move | |
| 262 | |
| 00:16:34,180 --> 00:16:37,840 | |
| slowly. So this deliberate movement could be a | |
| 263 | |
| 00:16:37,840 --> 00:16:42,340 | |
| possible thing here. There is deliberation in the | |
| 264 | |
| 00:16:42,340 --> 00:16:45,360 | |
| process. There could be another reason. Maybe to | |
| 265 | |
| 00:16:45,360 --> 00:16:47,740 | |
| show that it's like something that is delicate and | |
| 266 | |
| 00:16:47,740 --> 00:16:51,660 | |
| soft. The delicacy of it, okay, the softness. I | |
| 267 | |
| 00:16:51,660 --> 00:16:53,020 | |
| heard somebody say something here. | |
| 268 | |
| 00:16:56,280 --> 00:16:59,940 | |
| Okay, it's also free, it has this kind of free | |
| 269 | |
| 00:16:59,940 --> 00:17:03,280 | |
| will. It's not connected with anything, it just | |
| 270 | |
| 00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:10,020 | |
| moves at free will. So there could be these | |
| 271 | |
| 00:17:10,020 --> 00:17:15,040 | |
| reasons for a cloud, one cloud, three. I love how | |
| 272 | |
| 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:18,220 | |
| when you examine our friend here, Wordsworth, | |
| 273 | |
| 00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:22,500 | |
| we'll see the second poem in a bit. He likes to | |
| 274 | |
| 00:17:22,500 --> 00:17:24,640 | |
| position himself. Remember I said, try to | |
| 275 | |
| 00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:27,660 | |
| understand where the poet is, what he is or she is | |
| 276 | |
| 00:17:27,660 --> 00:17:29,560 | |
| doing now, at the moment the poem is being | |
| 277 | |
| 00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:33,460 | |
| written, right? Is he asleep? Is he walking? Is he | |
| 278 | |
| 00:17:33,460 --> 00:17:37,320 | |
| eating? Is he in a class? Is he what? In a train, | |
| 279 | |
| 00:17:37,460 --> 00:17:42,210 | |
| traveling? The man here positions himself up | |
| 280 | |
| 00:17:42,210 --> 00:17:44,950 | |
| above. We see the second poem, he does almost the | |
| 281 | |
| 00:17:44,950 --> 00:17:50,170 | |
| same. He distances himself from things. That | |
| 282 | |
| 00:17:50,170 --> 00:17:56,310 | |
| floats on high o'er vales and hills. Now, o'er is | |
| 283 | |
| 00:17:56,310 --> 00:18:00,710 | |
| over, but over makes it two syllables, or one | |
| 284 | |
| 00:18:00,710 --> 00:18:03,770 | |
| syllable. And again, look at nature. This is | |
| 285 | |
| 00:18:03,770 --> 00:18:07,490 | |
| something. When all at once I saw a crowd. If you | |
| 286 | |
| 00:18:07,490 --> 00:18:10,330 | |
| look at the first two lines, I think there is some | |
| 287 | |
| 00:18:10,330 --> 00:18:11,930 | |
| kind of deliberation. Somebody said deliberate | |
| 288 | |
| 00:18:11,930 --> 00:18:15,910 | |
| here. They're musical, but they are a little bit | |
| 289 | |
| 00:18:15,910 --> 00:18:19,910 | |
| slow. I wandered lonely as a cloud that floats on | |
| 290 | |
| 00:18:19,910 --> 00:18:24,270 | |
| high or vales and hills. This line goes even | |
| 291 | |
| 00:18:24,270 --> 00:18:27,850 | |
| quicker. When all at once I saw a crowd, a host of | |
| 292 | |
| 00:18:27,850 --> 00:18:32,590 | |
| golden daffodils. When all at once, look at this | |
| 293 | |
| 00:18:32,590 --> 00:18:37,470 | |
| suddenness here. I saw a crowd. And the crowd | |
| 294 | |
| 00:18:37,470 --> 00:18:42,050 | |
| refers to a bunch of daffodils he saw. He | |
| 295 | |
| 00:18:42,050 --> 00:18:47,290 | |
| describes them as a crowd doing something called a | |
| 296 | |
| 00:18:47,290 --> 00:18:49,850 | |
| personification. Because a crowd of people, we | |
| 297 | |
| 00:18:49,850 --> 00:18:52,610 | |
| say. But if crowd is negative, a little bit | |
| 298 | |
| 00:18:52,610 --> 00:18:54,970 | |
| negative, because crowd, you don't like crowds, | |
| 299 | |
| 00:18:55,050 --> 00:18:56,850 | |
| you're like, it's crowded, I'm not going to go | |
| 300 | |
| 00:18:56,850 --> 00:19:01,290 | |
| there. He quickly follows it with a host which is | |
| 301 | |
| 00:19:01,290 --> 00:19:05,610 | |
| more welcoming and more inviting. If you are a | |
| 302 | |
| 00:19:05,610 --> 00:19:10,090 | |
| guest, the guy taking care of you is the host. And | |
| 303 | |
| 00:19:10,090 --> 00:19:13,090 | |
| when you are a guest, somebody's guest, You just | |
| 304 | |
| 00:19:13,090 --> 00:19:17,490 | |
| stay there, you enjoy food, you enjoy drinks, you | |
| 305 | |
| 00:19:17,490 --> 00:19:22,290 | |
| enjoy just relax, right? But it's the host that | |
| 306 | |
| 00:19:22,290 --> 00:19:25,290 | |
| works hard to please you, to make you comfortable. | |
| 307 | |
| 00:19:26,430 --> 00:19:29,030 | |
| I'm not sure what he's doing here, but is he | |
| 308 | |
| 00:19:29,030 --> 00:19:31,730 | |
| suggesting that the closer you get, the more | |
| 309 | |
| 00:19:31,730 --> 00:19:35,090 | |
| beautiful the scene becomes, the more involved you | |
| 310 | |
| 00:19:35,090 --> 00:19:37,930 | |
| are, the more inviting and appealing it is, | |
| 311 | |
| 00:19:37,930 --> 00:19:41,580 | |
| because it sounded like a crowd, and then they | |
| 312 | |
| 00:19:41,580 --> 00:19:47,720 | |
| turn to be a host, which also means a group of | |
| 313 | |
| 00:19:47,720 --> 00:19:51,060 | |
| golden daffodils. Now, the daffodils are golden. | |
| 314 | |
| 00:19:51,140 --> 00:19:53,780 | |
| Why would you say golden if they are already | |
| 315 | |
| 00:19:53,780 --> 00:19:56,060 | |
| there? So there could be some kind of significance | |
| 316 | |
| 00:19:56,060 --> 00:19:59,440 | |
| for this color, shiny color. Some people would | |
| 317 | |
| 00:19:59,440 --> 00:20:02,120 | |
| suggest that gold, they're precious, they're gold. | |
| 318 | |
| 00:20:03,140 --> 00:20:05,120 | |
| Referring to the color, but referring to their | |
| 319 | |
| 00:20:05,120 --> 00:20:10,820 | |
| significance. Where? Beneath the lake, beside the | |
| 320 | |
| 00:20:10,820 --> 00:20:14,320 | |
| lake, beneath the trees, fluttering and dancing in | |
| 321 | |
| 00:20:14,320 --> 00:20:17,120 | |
| the breeze. This is again more for the | |
| 322 | |
| 00:20:17,120 --> 00:20:20,080 | |
| personification. They are fluttering like birds | |
| 323 | |
| 00:20:20,080 --> 00:20:23,520 | |
| but also they are dancing like human beings. | |
| 324 | |
| 00:20:26,840 --> 00:20:29,120 | |
| That's a beautiful opening to a poem, very | |
| 325 | |
| 00:20:29,120 --> 00:20:33,480 | |
| ecstatic, very appealing. I'm not sure if this is | |
| 326 | |
| 00:20:33,480 --> 00:20:37,800 | |
| soothing to you, but he's inviting you to some, in | |
| 327 | |
| 00:20:37,800 --> 00:20:41,060 | |
| a way, to reconsider natural scenes, natural | |
| 328 | |
| 00:20:41,060 --> 00:20:45,780 | |
| experiences. I hope you never see daffodils the | |
| 329 | |
| 00:20:45,780 --> 00:20:50,380 | |
| same after this poem, or roses, or cats, or birds, | |
| 330 | |
| 00:20:50,620 --> 00:20:55,640 | |
| or clouds. Now, I'm not sure what words you find | |
| 331 | |
| 00:20:55,640 --> 00:20:58,620 | |
| difficult here. Fluttering, we already mentioned | |
| 332 | |
| 00:20:58,620 --> 00:21:04,000 | |
| this before. Veil, veil, veil, veil, valley. | |
| 333 | |
| 00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:09,480 | |
| Fluttering, you know breeze, the sweet morning. | |
| 334 | |
| 00:21:12,500 --> 00:21:15,560 | |
| What else? I don't think there are difficult words | |
| 335 | |
| 00:21:15,560 --> 00:21:17,840 | |
| here. Even the words you're not familiar with, you | |
| 336 | |
| 00:21:17,840 --> 00:21:22,380 | |
| still can guess. If you go to the rhyme scheme, | |
| 337 | |
| 00:21:24,730 --> 00:21:29,150 | |
| Please. Thank you. Go. A, B, | |
| 338 | |
| 00:21:29,930 --> 00:21:35,750 | |
| A, B. Are you sure? Yes. Yes. C, C. Are you sure? | |
| 339 | |
| 00:21:35,910 --> 00:21:39,310 | |
| Yes. The letters are different. We have to count | |
| 340 | |
| 00:21:39,310 --> 00:21:42,730 | |
| the sound. It's the sound that we care about. | |
| 341 | |
| 00:21:43,090 --> 00:21:46,870 | |
| Perfect or? Perfect. Perfect. If you count, just | |
| 342 | |
| 00:21:46,870 --> 00:21:48,670 | |
| to save you some time, if you count the syllables, | |
| 343 | |
| 00:21:49,530 --> 00:21:53,990 | |
| Each line has eight syllables making four feet, | |
| 344 | |
| 00:21:54,150 --> 00:21:56,110 | |
| mostly iambic tetrameter. | |
| 345 | |
| 00:21:58,610 --> 00:22:01,430 | |
| You'll find that this time we're not going to find | |
| 346 | |
| 00:22:01,430 --> 00:22:05,930 | |
| many poems going for the five feet iambic | |
| 347 | |
| 00:22:05,930 --> 00:22:06,570 | |
| pentameter. | |
| 348 | |
| 00:22:10,090 --> 00:22:12,810 | |
| And then the second syllable goes for continuous | |
| 349 | |
| 00:22:12,810 --> 00:22:19,070 | |
| as the stars that shine. Again, another simile. as | |
| 350 | |
| 00:22:19,070 --> 00:22:22,630 | |
| the stars that shine and twinkle on the milky way, | |
| 351 | |
| 00:22:22,990 --> 00:22:26,690 | |
| they referring to? And look at this, this is by | |
| 352 | |
| 00:22:26,690 --> 00:22:31,130 | |
| the way, this is now a modifying phrase. | |
| 353 | |
| 00:22:33,390 --> 00:22:38,610 | |
| The sentence is originally, because they are | |
| 354 | |
| 00:22:38,610 --> 00:22:41,470 | |
| continuous, they stretched, or they were | |
| 355 | |
| 00:22:41,470 --> 00:22:46,500 | |
| continuous. They stretched. This one of them is | |
| 356 | |
| 00:22:46,500 --> 00:22:50,480 | |
| reduced. Continuous as the stars that shine and | |
| 357 | |
| 00:22:50,480 --> 00:22:53,860 | |
| twinkle on the Milky Way, they stretched a never | |
| 358 | |
| 00:22:53,860 --> 00:22:58,160 | |
| -ending line. Grammatically, it's a never-ending | |
| 359 | |
| 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:01,500 | |
| line because line is one. So there is, again, | |
| 360 | |
| 00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:04,920 | |
| because many people still say there's no such | |
| 361 | |
| 00:23:04,920 --> 00:23:07,340 | |
| thing as spontaneous overflow of powerful | |
| 362 | |
| 00:23:07,340 --> 00:23:11,090 | |
| emotions. there's always a conscious attempt, | |
| 363 | |
| 00:23:11,330 --> 00:23:15,650 | |
| deliberate attempt to write poetry. So if this is | |
| 364 | |
| 00:23:15,650 --> 00:23:17,650 | |
| a poem with a perfect rhyme scheme and a perfect, | |
| 365 | |
| 00:23:17,930 --> 00:23:21,690 | |
| you know, same number of syllables, yes great | |
| 366 | |
| 00:23:21,690 --> 00:23:24,750 | |
| poets don't stop and count, they feel the beat, | |
| 367 | |
| 00:23:24,850 --> 00:23:28,940 | |
| they feel The rhythm. But here, he's deleting the | |
| 368 | |
| 00:23:28,940 --> 00:23:33,080 | |
| أ just to make it fit the eight syllables. The | |
| 369 | |
| 00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:37,340 | |
| four feet. Along the margin of a bay, ten thousand | |
| 370 | |
| 00:23:37,340 --> 00:23:39,420 | |
| sawyer at once. Look at this. Again, | |
| 371 | |
| 00:23:39,560 --> 00:23:43,460 | |
| grammatically, this is called fronting. Fronting, | |
| 372 | |
| 00:23:44,060 --> 00:23:47,120 | |
| when you bring something in front. تقدير متأخير in | |
| 373 | |
| 00:23:47,120 --> 00:23:52,700 | |
| Arabic. It should be I saw ten thousand subject | |
| 374 | |
| 00:23:52,700 --> 00:23:58,060 | |
| verbs at a glance. But why is he doing this? Why | |
| 375 | |
| 00:23:58,060 --> 00:24:01,520 | |
| is he starting with ten thousand and then delaying | |
| 376 | |
| 00:24:01,520 --> 00:24:05,860 | |
| the subject? The door, the eye? Because the scene | |
| 377 | |
| 00:24:05,860 --> 00:24:09,820 | |
| is more important | |
| 378 | |
| 00:24:09,820 --> 00:24:12,200 | |
| than the person himself. What kind of scene do we | |
| 379 | |
| 00:24:12,200 --> 00:24:14,680 | |
| have here? The daffodils. Very good. So the | |
| 380 | |
| 00:24:14,680 --> 00:24:17,740 | |
| daffodils, the scene, thank you, nature is more | |
| 381 | |
| 00:24:17,740 --> 00:24:18,840 | |
| significant than he is. | |
| 382 | |
| 00:24:21,740 --> 00:24:23,660 | |
| He's bringing nature before, and of course we | |
| 383 | |
| 00:24:23,660 --> 00:24:26,320 | |
| don't, how did he know that this is 10,000 | |
| 384 | |
| 00:24:26,320 --> 00:24:28,160 | |
| daffodils? | |
| 385 | |
| 00:24:30,140 --> 00:24:34,360 | |
| Just, it's again, this is possible, it is possible | |
| 386 | |
| 00:24:34,360 --> 00:24:36,660 | |
| that this is an exaggeration, but you could see in | |
| 387 | |
| 00:24:36,660 --> 00:24:41,160 | |
| fields, you could see 10,000 roses or flowers in | |
| 388 | |
| 00:24:41,160 --> 00:24:43,280 | |
| particular natural scene. | |
| 389 | |
| 00:24:46,530 --> 00:24:49,410 | |
| If you, I'm sure you've seen many pictures online, | |
| 390 | |
| 00:24:49,910 --> 00:24:52,970 | |
| you will find sometimes actually none in, you look | |
| 391 | |
| 00:24:52,970 --> 00:24:55,590 | |
| to the horizon everywhere you'll be surrounded | |
| 392 | |
| 00:24:55,590 --> 00:25:00,210 | |
| with, but yeah it could be, could be he's just | |
| 393 | |
| 00:25:00,210 --> 00:25:05,300 | |
| creating this perfect Ecstatic image. 10,000 saw I | |
| 394 | |
| 00:25:05,300 --> 00:25:08,320 | |
| at a glance, again extending the personification | |
| 395 | |
| 00:25:08,320 --> 00:25:11,920 | |
| here, the metaphor, tossing their heads, like | |
| 396 | |
| 00:25:11,920 --> 00:25:16,020 | |
| moving their heads in sprightly dance. They're | |
| 397 | |
| 00:25:16,020 --> 00:25:18,420 | |
| still dancing. They're dancing here. They're | |
| 398 | |
| 00:25:18,420 --> 00:25:20,820 | |
| dancing in the second syllable, in the second | |
| 399 | |
| 00:25:20,820 --> 00:25:24,760 | |
| stanza. Dancing and dancing. They're happy. They | |
| 400 | |
| 00:25:24,760 --> 00:25:29,000 | |
| inspire joy, inspire happiness. Beauty if you look | |
| 401 | |
| 00:25:29,000 --> 00:25:34,400 | |
| at again same eight eight eight four feet each The | |
| 402 | |
| 00:25:34,400 --> 00:25:37,200 | |
| rhyme scheme is remember you could continue with | |
| 403 | |
| 00:25:37,200 --> 00:25:39,820 | |
| the letters But my advice is when you begin a new | |
| 404 | |
| 00:25:39,820 --> 00:25:43,520 | |
| stanza go back to the alphabet to to do this, | |
| 405 | |
| 00:25:43,600 --> 00:25:49,240 | |
| please a b a b | |
| 406 | |
| 00:25:51,650 --> 00:25:55,050 | |
| C and T, also perfect rhyme. So it's the same, A, | |
| 407 | |
| 00:25:55,150 --> 00:25:59,830 | |
| B, A, B, C, C, A, B, A, B, C, C, creating this | |
| 408 | |
| 00:25:59,830 --> 00:26:06,830 | |
| perfect world, world, natural element. And then, | |
| 409 | |
| 00:26:07,370 --> 00:26:15,090 | |
| standard three, which I love very much. | |
| 410 | |
| 00:26:18,010 --> 00:26:20,810 | |
| Now the waves, now look at how nature is | |
| 411 | |
| 00:26:20,810 --> 00:26:24,950 | |
| contagious. If you see a beautiful scene, it | |
| 412 | |
| 00:26:24,950 --> 00:26:29,090 | |
| inspires beauty everywhere. The waves themselves | |
| 413 | |
| 00:26:29,090 --> 00:26:32,890 | |
| were affected by the scene, the inanimate thing | |
| 414 | |
| 00:26:32,890 --> 00:26:37,410 | |
| here. The waves beside them danced. Even the way, | |
| 415 | |
| 00:26:37,510 --> 00:26:39,970 | |
| this is again, remember this is some kind of | |
| 416 | |
| 00:26:39,970 --> 00:26:44,470 | |
| perception. The romantics believe that beauty is | |
| 417 | |
| 00:26:44,470 --> 00:26:48,110 | |
| in the eye of the beholder. If you look for | |
| 418 | |
| 00:26:48,110 --> 00:26:51,130 | |
| beauty, you will find beauty. This is a man going | |
| 419 | |
| 00:26:51,130 --> 00:26:54,910 | |
| out who loves nature, who's looking for beauty. So | |
| 420 | |
| 00:26:54,910 --> 00:26:56,970 | |
| definitely he's going to see it. He's going to | |
| 421 | |
| 00:26:56,970 --> 00:27:00,790 | |
| look at the daffodils dancing, the trees dancing, | |
| 422 | |
| 00:27:00,910 --> 00:27:04,390 | |
| the clouds dancing, the waves dancing. But if he's | |
| 423 | |
| 00:27:04,390 --> 00:27:08,710 | |
| not in the mood, if he is dark, sad, if he has | |
| 424 | |
| 00:27:08,710 --> 00:27:12,890 | |
| just been through a tough experience, he's going | |
| 425 | |
| 00:27:12,890 --> 00:27:17,540 | |
| to be expressing it differently. And this is a | |
| 426 | |
| 00:27:17,540 --> 00:27:21,060 | |
| romantic concept. Some people believe this is, we | |
| 427 | |
| 00:27:21,060 --> 00:27:25,440 | |
| spoke about this with William Blake. how both read | |
| 428 | |
| 00:27:25,440 --> 00:27:29,740 | |
| the Bible day and night. I read, you read black | |
| 429 | |
| 00:27:29,740 --> 00:27:33,640 | |
| while I read white. Different people give | |
| 430 | |
| 00:27:33,640 --> 00:27:36,560 | |
| different impressions. That's why if it's raining, | |
| 431 | |
| 00:27:36,620 --> 00:27:39,600 | |
| it's not raining now, unluckily for us. If you | |
| 432 | |
| 00:27:39,600 --> 00:27:44,660 | |
| look at the rain, many people would think that | |
| 433 | |
| 00:27:44,660 --> 00:27:48,300 | |
| everybody reacts the same to nature, to rain. We | |
| 434 | |
| 00:27:48,300 --> 00:27:50,880 | |
| love rain, all of us. But for some of us who have | |
| 435 | |
| 00:27:50,880 --> 00:27:56,280 | |
| had bad experiences some rainy day, if you lost a | |
| 436 | |
| 00:27:56,280 --> 00:27:59,320 | |
| dear, a loved one, if you have had this sad | |
| 437 | |
| 00:27:59,320 --> 00:28:02,360 | |
| experience, rain is going to bring you all these | |
| 438 | |
| 00:28:02,360 --> 00:28:06,320 | |
| feelings of sadness and pain rather than joy and | |
| 439 | |
| 00:28:06,320 --> 00:28:13,520 | |
| happiness. So the waves were dancing, but they | |
| 440 | |
| 00:28:13,520 --> 00:28:20,820 | |
| again, the daffodils, out dead. They were more | |
| 441 | |
| 00:28:22,470 --> 00:28:27,770 | |
| Pleasant, more sparkling, happier than the waves. | |
| 442 | |
| 00:28:28,810 --> 00:28:32,950 | |
| Outdid the sparkling waves in glee, in happiness, | |
| 443 | |
| 00:28:33,130 --> 00:28:36,790 | |
| in pleasure. A poet could not but be gay. We'll | |
| 444 | |
| 00:28:36,790 --> 00:28:42,470 | |
| talk about this in detail now. A poet could not | |
| 445 | |
| 00:28:42,470 --> 00:28:50,010 | |
| but be gay in such joking company. I gazed. And | |
| 446 | |
| 00:28:50,010 --> 00:28:54,070 | |
| gaze. He could have said, I gazed a lot. Right? We | |
| 447 | |
| 00:28:54,070 --> 00:28:58,350 | |
| do this. I gazed a lot. And that's it. I gazed. | |
| 448 | |
| 00:28:58,610 --> 00:29:04,070 | |
| This is how he reacts. He just stands there. Once | |
| 449 | |
| 00:29:04,070 --> 00:29:07,350 | |
| he was suggesting this beautiful thing, submissive | |
| 450 | |
| 00:29:07,350 --> 00:29:12,650 | |
| to nature. You know? Like how the cloud is | |
| 451 | |
| 00:29:12,650 --> 00:29:15,510 | |
| submissive to nature, to the wind blowing it here | |
| 452 | |
| 00:29:15,510 --> 00:29:18,860 | |
| and there at free will. Because it doesn't control | |
| 453 | |
| 00:29:18,860 --> 00:29:21,560 | |
| it. He is exactly like this. He's just standing | |
| 454 | |
| 00:29:21,560 --> 00:29:24,880 | |
| there absorbing. You know absorbing in a sponge? | |
| 455 | |
| 00:29:25,100 --> 00:29:28,000 | |
| It absorbs water. He's trying to absorb this | |
| 456 | |
| 00:29:28,000 --> 00:29:33,860 | |
| beauty, this never-ending beauty. I gaze and gaze. | |
| 457 | |
| 00:29:33,900 --> 00:29:36,440 | |
| Look at how he's emphasizing feelings and emotions | |
| 458 | |
| 00:29:36,440 --> 00:29:38,940 | |
| over thinking. | |
| 459 | |
| 00:29:40,320 --> 00:29:44,760 | |
| But little thought. Not never. Same thing, two | |
| 460 | |
| 00:29:44,760 --> 00:29:47,180 | |
| syllables. But little thought. | |
| 461 | |
| 00:29:49,730 --> 00:29:52,790 | |
| This is unlike the Age of Reason, the Augustan | |
| 462 | |
| 00:29:52,790 --> 00:29:57,050 | |
| Age, where thinking and logic are more important | |
| 463 | |
| 00:29:57,050 --> 00:30:01,630 | |
| than feelings and emotions. I gazed, I just kept | |
| 464 | |
| 00:30:01,630 --> 00:30:04,570 | |
| looking and looking. And I found this very | |
| 465 | |
| 00:30:04,570 --> 00:30:06,590 | |
| beautiful, one of the most fascinating lines. | |
| 466 | |
| 00:30:06,950 --> 00:30:09,030 | |
| Because nowadays what we would be doing is just | |
| 467 | |
| 00:30:09,030 --> 00:30:11,290 | |
| again take our mobile phones and just snap | |
| 468 | |
| 00:30:11,290 --> 00:30:15,190 | |
| pictures just so you show off on social media. You | |
| 469 | |
| 00:30:15,190 --> 00:30:20,450 | |
| care more about the picture than just Enjoying the | |
| 470 | |
| 00:30:20,450 --> 00:30:24,770 | |
| scene. Submitting yourself to the scene. What | |
| 471 | |
| 00:30:24,770 --> 00:30:27,270 | |
| wealth the show to me had brought. There's wealth | |
| 472 | |
| 00:30:27,270 --> 00:30:30,390 | |
| here. This is not a businessman looking wow I'm | |
| 473 | |
| 00:30:30,390 --> 00:30:34,050 | |
| going to make a lot of money because he said gold | |
| 474 | |
| 00:30:34,050 --> 00:30:38,570 | |
| before he So we'll come back after a very, very | |
| 475 | |
| 00:30:38,570 --> 00:30:42,130 | |
| short break. So I'm saying here that there's | |
| 476 | |
| 00:30:42,130 --> 00:30:44,250 | |
| wealth here, but that's not the financial | |
| 477 | |
| 00:30:44,250 --> 00:30:47,790 | |
| materialistic wealth. This is the spiritual, | |
| 478 | |
| 00:30:48,210 --> 00:30:52,470 | |
| natural kind of wealth that the romantics look | |
| 479 | |
| 00:30:52,470 --> 00:30:57,490 | |
| forward to. Now, I find this very interesting as a | |
| 480 | |
| 00:30:57,490 --> 00:30:59,570 | |
| stanza. I think this is the core of the whole | |
| 481 | |
| 00:30:59,570 --> 00:30:59,850 | |
| poem. | |
| 482 | |
| 00:31:02,660 --> 00:31:05,480 | |
| If we start with the rhyme scheme, can somebody | |
| 483 | |
| 00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:13,920 | |
| help me with the rhyme scheme, please? A, B, A, C, | |
| 484 | |
| 00:31:14,880 --> 00:31:22,380 | |
| D, D, D. Possible? Possible? But do you have | |
| 485 | |
| 00:31:22,380 --> 00:31:27,320 | |
| another suggestion, somebody? Please? Say again? | |
| 486 | |
| 00:31:27,940 --> 00:31:35,230 | |
| Okay, begin again. A, B, A, another B, but does | |
| 487 | |
| 00:31:35,230 --> 00:31:41,310 | |
| company and glee rhyme? This is glee and this is | |
| 488 | |
| 00:31:41,310 --> 00:31:41,830 | |
| company. | |
| 489 | |
| 00:31:44,870 --> 00:31:50,210 | |
| Long, short. Okay, so we go for an imperfect rhyme | |
| 490 | |
| 00:31:50,210 --> 00:31:51,950 | |
| here, although I find this possible. | |
| 491 | |
| 00:31:55,630 --> 00:31:58,830 | |
| And the fact that we differ here, that the first | |
| 492 | |
| 00:31:58,830 --> 00:32:01,310 | |
| two sentences were beautiful and perfect. We're | |
| 493 | |
| 00:32:01,310 --> 00:32:03,410 | |
| fine with that. But all of a sudden there's | |
| 494 | |
| 00:32:03,410 --> 00:32:05,510 | |
| something, there's something that doesn't add up, | |
| 495 | |
| 00:32:05,610 --> 00:32:07,210 | |
| something that is imperfect, something that is | |
| 496 | |
| 00:32:07,210 --> 00:32:10,050 | |
| making us disagree. The first two sentences made | |
| 497 | |
| 00:32:10,050 --> 00:32:15,410 | |
| all of us like, you know, nodding. But here, they, | |
| 498 | |
| 00:32:15,650 --> 00:32:21,800 | |
| again, A, B, A, B, Nobody does this, the A, the S, | |
| 499 | |
| 00:32:21,940 --> 00:32:25,040 | |
| the B small thing, but I like to do it to indicate | |
| 500 | |
| 00:32:25,040 --> 00:32:29,200 | |
| an imperfect triangle. And then another C, another | |
| 501 | |
| 00:32:29,200 --> 00:32:33,480 | |
| C. If we just do the last one and come back to | |
| 502 | |
| 00:32:33,480 --> 00:32:37,620 | |
| this, it's going to also be A, B. | |
| 503 | |
| 00:32:40,180 --> 00:32:44,260 | |
| Perfect? So the only stanza with an imperfection | |
| 504 | |
| 00:32:44,260 --> 00:32:47,120 | |
| is stanza number three. That's number one. I was | |
| 505 | |
| 00:32:47,120 --> 00:32:49,460 | |
| counting the syllables the other day and I | |
| 506 | |
| 00:32:49,460 --> 00:32:55,300 | |
| realized the only line that has an | |
| 507 | |
| 00:32:55,300 --> 00:32:56,960 | |
| extra syllable was this one. | |
| 508 | |
| 00:32:59,540 --> 00:33:04,840 | |
| Is it this one? One, two, three, four, five, six, | |
| 509 | |
| 00:33:05,220 --> 00:33:07,800 | |
| seven, eight. No, which one? Which one was that? | |
| 510 | |
| 00:33:09,660 --> 00:33:11,840 | |
| Not this one. I think this one is perfect. Where's | |
| 511 | |
| 00:33:11,840 --> 00:33:16,290 | |
| the eraser? This one is also eight lines. I must | |
| 512 | |
| 00:33:16,290 --> 00:33:21,090 | |
| have mixed this up with another one. Okay. The | |
| 513 | |
| 00:33:21,090 --> 00:33:25,690 | |
| thing I noticed, if you look at this, is that the | |
| 514 | |
| 00:33:25,690 --> 00:33:27,670 | |
| poet here, remember this is a first, if this is a | |
| 515 | |
| 00:33:27,670 --> 00:33:30,990 | |
| story, this is a first person narrator. I | |
| 516 | |
| 00:33:30,990 --> 00:33:36,530 | |
| wondered, saw I at once, I gazed and gazed. And | |
| 517 | |
| 00:33:36,530 --> 00:33:42,730 | |
| then all of a sudden, he shifts. He shifts from I | |
| 518 | |
| 00:33:42,730 --> 00:33:50,770 | |
| to He or she, a poet. A poet could not but be gay. | |
| 519 | |
| 00:33:50,990 --> 00:33:59,230 | |
| He doesn't say I was nothing but gay. Why didn't | |
| 520 | |
| 00:33:59,230 --> 00:34:03,750 | |
| he say I was gay, I was happy? Definitely he | |
| 521 | |
| 00:34:03,750 --> 00:34:08,910 | |
| didn't care about coming out and people saying | |
| 522 | |
| 00:34:08,910 --> 00:34:12,920 | |
| he's gay because it meant happy here. A poet could | |
| 523 | |
| 00:34:12,920 --> 00:34:16,840 | |
| not but be gay. Poets should be happy, would be | |
| 524 | |
| 00:34:16,840 --> 00:34:20,580 | |
| happy. Can be nothing but happy when they come | |
| 525 | |
| 00:34:20,580 --> 00:34:24,180 | |
| face to face with this fascinating scene here. A | |
| 526 | |
| 00:34:24,180 --> 00:34:26,760 | |
| poet could not but be gay in such a joking | |
| 527 | |
| 00:34:26,760 --> 00:34:30,500 | |
| company. And there is another indication here. I | |
| 528 | |
| 00:34:30,500 --> 00:34:33,960 | |
| gazed and gazed. But little thought. The binary, | |
| 529 | |
| 00:34:34,080 --> 00:34:37,200 | |
| the opposites. So I gazed, some would be. | |
| 530 | |
| 00:34:37,880 --> 00:34:41,860 | |
| thinking. I wandered lonely, I gazed and some | |
| 531 | |
| 00:34:41,860 --> 00:34:47,780 | |
| might just be happy. What wealth does he show? He | |
| 532 | |
| 00:34:47,780 --> 00:34:53,470 | |
| didn't care about even this kind of wealth. In | |
| 533 | |
| 00:34:53,470 --> 00:34:56,730 | |
| other words, he didn't react instantly to the | |
| 534 | |
| 00:34:56,730 --> 00:35:00,170 | |
| poem, to the scene here. And we'll talk about two | |
| 535 | |
| 00:35:00,170 --> 00:35:03,490 | |
| types of imagination here. There is primary | |
| 536 | |
| 00:35:03,490 --> 00:35:06,030 | |
| imagination and there is secondary imagination. | |
| 537 | |
| 00:35:06,170 --> 00:35:09,150 | |
| The primary imagination is the instant reaction to | |
| 538 | |
| 00:35:09,150 --> 00:35:11,710 | |
| beauty, to nature. You see something beautiful, | |
| 539 | |
| 00:35:11,790 --> 00:35:14,270 | |
| you say, wow, and that's it. Or you take a picture | |
| 540 | |
| 00:35:14,270 --> 00:35:18,070 | |
| and you just go on. But for the romantics, they | |
| 541 | |
| 00:35:18,070 --> 00:35:22,750 | |
| like to absorb. to put it there in their heart and | |
| 542 | |
| 00:35:22,750 --> 00:35:27,650 | |
| mind and everything. And later on, two years | |
| 543 | |
| 00:35:27,650 --> 00:35:30,030 | |
| later, a day later, one month later, two months | |
| 544 | |
| 00:35:30,030 --> 00:35:32,250 | |
| later, they would be reflecting on this. | |
| 545 | |
| 00:35:33,490 --> 00:35:34,970 | |
| Recalling, that's why the second part of the | |
| 546 | |
| 00:35:34,970 --> 00:35:37,450 | |
| definition is as important. Recollected in | |
| 547 | |
| 00:35:37,450 --> 00:35:41,870 | |
| tranquility. But why would the poet shift from, | |
| 548 | |
| 00:35:42,170 --> 00:35:44,390 | |
| why is he distancing himself from this experience? | |
| 549 | |
| 00:35:45,770 --> 00:35:50,060 | |
| He's not saying, I was happy, right? He's saying a | |
| 550 | |
| 00:35:50,060 --> 00:35:58,500 | |
| poet could not but be gay. Yeah, please. Thank you | |
| 551 | |
| 00:35:58,500 --> 00:36:01,660 | |
| very much. This could suggest that not only words | |
| 552 | |
| 00:36:01,660 --> 00:36:04,980 | |
| worth, but also all poets. That's very good. | |
| 553 | |
| 00:36:05,040 --> 00:36:10,420 | |
| That's possible. More. Please. It's also maybe | |
| 554 | |
| 00:36:10,420 --> 00:36:14,760 | |
| attack or talking about the previous poet. Not | |
| 555 | |
| 00:36:14,760 --> 00:36:18,420 | |
| the, not the, the neo-classical maybe or the poet | |
| 556 | |
| 00:36:18,420 --> 00:36:22,980 | |
| that they prefer him. How's that? Because they | |
| 557 | |
| 00:36:22,980 --> 00:36:27,640 | |
| maybe not appreciate the nature as, as he does. | |
| 558 | |
| 00:36:27,640 --> 00:36:31,040 | |
| But, but he's saying the poet is happy. Could not | |
| 559 | |
| 00:36:31,040 --> 00:36:35,380 | |
| be. Please. It might be an advice or advice. | |
| 560 | |
| 00:36:38,470 --> 00:36:40,830 | |
| So this is for all poets, but why poets in | |
| 561 | |
| 00:36:40,830 --> 00:36:42,190 | |
| particular? Why not everybody? Remember the | |
| 562 | |
| 00:36:42,190 --> 00:36:45,410 | |
| romantics believe that a poet is an ordinary man | |
| 563 | |
| 00:36:45,410 --> 00:36:49,390 | |
| endowed with comprehensive sensibility. | |
| 564 | |
| 00:36:53,590 --> 00:36:57,790 | |
| You're not a poet, but poets don't only write | |
| 565 | |
| 00:36:57,790 --> 00:36:58,990 | |
| about happiness, right? | |
| 566 | |
| 00:37:02,350 --> 00:37:05,130 | |
| Okay, yeah, like if nature doesn't inspire | |
| 567 | |
| 00:37:05,130 --> 00:37:08,410 | |
| happiness and pleasure and beauty, you're not a | |
| 568 | |
| 00:37:08,410 --> 00:37:10,530 | |
| poet or you're not a romantic poet. | |
| 569 | |
| 00:37:25,980 --> 00:37:29,680 | |
| So when he says a poet, he means that a poet will | |
| 570 | |
| 00:37:29,680 --> 00:37:32,800 | |
| see this being something much more than any normal | |
| 571 | |
| 00:37:32,800 --> 00:37:35,260 | |
| or ordinary person would see. And this would make | |
| 572 | |
| 00:37:35,260 --> 00:37:37,740 | |
| him happy? That would make him happy. | |
| 573 | |
| 00:37:40,910 --> 00:37:45,570 | |
| Okay. Thank you very much. Want somebody here? I | |
| 574 | |
| 00:37:45,570 --> 00:37:49,070 | |
| think he's here distancing himself from this term | |
| 575 | |
| 00:37:49,070 --> 00:37:52,370 | |
| of the poet. Like he's putting himself above this | |
| 576 | |
| 00:37:52,370 --> 00:37:55,570 | |
| word. He's considering himself more than just a | |
| 577 | |
| 00:37:55,570 --> 00:37:58,570 | |
| poet. Because any other poet would just see the | |
| 578 | |
| 00:37:58,570 --> 00:38:01,590 | |
| scenery and be happy and react momentarily to it. | |
| 579 | |
| 00:38:01,650 --> 00:38:04,150 | |
| But he sees himself something more than this. So | |
| 580 | |
| 00:38:04,150 --> 00:38:06,390 | |
| he is in a way challenging the new classical | |
| 581 | |
| 00:38:06,390 --> 00:38:10,980 | |
| people. What's wrong with this? What's wrong with | |
| 582 | |
| 00:38:10,980 --> 00:38:11,720 | |
| being happy? | |
| 583 | |
| 00:38:14,820 --> 00:38:17,620 | |
| Okay, that's good. Connecting this with the | |
| 584 | |
| 00:38:17,620 --> 00:38:18,720 | |
| primary and secondary. | |
| 585 | |
| 00:38:22,800 --> 00:38:26,500 | |
| Some kind | |
| 586 | |
| 00:38:26,500 --> 00:38:28,680 | |
| of discipline and that, you know, the idea of | |
| 587 | |
| 00:38:28,680 --> 00:38:31,640 | |
| spontaneous could be challenged here. | |
| 588 | |
| 00:38:40,690 --> 00:38:41,250 | |
| Okay, | |
| 589 | |
| 00:38:44,570 --> 00:38:48,270 | |
| so you agree there with Rahaf that the ability to | |
| 590 | |
| 00:38:48,270 --> 00:38:50,830 | |
| express this, although not all people can express, | |
| 591 | |
| 00:38:50,950 --> 00:38:52,530 | |
| at least they can feel it inside. | |
| 592 | |
| 00:38:57,770 --> 00:39:00,670 | |
| Not all poets, remember. Romantic poets. | |
| 593 | |
| 00:39:20,860 --> 00:39:24,500 | |
| But what's wrong with being happy? Isn't that | |
| 594 | |
| 00:39:24,500 --> 00:39:24,800 | |
| good? | |
| 595 | |
| 00:39:36,320 --> 00:39:40,060 | |
| But clearly this poet is expressing himself or | |
| 596 | |
| 00:39:40,060 --> 00:39:46,240 | |
| herself by being happy, by being gay. Okay, so | |
| 597 | |
| 00:39:46,240 --> 00:39:50,420 | |
| you're taking happiness as just again some kind of | |
| 598 | |
| 00:39:50,420 --> 00:39:54,320 | |
| an instant momentary reaction to this, but for the | |
| 599 | |
| 00:39:54,320 --> 00:39:57,040 | |
| romantics a primary reaction, for the romantics | |
| 600 | |
| 00:39:57,040 --> 00:40:05,320 | |
| it's much more. Okay, sorry? he's beyond he | |
| 601 | |
| 00:40:05,320 --> 00:40:07,940 | |
| doesn't find this I think I agree with those who | |
| 602 | |
| 00:40:07,940 --> 00:40:10,080 | |
| suggested that this could include some kind of | |
| 603 | |
| 00:40:10,080 --> 00:40:12,820 | |
| parody clearly when he said but little thought | |
| 604 | |
| 00:40:12,820 --> 00:40:15,340 | |
| again he's putting himself as opposed to the other | |
| 605 | |
| 00:40:15,340 --> 00:40:18,500 | |
| Augustan poets I'm different from those people | |
| 606 | |
| 00:40:18,500 --> 00:40:22,150 | |
| which is a poet he's Suggesting an ordinary poet, | |
| 607 | |
| 00:40:22,450 --> 00:40:25,410 | |
| this is, yes, this emphasizes here couldn't but, | |
| 608 | |
| 00:40:26,010 --> 00:40:28,650 | |
| but it includes some negative, the negative of not | |
| 609 | |
| 00:40:28,650 --> 00:40:31,750 | |
| here. And the distance, the shift from the I to he | |
| 610 | |
| 00:40:31,750 --> 00:40:34,770 | |
| or she, the third person pronoun, suggests that | |
| 611 | |
| 00:40:34,770 --> 00:40:36,770 | |
| the poet is distancing himself from this | |
| 612 | |
| 00:40:36,770 --> 00:40:40,210 | |
| momentarily artificial reaction to nature. He's | |
| 613 | |
| 00:40:40,210 --> 00:40:45,170 | |
| saying an Augustan poet, an ordinary poet, would | |
| 614 | |
| 00:40:45,170 --> 00:40:48,770 | |
| just be happy and that's it, bye bye. But I am | |
| 615 | |
| 00:40:48,770 --> 00:40:51,470 | |
| different, I am not an ordinary poet, I'm a | |
| 616 | |
| 00:40:51,470 --> 00:40:54,630 | |
| romantic poet. Remember the romantics did not call | |
| 617 | |
| 00:40:54,630 --> 00:40:57,670 | |
| themselves romantic poets, later critics called | |
| 618 | |
| 00:40:57,670 --> 00:41:01,230 | |
| them the romantics or romanticism. Because for him | |
| 619 | |
| 00:41:01,230 --> 00:41:05,270 | |
| it's much more than just being happy, than just | |
| 620 | |
| 00:41:05,270 --> 00:41:08,510 | |
| the instant reaction to nature. It's about, | |
| 621 | |
| 00:41:08,590 --> 00:41:13,070 | |
| remember, absorbing, living the experience, making | |
| 622 | |
| 00:41:13,070 --> 00:41:15,970 | |
| it overwhelm you, submitting yourself to this. | |
| 623 | |
| 00:41:16,440 --> 00:41:18,860 | |
| making it change your life radically altogether, | |
| 624 | |
| 00:41:19,320 --> 00:41:21,940 | |
| as we're going to see in the second, in the last | |
| 625 | |
| 00:41:21,940 --> 00:41:26,800 | |
| stanza, in stanza number four. So this, again, | |
| 626 | |
| 00:41:26,880 --> 00:41:29,020 | |
| stanza in particular, has this imperfection, which | |
| 627 | |
| 00:41:29,020 --> 00:41:31,000 | |
| creates tension, tells us, wait a minute, there's | |
| 628 | |
| 00:41:31,000 --> 00:41:37,580 | |
| something there, and then we find the shift from I | |
| 629 | |
| 00:41:37,580 --> 00:41:39,980 | |
| to he or she, and then the negative here, | |
| 630 | |
| 00:41:40,400 --> 00:41:42,260 | |
| indicating that there's something, a poet is | |
| 631 | |
| 00:41:42,260 --> 00:41:46,020 | |
| telling us, calm down, Wait a minute, pay | |
| 632 | |
| 00:41:46,020 --> 00:41:48,060 | |
| attention, I'm doing something here. I'm raising a | |
| 633 | |
| 00:41:48,060 --> 00:41:54,360 | |
| point that is deeper than probably other ideas. | |
| 634 | |
| 00:41:54,660 --> 00:41:57,160 | |
| Some might read this and just keep going. But | |
| 635 | |
| 00:41:57,160 --> 00:42:00,120 | |
| yeah, I agree that there is some kind of mockery. | |
| 636 | |
| 00:42:00,200 --> 00:42:03,620 | |
| He's mocking previous poets who just react | |
| 637 | |
| 00:42:03,620 --> 00:42:09,200 | |
| artificially, momentarily, instantly to nature. To | |
| 638 | |
| 00:42:09,200 --> 00:42:12,690 | |
| those people, remember? Nature is a decoration, | |
| 639 | |
| 00:42:12,890 --> 00:42:16,650 | |
| but not this man who lives for nature, returns to | |
| 640 | |
| 00:42:16,650 --> 00:42:20,430 | |
| nature. And then there is a shift. One important | |
| 641 | |
| 00:42:20,430 --> 00:42:24,930 | |
| thing here is that the three stanzas, one, two, | |
| 642 | |
| 00:42:24,970 --> 00:42:29,090 | |
| and three, are basically in the past simple tense. | |
| 643 | |
| 00:42:31,290 --> 00:42:33,250 | |
| When I ask you the question, where is the poet | |
| 644 | |
| 00:42:33,250 --> 00:42:36,990 | |
| now? Probably he is lying on his couch. He's | |
| 645 | |
| 00:42:36,990 --> 00:42:38,890 | |
| probably lying on his couch. | |
| 646 | |
| 00:42:42,200 --> 00:42:46,580 | |
| He's not high, not as high as Coleridge of course, | |
| 647 | |
| 00:42:46,820 --> 00:42:51,960 | |
| as the cloud, not wandering, not gazing anymore. | |
| 648 | |
| 00:42:52,460 --> 00:42:57,240 | |
| He's now reliving, replaying, recalling the | |
| 649 | |
| 00:42:57,240 --> 00:43:00,620 | |
| experience. For oft, When on my, like often, | |
| 650 | |
| 00:43:00,800 --> 00:43:03,500 | |
| right? But often is two syllables and oft is one. | |
| 651 | |
| 00:43:04,420 --> 00:43:07,980 | |
| When on my couch I lie in vacant or in pensive | |
| 652 | |
| 00:43:07,980 --> 00:43:11,440 | |
| mood, whatever mood I am in, vacancy, pensiveness, | |
| 653 | |
| 00:43:12,200 --> 00:43:14,880 | |
| in mood, they, referring again back to the | |
| 654 | |
| 00:43:14,880 --> 00:43:17,880 | |
| alphabets, they flash upon the inward eye, | |
| 655 | |
| 00:43:18,000 --> 00:43:21,220 | |
| imagination, feelings, which is the bliss of | |
| 656 | |
| 00:43:21,220 --> 00:43:28,140 | |
| solitude, solitary. living, solitude, being alone. | |
| 657 | |
| 00:43:29,040 --> 00:43:31,900 | |
| And then what happens, it's like an argument, I'm | |
| 658 | |
| 00:43:31,900 --> 00:43:35,740 | |
| the same. But not like John Donne, of course. And | |
| 659 | |
| 00:43:35,740 --> 00:43:40,080 | |
| then my heart with pleasure fills. This is the | |
| 660 | |
| 00:43:40,080 --> 00:43:43,680 | |
| proper reaction. It's not about just, ah, I saw | |
| 661 | |
| 00:43:43,680 --> 00:43:49,240 | |
| this beautiful field with daffodils today and | |
| 662 | |
| 00:43:49,240 --> 00:43:52,890 | |
| that's it. For this man, experiencing nature is | |
| 663 | |
| 00:43:52,890 --> 00:43:57,470 | |
| life-changing experiences. You change, you have to | |
| 664 | |
| 00:43:57,470 --> 00:43:59,830 | |
| change. And I said this at the beginning of this | |
| 665 | |
| 00:43:59,830 --> 00:44:05,110 | |
| course. Hopefully, when you read texts, they must | |
| 666 | |
| 00:44:05,110 --> 00:44:09,410 | |
| have impact on you. And then my heart with | |
| 667 | |
| 00:44:09,410 --> 00:44:12,410 | |
| pleasure fills and dances with the affordance. I | |
| 668 | |
| 00:44:12,410 --> 00:44:14,790 | |
| love how he at the beginning personified nature | |
| 669 | |
| 00:44:14,790 --> 00:44:19,150 | |
| and now he's objectifying himself. He's not | |
| 670 | |
| 00:44:19,150 --> 00:44:21,210 | |
| uniting with nature. He's submitting himself to | |
| 671 | |
| 00:44:21,210 --> 00:44:23,930 | |
| nature. He's allowing nature to control him. He's | |
| 672 | |
| 00:44:23,930 --> 00:44:28,930 | |
| becoming part of nature, mother nature. I return | |
| 673 | |
| 00:44:28,930 --> 00:44:32,290 | |
| to nature as a romantic feature. | |
| 674 | |
| 00:44:33,690 --> 00:44:36,170 | |
| So the shift from the past simple tense to the | |
| 675 | |
| 00:44:36,170 --> 00:44:39,960 | |
| present simple tense is a very interesting thing | |
| 676 | |
| 00:44:39,960 --> 00:44:44,240 | |
| because he is reliving. This is the secondary | |
| 677 | |
| 00:44:44,240 --> 00:44:46,980 | |
| imagination we talk about. Later on, I'm not sure | |
| 678 | |
| 00:44:46,980 --> 00:44:49,740 | |
| how long after the original experience he's | |
| 679 | |
| 00:44:49,740 --> 00:44:52,440 | |
| writing this, but he's using the present | |
| 680 | |
| 00:44:52,440 --> 00:44:54,480 | |
| simpletons to express that this happens to him all | |
| 681 | |
| 00:44:54,480 --> 00:44:56,640 | |
| the time. Every time he's in a vacant or pensive | |
| 682 | |
| 00:44:56,640 --> 00:45:00,300 | |
| mood, what does he do? He recollects, he recalls, | |
| 683 | |
| 00:45:00,320 --> 00:45:03,580 | |
| he remembers that experience. And every time he | |
| 684 | |
| 00:45:03,580 --> 00:45:05,820 | |
| does so, this is again, remember, the baby-like | |
| 685 | |
| 00:45:05,820 --> 00:45:09,380 | |
| experience. Every time, experiencing every time, | |
| 686 | |
| 00:45:10,180 --> 00:45:12,780 | |
| everything as if it's the first time you've ever | |
| 687 | |
| 00:45:12,780 --> 00:45:15,740 | |
| seen this. Reliving again and again and again. | |
| 688 | |
| 00:45:15,800 --> 00:45:19,300 | |
| Every time being awestruck by this. This sense of | |
| 689 | |
| 00:45:19,300 --> 00:45:22,800 | |
| awe. Sense of wonder. Everything is a miracle. | |
| 690 | |
| 00:45:23,000 --> 00:45:28,210 | |
| Everything is a blessing. So this, the present | |
| 691 | |
| 00:45:28,210 --> 00:45:32,070 | |
| continuous give it continuity, but also it | |
| 692 | |
| 00:45:32,070 --> 00:45:35,230 | |
| indicates how the poet is reliving this experience | |
| 693 | |
| 00:45:35,230 --> 00:45:39,450 | |
| now. One last thing I find interesting about this | |
| 694 | |
| 00:45:39,450 --> 00:45:44,490 | |
| poem is the last couplet, if you want to say it's | |
| 695 | |
| 00:45:44,490 --> 00:45:46,450 | |
| a couplet. I don't like to call it a couplet here, | |
| 696 | |
| 00:45:46,530 --> 00:45:56,450 | |
| but okay. The last line, If you do the scan gene, | |
| 697 | |
| 00:45:56,510 --> 00:46:00,650 | |
| if you scan the meter here, it should be like this | |
| 698 | |
| 00:46:00,650 --> 00:46:09,350 | |
| and da says with the daf bills | |
| 699 | |
| 00:46:21,880 --> 00:46:25,020 | |
| Okay, so weak, strong, stressed, unstressed, | |
| 700 | |
| 00:46:25,220 --> 00:46:28,480 | |
| stressed, unstressed, stressed, unstressed, and | |
| 701 | |
| 00:46:28,480 --> 00:46:34,120 | |
| then stressed. But this way, and you should be | |
| 702 | |
| 00:46:34,120 --> 00:46:38,800 | |
| reading it, and dances with the daffodils. And | |
| 703 | |
| 00:46:38,800 --> 00:46:41,960 | |
| then my heart with pleasure fills and dances with | |
| 704 | |
| 00:46:41,960 --> 00:46:45,540 | |
| the daffodils without stress on with. And then my | |
| 705 | |
| 00:46:45,540 --> 00:46:48,460 | |
| heart with pleasure fills and dances with the | |
| 706 | |
| 00:46:48,460 --> 00:46:54,710 | |
| daffodils. Which is okay, again. But I think this | |
| 707 | |
| 00:46:54,710 --> 00:47:00,050 | |
| should be going back because with is a preposition | |
| 708 | |
| 00:47:00,050 --> 00:47:03,330 | |
| remember determiners, articles, prepositions even | |
| 709 | |
| 00:47:03,330 --> 00:47:07,410 | |
| auxiliaries are unstressed generally because says | |
| 710 | |
| 00:47:07,410 --> 00:47:10,570 | |
| something you add to the syllable to the word to | |
| 711 | |
| 00:47:10,570 --> 00:47:12,650 | |
| the main syllable so unstressed and then with | |
| 712 | |
| 00:47:12,650 --> 00:47:17,490 | |
| unstressed with two weak syllables here a weak | |
| 713 | |
| 00:47:17,490 --> 00:47:21,900 | |
| thought and dances with the daffodils But it | |
| 714 | |
| 00:47:21,900 --> 00:47:26,540 | |
| should be read otherwise, with being stressed. And | |
| 715 | |
| 00:47:26,540 --> 00:47:31,200 | |
| I find this beautiful and again deliberate with a | |
| 716 | |
| 00:47:31,200 --> 00:47:33,580 | |
| spontaneous overflow of powerful emotions stirred | |
| 717 | |
| 00:47:33,580 --> 00:47:37,740 | |
| word for word. In this sense, we emphasize the | |
| 718 | |
| 00:47:37,740 --> 00:47:42,900 | |
| idea of withness with nature. And then my heart | |
| 719 | |
| 00:47:42,900 --> 00:47:46,080 | |
| with pleasure fills and dances with the daffodils. | |
| 720 | |
| 00:47:47,360 --> 00:47:52,770 | |
| Emphasizing this is? Not only gain unity, like you | |
| 721 | |
| 00:47:52,770 --> 00:47:55,350 | |
| could say unity, I accept that, but this is nature | |
| 722 | |
| 00:47:55,350 --> 00:47:58,450 | |
| is overwhelming. He's submitting himself to | |
| 723 | |
| 00:47:58,450 --> 00:48:02,010 | |
| nature. He's emphasizing the idea of withness with | |
| 724 | |
| 00:48:02,010 --> 00:48:05,910 | |
| nature, unity with nature, going back, a return to | |
| 725 | |
| 00:48:05,910 --> 00:48:10,210 | |
| nature, to mother nature, like I said. So I could | |
| 726 | |
| 00:48:10,210 --> 00:48:13,670 | |
| ask you a question, for example, why should with | |
| 727 | |
| 00:48:13,670 --> 00:48:16,450 | |
| in the last line of the daffodils be stressed? | |
| 728 | |
| 00:48:17,090 --> 00:48:22,020 | |
| Please, don't say to emphasize. to emphasize is | |
| 729 | |
| 00:48:22,020 --> 00:48:25,700 | |
| not the answer. That's why I'd be asking you this | |
| 730 | |
| 00:48:25,700 --> 00:48:30,100 | |
| question, why is he emphasizing with? So the | |
| 731 | |
| 00:48:30,100 --> 00:48:32,740 | |
| emphasis here is to indicate this unity, this | |
| 732 | |
| 00:48:32,740 --> 00:48:34,960 | |
| total submission to nature. | |
| 733 | |
| 00:48:38,140 --> 00:48:43,520 | |
| What a beautiful poem. A critic says, many critics | |
| 734 | |
| 00:48:43,520 --> 00:48:47,600 | |
| say, this man was the poet who taught us how to | |
| 735 | |
| 00:48:47,600 --> 00:48:51,500 | |
| remember. Because this is about remembering | |
| 736 | |
| 00:48:51,500 --> 00:48:52,380 | |
| things. | |
| 737 | |
| 00:48:56,260 --> 00:49:00,220 | |
| Now, you could see all the features of romanticism | |
| 738 | |
| 00:49:00,220 --> 00:49:02,620 | |
| here. Maybe I forgot something. There's a return | |
| 739 | |
| 00:49:02,620 --> 00:49:04,020 | |
| to nature, imagination. | |
| 740 | |
| 00:49:07,160 --> 00:49:10,000 | |
| individuality, simplicity of language, anti | |
| 741 | |
| 00:49:10,000 --> 00:49:14,220 | |
| mainstream rejection of artistic conventions and | |
| 742 | |
| 00:49:14,220 --> 00:49:17,160 | |
| the form is the content, how in the third stanza | |
| 743 | |
| 00:49:17,160 --> 00:49:20,700 | |
| when he wanted to make a point to, he just created | |
| 744 | |
| 00:49:20,700 --> 00:49:23,240 | |
| this tension and conflict, memory, feelings and | |
| 745 | |
| 00:49:23,240 --> 00:49:28,380 | |
| emotions as opposed to reason. There are questions | |
| 746 | |
| 00:49:28,380 --> 00:49:30,840 | |
| here, I'll be posting one of them online so we can | |
| 747 | |
| 00:49:30,840 --> 00:49:31,920 | |
| continue the discussion. | |
| 748 | |
| 00:49:36,330 --> 00:49:37,690 | |
| Probably you mentioned some of them. | |
| 749 | |
| 00:49:41,110 --> 00:49:48,010 | |
| Look at this, number five. In real life, by the | |
| 750 | |
| 00:49:48,010 --> 00:49:52,210 | |
| way, it was Dorothy who had this entry, this | |
| 751 | |
| 00:49:52,210 --> 00:49:56,330 | |
| experience in her diaries. She's totally not | |
| 752 | |
| 00:49:56,330 --> 00:50:00,990 | |
| there. So I'm saying here that what is, why is | |
| 753 | |
| 00:50:00,990 --> 00:50:03,910 | |
| she, should be why, why is she erased from the | |
| 754 | |
| 00:50:03,910 --> 00:50:07,090 | |
| poem? We can continue this discussion online. Is | |
| 755 | |
| 00:50:07,090 --> 00:50:10,210 | |
| she erased because he hates her, because he's anti | |
| 756 | |
| 00:50:10,210 --> 00:50:15,750 | |
| -feminist, because women are not good enough? Or | |
| 757 | |
| 00:50:15,750 --> 00:50:20,010 | |
| is this more to do with the fact that this is a | |
| 758 | |
| 00:50:20,010 --> 00:50:24,910 | |
| romantic poem and individuality? Think about this. | |
| 759 | |
| 00:50:25,750 --> 00:50:28,090 | |
| But the last question is more important to me. | |
| 760 | |
| 00:50:28,350 --> 00:50:30,630 | |
| It's not showing here. I have to show it to you | |
| 761 | |
| 00:50:30,630 --> 00:50:34,350 | |
| because it's important. I love this question. | |
| 762 | |
| 00:50:38,140 --> 00:50:41,460 | |
| The question says, I'm quoting somebody. | |
| 763 | |
| 00:50:44,040 --> 00:50:49,140 | |
| It says, a trivial subject matter, okay? The | |
| 764 | |
| 00:50:49,140 --> 00:50:52,940 | |
| question says, a trivial subject matter, as Anne | |
| 765 | |
| 00:50:52,940 --> 00:50:58,780 | |
| Seward says or thought a daffodil to be, does not | |
| 766 | |
| 00:50:58,780 --> 00:51:04,140 | |
| deserve the ecstatic diction of vacancy, pensive, | |
| 767 | |
| 00:51:04,400 --> 00:51:07,880 | |
| and bliss. Like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. This is | |
| 768 | |
| 00:51:07,880 --> 00:51:10,900 | |
| just a daffodil, a bunch of daffodils. You don't | |
| 769 | |
| 00:51:10,900 --> 00:51:18,000 | |
| write this fascinating poem to react to just a | |
| 770 | |
| 00:51:18,000 --> 00:51:23,600 | |
| bunch of daffodils. That's too much. You use this | |
| 771 | |
| 00:51:23,600 --> 00:51:28,260 | |
| language and this beautiful reaction, what, to | |
| 772 | |
| 00:51:28,260 --> 00:51:33,050 | |
| write about the queen, about More significant | |
| 773 | |
| 00:51:33,050 --> 00:51:36,230 | |
| issues. How would you react? How would you reply | |
| 774 | |
| 00:51:36,230 --> 00:51:39,750 | |
| to this critic? Clearly, she's trashing the | |
| 775 | |
| 00:51:39,750 --> 00:51:43,850 | |
| romantics. Clearly, she is not happy with what the | |
| 776 | |
| 00:51:43,850 --> 00:51:46,870 | |
| romantics are doing. This will be our question to | |
| 777 | |
| 00:51:46,870 --> 00:51:49,910 | |
| discuss online. Would you agree that, yes, this is | |
| 778 | |
| 00:51:49,910 --> 00:51:53,930 | |
| trivial matter? You're causing us a headache with | |
| 779 | |
| 00:51:53,930 --> 00:51:57,830 | |
| this just daffodil, just a rose. Why are people | |
| 780 | |
| 00:51:57,830 --> 00:52:03,150 | |
| reacting to the poem this way? Now, in the | |
| 781 | |
| 00:52:03,150 --> 00:52:05,630 | |
| remaining time, we need to study this again, a | |
| 782 | |
| 00:52:05,630 --> 00:52:08,370 | |
| poem by William Wordsworth. I'm sure I'm shifting | |
| 783 | |
| 00:52:08,370 --> 00:52:08,850 | |
| quickly. | |
| 784 | |
| 00:52:11,430 --> 00:52:14,630 | |
| Upon Westminster Bridge. If you know London, | |
| 785 | |
| 00:52:15,290 --> 00:52:20,290 | |
| Westminster Bridge is a famous famous bridge in | |
| 786 | |
| 00:52:20,290 --> 00:52:22,250 | |
| London, probably the most famous bridge in London, | |
| 787 | |
| 00:52:22,430 --> 00:52:22,670 | |
| Westminster. | |
| 788 | |
| 00:52:28,230 --> 00:52:31,370 | |
| Remember, this is a poet of nature. What on earth | |
| 789 | |
| 00:52:31,370 --> 00:52:38,850 | |
| is he doing in London? If you reject London and | |
| 790 | |
| 00:52:38,850 --> 00:52:42,770 | |
| the corruption and the society, why are you there? | |
| 791 | |
| 00:52:44,270 --> 00:52:46,670 | |
| And again, let's examine where he positions | |
| 792 | |
| 00:52:46,670 --> 00:52:50,770 | |
| himself in time and in place. Please read the poem | |
| 793 | |
| 00:52:50,770 --> 00:52:54,830 | |
| very quickly. Earth has nothing to show my head. | |
| 794 | |
| 00:52:55,370 --> 00:52:59,020 | |
| Down would be heat. Would he be of soul who could | |
| 795 | |
| 00:52:59,020 --> 00:53:04,040 | |
| pass by a sight so touching in its majesty? This | |
| 796 | |
| 00:53:04,040 --> 00:53:08,520 | |
| city now doth like a garment wear the beauty of | |
| 797 | |
| 00:53:08,520 --> 00:53:14,700 | |
| the morning, silent there, ships, towers, domes, | |
| 798 | |
| 00:53:15,460 --> 00:53:20,980 | |
| theaters, and temples lie open unto the field and | |
| 799 | |
| 00:53:20,980 --> 00:53:24,250 | |
| to the sky. All bright and glittering in the | |
| 800 | |
| 00:53:24,250 --> 00:53:27,690 | |
| smokeless air, Never did sun more beautifully | |
| 801 | |
| 00:53:27,690 --> 00:53:33,330 | |
| steep. In his first splendor valley-bronze | |
| 802 | |
| 00:53:33,330 --> 00:53:38,670 | |
| overhead, Mare saw I never felt a calm so deep. | |
| 803 | |
| 00:53:39,450 --> 00:53:44,030 | |
| The river glides at his own sweet swell, Dear God, | |
| 804 | |
| 00:53:44,450 --> 00:53:48,510 | |
| the very houses he must leap, And all that mighty | |
| 805 | |
| 00:53:48,510 --> 00:53:52,850 | |
| heart is lying still. Okay, beautiful reading. | |
| 806 | |
| 00:53:53,470 --> 00:53:57,770 | |
| Thank you for this recitation. What do you notice | |
| 807 | |
| 00:53:57,770 --> 00:54:00,410 | |
| the first thing before we talk about it? Please. | |
| 808 | |
| 00:54:01,370 --> 00:54:05,790 | |
| Fourteen lines, so this is a sonnet. Ah, he's not | |
| 809 | |
| 00:54:05,790 --> 00:54:10,500 | |
| only in London. He's also restricting himself. | |
| 810 | |
| 00:54:10,700 --> 00:54:12,540 | |
| Where is the spontaneity, the spontaneous | |
| 811 | |
| 00:54:12,540 --> 00:54:14,580 | |
| overflow? Remember I told you never believe | |
| 812 | |
| 00:54:14,580 --> 00:54:18,300 | |
| critics and teachers. This is where you should | |
| 813 | |
| 00:54:18,300 --> 00:54:20,380 | |
| listen to my advice, unless you don't want to | |
| 814 | |
| 00:54:20,380 --> 00:54:23,740 | |
| listen to me as being a teacher. So this is a 14 | |
| 815 | |
| 00:54:23,740 --> 00:54:29,920 | |
| -line poem. It's a sonnet. Remember a sonnet is | |
| 816 | |
| 00:54:29,920 --> 00:54:34,240 | |
| very rigid. It's like what Rome do as Romans do. | |
| 817 | |
| 00:54:34,420 --> 00:54:38,250 | |
| So he's doing the same as Romans. Thank you. you | |
| 818 | |
| 00:54:38,250 --> 00:54:43,310 | |
| know, putting himself in this cage. So it's a | |
| 819 | |
| 00:54:43,310 --> 00:54:45,830 | |
| sonnet, thank you very much. 14 lines, thank you | |
| 820 | |
| 00:54:45,830 --> 00:54:50,010 | |
| very much. And what about the rhyme scheme? Could | |
| 821 | |
| 00:54:50,010 --> 00:54:51,570 | |
| somebody do it very quickly, the rhyme scheme, | |
| 822 | |
| 00:54:52,110 --> 00:54:56,550 | |
| please? A, B, B, | |
| 823 | |
| 00:54:58,750 --> 00:55:06,650 | |
| A, leave her alone, yeah? A, B, | |
| 824 | |
| 00:55:09,690 --> 00:55:15,830 | |
| B. A. Thank you. C. D. | |
| 825 | |
| 00:55:18,750 --> 00:55:22,130 | |
| Deep and | |
| 826 | |
| 00:55:22,130 --> 00:55:35,570 | |
| deep. C. Well. D. Asleep. C. And then? That's a | |
| 827 | |
| 00:55:35,570 --> 00:55:37,910 | |
| Petrarchan sonnet, not a Shakespearean sonnet. He | |
| 828 | |
| 00:55:37,910 --> 00:55:42,970 | |
| doesn't like Shakespeare, clearly. Listen, the | |
| 829 | |
| 00:55:42,970 --> 00:55:46,410 | |
| Romantics were called Romantics because | |
| 830 | |
| 00:55:46,410 --> 00:55:48,750 | |
| Romanticism, the word Romantic was used to | |
| 831 | |
| 00:55:48,750 --> 00:55:52,030 | |
| describe the Middle Ages, the medieval times, when | |
| 832 | |
| 00:55:52,030 --> 00:55:56,510 | |
| nature was unregulated, uncivilized, uncontrolled | |
| 833 | |
| 00:55:56,510 --> 00:56:01,110 | |
| by man. When nature was, when life was as simple | |
| 834 | |
| 00:56:01,110 --> 00:56:06,680 | |
| as it was in a way. So he's leaving, jumping over | |
| 835 | |
| 00:56:06,680 --> 00:56:09,940 | |
| all the poets, the giants, the romantic, the | |
| 836 | |
| 00:56:09,940 --> 00:56:13,440 | |
| neoclassicists, those poets, and he's going back | |
| 837 | |
| 00:56:13,440 --> 00:56:18,580 | |
| to the origin, the origin of things. So I think | |
| 838 | |
| 00:56:18,580 --> 00:56:21,800 | |
| this is a deliberate, again, attempt to distance | |
| 839 | |
| 00:56:21,800 --> 00:56:25,220 | |
| himself from Shakespeare. I also think that it's a | |
| 840 | |
| 00:56:25,220 --> 00:56:28,120 | |
| way of defining critics. Like, if you say I'm not | |
| 841 | |
| 00:56:28,120 --> 00:56:30,480 | |
| a poet, I can write upon it just as well. I can, | |
| 842 | |
| 00:56:30,560 --> 00:56:33,610 | |
| it could be, yeah. But also it says that the idea | |
| 843 | |
| 00:56:33,610 --> 00:56:36,910 | |
| of spontaneity in poetry and writing is a myth. | |
| 844 | |
| 00:56:37,830 --> 00:56:39,890 | |
| It's not always true. Sahya, you're right, you | |
| 845 | |
| 00:56:39,890 --> 00:56:43,170 | |
| react instantly sometimes. I'm sure you started | |
| 846 | |
| 00:56:43,170 --> 00:56:44,810 | |
| writing poetry, some of you. Sometimes you just | |
| 847 | |
| 00:56:44,810 --> 00:56:47,590 | |
| get the inspiration and you write a poem and it's | |
| 848 | |
| 00:56:47,590 --> 00:56:50,310 | |
| a beautiful poem. But sometimes you go back to | |
| 849 | |
| 00:56:50,310 --> 00:56:53,370 | |
| check, you know, on language and diction and | |
| 850 | |
| 00:56:53,370 --> 00:56:57,310 | |
| poetic language and everything. Some of you | |
| 851 | |
| 00:56:57,310 --> 00:57:00,070 | |
| protested something here. I agree that this is... | |
| 852 | |
| 00:57:00,650 --> 00:57:03,730 | |
| Okay, an imperfect rhyme. At the time when he's | |
| 853 | |
| 00:57:03,730 --> 00:57:08,410 | |
| talking about the majesty, the majesty here, by | |
| 854 | |
| 00:57:08,410 --> 00:57:10,490 | |
| and majesty, there is an imperfect rhyme. Again, | |
| 855 | |
| 00:57:10,570 --> 00:57:12,990 | |
| creating some kind of conflict. There is something | |
| 856 | |
| 00:57:12,990 --> 00:57:15,670 | |
| that is not right with the city. He's not saying, | |
| 857 | |
| 00:57:15,850 --> 00:57:18,150 | |
| okay, I'm sorry, nature is not as good as I | |
| 858 | |
| 00:57:18,150 --> 00:57:22,230 | |
| thought, and this is the city of London is more | |
| 859 | |
| 00:57:22,230 --> 00:57:27,270 | |
| significant, more important. What is the time in | |
| 860 | |
| 00:57:27,270 --> 00:57:32,270 | |
| the poem? Morning? This is at dawn, where did he | |
| 861 | |
| 00:57:32,270 --> 00:57:32,950 | |
| say this? | |
| 862 | |
| 00:57:39,070 --> 00:57:41,570 | |
| Okay, before the sun, there was something about | |
| 863 | |
| 00:57:41,570 --> 00:57:46,690 | |
| the sun there Okay The morning, this is the early | |
| 864 | |
| 00:57:46,690 --> 00:57:49,950 | |
| morning hours Where is the poet? | |
| 865 | |
| 00:57:52,730 --> 00:57:58,050 | |
| Again, standing up above almost everything High | |
| 866 | |
| 00:57:59,270 --> 00:58:04,250 | |
| But again, not as high as Coleridge. Sorry for the | |
| 867 | |
| 00:58:04,250 --> 00:58:05,010 | |
| stupid pun. | |
| 868 | |
| 00:58:09,470 --> 00:58:11,450 | |
| Thank you very much. And this is the second | |
| 869 | |
| 00:58:11,450 --> 00:58:13,430 | |
| question. What else do you notice about the poem? | |
| 870 | |
| 00:58:13,510 --> 00:58:19,370 | |
| The poem is people-less. There are no people. And | |
| 871 | |
| 00:58:19,370 --> 00:58:21,910 | |
| it's because if there are people, the factors will | |
| 872 | |
| 00:58:21,910 --> 00:58:25,630 | |
| be going on and then the smoke and the corruption | |
| 873 | |
| 00:58:25,630 --> 00:58:28,550 | |
| and the pollution and the anxiety will be | |
| 874 | |
| 00:58:28,550 --> 00:58:32,670 | |
| permeating, overwhelming. So the timing he chooses | |
| 875 | |
| 00:58:32,670 --> 00:58:38,810 | |
| is also, so he sees beauty in the heart of the | |
| 876 | |
| 00:58:38,810 --> 00:58:43,170 | |
| beast. The heart of London, he could see beauty. | |
| 877 | |
| 00:58:43,990 --> 00:58:47,810 | |
| And remember for this, I want you to compare this | |
| 878 | |
| 00:58:47,810 --> 00:58:50,850 | |
| poem to a poem called London by William Blake. | |
| 879 | |
| 00:58:52,030 --> 00:58:55,330 | |
| Fascinating stark contrast between both of them. | |
| 880 | |
| 00:58:56,590 --> 00:58:59,850 | |
| This man looks with beauty, only beauty, mostly | |
| 881 | |
| 00:58:59,850 --> 00:59:03,610 | |
| beauty. He was an outsider. This is significant. | |
| 882 | |
| 00:59:03,750 --> 00:59:06,590 | |
| He's not a Londoner himself. Blake was a Londoner. | |
| 883 | |
| 00:59:07,530 --> 00:59:11,290 | |
| Blake sees corruption. He sees injustice, he sees | |
| 884 | |
| 00:59:11,290 --> 00:59:14,930 | |
| blood, he sees poverty, he hears the voices of the | |
| 885 | |
| 00:59:14,930 --> 00:59:18,490 | |
| downtrodden, the wretched of the earth. He cares | |
| 886 | |
| 00:59:18,490 --> 00:59:21,290 | |
| about them, he raises their voices, he gives them | |
| 887 | |
| 00:59:21,290 --> 00:59:25,190 | |
| a voice and a face. But this man, that's why many | |
| 888 | |
| 00:59:25,190 --> 00:59:28,190 | |
| people describe William Wordsworth in particular | |
| 889 | |
| 00:59:28,190 --> 00:59:33,850 | |
| as an escapist, as | |
| 890 | |
| 00:59:36,710 --> 00:59:41,290 | |
| He's doing nothing. For many people, he is running | |
| 891 | |
| 00:59:41,290 --> 00:59:44,230 | |
| away, but for others, the act of writing poetry | |
| 892 | |
| 00:59:44,230 --> 00:59:50,450 | |
| itself is how bad corruption is. And for this, you | |
| 893 | |
| 00:59:50,450 --> 00:59:52,230 | |
| will be surprised by the way, when the second | |
| 894 | |
| 00:59:52,230 --> 00:59:56,850 | |
| generation was writing, Shelley, Keats, and Byron, | |
| 895 | |
| 00:59:58,090 --> 01:00:00,130 | |
| this man was still alive because he lived like a | |
| 896 | |
| 01:00:00,130 --> 01:00:03,700 | |
| hundred years. I'm not sure how old, but he was | |
| 897 | |
| 01:00:03,700 --> 01:00:06,320 | |
| very old. But again, the second generation was | |
| 898 | |
| 01:00:06,320 --> 01:00:11,180 | |
| taking control. And those people, Chile, you are | |
| 899 | |
| 01:00:11,180 --> 01:00:14,240 | |
| many, they are few. He was clearly calling for | |
| 900 | |
| 01:00:14,240 --> 01:00:17,100 | |
| revolution, for an actual revolution. And that's | |
| 901 | |
| 01:00:17,100 --> 01:00:20,300 | |
| probably one reason why I love him the most, | |
| 902 | |
| 01:00:20,780 --> 01:00:26,620 | |
| Chile. Was anti-authoritarian, anti-everything. | |
| 903 | |
| 01:00:29,440 --> 01:00:33,540 | |
| So the poem here, Upon Westminster Bridge, shows | |
| 904 | |
| 01:00:33,540 --> 01:00:35,700 | |
| how this as a romantic poet would choose a | |
| 905 | |
| 01:00:35,700 --> 01:00:37,820 | |
| particular timing and a particular place, again | |
| 906 | |
| 01:00:37,820 --> 01:00:40,960 | |
| just to be himself. If you read the poem, I'll | |
| 907 | |
| 01:00:40,960 --> 01:00:43,200 | |
| just do some commentary very quickly before we | |
| 908 | |
| 01:00:43,200 --> 01:00:49,000 | |
| leave. Earth has nothing, again this is starting | |
| 909 | |
| 01:00:49,000 --> 01:00:53,530 | |
| with a stressed syllable. Earth has nothing. has | |
| 910 | |
| 01:00:53,530 --> 01:00:59,450 | |
| not anything to show more fair. What? You just | |
| 911 | |
| 01:00:59,450 --> 01:01:02,530 | |
| said the daffodils are the most beautiful thing. | |
| 912 | |
| 01:01:04,990 --> 01:01:10,110 | |
| Dull would he be of soul who could pass by a sight | |
| 913 | |
| 01:01:10,110 --> 01:01:13,130 | |
| so touching in its majesty. | |
| 914 | |
| 01:01:15,710 --> 01:01:17,970 | |
| You'd be dull if you don't react to the beauty | |
| 915 | |
| 01:01:17,970 --> 01:01:24,300 | |
| here. The city now does I love him using the word | |
| 916 | |
| 01:01:24,300 --> 01:01:27,080 | |
| the old English middle English does rather than | |
| 917 | |
| 01:01:27,080 --> 01:01:31,340 | |
| does because again he's taking London 300 years | |
| 918 | |
| 01:01:31,340 --> 01:01:34,580 | |
| before 200 years before before the industrial | |
| 919 | |
| 01:01:34,580 --> 01:01:36,160 | |
| revolution and the factories and the corruption | |
| 920 | |
| 01:01:37,380 --> 01:01:40,780 | |
| Does like a garment wear and sadly this is only a | |
| 921 | |
| 01:01:40,780 --> 01:01:43,880 | |
| garment he knows this it's only something the | |
| 922 | |
| 01:01:43,880 --> 01:01:48,080 | |
| country will shed out will take off in in minutes | |
| 923 | |
| 01:01:48,080 --> 01:01:53,540 | |
| or in an hour or so a garment like a dress the | |
| 924 | |
| 01:01:53,540 --> 01:01:59,260 | |
| beauty of the morning silent bear the silence here | |
| 925 | |
| 01:01:59,260 --> 01:02:01,160 | |
| the lack of people the fact that there are no | |
| 926 | |
| 01:02:01,160 --> 01:02:09,160 | |
| people and there ships towers Domes, theaters, | |
| 927 | |
| 01:02:10,160 --> 01:02:13,660 | |
| temples, lie. And I think there could be a pun | |
| 928 | |
| 01:02:13,660 --> 01:02:17,160 | |
| here. Lie, they're just lying asleep out there, | |
| 929 | |
| 01:02:17,540 --> 01:02:21,600 | |
| but the scene lies. It's deceptive. Now it's | |
| 930 | |
| 01:02:21,600 --> 01:02:24,900 | |
| beautiful and romantic. In an hour or so, it's | |
| 931 | |
| 01:02:24,900 --> 01:02:29,700 | |
| going to be hell breaking loose upon | |
| 932 | |
| 01:02:31,510 --> 01:02:35,530 | |
| open onto the fields and to the sky, how it's just | |
| 933 | |
| 01:02:35,530 --> 01:02:38,670 | |
| one painting, one image, all bright and glittering | |
| 934 | |
| 01:02:38,670 --> 01:02:42,730 | |
| in the smokeless air. I think this is where I mix | |
| 935 | |
| 01:02:42,730 --> 01:02:45,810 | |
| things up. This is every line is 10 syllables. | |
| 936 | |
| 01:02:46,230 --> 01:02:49,390 | |
| It's basically Iambic Pentameter, but he does | |
| 937 | |
| 01:02:49,390 --> 01:02:54,340 | |
| experiment more. He's just not as Symmetric as | |
| 938 | |
| 01:02:54,340 --> 01:02:57,740 | |
| others This is the only line that has an extra | |
| 939 | |
| 01:02:57,740 --> 01:03:01,180 | |
| syllable unless you want to delete the schwa here | |
| 940 | |
| 01:03:01,180 --> 01:03:04,380 | |
| glittering if you go for glittering It's 10 if you | |
| 941 | |
| 01:03:04,380 --> 01:03:07,760 | |
| go for glitter glittering. It's just 8 it's | |
| 942 | |
| 01:03:07,760 --> 01:03:11,660 | |
| already 11 All bright and glittering in the | |
| 943 | |
| 01:03:11,660 --> 01:03:16,100 | |
| smokeless air. Look at this smokeless People is | |
| 944 | |
| 01:03:16,100 --> 01:03:18,280 | |
| what else does he go for list? How many listens do | |
| 945 | |
| 01:03:18,280 --> 01:03:20,760 | |
| we have? two or more | |
| 946 | |
| 01:03:24,020 --> 01:03:26,580 | |
| Smokeless, just one, so glittering in the | |
| 947 | |
| 01:03:26,580 --> 01:03:31,760 | |
| smokeless air, never did sun. It should be the sun | |
| 948 | |
| 01:03:31,760 --> 01:03:34,700 | |
| because just one sun, right? Or is he considering | |
| 949 | |
| 01:03:34,700 --> 01:03:37,520 | |
| him son of nature, son of this? But he doesn't go | |
| 950 | |
| 01:03:37,520 --> 01:03:40,670 | |
| for the sun, he's going to break See my point | |
| 951 | |
| 01:03:40,670 --> 01:03:44,050 | |
| here? Grammatically it should be the sun which is | |
| 952 | |
| 01:03:44,050 --> 01:03:46,130 | |
| going to add an extra syllable. But why did you | |
| 953 | |
| 01:03:46,130 --> 01:03:49,790 | |
| add an extra syllable here? I didn't want to add | |
| 954 | |
| 01:03:49,790 --> 01:03:52,070 | |
| one here because there is a message he's sending | |
| 955 | |
| 01:03:52,070 --> 01:03:54,590 | |
| here. If you dig deeper, you'll find it. | |
| 956 | |
| 01:04:00,160 --> 01:04:02,300 | |
| Possible, but I'm not sure whether, because | |
| 957 | |
| 01:04:02,300 --> 01:04:04,840 | |
| sometimes you have different texts, I try to look | |
| 958 | |
| 01:04:04,840 --> 01:04:07,280 | |
| for the original text, I couldn't find one, just | |
| 959 | |
| 01:04:07,280 --> 01:04:10,440 | |
| to see whether this is glittering or glittering, | |
| 960 | |
| 01:04:10,500 --> 01:04:14,220 | |
| right? And yeah, you look at texts, if this is the | |
| 961 | |
| 01:04:14,220 --> 01:04:16,140 | |
| original text, this is how he wrote it, why is | |
| 962 | |
| 01:04:16,140 --> 01:04:22,020 | |
| this capitalized, but not this? Or is this where | |
| 963 | |
| 01:04:22,020 --> 01:04:26,060 | |
| society and civilization control overwhelm and | |
| 964 | |
| 01:04:26,060 --> 01:04:30,950 | |
| subdue nature, which is not good? never did sun | |
| 965 | |
| 01:04:30,950 --> 01:04:34,810 | |
| more beautifully steep in this first in his first | |
| 966 | |
| 01:04:34,810 --> 01:04:39,410 | |
| remember his refers to the sun his first splendor | |
| 967 | |
| 01:04:39,410 --> 01:04:43,850 | |
| valley rock or hell no so I again never two | |
| 968 | |
| 01:04:43,850 --> 01:04:47,470 | |
| syllables no so I again the fronting here I never | |
| 969 | |
| 01:04:47,470 --> 01:04:53,470 | |
| saw I never saw never felt there's a lot of | |
| 970 | |
| 01:04:53,470 --> 01:04:57,560 | |
| negativity we'll see this in a bit A calm so deep, | |
| 971 | |
| 01:04:57,940 --> 01:05:00,120 | |
| a calm beauty, a silence. | |
| 972 | |
| 01:05:03,590 --> 01:05:08,490 | |
| The river glides, he goes again for, not glides, | |
| 973 | |
| 01:05:09,810 --> 01:05:13,810 | |
| going for old English because he's situating | |
| 974 | |
| 01:05:13,810 --> 01:05:16,430 | |
| himself in a different place. Remember this is the | |
| 975 | |
| 01:05:16,430 --> 01:05:19,950 | |
| relativity of time and issues of time and shapes | |
| 976 | |
| 01:05:19,950 --> 01:05:22,370 | |
| of time Dr. Lyman mentioned before you could use | |
| 977 | |
| 01:05:22,370 --> 01:05:25,970 | |
| this as an example. The river glides at his own | |
| 978 | |
| 01:05:25,970 --> 01:05:27,150 | |
| sweet will. | |
| 979 | |
| 01:05:30,520 --> 01:05:32,440 | |
| I don't think this is a religious, dear God. Some | |
| 980 | |
| 01:05:32,440 --> 01:05:34,400 | |
| people would take it as a religious thing. It's | |
| 981 | |
| 01:05:34,400 --> 01:05:40,820 | |
| just, dear God, the very houses seem asleep. This | |
| 982 | |
| 01:05:40,820 --> 01:05:43,500 | |
| is another personification. People are asleep. | |
| 983 | |
| 01:05:44,880 --> 01:05:50,020 | |
| Everything is asleep. And all that mighty heart is | |
| 984 | |
| 01:05:50,020 --> 01:05:54,820 | |
| lying still. The mighty heart, London. Is he just | |
| 985 | |
| 01:05:54,820 --> 01:05:57,760 | |
| referring to London as a whole? Or the factories? | |
| 986 | |
| 01:05:58,040 --> 01:06:02,260 | |
| Or the machines? Remember this is momentarily, | |
| 987 | |
| 01:06:02,500 --> 01:06:06,580 | |
| it's going to change. I find the imperfect rhyme, | |
| 988 | |
| 01:06:06,960 --> 01:06:08,780 | |
| the extra syllable, and thank you somebody said | |
| 989 | |
| 01:06:08,780 --> 01:06:11,160 | |
| the repetition of the never, never, and the not, | |
| 990 | |
| 01:06:11,280 --> 01:06:15,120 | |
| not. Things that create tension that tell us that | |
| 991 | |
| 01:06:15,120 --> 01:06:18,460 | |
| this is not going to last forever. Because it's | |
| 992 | |
| 01:06:18,460 --> 01:06:21,640 | |
| only, and he admits this, he's not deceiving us or | |
| 993 | |
| 01:06:21,640 --> 01:06:25,480 | |
| himself. This is a garment, it's just a gown you | |
| 994 | |
| 01:06:25,480 --> 01:06:31,380 | |
| put on at night And soon it will be taken off and | |
| 995 | |
| 01:06:31,380 --> 01:06:40,040 | |
| a garment of corruption, sins, pollution, smoke. | |
| 996 | |
| 01:06:40,940 --> 01:06:46,660 | |
| Smoke will overwhelm, will take over. Such a | |
| 997 | |
| 01:06:46,660 --> 01:06:48,800 | |
| beautiful poem. One of the most, again, | |
| 998 | |
| 01:06:49,360 --> 01:06:52,920 | |
| interesting poems of all times. But again, he's | |
| 999 | |
| 01:06:52,920 --> 01:06:55,360 | |
| not going for Shakespeare. He's jumping over | |
| 1000 | |
| 01:06:55,360 --> 01:07:00,020 | |
| Shakespeare. That's the term. Frog leaping or you | |
| 1001 | |
| 01:07:00,020 --> 01:07:04,220 | |
| know, it's going back to Petrarch. I think the | |
| 1002 | |
| 01:07:04,220 --> 01:07:07,520 | |
| word garment where it goes entirely with the whole | |
| 1003 | |
| 01:07:07,520 --> 01:07:11,460 | |
| time idea of lie and lying. The garment? Possibly, | |
| 1004 | |
| 01:07:11,540 --> 01:07:16,480 | |
| it's momentarily. It's now this | |
| 1005 | |
| 01:07:16,480 --> 01:07:19,600 | |
| beautiful and silent and bare, but in a moment | |
| 1006 | |
| 01:07:19,600 --> 01:07:21,500 | |
| it's going to be different. | |
| 1007 | |
| 01:07:24,160 --> 01:07:26,700 | |
| More? Please. | |
| 1008 | |
| 01:07:36,530 --> 01:07:38,870 | |
| Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but look at | |
| 1009 | |
| 01:07:38,870 --> 01:07:42,390 | |
| what timing he chooses, what place he places | |
| 1010 | |
| 01:07:42,390 --> 01:07:46,430 | |
| himself. That's a romantic concept. If you look at | |
| 1011 | |
| 01:07:46,430 --> 01:07:50,750 | |
| these questions, They are very interesting things | |
| 1012 | |
| 01:07:50,750 --> 01:07:53,770 | |
| to look into this poem. I'll stop here. If you | |
| 1013 | |
| 01:07:53,770 --> 01:07:57,190 | |
| have questions, please stay behind. | |