diff --git "a/batch_s000049.csv" "b/batch_s000049.csv" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/batch_s000049.csv" @@ -0,0 +1,10315 @@ +source,target + We set the nominal values of ο=3/2 and 7/2 for the thin and. thick shell cases. respectively.," We set the nominal values of $g=3/2$ and $7/2$ for the thin and thick shell cases, respectively." + Thus. (he only [ree parameter of the reverse shock emission is Dp.," Thus, the only free parameter of the reverse shock emission is $\Gamma_0$." + For the forward shockwe use the time evolution of the svnchrotron spectrum in the appropriate regime (i.e. spherical [SAL [or /—ἐς Sari.Piran&Naravan1998.. and an expanding jet [or />/;: Sari.Piran&Llalpern 1999)): here /;. the jet break time. is the epoch at which T—8; land 0; is the half opening angle ofthe jet.," For the forward shockwe use the time evolution of the synchrotron spectrum in the appropriate regime (i.e. spherical ISM for $tt_j$: \citealt{sph99}) ); here $t_j$, the jet break time, is the epoch at which $\Gamma\sim\theta_j^{-1}$ ,and $\theta_j$ is the half opening angle ofthe jet." + To account [or possible extinction within the host galaxy. tet. we use the parametric extinction curvesof Cardelli. and Fitzpatrick&Massa (1988).. alongwith the interpolation caleulated by Reiehart(2001 )..," To account for possible extinction within the host galaxy, $A_V^{\rm host}$ , we use the parametric extinction curvesof \citet{ccm89} and \citet{fm88}, , alongwith the interpolation calculated by \citet{rei01}. ." +Observed flat rotational curves of many galaxies have been sibjeet of long-term controversy.,Observed flat rotational curves of many galaxies have been subject of long-term controversy. + The observational [act that the azimuthal velocity of gas aud stars in the galactic plane is constaut over a large range of the distauces [rom the ceutre of a galaxy Las yjelded two main explanations., The observational fact that the azimuthal velocity of gas and stars in the galactic plane is constant over a large range of the distances from the centre of a galaxy has yielded two main explanations. + Iu an attempt tosave the assertion that the Newtoniau gravitatioual tleory holds over the cosmological distauces. oue such theory assumes the presence of non-baryonie 1jassive dark halo surrounding a spiral disk.," In an attempt to save the assertion that the Newtonian gravitational theory holds over the cosmological distances, one such theory assumes the presence of non-baryonic massive dark halo surrounding a spiral disk." + In this scenario. gravitational acceleration GAL«(r)/r which balances the centrifugal acceleration. rode/V7(r)/r. is. assumed to vary as yfL/r.," In this scenario, gravitational acceleration $GM_<(r)/r^2$ which balances the centrifugal acceleration $V^2(r)/r$, is assumed to vary as $1/r$." + This. means that tle inass enclosed withit a certain radius r2 Ade(r). scales as xr.," This means that the mass enclosed within a certain radius $r$ , $M_<(r)$, scales as $\propto r$." + However. this is not what is observed at large radii of tLe Galaxy.," However, this is not what is observed at large radii of the Galaxy." + The secoud possible explanation of the flat rotational curves is 1iat the Newtoulan grwvity does 100 apply on Cosinological scales and further imodificatious are due (Milgrom 1950)., The second possible explanation of the flat rotational curves is that the Newtonian gravity does not apply on cosmological scales and further modifications are due (Milgrom 1983). + Histo‘ically the atter explanation was not favoured due to abseuce of the general reativistic extension ofthe theory., Historically the latter explanation was not favoured due to absence of the general relativistic extension of the theory. +" However. this drawback was alleviated by the formulation of the gejeralisation of Einstein"" general 'elativity based on a pseudo-Bieimauniau metric tensor aud a skew-symuinetric rauk tl ο. ielcl. called inetric-skew-teusor gravity (MSTC)."," However, this drawback was alleviated by the formulation of the generalisation of Einstein's general relativity based on a pseudo-Riemannian metric tensor and a skew-symmetric rank three tensor field, called metric-skew-tensor gravity (MSTG)." + The latter leads to a moclilied acceleration law hat cau explain the flat rotation curves of galaxies aud cluster lensiug without postulating exotic dark matter (Mollat 2005)., The latter leads to a modified acceleration law that can explain the flat rotation curves of galaxies and cluster lensing without postulating exotic dark matter (Moffat 2005). + Recently. Brownstein MolIat. (2006) have shown that MSTC cau," Recently, Brownstein Moffat (2006) have shown that MSTG can" +This is because theholes.,This is because the. + We do not consider the possibility that stars are made in the nucleus of the galaxies (as would be required by AL) and then redistributed throughout the galaxy. in. stellar-kinematical mergers because (1) the dense stellar cores so produced: will not be disrupted. by mergers (or secular evolution). (2) we would. require about LOO mergers. per L elliptical and the observed. merger rate (c.g. Carlberg et al.," We do not consider the possibility that stars are made in the nucleus of the galaxies (as would be required by ) and then redistributed throughout the galaxy in stellar-kinematical mergers because (1) the dense stellar cores so produced will not be disrupted by mergers (or secular evolution), (2) we would require about 100 mergers per $^{*}$ elliptical and the observed merger rate (e.g. Carlberg et al." + 2000) is not that high. and (3) the number density concordance described above is then Lost. due to the Large number of mergers.," 2000) is not that high, and (3) the number density concordance described above is then lost due to the large number of mergers." +" Van der Marel 1999. finds the black hole mass (in solar units) log),Mia&183|logy,Lv."," Van der Marel 1999 finds the black hole mass (in solar units) $\log_{10} M_{\rm BH} \approx -1.83 + +\log_{10} L_V$." + Pherefore for a Schechter (1976). L elliptical galaxy (Ady= 21.5) at redshift z=0. the central black hole has mass 5.1.LO°AL.., Therefore for a Schechter (1976) $L^{*}$ elliptical galaxy $M_V = -21.5$ ) at redshift $z=0$ the central black hole has mass $5.1 \times 10^{8} {\rm M}_{\odot}$. +" For the same elliptical galaxy. the stellar core mass. is Aly,=1.60M. assuming. that the core is. approximately. isothermal at small raclii Ge10!"" G. We now turn to the right-hand plot of figure 13.."," In the left-hand plot we find that the measured numerical values agree very well with the expected scaling $\epsilon\propto B^2$ , with small deviations when $\Bav\gtrsim +10^{17}$ G. We now turn to the right-hand plot of figure \ref{toroidal_ellips}." +" This time we plot the ellipticity against B, not B?."," This time we plot the ellipticity against $\Bav$, not $\Bav^2$." +" First we look at configurations with ¢?-superconductivity, for a central critical field value H«1(0)=1015 G (the points on the line marked (a)) and also for H.1(0)=2x1016 G (the points on line (c))."," First we look at configurations with $\zeta^2$ -superconductivity, for a central critical field value $H_{c1}(0)=10^{16}$ G (the points on the line marked (a)) and also for $H_{c1}(0)=2\times 10^{16}$ G (the points on line (c))." +" In both cases we see that the points lie virtually on straight lines, showing that εοςB."," In both cases we see that the points lie virtually on straight lines, showing that $\epsilon\propto\Bav$." +" In addition, line (c) has twice the gradient of line (a)."," In addition, line (c) has twice the gradient of line (a)." +" This confirms that despite the high field strengths we are obliged to use (see the discussion above), we find the correct scaling of the ellipticity: eoxH«1B."," This confirms that despite the high field strengths we are obliged to use (see the discussion above), we find the correct scaling of the ellipticity: $\epsilon\propto H_{c1}\Bav$." + This gives us more confidence about our results and means we can safely extrapolate to more typical NS field strengths., This gives us more confidence about our results and means we can safely extrapolate to more typical NS field strengths. + We also present ellipticities for ¢3-superconductivity (points along line (b))., We also present ellipticities for $\zeta^3$ -superconductivity (points along line (b)). + The level of distortion inthis case is very similar to that in the C? case., The level of distortion inthis case is very similar to that in the $\zeta^2$ case. +nmeaniugs as the TLOWWSOLL Cross section. electrou iuass and the speed of light.,"meanings as the Thomson cross section, electron mass and the speed of light." + Suce ouly [ree electrous pa‘ticipate in Thomson scattering of the CMB photous. le integra Is €uw olf at the epoch of reiouization fa.," Since only free electrons participate in Thomson scattering of the CMB photons, the integral is cut off at the epoch of reionization $l_{\rm re}$." + Sole Iniportant statistics of the SZ elfect inunediately. come to 1iud., Some important statistics of the SZ effect immediately come to mind. +" The first oO‘ler quantity is y. the mean y pa""anieter average over the whole sky. which measwes the toal theral energy content ofthe univewe."," The first order quantity is $\bar{y}$, the mean $y$ parameter averaged over the whole sky, which measures the total thermal energy content of the universe." + Tie angular variation in y can be parameterizec by the two poiit correlation function of le temperatwe ποion ©. or equivaleutly the auguar power sj)ectrun Cy.," The angular variation in $y$ can be parameterized by the two point correlation function of the temperature fluctuation $\Theta$, or equivalently the angular power spectrum $C_l$." + For a Claussiall Fallcdoum field. these (wo pa‘ameters would describe the statisics completely.," For a Gaussian random field, these two parameters would describe the statistics completely." + Since the 5Z effect is dominated by nolinear structures. non-Craussiaulty may be siguificaut.," Since the SZ effect is dominated by non-linear structures, non-Gaussianity may be significant." + So we investigate higher order statistics su] as the ssewness aud kurtosis of the y parameter to quantify the , So we investigate higher order statistics such as the skewness and kurtosis of the $y$ parameter to quantify the non-Gaussianity. +The SZ elect contalus coutributious [rom all ‘edsüfts and it is challengiug to recover the sineared. redshif informaion., The SZ effect contains contributions from all redshifts and it is challenging to recover the smeared redshift information. + We have shown that cross Correlating the SZ ellect with a galaxy photometric recift survey. we can iier the redshilt “ESOvec IGM pressure-galaxy cross correlatjon aud the IGM prSSILEO allo correlation (Zhang&Pe12001)..," We have shown that cross correlating the SZ effect with a galaxy photometric redshift survey, we can infer the redshift resolved IGM pressure-galaxy cross correlation and the IGM pressure auto correlation \citep{Zhang01a}." + This method is robust. but does not capture all the iOratio iin the SZ observation.," This method is robust, but does not capture all the information in the SZ observation." + Iu this j»aper. we utilize the one point clistributjon function (PDF of he y paraiueter and the distribution of peaks in y to extract more information.," In this paper, we utilize the one point distribution function (PDF) of the $y$ parameter and the distribution of peaks in $y$ to extract more information." + Since smoothing is aways present for a real experinent with a finite beam. we calculate the statistics of the y paraineer sinoothed on a given angular scale 0.," Since smoothing is always present for a real experiment with a finite beam, we calculate the statistics of the $y$ parameter smoothed on a given angular scale $\theta$." + It we are interestecLin virialized objects. for example clusers aud groups of galaxies. we would expec them to be peaks in the smoothect or filtered πιαps. ViCy>gp).," If we are interested in virialized objects, for example clusters and groups of galaxies, we would expect them to be peaks in the smoothed or filtered $y$ maps. $N(y>y_p)$," + the σιiuulative distribution fuiction (CDF) of peaks with sinoothecl y parameter jeeerMD than certain valle. pp. is the raw observable.," the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of peaks with smoothed $y$ parameter bigger than certain value $y_p$, is the raw observable." + The yy €DF is the 5Z analog to a luminosity unction., The $y_p$ CDF is the SZ analog to a luminosity function. + I£ we choose a op hat window so that tie observation coue is large ough to include an etire object such as a cluster and is suiall enough hat tydically uo more tlian e such object cau be [οιuid aloug each cone. hen when the cone 15 ceiterecl at the ¢‘enter of each ject. a peak y= ypaj»pears in the sinoothlied nap.," If we choose a top hat window so that the observation cone is large enough to include an entire object such as a cluster and is small enough that typically no more than one such object can be found along each cone, then when the cone is centered at the center of each object, a peak $y\equiv y_p$ appears in the smoothed map." + This yp is directly related othe total gas Wass aud temperature of individual object., This $y_p$ is directly related to the total gas mass and temperature of individual object. + Asstuning a halo to be isothermal. the to aliass Al ofa halo is related to the gas teuperature T by AL/Als=(F/T4)7.," Assuming a halo to be isothermal, the total mass $M$ of a halo is related to the gas temperature $T$ by $M/M_8=(T/T_8)^{3/2}$." + Als=L8x101(054/0.3)/7.IM. is the Inass coutained in a sl!Npe sphere of the universe of mean density today. which is roughly the uiass scale of clusters.," $M_8=1.8\times 10^{14} (\Omega_0/0.3) h^{-1} {\rm M}_{\sun}$ is the mass contained in a $8 {\rm h}^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$ sphere of the universe of mean density today, which is roughly the mass scale of clusters." +" Zu(z) is the correspoucing temperature of a halo with mass My at reclshilt ο,", $T_8(z)$ is the corresponding temperature of a halo with mass $M_8$ at redshift $z$. + We then obtain Here. AQ is the solid angle of the cone. fy is the gas fraction of halos aud d4 is the angular cliameter distance.," We then obtain Here, $\Delta \Omega$ is the solid angle of the cone, $f_g$ is the gas fraction of halos and $d_A$ is the angular diameter distance." + For- clusters aud groups. the typicaln augular size. at 2=41 is. about 4/1.," For clusters and groups, the typical angular size at $z=1$ is about $1^{'}$." + For- the present cluster number deusity v(T>2keV)~10OfMpc* (Pen1998b).. the average number oL clusters in a cone with augular radius 0~20./ projected to 2 is about one allowing for the evolution of cluster number deusity.," For the present cluster number density $n(T>2 {\rm keV})\sim +10^{-5} h^{-3} {\rm Mpc}^3$ \citep{Pen98b}, the average number of clusters in a cone with angular radius $\theta \sim 20^{'}$ projected to $z\sim 2$ is about one allowing for the evolution of cluster number density." + So. the size of the smootling scale for the peak analysis should be between these two scales.," So, the size of the smoothing scale for the peak analysis should be between these two scales." + In this case. the IN(y2yy) is just the number of halos with gy2 yp.," In this case, the $N(y>y_p)$ is just the number of halos with $y>y_p$ ," +(Naze et citeNRM)).,(Naze et \\cite{NRM}) ). + Whilst there i$ no obvious X-ray emission from stars A and C. there might be some X-ray emission associated with stars B and D. However. the latter two objects lie in the wings of the X-ray source associated with 1183. and their status as X-ray emitters can therefore not be ascertained with confidence.," Whilst there is no obvious X-ray emission from stars A and C, there might be some X-ray emission associated with stars B and D. However, the latter two objects lie in the wings of the X-ray source associated with 183, and their status as X-ray emitters can therefore not be ascertained with confidence." + The lack of X-ray detections for stars A and C is somewhat surprising given their spectral types inferred above., The lack of X-ray detections for stars A and C is somewhat surprising given their spectral types inferred above. + One possibility could be a larger interstellar column density. thus larger absorption of the X-ray emission than for other stars in 22 of similar spectral type.," One possibility could be a larger interstellar column density, thus larger absorption of the X-ray emission than for other stars in 2 of similar spectral type." + However. this explanation needs to be confirmed using additional high angular resolution optical and X-ray observations.," However, this explanation needs to be confirmed using additional high angular resolution optical and X-ray observations." + The various eclipsing binaries that we have studied in this paper yield distance estimates in the range 6.5 to larger than Okkpe., The various eclipsing binaries that we have studied in this paper yield distance estimates in the range 6.5 to larger than kpc. + Whilst the uncertainty in these results is. difficult to evaluate. they are in very good agreement with the spectrophotometric distance of (8.0+I4) kkpe inferred in Paper I and clearly consistent with a cluster distance well beyond the kkpe proposed by Ascenso et ((2007)).," Whilst the uncertainty in these results is difficult to evaluate, they are in very good agreement with the spectrophotometric distance of $(8.0 \pm 1.4)$ kpc inferred in Paper I and clearly consistent with a cluster distance well beyond the kpc proposed by Ascenso et \cite{Ascenso}) )." + We thus conclude that all available observations of the early-type stellar population of 22 are most consistent with a distance near kkpe in agreement with the distance inferred for 220a., We thus conclude that all available observations of the early-type stellar population of 2 are most consistent with a distance near kpc in agreement with the distance inferred for 20a. + This result casts serious doubts on a possible association between the y-ray pulsar JJ1023.0—5746 (Ackermann et citeAckermann)) and the 22 cluster., This result casts serious doubts on a possible association between the $\gamma$ -ray pulsar $-$ 5746 (Ackermann et \\cite{Ackermann}) ) and the 2 cluster. + If the distance of the pulsar were confirmed at kkpe. it would then appear more likely that the latter belongs to a foreground stellar population unrelated to the massive stars of 22. but possibly related to the PMS stars discussed by Ascenso et ((2007)). With respect to the multiplicity of early-type stars in 22. we stress that among the eleven O-type stars and one WNha star monitored during our campaign. which were not previously known to be binary systems. only one star 1167) was found to probably be a short-period spectroscopic binary system.," If the distance of the pulsar were confirmed at kpc, it would then appear more likely that the latter belongs to a foreground stellar population unrelated to the massive stars of 2, but possibly related to the PMS stars discussed by Ascenso et \cite{Ascenso}) With respect to the multiplicity of early-type stars in 2, we stress that among the eleven O-type stars and one WNha star monitored during our campaign, which were not previously known to be binary systems, only one star 167) was found to probably be a short-period spectroscopic binary system." + The other targets did not display RV variations well above the uncertainties estimated from the RV dispersion of the DIBs., The other targets did not display RV variations well above the uncertainties estimated from the RV dispersion of the DIBs. + To assess the significance of our results. we performed Monte Carlo. simulations (Hammersley Handscomb 1964)) of the RVs of a synthetic population of massive binaries.," To assess the significance of our results, we performed Monte Carlo simulations (Hammersley Handscomb \cite{HH}) ) of the RVs of a synthetic population of massive binaries." + The parent distribution of the binary parameters of the population of massive binaries is unfortunately unknown. but we can make a series of reasonable assumptions.," The parent distribution of the binary parameters of the population of massive binaries is unfortunately unknown, but we can make a series of reasonable assumptions." + Here. we have followed an approach similar to the one of Sana. Gosset Evans (2009)).," Here, we have followed an approach similar to the one of Sana, Gosset Evans \cite{SGE}) )." + Following the latter authors. we adopt a bi-uniform period distribution in logP(days) with of the systems in the range 0.3€logP<1.0 and the remainder in the range 1.0«logP.€3.5.," Following the latter authors, we adopt a bi-uniform period distribution in $\log{P(days)}$ with of the systems in the range $0.3 \leq \log{P} \leq 1.0$ and the remainder in the range $1.0 < \log{P} \leq 3.5$." + The eccentricity was assumed to be uniformly distributed between 0.0 and 0.9. with all systems with orbital periods shorter than four days assumed to have circular orbits.," The eccentricity was assumed to be uniformly distributed between 0.0 and 0.9, with all systems with orbital periods shorter than four days assumed to have circular orbits." + The longitudes of periastron and true anomaly of the first observation were taken to be uniformly distributed in the [0.2] interval and we adopted a uniform distribution of the mass ratio g=m-2/ni between 0.1 and 1.0.," The longitudes of periastron and true anomaly of the first observation were taken to be uniformly distributed in the $[0,2\,\pi]$ interval and we adopted a uniform distribution of the mass ratio $q = m_2/m_1$ between 0.1 and 1.0." + The lower limit to the range of mass ratio was chosen because. in practice. it would be very difficult to observe the reflex motion of an O-star for such à low-mass companion.," The lower limit to the range of mass ratio was chosen because, in practice, it would be very difficult to observe the reflex motion of an O-star for such a low-mass companion." + Finally. the orbital inclination was taken to be uniform in cos/ between —1.0 and 1.0.," Finally, the orbital inclination was taken to be uniform in $\cos{i}$ between $-1.0$ and $1.0$." + For four values of the primary mass (20. 30. 40. and 50M... spanning roughly the range of spectral types for which some observational information on multiplicity is available) we simulated a population of 100000. binary systems.," For four values of the primary mass (20, 30, 40, and $M_{\odot}$, spanning roughly the range of spectral types for which some observational information on multiplicity is available) we simulated a population of 100000 binary systems." + For each system. we evaluated the maximum RV difference A RRV = maxAV(¢;)—minRV(¢4;) that would be measured on this system adopting the same temporal sampling as used for our five GIRAFFE-IFUobservations?.," For each system, we evaluated the maximum RV difference $\Delta$ RV = $\max{RV(\phi_i)} - \min{RV(\phi_i)}$ that would be measured on this system adopting the same temporal sampling as used for our five GIRAFFE-IFU." +. The results are summarized in refMC. and illustrated in refhisto.., The results are summarized in \\ref{MC} and illustrated in \\ref{histo}. +" If we assumed that a velocity difference of ss! were required to claim the detection of a binarysystem"". we would find that fewer than of the systems containing an VV primary star wwith a mass higher than 30M,.). and having an orbital period of shorter than ddays. would escape detection."," If we assumed that a velocity difference of $^{-1}$ were required to claim the detection of a binary, we would find that fewer than of the systems containing an V primary star with a mass higher than $M_{\odot}$ ), and having an orbital period of shorter than days, would escape detection." + Only the lowest inclination systems would indeed remain undetected., Only the lowest inclination systems would indeed remain undetected. + For longer orbital periods. the fraction of systems that would be missed by our GIRAFFE-IFU campaign steeply increases: for systems with orbital periods between 50 and ddays. about half of the binaries would escape detection.," For longer orbital periods, the fraction of systems that would be missed by our GIRAFFE-IFU campaign steeply increases: for systems with orbital periods between 50 and days, about half of the binaries would escape detection." + However. owing to the assumed preponderance of short orbital-period systems. the total fraction of systems with a period up to ddays that we would miss. would still remain quite low (4 - 5%%)).," However, owing to the assumed preponderance of short orbital-period systems, the total fraction of systems with a period up to days that we would miss, would still remain quite low (4 - )." + The same approach was applied to the sampling of the three GIRAFFE-ARGUS observations (see refMC2))., The same approach was applied to the sampling of the three GIRAFFE-ARGUS observations (see \\ref{MC2}) ). + As could be expected. this sampling ts less efficient for the detection of binary systems.," As could be expected, this sampling is less efficient for the detection of binary systems." + Nonetheless. for primary masses in the range 20 - M.« (corresponding roughly to VV spectral types). our simulations indicate that à binary system with a period shorter than ddays has less than a probability of escaping detection because ARRV 20kkm ss!.," Nonetheless, for primary masses in the range 20 - $M_{\odot}$ (corresponding roughly to V spectral types), our simulations indicate that a binary system with a period shorter than days has less than a probability of escaping detection because $\Delta$ RV $< 20$ $^{-1}$." + Therefore. we can safely conclude that the probability that either of the stars 118. 171. 182. 183. 199. or 203 or stars A. B or C is a short-period binary system must be very low.," Therefore, we can safely conclude that the probability that either of the stars 18, 171, 182, 183, 199, or 203 or stars A, B or C is a short-period binary system must be very low." + If these stars are indeed binaries. they must have either a very low orbital inclination. a very long orbital period. or both.," If these stars are indeed binaries, they must have either a very low orbital inclination, a very long orbital period, or both." + The situation is a bit less clear for 220b for which we do observe a maximum RV difference above our threshold., The situation is a bit less clear for 20b for which we do observe a maximum RV difference above our threshold. + However. as stated above. this result must be considered with," However, as stated above, this result must be considered with" +where the ecometric comoving angular diameter distance terms have been absorbed into ον).,where the geometric comoving angular diameter distance terms have been absorbed into $g(\chi)$. + It is therefore now clear. given our earlier discussion. how weal lensing as à cosmological probe is particularly useful in. studies of modified gravity.," It is therefore now clear, given our earlier discussion, how weak lensing as a cosmological probe is particularly useful in studies of modified gravity." + For this statistic is sensitive to the erowth of structure via the presence of the linear growth ctor squared (q (a)) in the matter power spectrum I5., For this statistic is sensitive to the growth of structure via the presence of the linear growth factor squared $g^{2}(a)$ ) in the matter power spectrum $P_{\delta}$. + lt is sensitive to the expansion history through the ternis in the square brackets and. through the Hubble. drag in he growth of structure and. also. as discussed at the end of the last section. it is sensitive to the relation between he power spectrum of the potentials and density.," It is sensitive to the expansion history through the terms in the square brackets and through the Hubble drag in the growth of structure and also, as discussed at the end of the last section, it is sensitive to the relation between the power spectrum of the potentials and density." +" In. the equation above the relation from £2,,. to Ps has already oen performed. assuming GR as given routinely in the iterature.", In the equation above the relation from $P_{\phi + \psi}$ to $P_{\delta}$ has already been performed assuming GR as given routinely in the literature. + Again. it is worth reiterating that if there is a modification to the Poisson equation. and/or το the anisolropic stress one must augment this powerspectrum with the approapriate prefactor given. for example. as in Equation(17).," Again, it is worth reiterating that if there is a modification to the Poisson equation and/or to the anisotropic stress one must augment this powerspectrum with the approapriate prefactor given, for example, as in Equation." +. In addition to these sensitivities it is worth adding that because the dellection is given by the potentiaLg which are sourced by mass irrespective of being barvonic or dark. weak lensing does not suller from any unknown bias.," In addition to these sensitivities it is worth adding that because the deflection is given by the potentials, which are sourced by mass irrespective of being baryonic or dark, weak lensing does not suffer from any unknown bias." + That is. it probes the entirety of the mass distribution.," That is, it probes the entirety of the mass distribution." + While this probe. in principle. is excellent. for our chosen study it is worthwhile noting that the shear signal is a small 174 distortion on the already existing intrinsic ellipticity.," While this probe, in principle, is excellent for our chosen study it is worthwhile noting that the shear signal is a small $1\%$ distortion on the already existing intrinsic ellipticity." + This provides a thorough. technical challenge that is being combated with a combination of large galaxy nuniber analyses and refined shear measurement techniques (?.. ?. and ?)).," This provides a thorough technical challenge that is being combated with a combination of large galaxy number analyses and refined shear measurement techniques \citet{Heymans05}, \citet{Massey06} and \citet{Bridle08}) )." + Further still. the first. cleteetions of weak lensing are particularly recent. (7... 7... 2? and ?)) and so in this wav lensing is very much a highly promising. vet developing. cosmological probe.," Further still, the first detections of weak lensing are particularly recent \citet{Bacon00}, \citet{Kaiser00}, \citet{Wittman00} and \citet{vanWaerbeke00}) ) and so in this way lensing is very much a highly promising, yet developing, cosmological probe." + Despite this there are already a number of papers in the literature that have addressed. the relationship between weak lensing and mocified gravity or dark energy. such as 2.. 2.. 2.. 2. 2. 7 and ?..," Despite this there are already a number of papers in the literature that have addressed the relationship between weak lensing and modified gravity or dark energy, such as \citet{UzanBernardeau01}, \citet{Schimd05}, \citet{DoreMartigMellier07}, \citet{Schimd07}, \citet{AmendolaKunzSapone07}, \citet{Jain07} and \citet{Tsujikawa08}." + With these studies and potential modified: gravity attributes in lensing it is imperitive to realise that there does exist. à severe caveat., With these studies and potential modified gravity attributes in lensing it is imperitive to realise that there does exist a severe caveat. + This is due to the fact that lensing probes into the non-linear regime., This is due to the fact that lensing probes into the non-linear regime. + We are fortunate to be able to use a fitting Function (IZ.g. 2)) for the non- in standard gravity., We are fortunate to be able to use a fitting function (E.g. \citealt{Smith03}) ) for the non-linearities in standard gravity. + Unfortunately this is poorly understood in any deviation [from the current. framework and subsequent implementation of the fit would. technically. be invalid.," Unfortunately this is poorly understood in any deviation from the current framework and subsequent implementation of the fit would, technically, be invalid." + Vherefore until N-body simulations have been undertaken that could. generalise the fitting function. or accurately quantify deviations from it we must strive to work in the linear regime as much as possible., Therefore until N-body simulations have been undertaken that could generalise the fitting function or accurately quantify deviations from it we must strive to work in the linear regime as much as possible. + Although some attempts have been made at quantifving the validity of the present fits (IZ.g. ? and 2)) we keep. for now. a strict and linear only analysis.," Although some attempts have been made at quantifying the validity of the present fits (E.g. \citet{LaszloBean07} and \citet{Oyaizu08}) ) we keep, for now, a strict and linear only analysis." + Phere are. in addition. other benefits in avoiding the inclusion of small scales such as the presence of intrinsic ellipticity correlations. shear-shape correlations and the presence of non-Gaussianity in the error.," There are, in addition, other benefits in avoiding the inclusion of small scales such as the presence of intrinsic ellipticity correlations, shear-shape correlations and the presence of non-Gaussianity in the error." + We therefore utilise the data provided by FOS based on the CELUELS-wide survey which. due to its range of large angular scales (up to 230 arcminutes) probing the more linear regime. is ideal for work on non-LODAL cosmology such as this.," We therefore utilise the data provided by F08 based on the CFHTLS-wide survey which, due to its range of large angular scales (up to 230 arcminutes) probing the more linear regime, is ideal for work on non-LCDM cosmology such as this." + The Canada-Erance-Hawaii Telescope. Legacy Survey (CELUPLS). based on the MEGAPRIAIE/AIEGACAAL instrument. is an ongoing survey with a target of 450 nights extending over 5 vears.," The Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHTLS), based on the MEGAPRIME/MEGACAM instrument, is an ongoing survey with a target of 450 nights extending over 5 years." + The recent analysis by ? has gone bevond the initial releases and investigations by 7? and ? which themselves were successful in. deriving constraints on the οax degeneracy ancl demonstrating the evolution of the shear signal with redshift., The recent analysis by \citet{Benjamin07} has gone beyond the initial releases and investigations by \citet{Semboloni06} and \citet{Hoekstra06} which themselves were successful in deriving constraints on the $\Omega_{m}- \sigma_{8}$ degeneracy and demonstrating the evolution of the shear signal with redshift. + This was achieved in 7/— through a better understanding. of the redshift distribution and having an increased area., This was achieved in \citet{Benjamin07} through a better understanding of the redshift distribution and having an increased area. + This. while marking significant progress. is still not the most optimal lensing analvsis for this work.," This, while marking significant progress, is still not the most optimal lensing analysis for this work." + This is because they are potentially sensitive to the growth of structures on non-linear scales which. as we emphasised above. is undesirable for a current study of bevond-LEinstcin cosmology and weak lensing.," This is because they are potentially sensitive to the growth of structures on non-linear scales which, as we emphasised above, is undesirable for a current study of beyond-Einstein cosmology and weak lensing." + We therefore look to the 3rd vear CELILTLS-wide release CP0003) given by ? (E08)., We therefore look to the 3rd year CFHTLS-wide release (T0003) given by \citet{Fu08} (F08). + Although having a smaller Ποιά of view than ? it utilises much larger angular scales (into the linear regime) also avoiding many of the potential systematics mentioned at the end of the last section., Although having a smaller field of view than \citet{Benjamin07} it utilises much larger angular scales (into the linear regime) also avoiding many of the potential systematics mentioned at the end of the last section. + Lt is because of this that both works reveal approximately equivalent cosmological constraints ancl little constraining power is lost., It is because of this that both works reveal approximately equivalent cosmological constraints and little constraining power is lost. + The current sky coverage of 57deg. approximately 3DAmi’ of the final CELIUELS. target area. is reduced. to 34.2cdee7 alter masking and the removal of various contaminants.," The current sky coverage of $57 \mathrm{deg^{2}}$, approximately $35\%$ of the final CFHTLS target area, is reduced to $34.2 \mathrm{deg^{2}}$ after masking and the removal of various contaminants." +" Eventually including five bands this / band study stretches to à magnitude of 7,5=24.5 and encapsulating nearly 1.7 million galaxies has an elfective galaxy number density of n—l]33gal/arcmün.", Eventually including five bands this $i'$ band study stretches to a magnitude of $i'_{AB} = 24.5$ and encapsulating nearly 1.7 million galaxies has an effective galaxy number density of $n = 13.3 \mathrm{gal/arcmin^{2}}$. + The data (E08) comes in the form of several two point statistics which are relevant to this study., The data (F08) comes in the form of several two point statistics which are relevant to this study. + We choose to utilise the LE correlation Function which is shown in Equation and displayed: along with the cosmological best fit in Figure 4.., We choose to utilise the E correlation function which is shown in Equation and displayed along with the cosmological best fit in Figure \ref{fig:paper_E_correlation}. +" As lor the aperture mass and shear top hat variance «[52 two point statistics this is a weighted transform of the convergence power spectrum.", As for the aperture mass $< \! M^{2}_{\mathrm{ap}} \!>$ and shear top hat variance $<|\gamma|^{2}>$ two point statistics this is a weighted transform of the convergence power spectrum. + In this case it is given by a zeroth order Bessel function of the first kind Jy., In this case it is given by a zeroth order Bessel function of the first kind $J_{0}$. + lt dis in this way that the two point functions vary in their sensitivity to. various aspects of the power spectrum and in turn any svstematios., It is in this way that the two point functions vary in their sensitivity to various aspects of the power spectrum and in turn any systematics. +£e sullers [from a constant olfset resulting from a mixing of E and. D-mocdes.,$\xi_{E}$ suffers from a constant offset resulting from a mixing of E and B-modes. + A finite survey size introduces a maximum angular scale which prevents a complete calculation of the shear correlation function over larger ranges., A finite survey size introduces a maximum angular scale which prevents a complete calculation of the shear correlation function over larger ranges. + This is needed. for a separation of I5 and B (?).., This is needed for a separation of E and B \citep{Kilbinger06}. + Yo alleviate this we alter the statistic £g to £g|6 including the constant ollset c as an extra. parameter., To alleviate this we alter the statistic $\xi_{E}$ to $\xi_{E} + c'$ including the constant offset $c'$ as an extra parameter. + An expression is then obtained for the olfset which represents the best fit ollset (d?de’= 0) for cach parameter choice., An expression is then obtained for the offset which represents the best fit offset $\mathrm{d} \chi^{2}/\mathrm{d} c' = 0$ ) for each parameter choice. + This constitutes an analytic mareinalisation over e (2).., This constitutes an analytic marginalisation over $c'$ \citep{Lewis02}. + We subsequently find the expression to be, We subsequently find the expression to be +aud is thus not able to account for two-body relaxation effects in granular media.,and is thus not able to account for two-body relaxation effects in granular media. + However. a certain degree of erauularitvis a inherent property of N-body svstemis.," However, a certain degree of granularity is a inherent property of $N$ -body systems." + This may then lead to discrepancies. expecially iu the unstable interval of negative specific heat. where ράσο trausitious may be sensitive to s1all scale plivsics.," This may then lead to discrepancies, especially in the unstable interval of negative specific heat, where phase transitions may be sensitive to small scale physics." + Whereas thermostatistics is too smooth to account for muicroscopic physics in eranular seltf-eravitatiug media such as the interstellar eas. two-body relaxation is often too strong in N-body system due to computational limitations.," Whereas thermostatistics is too smooth to account for microscopic physics in granular self-gravitating media such as the interstellar gas, two-body relaxation is often too strong in $N$ -body system due to computational limitations." +. Especially. in. high. force. resolution. simulationsN. the force resolution. is. lareer. than the mass Boghosian resolution., Especially in high force resolution simulations where the force resolution is larger than the mass resolution. + We refer to this iu Sect., We refer to this in Sect. + 6.1 where we discuss. amoung other thines. the effect of the eramularity on lone-range correlations appearing iu the interval of negativo specific heat.," \ref{corr} where we discuss, among other things, the effect of the granularity on long-range correlations appearing in the interval of negative specific heat." + A further discrepancy between nature. analytical models and N-body models may be due to the eutropy used in eravo-thermal statistics (Tara Sakagaii 900111.," A further discrepancy between nature, analytical models and $N$ -body models may be due to the entropy used in gravo-thermal statistics (Taruya Sakagami \cite{Taruya01}) )." + Iudeed. the entropy used in analytical models to find equilibrimm states via the maxinuun eutropy principle is the extensive Boltzmaun-Cabbs eutropy. that is im fact not applicable for nou-exteusive sclf-eravitating svsteuis.," Indeed, the entropy used in analytical models to find equilibrium states via the maximum entropy principle is the extensive Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy, that is in fact not applicable for non-extensive self-gravitating systems." + Generalized thermostatistics includiug nou-exteusivitv are currently developed (Tsallis L98s8:: Sumivosli 2001:: Latora et al. 2001:, Generalized thermostatistics including non-extensivity are currently developed (Tsallis \cite{Tsallis88}; ; Sumiyoshi \cite{Sumiyoshi01}; Latora et al. \cite{Latora01}; + Leubner 20013)., Leubner \cite{Leubner01}) ). + These formalis sugeest that non-extcusivity changes not all but some of1 the ∖classical thermodynamical∖⋅ry):EM resultsou: (PsallisNNje ΤοΟΟ..1999: 1999)).2⊾d. 1€ which agrees“Wye with∢⊾⋅∖∖↴ ourEM findings.," These formalisms suggest that non-extensivity changes not all but some of the classical thermodynamical results (Tsallis \cite{Tsallis99}; Boghosian \cite{Boghosian99}) ), which agrees with our findings." + 1ναιwhere Because currently it is a priori uot known which thermostatistical properties change i non-cxteusive svstenis aud cousisteut theoretical tools are not available. analytical results mustbe considered with caution.," Because currently it is a priori not known which thermostatistical properties change in non-extensive systems and consistent theoretical tools are not available, analytical results mustbe considered with caution." +tidal forces are time-dependeut and can vary ercatly depending on the orbital phase.,tidal forces are time-dependent and can vary greatly depending on the orbital phase. + Here. we show that despite the large tidal forces at periastrou. our boundary conditions are well suited for the imodeliug of such systems.," Here, we show that despite the large tidal forces at periastron, our boundary conditions are well suited for the modeling of such systems." + The system we model consists of two maisequence stars with massesof 1.10 and 1.50 AD. with au eccentricity of e=0.15 aud evolved for over four orbits {Port—Ll code units)., The system we model consists of two main-sequence stars with massesof $1.40$ and $1.50$ $_{\odot}$ with an eccentricity of $e=0.15$ and evolved for over four orbits $P_{\textrm{orb}}\simeq 44$ code units). + The total uuuber of particles nears ~500.000 aud the location of the boundary is at ~75% of the stars radius. which. as shown in Fieure S. is deep inside the star so that the effects of tidal force are negligible.," The total number of particles nears $\sim500,000$ and the location of the boundary is at $\sim75\%$ of the stars' radius, which, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:encmass}, is deep inside the star so that the effects of tidal force are negligible." + Iudeed. Figure 8. shows the radius of the primary euclosiug differcut fractious of the total bound ass (m SPIT particles) as a fiction of time for our binary svsteu.," Indeed, Figure \ref{fig:encmass} shows the radius of the primary enclosing different fractions of the total bound mass (in SPH particles) as a function of time for our binary system." + For example. the radii coutaimineg GU to 90% of the total bound mass are shown to not changeX significantly during the whole duration of this simulation.," For example, the radii containing $60\%$ to $90\%$ of the total bound mass are shown to not change significantly during the whole duration of this simulation." + Iu fact. only the outer radius of the star. containing over 95% of the bound mass. oscillates ching each orbit.," In fact, only the outer radius of the star, containing over $95\%$ of the bound mass, oscillates during each orbit." + Therefore. in this case. the choice of the locaion of the boundary (dotted line} is well justified aud Figure 8. shows jii the use of our method for ecceatric binaries is acequate.," Therefore, in this case, the choice of the location of the boundary (dotted line) is well justified and Figure \ref{fig:encmass} + shows that the use of our method for eccentric binaries is adequate." + Replacing the core of a star with a ceutral poi ifagnass aud a boundary remains avaid approxinatiou asx long as the boundary is deep enough inside the cuveope of the star., Replacing the core of a star with a central point mass and a boundary remains a valid approximation as long as the boundary is deep enough inside the envelope of the star. + We now present the results from the simulation prescuted in 6 .3.., We now present the results from the simulation presented in $\S$ \ref{sect:eccentric}. . + In particular. we are interested iu the lass trauster rates observed alone the eccentric orbit.," In particular, we are interested in the mass transfer rates observed along the eccentric orbit." +function on Nyy for nine of the strongest les. assunius a carbon abunudauce of |C/II|2-2.5 aud a relative abundance pattern similar to that observed in population IT stars.,"function on $N_{\rm HI}$ for nine of the strongest lines, assuming a carbon abundance of [C/H]=-2.5 and a relative abundance pattern similar to that observed in population II stars." +" A more exhaustive list of lines is presented in [11]. which also discusses the dependence of the LOX on :. O5. aud the normalization of the radiation field J,."," A more exhaustive list of lines is presented in \cite{hel97b}, which also discusses the dependence of the LOX on $z$, $\Omega _b$, and the normalization of the radiation field $J_{\nu}$." + This dependence is weak. aud the following predictious are believed to hold rather ecuerally in cosmological models of the forest:," This dependence is weak, and the following predictions are believed to hold rather generally in cosmological models of the forest:" +et al,et al. + as members of the Virgo cluster we assign thei a distance of 17 AIpe., as members of the Virgo cluster we assign them a distance of 17 Mpc. + These three galaxies are reported in figure 2b., These three galaxies are reported in figure 2b. + For the most luminous (F12212|0919) the upper Πατ of Foo/Fu.2 is compatible with the general treud. the two faint Virgo dwarfs clearly disagree.," For the most luminous (F12242+0919) the upper limit of $\rm F_{60}/F_{0.2}$ is compatible with the general trend, the two faint Virgo dwarfs clearly disagree." + Due to their füutuess not much information is available for thoi. F12259|LIT is classified as dE and F12235|0911 dE or Du. A large FIR to UV ratio is not expected for elliptical ealaxies. therefore these objects are probably not dE. We will see in section 6 that even the most FIR bright aud extincted objects known in the Universe follow aud exteud he trend found in figure 2b so the behavior of these two objects is difficult to wuclerstae.," Due to their faintness not much information is available for them, F12259+1141 is classified as dE and F12235+0914 dE or Im. A large FIR to UV ratio is not expected for elliptical galaxies, therefore these objects are probably not dE. We will see in section 6 that even the most FIR bright and extincted objects known in the Universe follow and extend the trend found in figure 2b so the behavior of these two objects is difficult to understand." + We can try to estimate an extinction for the objects isted iu able 2., We can try to estimate an extinction for the objects listed in table 2. + Ouly two (F12011165]9. F13011|2907) aave been detecος at oth GO aud 100422. For these wo galaxies we have he FIR fux to estimate the UV extinction (a lower lait for F13011]2907) using the oruula {οπιοαι] fit) established in section 3.1.," Only two (F12041+6519, F13041+2907) have been detected at both 60 and $\mu$ m. For these two galaxies we have the FIR flux to estimate the UV extinction (a lower limit for F13041+2907) using the formula (polynomial fit) established in section 3.1." + For the eaOs:axies rot detected at LOO µ i we estimate arbitrarily lis flux such as fooπου=0.3 which is imutermediate jetween the values for warni aixl cool dust (Lousdale Uelou 1987)). i£ this value is incompatible witi the upper indt. we adopt the upper lait.," For the galaxies not detected at 100 $\mu$ m we estimate arbitrarily this flux such as $\rm f_{60}/f_{100}=0.3$ which is intermediate between the values for warm and cool dust (Lonsdale Helou \cite{lonsdale}) ), if this value is incompatible with the upper limit, we adopt the upper limit." + The extinctions are listed iu table 2., The extinctions are listed in table 2. + Adopting the relation of Meurer et al., Adopting the relation of Meurer et al. + leads to extinctions larger by 0.1L mae., leads to extinctions larger by 0.4 mag. + Three galaxies have a UV extinction huger than 3.5 mae. they are the two objects without any optical identification aud the faintest ealaxy of the table 2 detected in D. The three other cases (two non detectious and the uncertzn one) are less extreme (apyον2.5 mae).," Three galaxies have a UV extinction larger than 3.5 mag, they are the two objects without any optical identification and the faintest galaxy of the table 2 detected in B. The three other cases (two non detections and the uncertain one) are less extreme $\rm a_{UV}>\sim 2.5 ~mag$ )." + Note that the upper limits found for these galaxies are compatible with the values fouud for some galaxies of the IRAS/FOCAÀ sample (figures 2)., Note that the upper limits found for these galaxies are compatible with the values found for some galaxies of the IRAS/FOCA sample (figures 2). + For example the two most extincted galaxies of our sample. namely M82 aud IC732. have a UV extinction larger than 5 mae and a Foo/Eo» ratio larger than 2 in log unit.," For example the two most extincted galaxies of our sample, namely M82 and IC732, have a UV extinction larger than 5 mag and a $\rm F_{60}/F_{0.2}$ ratio larger than 2 in log unit." +WII Jised+24: Galactic nebulositv.,WHI J1824+24: Galactic nebulosity. + Measurements are given for a ringlike structure. connected to more wisps going olf the edge of the field.," Measurements are given for a ringlike structure, connected to more wisps going off the edge of the field." + This is conceivably a PN., This is conceivably a PN. + WII J132314-24: Mottled Galactic nebulosity with distant galaxies in the background., WHI J1831+24: Mottled Galactic nebulosity with distant galaxies in the background. + COMAW 5-577172: Multiarmed spiral galaxy. behind a lot of Galactic stars.," CGMW 5-5772: Multiarmed spiral galaxy, behind a lot of Galactic stars." + WII JiStd4+28: A wisp of Galactic nebulositv., WHI J1844+28: A wisp of Galactic nebulosity. + There is more in the field as well as leading out of it: (Bis is the most coherent. compact part.," There is more in the field as well as leading out of it; this is the most coherent, compact part." + WII J18562-52: Very faint. (wo wisps of nebulosity forming a part of a circle.," WHI J1856+52: Very faint, two wisps of nebulosity forming a part of a circle." + Although it is not much (Gf anv) brighter than flat-fielding residuals. observations at (wo different observing runs eive (he same shape and surface brightness.," Although it is not much (if any) brighter than flat-fielding residuals, observations at two different observing runs give the same shape and surface brightness." + WII J1359--45: A few wisps which might outline a larger area of galactic nebulosity., WHI J1859+45: A few wisps which might outline a larger area of galactic nebulosity. + WII J19092-50: Galactic nebulosity., WHI J1909+50: Galactic nebulosity. + WII J1913+41: The brightest bit of Galactic nebulosity whieh just about fills the field., WHI J1913+41: The brightest bit of Galactic nebulosity which just about fills the field. + The main uncertainty in surface brightness comes from not knowing what is skv ancl what is fainter nebulosity., The main uncertainty in surface brightness comes from not knowing what is sky and what is fainter nebulosity. + WII J1919--44: Very nice bipolar PN., WHI J1919+44: Very nice bipolar PN. + WII J1932+08: Face-on spiral. with a central bar (accentuated by a guiding error in our follow-up image).," WHI J1932+08: Face-on spiral, with a central bar (accentuated by a guiding error in our follow-up image)." + WII J19334-55: A roundish piece of nebulosity., WHI J1933+55: A roundish piece of nebulosity. + WII J1945+22: Large. [aint nebulositv.," WHI J1945+22: Large, faint nebulosity." + Due to the high star density. the surface brightness measurements are even more uncertain than usual.," Due to the high star density, the surface brightness measurements are even more uncertain than usual." + WII J20044-64: Swirls of Galactie nebulositv., WHI J2004+64: Swirls of Galactic nebulosity. + Little or no Ila., Little or no $\alpha$. + WIL J20242-52: A voundish bit of Galactic nebulositv., WHI J2024+52: A roundish bit of Galactic nebulosity. + Crowcded field., Crowded field. + WII J20314-00: Oval bit of Galactic nebulositv., WHI J2031+00: Oval bit of Galactic nebulosity. + ZOAG (G093.12--08.90: A [ace-on. extineted spiral galaxy.," ZOAG G093.12+08.90: A face-on, extincted spiral galaxy." + There are wisps of Galactic nebulosity within a few are minutes., There are wisps of Galactic nebulosity within a few arc minutes. + IXIXR99-59: A diffuse. oval object. catalogued by Narachentsevοἱal.(1999). as a probable nearby dwarf galaxyv.," KKR99-59: A diffuse, oval object, catalogued by \citet{KKR99} as a probable nearby dwarf galaxy." + Is morphology here. together with the [act that it has apparently not been seen in HI by Iluchtmeieretal.(2000a) nor in lla. bv. (2003).. lead us to believe it to be Galactic reflection nebulositv.," Its morphology here, together with the fact that it has apparently not been seen in HI by \citet{HKK00} nor in $\alpha$ by \citet{MKB03}, lead us to believe it to be Galactic reflection nebulosity." + WII J2125+44: Bright (and near a bright star)., WHI J2125+44: Bright (and near a bright star). + Probably a barred spiral. but. possibly," Probably a barred spiral, but possibly" +The cosmic microwave background (CMB) was discovered by Penzias and Wilson (1965).,The cosmic microwave background (CMB) was discovered by Penzias and Wilson (1965). + Unique information about the earliest phases of the evolution of the Universe can be derived from CMB temperature and polarization maps., Unique information about the earliest phases of the evolution of the Universe can be derived from CMB temperature and polarization maps. + Since its discovery. tremendous effort has been made to improve the CMB maps.," Since its discovery, tremendous effort has been made to improve the CMB maps." + Significant improvement has been made with the ongoing ASA (WMAP. Benet et al.," Significant improvement has been made with the ongoing NASA (WMAP, Bennet et al." + 2003a). and with the Planck mission. launched in Ίαν 2009. it is expected that the sensitivity and angular resolution of the CMB maps will be improved by more than an order of magnitude.," 2003a), and with the Planck mission, launched in May 2009, it is expected that the sensitivity and angular resolution of the CMB maps will be improved by more than an order of magnitude." + Unfortunately. the cosmological CMB signal is always mixed with emission from the Milky Way (synchrotron. free-free. and thermal dust emission).," Unfortunately, the cosmological CMB signal is always mixed with emission from the Milky Way (synchrotron, free-free, and thermal dust emission)." + To extract the background cosmological information. it is essential to remove the galactic foregrounds without introducing systematic errors.," To extract the background cosmological information, it is essential to remove the galactic foregrounds without introducing systematic errors." + Several algorithms have been developed to solve this key issue in CMB research., Several algorithms have been developed to solve this key issue in CMB research. + A comprehensive review is given by Delabrouille and Cardoso (2007)., A comprehensive review is given by Delabrouille and Cardoso (2007). + Of course. it is most desirable that the method for removing the galactic foregrounds produces both a power spectrum and a CMB map with insignificant systematic errors.," Of course, it is most desirable that the method for removing the galactic foregrounds produces both a power spectrum and a CMB map with insignificant systematic errors." + For the Planck mission. 1t is an important requirement. since one of the main scientific goals is to search for non-Gaussian features in the CMB maps.," For the Planck mission, it is an important requirement, since one of the main scientific goals is to search for non-Gaussian features in the CMB maps." + A lot of signals of individual sky pixels are averaged in order to derive the power spectrum. therefore. the crucial issue is not so much to minimize the random errors per sky pixel. but to minimize the systematic errors in the CMB map as a whole.," A lot of signals of individual sky pixels are averaged in order to derive the power spectrum, therefore, the crucial issue is not so much to minimize the random errors per sky pixel, but to minimize the systematic errors in the CMB map as a whole." + From the FIRAS instrument onboard the COBE satellite. it is known that the CMB spectrum follows a black body spectrum very closely (Mather et al.," From the FIRAS instrument onboard the COBE satellite, it is known that the CMB spectrum follows a black body spectrum very closely (Mather et al." + 1999)., 1999). + Fortunately. all known non-cosmological signals have very different spectral behaviour from a black body.," Fortunately, all known non-cosmological signals have very different spectral behaviour from a black body." + It is thus possible to disentangle the different components of the microwave signals., It is thus possible to disentangle the different components of the microwave signals. + The obtained accuracy will. of course. depend on the observational errors and frequency coverage of the data available.," The obtained accuracy will, of course, depend on the observational errors and frequency coverage of the data available." + The ESA Planck mission was successfully launched in May 2009. and all systems have been working according to expectations ever since.," The ESA Planck mission was successfully launched in May 2009, and all systems have been working according to expectations ever since." + An important part of the preparation of the mission has been evaluation of the available galactic foreground removal algorithms. based on detailed simulations. called the (PSM).," An important part of the preparation of the mission has been evaluation of the available galactic foreground removal algorithms, based on detailed simulations, called the (PSM)." + This work was done by Planck Working Group 2. coordinated by J. Delabrouille and G. de Zotti.," This work was done by Planck Working Group 2, coordinated by J. Delabrouille and G. de Zotti." + Comparisons of the 8 investigated methods can be found in Leach et ((2008)., Comparisons of the 8 investigated methods can be found in Leach et (2008). + Norgaard-ielsen. and Jorgensen (2008. hereafter NNJ) have shown that with observational errors as expected from the Planck satellite. reasonable assumptions about the spectral behaviour of the galactic foregrounds. it is possible to use simple neural networks to extract the CMB temperature signal with negligible systematic errors.," rgaard-Nielsen and rgensen (2008, hereafter NNJ) have shown that with observational errors as expected from the Planck satellite, reasonable assumptions about the spectral behaviour of the galactic foregrounds, it is possible to use simple neural networks to extract the CMB temperature signal with negligible systematic errors." + In the analysis of the same PSM data às used by Leach et al.((2008). Norgaard-Nielsen and Hebert (2009. hereafter NNH) have shown that neural networks can also significantly improve the removal of systematic errors in the CMB temperature determination for imaging data.," In the analysis of the same PSM data as used by Leach et (2008), rgaard-Nielsen and Hebert (2009, hereafter NNH) have shown that neural networks can also significantly improve the removal of systematic errors in the CMB temperature determination for imaging data." + An analysis of the WMAP 5yr data Is presented here to show the improvement produced by neural networks. also for real observed data.," An analysis of the WMAP 5yr data is presented here to show the improvement produced by neural networks, also for real observed data." + It is basically the same method as in NNJ and NNH. so the neural network references can be found there.," It is basically the same method as in NNJ and NNH, so the neural network references can be found there." + The frequency maps obtained during the first 5 years of the WMAP mission (K. Ka. Q. V. W. centred at 22GHz. 33GHz. 41GHz. 61GHz. 94GHz. respectively) were taken from the official WMAP website:Anap/eurrent/m_products.," The frequency maps obtained during the first 5 years of the WMAP mission (K, Ka, Q, V, W, centred at 23GHz, 33GHz, 41GHz, 61GHz, 94GHz, respectively) were taken from the official WMAP website:." +cfit.. The PSM maps were taken from the Planck Working Group 2 Challenge-2 ftp area:2/PSM-maps., The PSM maps were taken from the Planck Working Group 2 Challenge-2 ftp area:. +v0.. PSM exposures maps (expected hits per sky pixel) are also provided., PSM exposures maps (expected hits per sky pixel) are also provided. + In order to derive noise maps for each frequency the algorithm given at the WMAP website hàs been used. assuming that the noise is Gaussianly distributed.," In order to derive noise maps for each frequency the algorithm given at the WMAP website has been used, assuming that the noise is Gaussianly distributed." + For each of the WMAP frequencies and each of the components (CMB. synchrotron. free-free. thermal and spinning dust) PSM provides maps without observational errors and no corrections," For each of the WMAP frequencies and each of the components (CMB, synchrotron, free-free, thermal and spinning dust) PSM provides maps without observational errors and no corrections" +radii and temperatures. as well as My and (V—7) are nicely reproduced.,"radii and temperatures, as well as $M_V$ and $(V-I)$ are nicely reproduced." + For 12 Gyr the predicted radii start to be larger than observed. while in the other planes we obtain a good fit.," For 12 Gyr the predicted radii start to be larger than observed, while in the other planes we obtain a good fit." + Thus we consider 12 Gyr as an upper limit to the ASAS-04 age., Thus we consider 12 Gyr as an upper limit to the ASAS-04 age. + Note also that the BHAC98 model for 8 Gyr and the solar Z predicts the largest radit of all sets. despite predicting the lowest temperatures and luminosities.," Note also that the BHAC98 model for 8 Gyr and the solar $Z$ predicts the largest radii of all sets, despite predicting the lowest temperatures and luminosities." + The presented models suggest that the radius and temperature discrepancies may not be significant for older stars., The presented models suggest that the radius and temperature discrepancies may not be significant for older stars. + This seems to be supported by the recent discovery of à 0.88 + 0.86 M. evolved eclipsing binary in the famous globular cluster (Thompsonetal.2010)., This seems to be supported by the recent discovery of a 0.88 + 0.86 $_\odot$ evolved eclipsing binary in the famous globular cluster \citep{tho09}. +. Several sets of theoretical models succeeded to fit the observed radii and bolometric luminosities of this binary components with a single isochrone., Several sets of theoretical models succeeded to fit the observed radii and bolometric luminosities of this binary components with a single isochrone. + The estimated age was 11.3 Gyr and |Fe/H|2-0.70 was assumed., The estimated age was 11.3 Gyr and [Fe/H]=-0.70 was assumed. + Considering the similar masses of the ASAS-04 components we may expect that the almost perfect fits of¢>10 Gyr isochrones are plausible., Considering the similar masses of the ASAS-04 components we may expect that the almost perfect fits of $t>10$ Gyr isochrones are plausible. + From the discussion above. we can deduce the age of ASAS-04 to be 5-12 Gyr and the metal abundance between 0.008 and 0.02 with the ranges of 8—I1 Gyr and Z from 0.012 to ~0.018 be the most probable ones.," From the discussion above, we can deduce the age of ASAS-04 to be $5 - 12$ Gyr and the metal abundance between 0.008 and 0.02 with the ranges of $8 - 11$ Gyr and $Z$ from 0.012 to $\sim0.018$ be the most probable ones." + This makes, This makes +lo give where Q(r) is the total energv input to the wind.,to give where $Q(r)$ is the total energy input to the wind. + Since we are interested in the terminal velocity of the outflow. we choose a point above the heating shell where the energy has reached its steady state value where the energy is constant in Figure 3.. top panel) and integrate outwards using the energy ancl Mach number at this point to solve (11)) as an initial value problem.," Since we are interested in the terminal velocity of the outflow we choose a point above the heating shell where the energy has reached its steady state value where the energy is constant in Figure \ref{fig:nrmdoten}, top panel) and integrate outwards using the energy and Mach number at this point to solve \ref{eq:machno}) ) as an initial value problem." + Note that in [act the terminal velocity is determined by the (constant) value of the Bernoulli energy above, Note that in fact the terminal velocity is determined by the (constant) value of the Bernoulli energy above +number of bins ranging from 2 to 10.,number of bins ranging from 2 to 10. +" Roughly. one gets an idea of the distribution of the planet abundances with 6=3. but one can realistically only start talking about a ""planetary mass function"" for 625."," Roughly, one gets an idea of the distribution of the planet abundances with $b \geq 3$, but one can realistically only start talking about a “planetary mass function” for $b \geq 5$." +" While a planetary mass-radius-separation function yi)(ip.rp.ανAd.Z.7) depending on the stellar mass. metallicity. and age involves 6 parameters. less detailed ++parameter functions are e.g. the planetary mass-separation in,,ny.e:AL.Z) or mass radius function snasUpryM,Z) depending on stellar mass and metallicity. or a planetary mass-radius-separation function depending on stellar mass only. and 2-parameter functions would e.g. be the planetary mass function «τηνCn:M,) depending on stellar mass only. or the planetary mass-separation function ια(1.(1) irrespective of the stellar properties."," While a planetary mass-radius-separation function $\varphi_{m_\rmn{p},r_\rmn{p},a}(m_\rmn{p},r_\rmn{p},a;M_\star,Z,\tau)$ depending on the stellar mass, metallicity, and age involves 6 parameters, less detailed 4-parameter functions are e.g. the planetary mass-separation $\varphi_{m_\rmn{p},a}(m_\rmn{p},a;M_\star,Z)$ or mass radius function $\varphi_{m_\rmn{p},r_\rmn{p}}(m_\rmn{p},r_\rmn{p};M_\star,Z)$ depending on stellar mass and metallicity, or a planetary mass-radius-separation function depending on stellar mass only, and 2-parameter functions would e.g. be the planetary mass function $\varphi_{m_\rmn{p}}(m_\rmn{p};M_\star)$ depending on stellar mass only, or the planetary mass-separation function $\varphi_{m_\rmn{p},a}(m_\rmn{p},a)$ irrespective of the stellar properties." + We now have a total sample of about 450 planets orbiting stars other than the Sun. where it took about 10 years to detect the first 150. then about 3 years to detect the next 150. and then just about | year to detect the equal number of 150.," We now have a total sample of about 450 planets orbiting stars other than the Sun, where it took about 10 years to detect the first 150, then about 3 years to detect the next 150, and then just about 1 year to detect the equal number of 150." + Table 1. shows how long campaigns with a constant detection rate of 150 planets per year would have to last in order ο obtain the respective functions with desired accuracies., Table \ref{tab:nplanets} shows how long campaigns with a constant detection rate of 150 planets per year would have to last in order to obtain the respective functions with desired accuracies. + Right now. the collected data allow to measure. [-parameter 'unctions. find the basic structure structure ()ο 10) of 2-parameter ‘unctions. see basic trends (>= 3) in 4-parameter functions. and some hint on the dependency of the planet abundance on further »uameters.," Right now, the collected data allow to measure 1-parameter functions, find the basic structure structure $b \geq 10$ ) of 2-parameter functions, see basic trends $b \geq 3$ ) in 4-parameter functions, and some hint on the dependency of the planet abundance on further parameters." +" With 150 planets per year. or more realistically. a fair ""actor of this rate. rough ideas (> 2:5) of 4-parameter planetary mass functions (5 5) and an indication of trends (b. 3) ‘or 6-parameter planetary mass functions are obtainable within oreseeable time frames. but the numbers call for more aggressive searches."," With 150 planets per year, or more realistically, a fair factor of this rate, rough ideas $b \geq 5$ ) of 4-parameter planetary mass functions $b \geq 5$ ) and an indication of trends $b \geq 3$ ) for 6-parameter planetary mass functions are obtainable within foreseeable time frames, but the numbers call for more aggressive searches." +" While stars with and without planets have been distinguished by referring to the fraction f,CV...Z.7.O) of stars that host planets and defining the differential planetary mass-radius-orbit function «(Πριr0:M,Z.7.02) to relate to these only. a further statistic is the distribution of the number of planets amongst all planetary systems."," While stars with and without planets have been distinguished by referring to the fraction $f_\rmn{p}(M_\star,Z,\tau,\Omega)$ of stars that host planets and defining the differential planetary mass-radius-orbit function $\varphi(m_\rmn{p},r_\rmn{p},a,\varepsilon; M_\star, Z, \tau,\Omega)$ to relate to these only, a further statistic is the distribution of the number of planets amongst all planetary systems." + With multiplicity indices c; that denote the fraction of planetary systems containing & planets. where the planetary mass-radius-orbit function can be decomposed as where In general. all ji(mmyryec:Ad.Z.7.0) may be different.," With multiplicity indices $\zeta_k$ that denote the fraction of planetary systems containing $k$ planets, where the planetary mass-radius-orbit function can be decomposed as where In general, all $\hat{\varphi}_k(m_\rmn{p},r_\rmn{p},a,\varepsilon; M_\star, Z, \tau,\Omega)$ may be different." + Together with the multiplicity indices ος. one would be left with an infinite number of parameters.," Together with the multiplicity indices $\zeta_k$, one would be left with an infinite number of parameters." +" This however can be meaningfully avoided by adopting a functional dependence of ος and 4, on k that is described by a small finite number of parameters.", This however can be meaningfully avoided by adopting a functional dependence of $\zeta_k$ and $\hat{\varphi}_k$ on k that is described by a small finite number of parameters. +" In particular. one might want to distinguish stars with a single planets to multiple-planet systems. described by Qj (with l Gh gilmore:M.Z.T.QO). and In fact. ὁ have argued that there is evidence for 4, being different from yfunut-"," In particular, one might want to distinguish stars with a single planets to multiple-planet systems, described by $\zeta_1$ (with $\zeta_\rmn{mult} = 1-\zeta_1$ ), $\hat{\varphi}_1(m_\rmn{p},r_\rmn{p},a,\varepsilon; M_\star, Z, \tau,\Omega)$, and In fact, \citet{Wright} have argued that there is evidence for $\hat{\varphi}_1$ being different from $\hat{\varphi}_\rmn{mult}$." + The assessment of planetary multiplicity however poses a huge challenge for properly interpreting the observational data. given that our knowledge of the absence of further planets in observed systems is quite limited.," The assessment of planetary multiplicity however poses a huge challenge for properly interpreting the observational data, given that our knowledge of the absence of further planets in observed systems is quite limited." + If Hot Jupiters are considered lonely. whereas Neptune-mass planets are frequently found in multiple systems (22).. how much does this have to be attributed to the faet that observational techniques that report Hot Jupiters are insensitive to less massive planets. whereas if the sensitivity extends down to lower masses. other such planets are spotted rather easily?," If Hot Jupiters are considered lonely, whereas Neptune-mass planets are frequently found in multiple systems \citep{Mayor:abundance,HARPS:abundance2}, how much does this have to be attributed to the fact that observational techniques that report Hot Jupiters are insensitive to less massive planets, whereas if the sensitivity extends down to lower masses, other such planets are spotted rather easily?" + It is intriguing to see that observations of transit timing variations led to the suggestion of the presence of a 15 Earth-mass planet in the WASP-3 system (2). that was already Known to host a Hot Jupiter (2).., It is intriguing to see that observations of transit timing variations led to the suggestion of the presence of a 15 Earth-mass planet in the WASP-3 system \citep{MacPlanet} that was already known to host a Hot Jupiter \citep{WASP3}. + Planets reported by microlensing in particular cannot be claimed to be the only ones in the system. they were just the only ones that revealed their presence during a transient event.," Planets reported by microlensing in particular cannot be claimed to be the only ones in the system, they were just the only ones that revealed their presence during a transient event." + ? explicitly found that the acquired data do not exclude the presence of gas-giant planets at any separation orbiting the lens star, \citet{390further} explicitly found that the acquired data do not exclude the presence of gas-giant planets at any separation orbiting the lens star +Generally speaking. with these data it 1s not possible to firmly separate carbon-rich from oxygen-rich stars among our AGB candidates.,"Generally speaking, with these data it is not possible to firmly separate carbon-rich from oxygen-rich stars among our AGB candidates." + However. for such metal-poor galaxies we would expect to find carbon-rich stars at colors Jy—Koz1.5 (e.g.?.andreferencestherein). and a few stars with these colors are indeed present in all of our target galaxies.," However, for such metal-poor galaxies we would expect to find carbon-rich stars at colors $J_0-K_0\gtrsim1.5$ \citep[e.g.][and references therein]{kang06}, and a few stars with these colors are indeed present in all of our target galaxies." + We check whether our stellar samples contain dust enshrouded AGB stars., We check whether our stellar samples contain dust enshrouded AGB stars. + This kind of objects are extremely faint or undetected in the optical. very red at NIR wavelengths and thus not easily detectable in the J-band because of incompleteness effects in our observations.," This kind of objects are extremely faint or undetected in the optical, very red at NIR wavelengths and thus not easily detectable in the $J$ -band because of incompleteness effects in our observations." + For example. ? consider a sample of ~40 stellar clusters with a range of ages and metallicities in the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds.," For example, \citet{vanloon05} consider a sample of $\sim40$ stellar clusters with a range of ages and metallicities in the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds." + They find a total of about 30 dust enshrouded AGB stars in ~20 young and intermediate-age clusters., They find a total of about 30 dust enshrouded AGB stars in $\sim20$ young and intermediate-age clusters. + These stars are found at /-K>2.5. and have metallicities higher than [Fe/H|—0.9 dex.," These stars are found at $J-K>2.5$, and have metallicities higher than $=-0.9$ dex." + However. for clusters with ages and metallicities comparable to our target galaxies. no dust enshrouded AGB stars were detected.," However, for clusters with ages and metallicities comparable to our target galaxies, no dust enshrouded AGB stars were detected." + We thus do not expect a significant number of dust enshrouded stars to be present in our target galaxies., We thus do not expect a significant number of dust enshrouded stars to be present in our target galaxies. + We search for stars that have good K-band measurement but no J- counterpart. and find two such objects in CenA-dEI. none in $GC1319.1-4216 and one in ESO269-066.," We search for stars that have good $K$ -band measurement but no $J$ -band counterpart, and find two such objects in CenA-dE1, none in SGC1319.1-4216 and one in ESO269-066." + Of the mentioned sources. in CenA-dE] one is found slightly outside the limiting radius. while the second is close to the center but has a good measurement only for one of the two K-bands: in ESO269-066 the dust enshrouded candidate also has à bac measurement in one of the two bands.," Of the mentioned sources, in CenA-dE1 one is found slightly outside the limiting radius, while the second is close to the center but has a good measurement only for one of the two $K$ -bands; in ESO269-066 the dust enshrouded candidate also has a bad measurement in one of the two bands." + We thus mention that these are candidates but could just as well be unresolved background galaxies (see previous Sect.)., We thus mention that these are candidates but could just as well be unresolved background galaxies (see previous Sect.). + We can also look for additional AGB candidates by considering variability. which is an intrinsic. characteristic of luminous AGB stars.," We can also look for additional AGB candidates by considering variability, which is an intrinsic characteristic of luminous AGB stars." + For all of the target galaxies we have at least two observations 1n the K-band. so we use the difference between the stellar magnitudes at different epochs as a_ variability indicator.," For all of the target galaxies we have at least two observations in the $K$ -band, so we use the difference between the stellar magnitudes at different epochs as a variability indicator." + For a long period variable star. the typical maximum magnitude difference is ~O.1 to ~1.5 mag in the K-band. and the period is on the order of ~10°? days (seeforex-ample?.andreferences therein)..," For a long period variable star, the typical maximum magnitude difference is $\sim0.1$ to $\sim1.5$ mag in the $K$ -band, and the period is on the order of $\sim10^{2-3}$ days \citep[see for example][and references therein]{rejkuba03}." + We should thus expect to see variations of a few tens of a magnitude at most. given the observing timescales for our targets (see Tab. 2)).," We should thus expect to see variations of a few tens of a magnitude at most, given the observing timescales for our targets (see Tab. \ref{infonir}) )." + For CenA-dEI. there are three observations in the K-band due to one repeated observation.," For CenA-dE1, there are three observations in the $K$ -band due to one repeated observation." + There are 36 days between the first and the last one (see Tab. 2)).," There are 36 days between the first and the last one (see Tab. \ref{infonir}) )," + which are barely enough to put a lower limit on the number of possible long-period variables., which are barely enough to put a lower limit on the number of possible long-period variables. + We check whether there are variations between the different K-band observations. but find none.," We check whether there are variations between the different $K$ -band observations, but find none." + We then also check the whole combined list of sources. looking for stars that display a magnitude variation of more than 3 times the combined photometric errors of the individual measurements.," We then also check the whole combined list of sources, looking for stars that display a magnitude variation of more than 3 times the combined photometric errors of the individual measurements." + We find two additional variable sources that lie just below the lower limits of the AGB selection boxes. and thus include them in our AGB candidates list.," We find two additional variable sources that lie just below the lower limits of the AGB selection boxes, and thus include them in our AGB candidates list." + However. when checking them or the images we find that their profiles look like those of barely resolved background galaxies.," However, when checking them on the images we find that their profiles look like those of barely resolved background galaxies." + In Fig., In Fig. + 10. (upper panel) we display the A-band magnitude difference between the seconc and the third epochs. since these are the ones with better seeing. for all the candidate AGB stars except one. because it has a bad measurement in the second K-band observation.," \ref{variab} (upper panel) we display the $K$ -band magnitude difference between the second and the third epochs, since these are the ones with better seeing, for all the candidate AGB stars except one, because it has a bad measurement in the second $K$ -band observation." + Shown (1 green) are also the two likely background galaxies., Shown (in green) are also the two likely background galaxies. + The K-band observations of SGCI319.1-4216 were take 57 days apart. and three of the AGB candidates. display variability (blue dots in the central panel of Fig. 10)).," The $K$ -band observations of SGC1319.1-4216 were taken 57 days apart, and three of the AGB candidates display variability (blue dots in the central panel of Fig. \ref{variab}) )." + Whe considering the entire sample. two stars that lie just leftwards of the NIR selection box. and are found inside the optical selectio box. are indeed variables exhibiting a luminosity change by more than 307 (green symbols).," When considering the entire sample, two stars that lie just leftwards of the NIR selection box, and are found inside the optical selection box, are indeed variables exhibiting a luminosity change by more than $3\sigma$ (green symbols)." + We add the two latter to the number of candidate AGB stars for SGCI319.1-4216 (anc report them in the electronic version of Tab. 3))., We add the two latter to the number of candidate AGB stars for SGC1319.1-4216 (and report them in the electronic version of Tab. \ref{agb_list}) ). + Also in this, Also in this +1851 and NGC 1904.,1851 and NGC 1904. +" These clusters were selected for being located at r=16.7 and 18.8 kpc from the galactic center, respectively."," These clusters were selected for being located at r=16.7 and 18.8 kpc from the galactic center, respectively." +" Compared to the other globular clusters studied so far, NGC 1851 and NGC 1904 are approximately twice as distant from the Milky Way center."," Compared to the other globular clusters studied so far, NGC 1851 and NGC 1904 are approximately twice as distant from the Milky Way center." +" Thus are experiencing a tidal heating, proportional to , about one order of magnitude smaller, making its effects negligible."," Thus are experiencing a tidal heating, proportional to $r^{-3}$, about one order of magnitude smaller, making its effects negligible." +" The initial selection of targets was based on their color, as derived from the analysis of ESO Imaging Survey frames and ESO 2.2m Wide Field Imager data."," The initial selection of targets was based on their color, as derived from the analysis of ESO Imaging Survey frames and ESO 2.2m Wide Field Imager data." +" Targets have been selected requiring color difference from the cluster main sequence V-1I«0.05 and V—I<0.1, and apparent magnitude of 19>m18 and 19>m17, respectively for NGC 1851 and 1904."," Targets have been selected requiring color difference from the cluster main sequence $V-I<0.05$ and $V-I<0.1$, and apparent magnitude of $19>m>18$ and $19>m>17$, respectively for NGC 1851 and 1904." + The cut in luminosity was made close to the base of the giant branch to probe the cluster stellar population in a well populated region to ensure good probability to find cluster members at large distances from the cluster., The cut in luminosity was made close to the base of the giant branch to probe the cluster stellar population in a well populated region to ensure good probability to find cluster members at large distances from the cluster. +" Indeed, according to Milky Way stellar population models Vanhollebeke,Groenewegen,andGirardi(2009) we expect a contamination of only 0.029 and 0.118 stars per arcmin squared in the selected color-luminosity range."," Indeed, according to Milky Way stellar population models \cite{Vanhollebeke09} we expect a contamination of only 0.029 and 0.118 stars per arcmin squared in the selected color-luminosity range." + With this surface density we expect a contamination of about, With this surface density we expect a contamination of about +matter to [low from the voids towards the surrounding galaxy walls. implying coneentric shells of matter may collide.,"matter to flow from the voids towards the surrounding galaxy walls, implying concentric shells of matter may collide." + We therefore consider a model of a void surrounced bv àn overdense region., We therefore consider a model of a void surrounded by an overdense region. +" Within voids. due to the lower amount of matter than in the homogeneous background. the curvature of the space is negative. thus the explicit forms of mass (M) and curvature (expressed by the function. ZZ) are where Ady is the mass in the corresponding volume of the homogeneous universe lie. Aly=(4706Ac)2Porat? and Pots is the background density at the last scattering instant]. Al,=sAbaο 77. MS=03 kpe. a=12 kpc."," Within voids, due to the lower amount of matter than in the homogeneous background, the curvature of the space is negative, thus the explicit forms of mass $M$ ) and curvature (expressed by the function $E$ ) are where $M_0$ is the mass in the corresponding volume of the homogeneous universe [i.e. $M_0 = (4 \pi G /3c^2) \rho_{b,ls} r^3$ and $\rho_{b,ls}$ is the background density at the last scattering instant], $M_1 = 8 M_2 a^{-3} {\rm e}^{-3/2}$ , $M_2 = -0.3$ kpc, $a = 12$ kpc." +" where E,=4Esbeto ES=Ll1ο, ὁ= kpe."," where $E_1 = 4 E_2 b^{-2} {\rm e}^{-1}$, $E_2 = -1.1 \times 10^{-5}$, $b = 10.9$ kpc." + lt should. be noted. that other models οἱ voids are also possible even ones which do not evolve. from initial rarclactions but from condensation. ef. Mustapha&Lellaby (2001).," It should be noted that other models of voids are also possible – even ones which do not evolve from initial rarefactions but from condensation, cf. \citet{MH01}." +.. However. this particular void. model was chosen because it develops. as we will show. a shell crossing singularity.," However, this particular void model was chosen because it develops, as we will show, a shell crossing singularity." + As can bee seen for ro24 the mass distribution as well as the curvature is the same as in the homogeneous FLAW mioclels., As can bee seen for $r>24$ the mass distribution as well as the curvature is the same as in the homogeneous FLRW models. + These functions were used as an initial condition specified. at the last scattering instant., These functions were used as an initial condition specified at the last scattering instant. + The initial density distribution for these moccels is very close to the form given in the first panel of Fig L.., The initial density distribution for these models is very close to the form given in the first panel of Fig \ref{fig1}. + One can see here that the void region extends from Iz1.5Alper. and is surrounded by the galaxy wall which has à density up to twice the value of the void.," One can see here that the void region extends from $R\approx 1.5$, and is surrounded by the galaxy wall which has a density up to twice the value of the void." + We start the evolution of both. the pressurc-frec LemaittreTolman and the Lemaittre models from the same profile of mass and curvature clistributions., We start the evolution of both the pressure-free Lemaîttre–Tolman and the Lemaîttre models from the same profile of mass and curvature distributions. + The only discrepaney between these models is with the equation of state. which was chosen to be of a polvtropic form The polvtropic index is chosen to be η=3/2 which is the case of à mono-atomic gas.," The only discrepancy between these models is with the equation of state, which was chosen to be of a polytropic form The polytropic index is chosen to be $n =3/2$ which is the case of a mono-atomic gas." + This equation of state is à good approximation to deseribe degenerate star cores. giant gaseous planets. or even for rocky planets;," This equation of state is a good approximation to describe degenerate star cores, giant gaseous planets, or even for rocky planets." + Thus. although realistic conditions within high-density regions inside walls might lead to a more complicated dependence of pressure. this simple polvtropie equation of state can be treated as a σου first approximation to the problem considered in thisLeller.," Thus, although realistic conditions within high-density regions inside walls might lead to a more complicated dependence of pressure, this simple polytropic equation of state can be treated as a good first approximation to the problem considered in this." + The constant. Ix for the LemaitreTolman model. which is pressure-free. is A=0 and for Lemaittre moccl is chosen to be A=1.98Ott m? s. (," The constant K for the Lemaîttre–Tolman model, which is pressure-free, is $K=0$ and for Lemaîttre model is chosen to be $K = 1.98 \times 10^{14}$ $^2$ $^2$. (" +Sec. 71) ,Sec. \ref{evolution}) ) +and A—Los107 n So(Sec. ??))., and $K = 1.08 \times 10^{14}$ $^2$ $^2$ (Sec. \ref{acousticosc}) ). + These are very high values., These are very high values. + For comparison the ratio of standard pressure of ai (pare=101.325 kPa) to its density (pi;=1.202 m) αἱ O° C is approximately equal to 7.84101 mes?) , For comparison the ratio of standard pressure of air $p_{air} = 101.325$ kPa) to its density $\rho_{air} = 1.292$ $^3$ ) at $^{\circ}$ C is approximately equal to $7.84 \times 10^4$ $^2$ $^2$. +Sue values were chosen in order to better depict the influence of pressure gradients on the evolution of matter., Such values were chosen in order to better depict the influence of pressure gradients on the evolution of matter. + Llowever. even if such very stiff. equations of state are. emploved. their impact on the evolution is visible only when density eradients become large.," However, even if such very stiff equations of state are employed, their impact on the evolution is visible only when density gradients become large." + Phus. the incorporation of this gradient of pressure mostly. affects only regions where the shell crossing singularities would occur.," Thus, the incorporation of this gradient of pressure mostly affects only regions where the shell crossing singularities would occur." + The algorithm which is used to calculate the evolution in the LemaittreTolman model is the same asthe one used, The algorithm which is used to calculate the evolution in the Lemaîttre–Tolman model is the same asthe one used +and z>8.0 compared to that of Pen99.,and $z > 8.0$ compared to that of Pen99. + We note that the error in our method decreases steadily with redshift approaching «0.014 at z=1100., We note that the error in our method decreases steadily with redshift approaching $< 0.014$ at $z=1100$. +" In comparison, for high redshifts, Pen99 error always stays ~ and does not decrease appreciably."," In comparison, for high redshifts, Pen99 error always stays $\sim$ and does not decrease appreciably." + A contour plot of AE based on the method of Pen99 with various z and Qa is shown in figure 2.., A contour plot of $\Delta E$ based on the method of Pen99 with various $z$ and $\Omega_\Lambda$ is shown in figure \ref{ContourPen}. . + Relatively complicated distribution of variations in the AE can be seen for the parameter space characterized by z and Qa., Relatively complicated distribution of variations in the $\Delta E$ can be seen for the parameter space characterized by $z$ and $\Omega_\Lambda$. +" However, a contour plot of AE for our method, whichis shown in Figure 3,, 5.."," However, a contour plot of $\Delta E$ for our method, whichis shown in Figure \ref{ContourWick}, \ref{HistoPenWick}." +consider the combination of three dillerent. requirements on them: Note that over the Galaxy. as a whole. the requirement on 0 only allects the distribution in 0 and the requirement on J only alfects the distribution in J the two distributions can be thought of asindependent?.,"consider the combination of three different requirements on them: Note that over the Galaxy as a whole, the requirement on $\bolth$ only affects the distribution in $\bolth$ and the requirement on $\bolJ$ only affects the distribution in $\bolJ$ – the two distributions can be thought of as." +. It is only because of the finite survey. volume. and therefore the finite range of 0 for which stars with for a given J will be observed. that. the J condition significantly allects the observed 9 distribution (and vice versa)," It is only because of the finite survey volume, and therefore the finite range of $\bolth$ for which stars with for a given $\bolJ$ will be observed, that the $\bolJ$ condition significantly affects the observed $\bolth$ distribution (and vice versa)." +" In Figure 10. I plot the density of the GCS stars as a function of JL, and J).", In Figure \ref{fig:actions} I plot the density of the GCS stars as a function of $J_\phi$ and $J_r$. + The density of stars in my phase- model is also plotted. for comparison.," The density of stars in my phase-mixed model is also plotted, for comparison." +" For a given J,, there is a minimum 4,νι lor stars to reach the Solar neighbourhood. which can be thought of as a mininiun epievelic amplitude for a given guiding centreraclius*."," For a given $J_\phi$ there is a minimum $J_r=J_{r,min}$ for stars to reach the Solar neighbourhood, which can be thought of as a minimum epicyclic amplitude for a given guiding centre." +. This is the cause of the near-parabolie lower boundary scen in ligure 10.., This is the cause of the near-parabolic lower boundary seen in Figure \ref{fig:actions}. + Phe Pleiades and Sirius moving groups can be clearly. seen as small overdensities in this plot., The Pleiades and Sirius moving groups can be clearly seen as small overdensities in this plot. +" The Lyacles moving group is seen as a rather more spread out overdensity al à range of J,. around. J;,0.97.75,4. tending towards slightly lower J, with increasing ο."," The Hyades moving group is seen as a rather more spread out overdensity at a range of $J_r$ , around $J_\phi=0.97J_{\phi,0}$, tending towards slightly lower $J_\phi$ with increasing $J_r$ ." +" The dotted ancl dashed. lines in Figure LO are 2:1 OLI and ILR lines respectively. these are lines along which 20,(J)|OF)=20, and 20,(J)Q,(J)=20, respectively. for cillerent values of £3. the perturber pattern speed. chosen such that the resonance lines reach J;=0 at J,ο.1. or Lido."," The dotted and dashed lines in Figure \ref{fig:actions} + are 2:1 OLR and ILR lines respectively, these are lines along which $2\Omega_\phi(\bolJ)+\Omega_r(\bolJ)=2\Omega_p$ and $2\Omega_\phi(\bolJ)-\Omega_r(\bolJ)=2\Omega_p$ respectively, for different values of $\Omega_p$, the perturber pattern speed, chosen such that the resonance lines reach $J_r=0$ at $J_\phi=0.9,\,1$, or $1.1J_{\phi,0}$." +" Changing the value of Ον moves the resonance lines in -/,,. but does not significantly alter their &eracient in this range of J."," Changing the value of $\Omega_p$ moves the resonance lines in $J_\phi$, but does not significantly alter their gradient in this range of $\bolJ$." + The Livacdes overdensity seems o lie around a Lindblad. resonance line. but this could. be either an OLR or LR bine it was this [act which lead SLO to claim this was an Lindblad resonance. but that one needed o investigate the distribution in angle to determine which one.," The Hyades overdensity seems to lie around a Lindblad resonance line, but this could be either an OLR or ILR line – it was this fact which lead S10 to claim this was an Lindblad resonance, but that one needed to investigate the distribution in angle to determine which one." + Other resonances the 3:1 or 4:1 OLR. or ILI lines would appear very similar on Figure 10.. though the 2:1 Η ine is the furthest from the vertical.," Other resonances – the 3:1 or 4:1 OLR or ILR lines – would appear very similar on Figure \ref{fig:actions}, though the 2:1 ILR line is the furthest from the vertical." + It is also worth noting hat the slope of the various resonance lines is sensitive to he Galactic potential in a logarithmic potential (of the kind. used by SLO). the gradients of the 2:1 OLR and ILH ines in this part of J-space are nearly identical.," It is also worth noting that the slope of the various resonance lines is sensitive to the Galactic potential – in a logarithmic potential (of the kind used by S10), the gradients of the 2:1 OLR and ILR lines in this part of $\bolJ$ -space are nearly identical." + Lt may »f possible to use the slope of resonance lines in action space to provide information about the Galactic potential by comparing them to observed dynamical substructure. but that is bevond the scope of this study.," It may be possible to use the slope of resonance lines in action space to provide information about the Galactic potential by comparing them to observed dynamical substructure, but that is beyond the scope of this study." +" ‘To explore the expected distribution of stars in the Solar neighbourhood associated with a resonance. E consider a rrelated to the phase-mixecl uusecl previously. adjusted to include a resonant component: where fy is the distribution. function. described. in Section 3.. €' is a constant chosen such that the resonant component contributes S percent of the stars observed. in the Solar neighbourhood. and Jos is a function of J, and is chosen such that LOAdae)dΠοdies)=const. lor J.=0. andl 0,,,; is a function of ϐ,, and is chosen such that IB,s|me,=const."," To explore the expected distribution of stars in the Solar neighbourhood associated with a resonance, I consider a related to the phase-mixed used previously, adjusted to include a resonant component: where $f_0$ is the distribution function described in Section \ref{sec:num}, , $C$ is a constant chosen such that the resonant component contributes $8$ percent of the stars observed in the Solar neighbourhood, and $J_{\phi,res}$ is a function of $J_r$ and is chosen such that $l\Omega_r(J_r,J_{\phi,res})+m\Omega_\phi(J_r,J_{\phi,res}) += const$, for $J_z=0$, and $\theta_{r,res}$ is a function of $\theta_\phi$ and is chosen such that $l\theta_{r,res}+m\theta_\phi = const$." +" The values Ay. and Ap... give the width of the resonance peak around the exact resonance lines in JJ, and 8,.. respectively."," The values $\Delta_{J,res}$ and $\Delta_{\theta,res}$ give the width of the resonance peak around the exact resonance lines in $J_\phi$ and $\theta_r$, respectively." +" One could. equally. describe the width in action or angle in terms of a spread in J, or 6,, respectively. but for convenience I have chosen to describe it in terms of the coordinates with the e&reater ranges of values in these data."," One could, equally, describe the width in action or angle in terms of a spread in $J_r$ or $\theta_\phi$ respectively, but for convenience I have chosen to describe it in terms of the coordinates with the greater ranges of values in these data." + Phe width Avy. is ellectivelv a width in frequency about the pattern speed. of the perturber.," The width $\Delta_{J,res}$ is effectively a width in frequency about the pattern speed of the perturber." + 1n the toy models E show here E take Avy.=0.014. Noes=0.3.," In the toy models I show here I take $\Delta_{J,res}=0.01J_{\phi,0}$ , $\Delta_{\theta,res}=0.3$." + ] consider two toy models. cach designed. to. produce models with an overdensitv in phase-space in a similar volume to that where the ναός moving group is found (but not tuned to produce abest fit). one corresponding to an OLR (/=I. m= 2) and one corresponding to an ILI (= —]l1.m —2).," I consider two toy models, each designed to produce models with an overdensity in phase-space in a similar volume to that where the Hyades moving group is found (but not tuned to produce abest fit), one corresponding to an OLR $l=1$, $m=2$ ) and one corresponding to an ILR $l=-1$, $m=2$ )." +" For the OLR model. E take 6...|26,= 1.9. and for the ILIt mocel 06,,,;|24,=13."," For the OLR model, I take $\theta_{r,res}+2\theta_\phi=-1.9$ , and for the ILR model $-\theta_{r,res}+2\theta_\phi=1.3$." +" In the OLI case L take JuC],=0)0.975.459. and in the ILB Case Ayal.m0)—03985.,,n."," In the OLR case I take $J_{\phi,res}(J_r=0)=0.975J_{\phi,0}$, and in the ILR case $J_{\phi,res}(J_r=0)=0.985J_{\phi,0}$." +" Figure LL shows contour plots of the density in the 8, 9,, plane of the OLR. and LLL models. and plots of 6,|n6,, (as in Figure 6)) restricted to 5»=#2 in the interests of brevity."," Figure \ref{fig:IOLR_mod_cont} + shows contour plots of the density in the $\theta_r$, $\theta_\phi$ plane of the OLR and ILR models, and plots of $\theta_r+n\theta_\phi$ (as in Figure \ref{fig:meat}) ) restricted to $n=\pm2$ in the interests of brevity." + Both the ILIt and OLI. models reproduce some of the features of the HIvades overdensity., Both the ILR and OLR models reproduce some of the features of the Hyades overdensity. + In. both cases the overdensity in angle space is somewhat triangular in shape. like the EIvades overdensity. rather than following a single line as one would expect if only the condition on angle (eq. 1))," In both cases the overdensity in angle space is somewhat triangular in shape, like the Hyades overdensity, rather than following a single line as one would expect if only the condition on angle (eq. \ref{eq:res}) )" + was relevant., was relevant. + In both cases the overdensity in angle is strong for the two cases mn=x2. as well for other values of n (not shown).," In both cases the overdensity in angle is strong for the two cases $n=\pm2$, as well for other values of $n$ (not shown)." +" In an elfort to explain the structure of the overdensity in the 6,.4,, plane. the upper panels of Figure 11. also show the lines 4,=6)... for the two models. and lines corresponding to the condition on J."," In an effort to explain the structure of the overdensity in the $\theta_r$, $\theta_\phi$ plane, the upper panels of Figure \ref{fig:IOLR_mod_cont} also show the lines $\theta_r=\theta_{r,res}$ for the two models, and lines corresponding to the condition on $\bolJ$." +" The latter are found by taking the condition that 1,=ενω.) Cor d,mhayesENpas OL Id=done.F2N es) ancl determining the two possible values of@ that a star with these actions would have at the Sun's position in the relevantpart of phase. space. lower values of J, correspond to smaller (ic. closer tozero) values of 6,,."," The latter are found by taking the condition that $J_\phi=J_{\phi,res}(J_r)$ (or $J_\phi=J_{\phi,res}\pm\Delta_{J,res}$ or $J_\phi=J_{\phi,res}\pm2\Delta_{J,res}$ ) and determining the two possible values of$\bolth$ that a star with these actions would have at the Sun's position – in the relevantpart of phase space, lower values of $J_r$ correspond to smaller (i.e. closer tozero) values of $\theta_\phi$ ." +" ""his gives a sense of the two competing cllects which (in addition to the general selection ellects illustratedin Figure 5)) determine the shape of the overdensity in", This gives a sense of the two competing effects which (in addition to the general selection effects illustratedin Figure \ref{fig:mod_0_cont}) ) determine the shape of the overdensity in +Additional position errors may have occurred because source OS (ol M98) is only 50 aresee away (ie the ENIM of the oll- PSE).,Additional position errors may have occurred because source 98 (of M98) is only 50 arcsec away (ie the FWHM of the off-axis PSF). + Alternatively. the counterpart may be a variable AGN. undetected in the WRI and with Re24.5 mag at the epoch of the optical imaging.," Alternatively, the counterpart may be a variable AGN, undetected in the HRI and with $>$ 24.5 mag at the epoch of the optical imaging." + Alrough this source is outside the complete survey ares. it is potentially of interest.," Although this source is outside the complete survey area, it is potentially of interest." + It is listed by MOS as a |ank field (ie no counterpart with 1123 mae)., It is listed by M98 as a blank field (ie no counterpart with $<$ 23 mag). + A possible extremely distant. cluster of. galaxies lies 20 aresee south of the PSPC position., A possible extremely distant cluster of galaxies lies 20 arcsec south of the PSPC position. + The likely brightest. cluster galaxy (BCG) has 10223 mag. giving an estimated redshift zz L where the redshift has been estimated from the BCC magnitude by extrapolating the relation of Vikhlinin (1998).," The likely brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) has $\ga$ 23 mag, giving an estimated redshift $\ga$ 1.3, where the redshift has been estimated from the BCG magnitude by extrapolating the relation of Vikhlinin (1998)." + Llowever. the detection in the LIRL data of a X-ray source coincident with a R=23 mag galaxy 9 arcsec south of the PSPC position suggests that this galaxy is the counterpart. and not the intra-cluster medium of the possible clistant cluster.," However, the detection in the HRI data of a X-ray source coincident with a R=23 mag galaxy 9 arcsec south of the PSPC position suggests that this galaxy is the counterpart, and not the intra-cluster medium of the possible distant cluster." + This source is also outside the complete survey area but we list it here because a compact group of three galaxies of Reels mag lie within the PSPC error box., This source is also outside the complete survey area but we list it here because a compact group of three galaxies of $\approx$ 18 mag lie within the PSPC error box. + The redshifts are unknown. but based on the BCC: magnitude probably lie in jo range Z=0.25-0.3.," The redshifts are unknown, but based on the BCG magnitude probably lie in the range z=0.25-0.3." + This source is potentially an extremely distant. cluster., This source is potentially an extremely distant cluster. + lt is listed. by MOS as a blank field., It is listed by M98 as a blank field. + A galaxy of R=23.1 mage surrounded by several fainter galaxies lies within the PSPC error circle., A galaxy of R=23.1 mag surrounded by several fainter galaxies lies within the PSPC error circle. + Near infra-red Ix band imaging (Newsam 1997) shows that many of the galaxies of very red: the brightest has R-h=4.2+0.4 and. R-L=1.6 (to be compared with R-h=2.6 anc R-L=0.6 for zero redshift’ ellipticals)., Near infra-red K band imaging (Newsam 1997) shows that many of the galaxies of very red; the brightest has $\pm$ 0.4 and R-I=1.6 (to be compared with R-K=2.6 and R-I=0.6 for zero redshift ellipticals). + If this galaxy is the BCG of a cluster. then the redshift estimated from its Ro band magnitude is 221.3. and from its Ix18.9 magnitude. involving a less uncertain extrapolation. “1.5 ," If this galaxy is the BCG of a cluster, then the redshift estimated from its R band magnitude is $\ga$ 1.3, and from its K=18.9 magnitude, involving a less uncertain extrapolation, $\approx$ " +strounding the black hole is that of a standard accretion disk. this does not come about.,"surrounding the black hole is that of a standard accretion disk, this does not come about." + We now consider two cases of accretion flow. which are not standard thin accretion disks. in which να advection of poloidal Seld is more likely to occur.," We now consider two cases of accretion flow, which are not standard thin accretion disks, in which inward advection of poloidal field is more likely to occur." + Iu au acvection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF). the basic idea is that energy released in the accretion process is not radiated locally but is. rather. retained by the fluid as internal energv aud advected iuto the hole (see. for exaniple. Naravan Yi 1995: aud the review by Sveusson 1998).," In an advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF), the basic idea is that energy released in the accretion process is not radiated locally but is, rather, retained by the fluid as internal energy and advected into the hole (see, for example, Narayan Yi 1995; and the review by Svensson 1998)." + As fay as the present discussion is concerned. tle major difference between this kind of accretion flow aud the standard disk is that the disk is geometrically thick in the seuse that JP~HR.," As far as the present discussion is concerned, the major difference between this kind of accretion flow and the standard disk is that the disk is geometrically thick in the sense that $H\sim +R$." + The accretion is driven bv viscous processes with a~1. aud heuce with eg~ey.," The accretion is driven by viscous processes with $\alpha\sim1$, and hence with $v_R\sim v_\phi$." + What this implies (see Section 3.2) is that the invard How velocity is comparable in maeuitucde to the outward diffusiou velocity for a poloidal field threading the disk., What this implies (see Section 3.2) is that the inward flow velocity is comparable in magnitude to the outward diffusion velocity for a poloidal field threading the disk. + This meaus that there could iu principle be some non-ieelieible radial advection of poloidal flux., This means that there could in principle be some non-negligible radial advection of poloidal flux. + While it Πο]! ο possible to set up a steady coufleuration in which inward advection of poloidal flux is balanced at cach radius x outward diffusion. there is no reason to expect that the field threading the hole (which is in any case generated x currents in the disk) can significantly exceed the field hreacding the iuuer disk.," While it might be possible to set up a steady configuration in which inward advection of poloidal flux is balanced at each radius by outward diffusion, there is no reason to expect that the field threading the hole (which is in any case generated by currents in the disk) can significantly exceed the field threading the inner disk." + It is evident that if we wish to produce significant advection of poloidal flux to the πιο disk regions it is necessary to ensure that the radial inflow velocity iu the disk exceeds the radial diffusive outflow rate of poloidal field., It is evident that if we wish to produce significant advection of poloidal flux to the inner disk regions it is necessary to ensure that the radial inflow velocity in the disk exceeds the radial diffusive outflow rate of poloidal field. + Since this cannot be done uxiug a standard disk iu which the inflow is duc to outward diffusion of angular momentum through the disk. it follows that we ποσα to look for other mechanisnis for outward transport of aueular 1uonientuni.," Since this cannot be done using a standard disk in which the inflow is due to outward diffusion of angular momentum through the disk, it follows that we need to look for other mechanisms for outward transport of angular momentum." + It the disk is selteravitatius. ax is thought to occur in the carly stages of protostellar disks. aud inu the outer regions of disks around galactic nuclei. then: non-axisviunietrie instabilities can eive rise fo significant outward trausport of angular momentum (Paczvisski LOTS: Boss 198 E:Authouv Carlbere 1988: Lin Priugle 1987. 1990: Sellwood Liu 1989: Laughlin. IKorchaei- Adams 1997).," It the disk is self-gravitating, as is thought to occur in the early stages of protostellar disks, and in the outer regions of disks around galactic nuclei, then non-axisymmetric instabilities can give rise to significant outward transport of angular momentum (Paczyńsski 1978; Boss 1984; Anthony Carlberg 1988; Lin Pringle 1987, 1990; Sellwood Lin 1989; Laughlin, Korchagin, Adams 1997)." + Since such a process is not driven by lvdromaguetic oeiustabilities it is conceivable that the magnetic Praudtl nuuber στ be quite different frou unity. and that significant nmsvurd transport of poloidal field might be able to take place.," Since such a process is not driven by hydromagnetic instabilities it is conceivable that the magnetic Prandtl number might be quite different from unity, and that significant inward transport of poloidal field might be able to take place." + Although the inner regions of disks around black holes either in ACN or in QCalactie binaries are not usually considered to be seltberavitating. there müeght be au iuterestiug exception here if one considers the disk generated in the dynamical iguptiou of a neutron star by a black hole. which occurs oe1 sone models for x-ray bursts (Rasio 1996: Móssziros Rees 1997: Paczvüsski 1998).," Although the inner regions of disks around black holes either in AGN or in Galactic binaries are not usually considered to be self-gravitating, there might be an interesting exception here if one considers the disk generated in the dynamical disruption of a neutron star by a black hole, which occurs in some models for $\gamma$ -ray bursts (Rasio 1996; Mésszárros Rees 1997; Paczyńsski 1998)." +" It has been argued by a nmuuber of authors DDBludford Pavue 1982: ιο Norman 1986: Kounigl 1989: Pelleticr ιο 1992: Lovelace. Romanova, Contopolous 1993) that a imaguetically driven disk wind might be the main mechanisii by which excess angular momentum is removed from disk material. and so nüght be the main mechanisina that drives au accretion disk."," It has been argued by a number of authors Blandford Payne 1982; Pudritz Norman 1986; Könnigl 1989; Pelletier Pudritz 1992; Lovelace, Romanova, Contopolous 1993) that a magnetically driven disk wind might be the main mechanism by which excess angular momentum is removed from disk material, and so might be the main mechanism that drives an accretion disk." + Were again the inflow velocity can in principle significantly exceed any outward diffusion rate for poloidal field. especially if the poloidal ficld is strong enough to suppress the Balbus-Wawley iustabilitv.," Here again the inflow velocity can in principle significantly exceed any outward diffusion rate for poloidal field, especially if the poloidal field is strong enough to suppress the Balbus-Hawley instability." + If sich a 1nechanisu were able to give rise to a steady state. it would be necessary to appeal to some process (such as the interchange iustabilitv: Spruit Taain 1990: Lubow Spruit 1995: Sprit. Stelle. Papaloizou 1995) that counterbalauces the steady inward drageing of poloidal field and allows outward diffusion of field to occur.," If such a mechanism were able to give rise to a steady state, it would be necessary to appeal to some process (such as the interchange instability; Spruit Taam 1990; Lubow Spruit 1995; Spruit, Stehle, Papaloizou 1995) that counterbalances the steady inward dragging of poloidal field and allows outward diffusion of field to occur." + Thus. as in Section L2.1. it is envisaged that a steady poloidal field configuration is set up. with mad advection and outward diffusion producing a balance aud a steady eradieut in the poloidal feld.," Thus, as in Section 4.2.1, it is envisaged that a steady poloidal field configuration is set up, with inward advection and outward diffusion producing a balance and a steady gradient in the poloidal field." + However. for the reasons discussed above. there is no reason to expect such physical processes to eive rise to a poloidal feld threading the hole that is significantly cubanced over the poloidal field threading the imuer disk.," However, for the reasons discussed above, there is no reason to expect such physical processes to give rise to a poloidal field threading the hole that is significantly enhanced over the poloidal field threading the inner disk." + Iu addition. the idea that such a steady balance cau be set up at all has been brought into question (Lovelace. Romanova. Newman 1991: Lubow. Papaloizou. Pringle 1991b: Agapitou Papaloizon 1995).," In addition, the idea that such a steady balance can be set up at all has been brought into question (Lovelace, Romanova, Newman 1994; Lubow, Papaloizou, Pringle 1994b; Agapitou Papaloizou 1998)." + The main vont here is that the process of wind removal of angular nuoiientunmi occurs locally and directly at each radius in the disk., The main point here is that the process of wind removal of angular momentum occurs locally and directly at each radius in the disk. + Au annulus in the disk which succeeds in getting rid of angular momentum to a wind docs rot require the presence of neighbouring annuli to do so., An annulus in the disk which succeeds in getting rid of angular momentum to a wind does not require the presence of neighbouring annuli to do so. + Thus different anuuli which manage to dispose of heir angular ποιο in this wav are to some extent independeut dynamical entities., Thus different annuli which manage to dispose of their angular momentum in this way are to some extent independent dynamical entities. +" Furthermore. cfiicicut removal of angular momentum from a particular annulus cads to mwurd movement. outward beudiug of poloidal ficld lines. and consequently euhauced wind outflow. enhanced removal of augulu ποιοτα, and further iuflow (Lubow. Papaloizou. Pringle 1991b). ("," Furthermore, efficient removal of angular momentum from a particular annulus leads to inward movement, outward bending of poloidal field lines, and consequently enhanced wind outflow, enhanced removal of angular momentum, and further inflow (Lubow, Papaloizou, Pringle 1994b). (" +This instability may be tempered by the fact that stroug bending of field) lines impedes au outflow bv iakine the disk sub-Neplerian: Ogilvie Livio 1998.),This instability may be tempered by the fact that strong bending of field lines impedes an outflow by making the disk sub-Keplerian; Ogilvie Livio 1998.) + ILowever. even if such unstable wind driven accretion occurs (aud at least in the disks i cataclysinic variables there is evidence that it does not. Livio 1997). there is no particular reason to suppose that at any stage the streugth of the poloidal field threading the hole is slenificantly ereater that the streneth of the poloidal field threading the imuer disk. except possibly for brief dvuamical interludes.," However, even if such unstable wind driven accretion occurs (and at least in the disks in cataclysmic variables there is evidence that it does not, Livio 1997), there is no particular reason to suppose that at any stage the strength of the poloidal field threading the hole is significantly greater that the strength of the poloidal field threading the inner disk, except possibly for brief dynamical interludes." +" Thus. here again. it seenmis difficult to set up a credible picture iu which electromagnetic extraction of spin enerev from the hole donünates iu a steady. or even a time-averaged κακο, over electromagnetic extraction of spin cucrey frou the disk material."," Thus, here again, it seems difficult to set up a credible picture in which electromagnetic extraction of spin energy from the hole dominates in a steady, or even a time-averaged sense, over electromagnetic extraction of spin energy from the disk material." + Dlaudford Zuajek (1977) noted that if the poloidal magnetic field threading the black hole is comparable iu, Blandford Znajek (1977) noted that if the poloidal magnetic field threading the black hole is comparable in +to fit several indices simultaneously could. spuriously. be interpreted as an indication of nou-solar abundance ratios.,"to fit several indices simultaneously could, spuriously, be interpreted as an indication of non-solar abundance ratios." + Also. uiisiatches between observational data aud model SSPs are often taken as evidence for the presence of components which are not fully accounted for iu the models. such as nissiue (or extreme) stellar evolutionary stages or a composite population.," Also, mismatches between observational data and model SSPs are often taken as evidence for the presence of components which are not fully accounted for in the models, such as missing (or extreme) stellar evolutionary stages or a composite population." +" demonstrated that. for SSPs. the Fe5106 iudex traces Fe only. whilst [MgFo]. traces total uctallicity, Z (as first noted by 73)."," demonstrated that, for SSPs, the Fe5406 index traces Fe only, whilst [MgFe] traces total metallicity, $Z$ (as first noted by )." + These two iudices. iu. conibiuation therefore provide an estimate of the level of a-eulianceient. or simply whether a population has non-solu abundance ratios.," These two indices, in combination therefore provide an estimate of the level of $\alpha$ -enhancement, or simply whether a population has non-solar abundance ratios." + Figure L shows the Fe5106|AleFe} plane with lines from the DaSTI 11 Gyr (coustaut age) scaled-solar aud a-cuhanced models. jomed at »oiuts of approximately equal |Fe/T] (uote that at constant Z. [Fo/II| is lower for a-euhauced nodels than the corresponding scaled-solar ones).," Figure \ref{fig4} shows the Fe5406–[MgFe] plane with lines from the BaSTI 14 Gyr (constant age) scaled-solar and $\alpha$ -enhanced models, joined at points of approximately equal [Fe/H] (note that at constant $Z$ , [Fe/H] is lower for $\alpha$ -enhanced models than the corresponding scaled-solar ones)." +" Overplotted ire the results from the whole-isochrouc tests for increased 7,4, (LOO). inereased ogg (0.25 dex) aud iucreased/decreased. [Fo/TI] (0.15 dex)."," Overplotted are the results from the whole-isochrone tests for increased $T_{eff}$ (100K), increased $g$ (0.25 dex) and increased/decreased [Fe/H] (0.15 dex)." + Iu this diagraiu one expects that ασ deviation i abundance ratios will move poiuts iorizontallv. ie. any degree of a-enhancenmeut uoves points from the scaled-solar liue on the eft. towards the a-cnhanced line on the right (see Figure 9 of uote that lines of different age are completely degenerate iu this diagram).," In this diagram one expects that any deviation in abundance ratios will move points horizontally, i.e. any degree of $\alpha$ -enhancement moves points from the scaled-solar line on the left, towards the $\alpha$ -enhanced line on the right (see Figure 9 of – note that lines of different age are completely degenerate in this diagram)." + Hore it can be seen that altering auy of +the atinosplieric paralucters simply moves the scaled-solar SSP points along the scaled-solar line. changing the inferred |Fe/HI| but not altering the inferred abundance ratios for other elements to nou-solar ratios.," Here it can be seen that altering any of the atmospheric parameters simply moves the scaled-solar SSP points along the scaled-solar line, changing the inferred [Fe/H] but not altering the inferred abundance ratios for other elements to non-solar ratios." + This is an important point to notice siuce individual clement abunudances. inclhudius several a clemenuts. appear to alter substantially. as demonstrated by the measured offsets in the various line iudices listed in Tables 1. aud 2..," This is an important point to notice since individual element abundances, including several $\alpha$ elements, appear to alter substantially, as demonstrated by the measured offsets in the various line indices listed in Tables \ref{tab:4Gtests} and \ref{tab:14Gtests}." + Iu couclusion. we urge caution against the over-interpretation of stellay population parameters Toni line iudex data. m terms of the tuferred scaled-solar or non-caled-solu abuudauce ratios and also the inferred. presence of a composite »opulation. especially when nmultipledudex or full- fitting methods are eiiploved.," In conclusion, we urge caution against the over-interpretation of stellar population parameters from line index data, in terms of the inferred scaled-solar or non-scaled-solar abundance ratios and also the inferred presence of a composite population, especially when multiple-index or full-SED fitting methods are employed." + We find that. or SSPs. Fe5106 in combination with |MgFCO| oxovides the iost robust indication of non-solar abundance ratios.," We find that, for SSPs, Fe5406 in combination with [MgFe] provides the most robust indication of non-solar abundance ratios." + We remind the reader that our results potentially impact on all SPS methods. whether fitting functions or full SEDs are eniploved.," We remind the reader that our results potentially impact on all SPS methods, whether fitting functions or full SEDs are employed." + Measured offsets for 23 commonly used diagnostic line indices are provided. aud we encourage the user to deteriuine the overall iupact ou their observational data and preferred fitting method.," Measured offsets for 23 commonly used diagnostic line indices are provided, and we encourage the user to determine the overall impact on their observational data and preferred fitting method." + We thaul the anonviuous referee for a constructive report aud some useful suggestions which helped to put our results in context., We thank the anonymous referee for a constructive report and some useful suggestions which helped to put our results in context. + SALP. would like to express heartfelt thanks to Elaine Siith-Freeiian for many useful diseussious aud for providing the initial motivation to dothis work., S.M.P. would like to express heartfelt thanks to Elaine Smith-Freeman for many useful discussions and for providing the initial motivation to dothis work. + S.ALP. acknowledges financial support from the Scicuce Techuoloey Facilities Council (STFC) through a Postdoctoral Researcl Fellowship., S.M.P. acknowledges financial support from the Science Technology Facilities Council (STFC) through a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. +The current study was limited. not only by the small FOV of TIP-IL which nowadays has a slit twice as long as during our observing campaign in 2005. but also by the observational gap on July 4th.,"The current study was limited, not only by the small FOV of TIP-II, which nowadays has a slit twice as long as during our observing campaign in 2005, but also by the observational gap on July 4th." + Magnetic field extrapolations could undoubtedly shed more light on clarifying the magnetic structure of this filament., Magnetic field extrapolations could undoubtedly shed more light on clarifying the magnetic structure of this filament. + It is now crucial to carry out more multrwavelength measurements. as the one presented in here. with higher cadence and bigger FOVs to fit the pieces of the puzzle together. in order to fully understand the origin. evolution and magnetie topology of AR filaments.," It is now crucial to carry out more multiwavelength measurements, as the one presented in here, with higher cadence and bigger FOVs to fit the pieces of the puzzle together, in order to fully understand the origin, evolution and magnetic topology of AR filaments." + In particular. continuous vector magnetograms of active regions together with simultaneous imaging of the corona should be able to prove/disprove the proposed scenario for the last stages of their evolution.," In particular, continuous vector magnetograms of active regions together with simultaneous imaging of the corona should be able to prove/disprove the proposed scenario for the last stages of their evolution." + The instrument suite on board the NASA/SDO satellite is the best candidate for such an study., The instrument suite on board the NASA/SDO satellite is the best candidate for such an study. + , +times larger than that monitored by current high-: SN Ia searches down to the same limiting magnitude 00z20) (Perlmutter 1999).,times larger than that monitored by current $z$ SN Ia searches down to the same limiting magnitude $m_B \approx 20$ ) (Perlmutter 1999). +" The simple fireball model (rie. a spherically symmetric relativistic external shock wave expanding into a homogeneous medium) has been ""in and out of the hospital"" for months. but notices of its death appear to be premature."," The simple fireball model (i.e., a spherically symmetric relativistic external shock wave expanding into a homogeneous medium) has been “in and out of the hospital” for months, but notices of its death appear to be premature." +" This amazes me. given the wealth of complexities one can easily imagine in the fireball itself and in its environment (Mésszárros 1999),"," This amazes me, given the wealth of complexities one can easily imagine in the fireball itself and in its environment (Mésszárros 1999)." + If the simple relativistic fireball model (or even more complex variants of it) suffice to explain burst afterglows (see Figure 5). much can be learned. including the energy of the fireball per unit solid angle. the ratio of the energy in the magnetic field to that in relativistic electrons. and the density of the external medium into which the fireball expands (Wijers Galama 1999; van Paradijs 1999: Lamb. Castander Reichart 1999).," If the simple relativistic fireball model (or even more complex variants of it) suffice to explain burst afterglows (see Figure 5), much can be learned, including the energy of the fireball per unit solid angle, the ratio of the energy in the magnetic field to that in relativistic electrons, and the density of the external medium into which the fireball expands (Wijers Galama 1999; van Paradijs 1999; Lamb, Castander Reichart 1999)." +" It should be possible. in principle. to use the effects on the afterglow spectrum of extinction due to dust in the host galaxy and of absorption by the Lyman-o forest to determine the redshift of the burst itself. but so far. this goal has eluded modelers (see. e.g. Lamb. Castander Reichart 1999),"," It should be possible, in principle, to use the effects on the afterglow spectrum of extinction due to dust in the host galaxy and of absorption by the $\alpha$ forest to determine the redshift of the burst itself, but so far, this goal has eluded modelers (see, e.g, Lamb, Castander Reichart 1999)." +" Currently. we are in the regime in terms of what we learn from each individual because. given the diversity of GRBs. GRB afterglows. and host galaxies. we have yet to sample the full ""phase space"" of afterglow or host galaxy properties."," Currently, we are in the regime in terms of what we learn from each individual because, given the diversity of GRBs, GRB afterglows, and host galaxies, we have yet to sample the full “phase space” of afterglow or host galaxy properties." +" Still less have we sampled the full ""phase space"" of combinations of burst. afterglow. and host properties."," Still less have we sampled the full “phase space” of combinations of burst, afterglow, and host properties." + At the same time. we are in the stronglynon-linear regime. in terms of what we learn from each individual of a burst afterelow.," At the same time, we are in the strongly regime, in terms of what we learn from each individual of a burst afterglow." + The value of each astronomer's observation 1s enhanced by the observations made by all other astronomers., The value of each astronomer's observation is enhanced by the observations made by all other astronomers. + As we have heard from several speakers at this workshop. the amount of information that can be gleaned from a given afterelow depends greatly on the number of measurements that exist both simultaneously in time and in wavelength. from the radio through the millimeter. sub-millimeter. near-infrared. optical. and X-ray bands.," As we have heard from several speakers at this workshop, the amount of information that can be gleaned from a given afterglow depends greatly on the number of measurements that exist both simultaneously in time and in wavelength, from the radio through the millimeter, sub-millimeter, near-infrared, optical, and X-ray bands." + Furthermore. since the range of redshifts for the bursts (and therefore also their atterglows) is large. we cannot know in advance which bands will be crucial.," Furthermore, since the range of redshifts for the bursts (and therefore also their afterglows) is large, we cannot know in advance which bands will be crucial." + Thus simultaneous or near-simultaneous multi-wavelength observations of burst afterglows are essential. and therefore observations by as many observers as possible must be encouraged.," Thus simultaneous or near-simultaneous multi-wavelength observations of burst afterglows are essential, and therefore observations by as many observers as possible must be encouraged." + Finally. greater co-operation and co-ordination among observers is important. and should be facilitated. as has been done by setting up the invaluable service represented by the Gamma-Ray Burst Coordinate Network (GCN) (Barthelmy et al.," Finally, greater co-operation and co-ordination among observers is important, and should be facilitated, as has been done by setting up the invaluable service represented by the Gamma-Ray Burst Coordinate Network (GCN) (Barthelmy et al." + 1999)., 1999). + Star forming regions consist of a cluster of O/B stars that lie in and around a clumpy cloud of dust and gas., Star forming regions consist of a cluster of O/B stars that lie in and around a clumpy cloud of dust and gas. + We expect Ae>>1 for O/B stars embedded in the cloud. and Ay;~0 for O/B stars that have drifted out of the cloud and/or lie near the surface of the cloud and have expelled the gas and dust in their vicinity.," We expect $A_V >> 1$ for O/B stars embedded in the cloud, and $A_V \approx 0$ for O/B stars that have drifted out of the cloud and/or lie near the surface of the cloud and have expelled the gas and dust in their vicinity." + Thus the optical/UV spectrum of star forming regions is à sum of the spectra of many hot (blue) stars. some of which are embedded in the cloud. and therefore heavily extinguished. and some of which lie on the surface or around the cloud. and are therefore essentially un-extinguished.," Thus the optical/UV spectrum of star forming regions is a sum of the spectra of many hot (blue) stars, some of which are embedded in the cloud, and therefore heavily extinguished, and some of which lie on the surface or around the cloud, and are therefore essentially un-extinguished." + This composite spectrum is rather blue. and yields a value AVEzl when a single extinction curve Is fitted to it.," This composite spectrum is rather blue, and yields a value $A_V^{\rm eff} +\approx 1$ when a single extinction curve is fitted to it." + The situation is very different when we consider an individual line-of-sight. as is appropriate for the afterglow of a GRB.," The situation is very different when we consider an individual line-of-sight, as is appropriate for the afterglow of a GRB." + If the GRB source lies outside and far away from any star-forming region. we expect Aversion<1: if the GRB source lies outside but near a star-forming region. we expect Αμπο1 about half the time and Ay!altcrelow>>L about half the time.," If the GRB source lies outside and far away from any star-forming region, we expect $A_V^{\rm afterglow} \lesssim 1$; if the GRB source lies outside but near a star-forming region, we expect $A_V^{\rm afterglow} \lesssim +1$ about half the time and $A_V^{\rm afterglow} >> 1$ about half the time." +" Finally. if the GRB source is embedded Π the star-forming; region.; we expect AVS""afterglow>>4]."," Finally, if the GRB source is embedded in the star-forming region, we expect $A_V^{\rm afterglow} >> 1$." + Thus. if GRB sources actually lie in star-forming regions. one would expect .1.o> (values of Ay~1030 are not uncommon for dense. cool molecular clouds in the Galaxy).," Thus, if GRB sources actually lie in star-forming regions, one would expect $A_V^{\rm afterglow} >> 1$ (values of $A_V \sim 10-30$ are not uncommon for dense, cool molecular clouds in the Galaxy)." + Is this consistent with what we see?, Is this consistent with what we see? + No., No. + However. this may not mean that GRB sources do not lie in star-forming regions.," However, this may not mean that GRB sources do not lie in star-forming regions." + The reason is that the soft X rays and the UV radiation from the GRB and its afterglow are capable. during the burst and immediately afterward. of vaporizing all of the dust in their path (Lamb Reichart 1999b).," The reason is that the soft X rays and the UV radiation from the GRB and its afterglow are capable, during the burst and immediately afterward, of vaporizing all of the dust in their path (Lamb Reichart 1999b)." + Thus the value of Appt that we measure may have nothing to do with the pre-existing value of the extinction through the star-forming region in which the burst source is embedded. but may instead reflect merely the extinction due to dust and gas in the disk of the host galaxy.," Thus the value of $A_V^{\rm afterglow}$ that we measure may have nothing to do with the pre-existing value of the extinction through the star-forming region in which the burst source is embedded, but may instead reflect merely the extinction due to dust and gas in the disk of the host galaxy." + The GRB. and its soft X-ray and UV afterglow. are also capable of tonizing gas in any envelope material expelled by the progenitor of the burst source and in the interstellar medium of the host galaxy.," The GRB, and its soft X-ray and UV afterglow, are also capable of ionizing gas in any envelope material expelled by the progenitor of the burst source and in the interstellar medium of the host galaxy." +" This will produce Strómmgren spheres or very narrow cones (if the burst and its afterglow are beamed) in hydrogen. helium and various metals (Bisnovatyi-Kogan Timokhin 1998. Timokhin Bisnovatyi-Kogan 1999, Mésszárros 1999)."," This will produce Strömmgren spheres or very narrow cones (if the burst and its afterglow are beamed) in hydrogen, helium and various metals (Bisnovatyi-Kogan Timokhin 1998, Timokhin Bisnovatyi-Kogan 1999, Mésszárros 1999)." + Recombination of the tonized hydrogen eventually produces intense [CII]. [CIV]. [OVI] and [CIII] emission lines in the UV. and intense Πα and H./ emission lines in the optical.," Recombination of the ionized hydrogen eventually produces intense [CII], [CIV], [OVI] and [CIII] emission lines in the UV, and intense $\alpha$ and $\beta$ emission lines in the optical." + However. the line fluxes may still not be strong enough to be detectable at the large redshift distances of GRB host galaxies.," However, the line fluxes may still not be strong enough to be detectable at the large redshift distances of GRB host galaxies." + Interaction of the GRB and its soft X-ray afterelow with any envelope material expelled by the progenitor of the burst source and with the surrounding interstellar medium can also produce intense fluorescent iron line emission (see. e.g. Mésszárros 1999). but it is again difficult to see how the line flux could be large enough to be detectable or to explain the hints of a fluorescent iron emission line in the X-ray afterglows of GRB 980703 (Piro et al.," Interaction of the GRB and its soft X-ray afterglow with any envelope material expelled by the progenitor of the burst source and with the surrounding interstellar medium can also produce intense fluorescent iron line emission (see, e.g., Mésszárros 1999), but it is again difficult to see how the line flux could be large enough to be detectable or to explain the hints of a fluorescent iron emission line in the X-ray afterglows of GRB 980703 (Piro et al." + 1999) and GRB 980828 (Yoshida et al., 1999) and GRB 980828 (Yoshida et al. +" 1999),", 1999). +"this latter effect is commonly parameterized through electron acceleration parameters e, and &, both assumed to be on the order of ~107! (e.g., Bóttcher&Dermer (2010))).","this latter effect is commonly parameterized through electron acceleration parameters $\epsilon_e$ and $\zeta_e$, both assumed to be on the order of $\sim 10^{-1}$ (e.g., \cite{bd10}) )." +" Those parameters are defined so that e, is the fraction of swept-up proton energy transferred to relativistic electrons, and Z, the fraction of swept-up electrons that are accelerated to relativistic energies."," Those parameters are defined so that $\epsilon_e$ is the fraction of swept-up proton energy transferred to relativistic electrons, and $\zeta_e$ the fraction of swept-up electrons that are accelerated to relativistic energies." +" Specifically, if the electron acceleration process results in an electron spectral index of q>2, the cutoff is given by A A A A where [shock is the Lorentz factor of the (internal) forward or reverse shock resulting from the collision of two shells of relativistic ejecta, measured in the co-moving frame of the shocked material (Bóttcher&Dermer (2010)))."," Specifically, if the electron acceleration process results in an electron spectral index of $q > 2$, the low-energy cutoff is given by         where $\Gamma_{\rm shock}$ is the Lorentz factor of the (internal) forward or reverse shock resulting from the collision of two shells of relativistic ejecta, measured in the co-moving frame of the shocked material \cite{bd10}) )." +" While Pghock is a strong function of the relative Lorentz factors of the colliding shells, e, and Z, are expected to depend on the efficiency of the generation of turbulent magnetic fields mediating the energy transfer between protons and electrons behind the shock fronts."," While $\Gamma_{\rm shock}$ is a strong function of the relative Lorentz factors of the colliding shells, $\epsilon_e$ and $\zeta_e$ are expected to depend on the efficiency of the generation of turbulent magnetic fields mediating the energy transfer between protons and electrons behind the shock fronts." +" In Bóttcheretal.(2007), constraints on jet parameters could be derived from the estimated synchrotron peak flux in the 15 January 2006 SED, and a hint for hard lags among the optical (BVR) bands."," In \cite{bbj07}, constraints on jet parameters could be derived from the estimated synchrotron peak flux in the 15 January 2006 SED, and a hint for hard lags among the optical (BVR) bands." + The synchrotron peak flux was translated into a magnetic-field estimate according to Eq., The synchrotron peak flux was translated into a magnetic-field estimate according to Eq. + 4 in, 4 in +ÀcTT74A.. respectively.,"$\lambda \sim 7774\,$, respectively." + All the targets were selected from the photometric catalog published by(2004).. choosing only relatively isolated objects.," All the targets were selected from the photometric catalog published by, choosing only relatively isolated objects." + Two different pointings were perlormed in order to sample the inner aud the most external regions of the cluster., Two different pointings were performed in order to sample the inner and the most external regions of the cluster. + Our ability to observe BSS in the inner wwas grea(lv restricted by Che crowding of bot stars and fibers., Our ability to observe BSS in the inner was greatly restricted by the crowding of both stars and fibers. + In each pointing ~30 BSS were observed. while ~20 fibers were used (o acquire skv spectra.," In each pointing $\sim 30$ BSS were observed, while $\sim 20$ fibers were used to acquire sky spectra." + Seventeen BSS were observed in both the pointings and were used to test the internal accuracy of the abundance measures., Seventeen BSS were observed in both the pointings and were used to test the internal accuracy of the abundance measures. + The total exposure time of each pointing was split in sub-exposures of about one hour each., The total exposure time of each pointing was split in sub-exposures of about one hour each. + In summary. for each of the two pointings we have obtained 3 spectra sampling the lines and 2 for theOr.," In summary, for each of the two pointings we have obtained 3 spectra sampling the lines and 2 for the." + By combining the sub-exposures we finally obtained mean spectra with a S/.V250 (per resolution element) for most of the selected BSS., By combining the sub-exposures we finally obtained mean spectra with a $S/N \ga 50$ (per resolution element) for most of the selected BSS. + Raw spectra were recuced in IRAF following the stanclared procedure., Raw spectra were reduced in IRAF following the standard procedure. + The task APALL was used to deline and extract the apertures and (o calibrate the one-dimensional spectra in wavelength. by adopting the dispersion solution derived by Th-Ar lamps accquired after each spectra.," The task APALL was used to define and extract the apertures and to calibrate the one-dimensional spectra in wavelength, by adopting the dispersion solution derived by Th-Ar lamps acquired after each spectra." + A full description of the data analvsis will be given in a forthcoming paper (Sabbi et al., A full description of the data analysis will be given in a forthcoming paper (Sabbi et al. + 2006. in preparation).," 2006, in preparation)." + Ilere we focus on the discussion of C and O abundances., Here we focus on the discussion of C and O abundances. + The analvsis of ihe chemical abundances was performed using the ROSA package1, The analysis of the chemical abundances was performed using the ROSA package. +"9558), The equivalent width (EW) of each measurable line was measured by Gaussian fitüng of the line profile. adopting a relationship between EW anc EWIIM. as described in(2001): an iterative clipping average over a traction of the highest spectral points around each line was applied to define a local continuum."," The equivalent width (EW) of each measurable line was measured by Gaussian fitting of the line profile, adopting a relationship between EW and FWHM, as described in; an iterative clipping average over a fraction of the highest spectral points around each line was applied to define a local continuum." + Abundances were derived [rom the measured EW once appropriate atmospheric parameters have been adopted., Abundances were derived from the measured EW once appropriate atmospheric parameters have been adopted. +" In. particular: (1) stellar temperatures (7~6600—8000 IXIN) were estimated by (he empirical relation log--—0.38(D—V)4-3.99. οριαπο from Che IL, temperatures of TO stars and of a few BSS. observed at high resolution (/2~ 40.000) with UVES2006): (2) gravites (logg~4.3. 4.8) were estimated Irom the BSSlocation in the Color Magnitude Diagram (CMD. see Fig. 5))."," In particular: (1) stellar temperatures $T\simeq 6600-8000$ K) were estimated by the empirical relation $\log T=-0.38 { (B-V)} +3.99$, obtained from the $_\alpha$ temperatures of TO stars and of a few BSS, observed at high resolution $R\sim 40,000$ ) with UVES; (2) gravities $\log g\simeq 4.3$ –4.8) were estimated from the BSSlocation in the Color Magnitude Diagram (CMD, see Fig. \ref{f2}) )," +" and (3) a value of was assumed for the microturbulence velocity,", and (3) a value of was assumed for the microturbulence velocity. + Finally. |Fe/I1I]|——0.67 has been adopted from(2004).," Finally, $=-0.67$ has been adopted from." +.. The derived abundances of [O/Fe]| were corrected for departures from the local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE). following 0.345...," The derived abundances of [O/Fe] were corrected for departures from the local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE), following ." +forward shock emission should be dominated at this time.,forward shock emission should be dominated at this time. +" Thus. we expect that At 5000 s. from equation (12) and (13) and using the constrained value of E and 5 from the forward shock LOR5 ""-gez.∣−26g,4,Hz⊜⋯⋯⋯∏⋅∖∖⇁⊜∶↔⊺⊜⊓∕⋯∣∿↻∙⊃⊝∖ and i4 3.29.10Mey3 Hz. so the optical frequency mp (4.7«10' Hz) is expected to be in the regime rj;Maio only if ja>|126!,€3 ."," As $\nu_{{\rm mr}}\propto \hat t^{-73/48}$, we note that at $4.67\times 10^5$ s, $\nu_{{\rm mr}}>\nu_{{\rm radio}}$ only if $\eta_3>112\epsilon_{{\rm er},-1}^{-1}\epsilon_{{\rm Br},-1}^{-1/4}$ ." + Since such an initial Lorentz factor ts too large. this spectral regime ts unlikely (see c.f.," Since such an initial Lorentz factor is too large, this spectral regime is unlikely (see c.f." + loka 2010)., Ioka 2010). + Radio flux from the reverse shock may be also affected by the synchrotron self absorption (SSA) of the radiating electrons., Radio flux from the reverse shock may be also affected by the synchrotron self absorption (SSA) of the radiating electrons. + The SSA frequency in the slow cooling case is (Wu et al., The SSA frequency in the slow cooling case is (Wu et al. +" 20051) where co&15 Leis nearly a constant and X==""E e.is shock.the column density of electrons heated by the reverse "," 2005a) where $c_0\simeq 15$ is nearly a constant and $\Sigma=\frac{E/\eta +m_pc^2}{4\pi R^2}$ is the column density of electrons heated by the reverse shock." +"We find ri,\nu_{\rm c} $ ) with a large $\epsilon_{\rm e} $." + In this case. the decreasing blast wave energy at early times will result in a faster decay of the afterglow emission than the adiabatic case.," In this case, the decreasing blast wave energy at early times will result in a faster decay of the afterglow emission than the adiabatic case." + At late time. as 7» decreases with time. the radiation efficiency drops and the decay slope changes to the adiabatic case.," At late time, as $\frac{\nu_{\rm m} }{\nu_{\rm c} }$ decreases with time, the radiation efficiency drops and the decay slope changes to the adiabatic case." + We examine whether this scenario can explain the fast decay in the early optical and high-energy LAT emission., We examine whether this scenario can explain the fast decay in the early optical and high-energy LAT emission. + According to Huang et al. (, According to Huang et al. ( +1999) and Wu et al. (,1999) and Wu et al. ( +2005a). the isotropic-equivalent energy E of the blast wave evolve with time as The quantities describing the synchrotron spectrum in such a semi-radiative shock are similar to equations (3)-(5). except that the constant E in these equations should be replaced by a time-dependent E as deseribed by Eq. (,"2005a), the isotropic-equivalent energy $E$ of the blast wave evolve with time as The quantities describing the synchrotron spectrum in such a semi-radiative shock are similar to equations (3)–(5), except that the constant $E$ in these equations should be replaced by a time-dependent $E$ as described by Eq. (" +22).,22). +" So the synchrotron emission flux decays as F,«T0710070 for Vp<< iy."," So the synchrotron emission flux decays as $F_{{\rm \nu}}\propto +T^{-3(p-1+\epsilon)/(4-\epsilon)}$ for $\nu_{{\rm mf}}<\nu <\nu_{{\rm cf}}$ ." + To explain the decay slope à=1.6 of the early optical emission in GRB 090902B with this model. we need €Z0.6.," To explain the decay slope $\alpha\ga 1.6$ of the early optical emission in GRB 090902B with this model, we need $\epsilon \ga 0.6$." + Thus we need To explain the late optical. X-ray and radio observations. we also need: #F!opt(10?s)- 0.01mdy. E!radio10's)20.03ml y. and FXGOO8)):2 0.2;y (radio observations starts at about 1005. we extrapolate it to 10?s).," Thus we need To explain the late optical, X-ray and radio observations, we also need: $\kappa F_{{\rm opt}}^{\rm f}(10^5{\rm s})\simeq 0.01$ mJy, $F_{{\rm radio}}^{\rm f}(10^5{\rm s})\simeq 0.03$ mJy, and $F_{{\rm X}}^{\rm f}(10^5{\rm +s})\simeq 0.2 \mu$ Jy (radio observations starts at about $1.3\times +10^5$ s, we extrapolate it to $10^5$ s)." +" At 10°s. the two characteristic frequencies in the synchrotron spectrum are Myrc2.0«OPELτιεςHz MEand epjq7mous11LOVEEspPaPasPRapsέρωςΗΖ for e,20.6 and 4p22.2."," At $10^5$ s, the two characteristic frequencies in the synchrotron spectrum are $\nu_{{\rm mf}}\simeq 2.0\times 10^{12} E_{54}^{1/2}\epsilon_{{\rm Bf},-5}^{1/2} +{\rm Hz}$ and $\nu_{{\rm cf}}\simeq 1.1\times +10^{17}E_{54}^{-11/18}n_{-3}^{-10/9}\epsilon_{{\rm Bf},-5}^{-11/18} {\rm +Hz}$ for $\epsilon_{\rm e} =0.6$ and $p=2.2$." + As rag. «Ix. Hio He in three different frequency regimes. we have three independent constraints on the shock parameters.," As $\nu_{{\rm opt}}$, $\nu_{{\rm X}}$, $\nu_{{\rm radio}}$ lie in three different frequency regimes, we have three independent constraints on the shock parameters." +" Finally we obtain For these parameters. the deceleration time of the blast wave Is Tyo.& 120s. and we can obtain the blast wave kinetic energy at the deceleration time 744, according to Eq.(22)). Le. EsTa)&50."," Finally we obtain For these parameters, the deceleration time of the blast wave is $T_{\rm dec}\simeq 120$ s, and we can obtain the blast wave kinetic energy at the deceleration time $T_{\rm dec}$ according to \ref{ET}) ), i.e. $E_{54}(T_{\rm dec})\simeq 50$." + This energy is extraordinary large., This energy is extraordinary large. + With such a high isotropic energy. we the flux density in LAT band at the deceleration time to be expectFs(a)& Hy. which is one order of magnitude higher than the observed flux (—0.1/Jy).," With such a high isotropic energy, we expect the flux density in LAT band at the deceleration time to be $F_{\rm +LAT}^{\rm f}(T_{\rm dec})\simeq 1\mu$ Jy, which is one order of magnitude higher than the observed flux $\simeq 0.1\mu {\rm Jy}$ )." + Therefore. we conclude that this model can not explain the broadband data of GRB 090902B. Jets from GRBs may have complex structure.," Therefore, we conclude that this model can not explain the broadband data of GRB 090902B. Jets from GRBs may have complex structure." + For the sake of calculation ease. the structured jet can be simplified as a two-component jet.," For the sake of calculation ease, the structured jet can be simplified as a two-component jet." +" It assumes that the Jet consists of two components: a narrow component with a relatively small half- angle (4) and a large isotropic-equivalent energy in the center. and àwide component with a larger half- angle (£y) and a smaller isotropic-equivalent energy (hereafter. we use the superscripts/subscripts ""NT and W? represents the quantities of the narrow component and the"," It assumes that the jet consists of two components: a narrow component with a relatively small half-opening angle $\theta_N$ ) and a large isotropic-equivalent energy in the center, and awide component with a larger half-opening angle $\theta_W$ ) and a smaller isotropic-equivalent energy (hereafter, we use the superscripts/subscripts 'N' and 'W' represents the quantities of the narrow component and the" +forms a central black hole of mass Ady.,forms a central black hole of mass $M_{\rm bh}$. +" The black hole mass fraction kr=μιAdal, Is assumed to obey. a loe- probability distribution with logry=35 and σ=O44 (Ihbunanu Loeb L999b) These values roughly reflect the distribution of jack hole to bulge mass ratios found iu a sample of 36 local galaxies (Alagorrian et al.", The black hole mass fraction $r\equiv M_{\rm bh}/M_{\rm halo}$ is assumed to obey a log-Gaussian probability distribution with $\log r_0=-3.5$ and $\sigma=0.5$ (Haiman Loeb 1999b) These values roughly reflect the distribution of black hole to bulge mass ratios found in a sample of 36 local galaxies (Magorrian et al. + 1998) for a xuvonie nass fraction of ~(Οιου)z0.1., 1998) for a baryonic mass fraction of $\sim (\Omega_{\rm b}/\Omega_0)\approx 0.1$. +" We further xoxtulate that each black hole cuits a timedepeucdent xoimetrie huuiuositvin proportion to its mass, L4—Myafg=MigLgaaexptt fy). where Lada=15x1U7Ay/AL.eres5 ds the Eddinetou luminosity. f is he time clapsed since the formation of the black hole. aud ty= lU)vr is the characteristic quasar lifetime."," We further postulate that each black hole emits a time–dependent bolometric luminosityin proportion to its mass, $L_{\rm q}\equiv M_{\rm bh}f_{\rm q}=M_{\rm bh}L_{\rm +Edd} \exp(-t/t_0)$ , where $L_{\rm Edd}=1.5\times10^{38}~M_{\rm bh}/{\rm +M_\odot}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$ is the Eddington luminosity, $t$ is the time elapsed since the formation of the black hole, and $t_0=10^6$ yr is the characteristic quasar lifetime." + Finally. we assuine that the shape of the emitted spectrum follows he mean spectrum of the quasar sample iu Elvis et al. (," Finally, we assume that the shape of the emitted spectrum follows the mean spectrum of the quasar sample in Elvis et al. (" +1991) up to a photon cherey of LO keV. We extrapolate he spectrum up to ~50 keV. assuniug a spectral slope of a —U (or a photon iudex of -1).,"1994) up to a photon energy of 10 keV. We extrapolate the spectrum up to $\sim 50$ keV, assuming a spectral slope of $\alpha$ =0 (or a photon index of -1)." + This simple model was demonstrated to accurately reproduce the evolution of the optical luminosity function in the Bband (Pei 1995) at redshifts :22.2 (Wana Loeb 1998)., This simple model was demonstrated to accurately reproduce the evolution of the optical luminosity function in the B–band (Pei 1995) at redshifts $z\gsim 2.2$ (Haiman Loeb 1998). + Because our model mceorporates several sinplifiug assuiptious. we regard it as the minimal tov model which successtully reproduces the existing data.," Because our model incorporates several simplifying assumptions, we regard it as the minimal toy model which successfully reproduces the existing data." + If one of our input assunipfious was drastically violated and our model had failed to ft the observed LF. then a uodification of its basic ineredicuts would be needed.," If one of our input assumptions was drastically violated and our model had failed to fit the observed LF, then a modification of its basic ingredients would be needed." +" Iu lusLetter, we focus on the predictions of this nüninmual nodel in auticipation of the forthcoming lauuch ofCXO: an investigation of a broader range of plausible tov nocels will be mace clsewhere."," In this, we focus on the predictions of this minimal model in anticipation of the forthcoming launch of; an investigation of a broader range of plausible toy models will be made elsewhere." +" We adopt the concordance cosmology of Ostriker Steinhardt (1995). namely à AC DAL model with a tilted power spectrum (Qy.04.0,ioyn) (0.35. 0.65. 0.0L. 1.65. 08T. 0.96)."," We adopt the concordance cosmology of Ostriker Steinhardt (1995), namely a $\Lambda$ CDM model with a tilted power spectrum $\Omega_0,\Omega_\Lambda, \Omega_{\rm b},h,\sigma_{8h^{-1}},n$ )=(0.35, 0.65, 0.04, 0.65, 0.87, 0.96)." +" Figure 1 shows the adopted spectrum of quasars. assunine a black hole mass μι=LOAD... placed at two different redshifts. 7,=Il aud 7.=6."," Figure \ref{fig:spectrum} shows the adopted spectrum of quasars, assuming a black hole mass $M_{\rm bh}=10^8{\rm M_\odot}$, placed at two different redshifts, $z_{\rm s}=11$ and $z_{\rm s}=6$." + Iu computing the intergalactic absorption. we included the opacity of both livdrogen and helium as well as the effect of electron scattering.," In computing the intergalactic absorption, we included the opacity of both hydrogen and helium as well as the effect of electron scattering." +" We assumed that reionization occurred at z,=10 aud that at higher redshifts the IGM was homogeneous and fully neutral."," We assumed that reionization occurred at $z_{\rm +r}=10$ and that at higher redshifts the IGM was homogeneous and fully neutral." +" At lower redshifts. Qoioκτν, we included the livdrvogen opacity of the Ίνα forest given by Madau (1995). and extrapolated his fitting formulae for the evolution of the mmuberdensity of absorbers bevoud 2=5 when necessary."," At lower redshifts, $0 fin MpeP(erg/s) 1| is eiven by a stun over halos that formed just before that redshift. ONENESS""TENarse where Ly is the observed ταν luuinosity in the iustruient* detection baud (0.5 3 keV for ROSAT and 0.1.6 keV for CNO): fx is the fraction of the quasar’s bolometric Wuninosity emitted in this baud: 4?N74Mdt is the black halo formation rate. eiven by a convolution of the PressSchechter halo mass function with equation (1)): and Af=?¢(-) fis the time elapsed from a cosmic time f until a redshift +."," In our model, the X–ray luminosity function at a redshift $z$ [in ${\rm +Mpc^{-3}~(erg/s)^{-1}}$ ] is given by a sum over halos that formed just before that redshift, (L_X,z) where $L_X$ is the observed X–ray luminosity in the instrument's detection band $0.5$ $3$ keV for ROSAT and 0.4–6 keV for ); $f_{\rm X}$ is the fraction of the quasar's bolometric luminosity emitted in this band; $d^2N/dM_{\rm bh}dt$ is the black halo formation rate, given by a convolution of the Press–Schechter halo mass function with equation \ref{eq:scat}) ); and $\Delta t=t(z)-t$ is the time elapsed from a cosmic time $t$ until a redshift $z$." + Although our model was constructed so as to fit the observed optical LE. Figure 2. demonstrates that it is also in good aerecment with the data on the Xrax LF.," Although our model was constructed so as to fit the observed optical LF, Figure \ref{fig:LF} demonstrates that it is also in good agreement with the data on the X–ray LF." + This implies that the choice of quasar spectrum im our model is reasonable., This implies that the choice of quasar spectrum in our model is reasonable. + The solid curve in this fleure shows the prediction of equation (3)) at 2= 3.5. near the highest redshift where N-vay data is available.," The solid curve in this figure shows the prediction of equation \ref{eq:LF}) ) at $z=3.5$ , near the highest redshift where X-ray data is available." + The bottom curve corresponds to a cutoff in circular velocity for the host halos of ea50kns Lo which is introduced here in," The bottom curve corresponds to a cutoff in circular velocity for the host halos of $v_{\rm circ}\geq 50~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$ , which is introduced here in" +Recent work has demonstrated that several [x gian stars exhibit. low-amplitude. long-term radial velocity (RY) variations with periods of several hundreds: of days (MeClure ct al.," Recent work has demonstrated that several K giant stars exhibit low-amplitude, long-term radial velocity (RV) variations with periods of several hundreds of days \nocite{mcc85} \nocite{irw89} \nocite{wal92} \nocite{hat93} (McClure et al." + 1985: Irwin. et al., 1985; Irwin et al. + 1989: Walker e al., 1989; Walker et al. + 1992: Ilatzes Cochran 1993)., 1992; Hatzes Cochran 1993). + The nature of these variations is presently unknown., The nature of these variations is presently unknown. + Racial pulsations can be excluded: as a cause since the period of the fundamenta racial mode is expected to be about a week. C, Radial pulsations can be excluded as a cause since the period of the fundamental radial mode is expected to be about a week. ( +Ehese stars also show short-term variability on timescales of a few davs which are due to radial or nonracial pulsations.),These stars also show short-term variability on timescales of a few days which are due to radial or nonradial pulsations.) + This eaves nonradial pulsations (NIA). rotational modulation w surface features. or low-niass companions as possible explanations for the long-period RY variations.," This leaves nonradial pulsations (NRP), rotational modulation by surface features, or low-mass companions as possible explanations for the long-period RV variations." + Ix giant stars iive large radii and low projected: rotational velocities so he period of rotation for these stars is expected. to. be several hundreds ofdays., K giant stars have large radii and low projected rotational velocities so the period of rotation for these stars is expected to be several hundreds of days. + Rotational modulation thus seenis o be a front-running hypothesis for explaining the lone-erm variabilitv., Rotational modulation thus seems to be a front-running hypothesis for explaining the long-term variability. + Lf the surface features are related to stellar activity (spots. plage. ete.)," If the surface features are related to stellar activity (spots, plage, etc.)" + then we should expect to find variations in the equivalent widths of lines. particularly ones ormed in the chromospheric.," then we should expect to find variations in the equivalent widths of lines, particularly ones formed in the chromospheric." + Indeed. Lambert (1987) found variations in the He E line in Arcturus with the same period (233 clavs) that was later found in the RV variations.," Indeed, Lambert (1987) \nocite{lam87} + found variations in the He I line in Arcturus with the same period (233 days) that was later found in the RV variations." + Larson et al. (, Larson et al. ( +1993) found evidence for the 545 day RW period in the equivalent width: variations of Ca IL in 3 Geminorum.,1993) found evidence for the 545 day RV period in the equivalent width variations of Ca II in $\beta$ Geminorum. + I thus seems that the long-period variability is consistent with rotational moculation. at least for Arcturus and 3 Geminorum.," It thus seems that the long-period variability is consistent with rotational modulation, at least for Arcturus and $\beta$ Geminorum." + The confirmation of rotational modulation as the source of the RY variability has. vet to be established. for Aldebaran (= a Tauri). a IX giant. with an HV. period of 643 clavs and a 2-4. (peak-to-peak) amplitude of (llatzes Cochran 1993: hereafter 11092).," The confirmation of rotational modulation as the source of the RV variability has yet to be established for Aldebaran $=$ $\alpha$ Tauri), a K giant with an RV period of 643 days and a $K$ (peak-to-peak) amplitude of (Hatzes Cochran 1993; hereafter HC93)." + The interesting aspect of this variability is that is seems to have been oesent ancl coherent. (same amplitude ancl phase) in RV measurcments spanning over 12 vears., The interesting aspect of this variability is that is seems to have been present and coherent (same amplitude and phase) in RV measurements spanning over 12 years. + IH surface structure is responsible for the RW variability of this star then it mus ος very. long-lived. which at first seems unlikely. but since nothing is known about surface structure on Ix. giants this ivpothesis cannot be summarilv rejected.," If surface structure is responsible for the RV variability of this star then it must be very long-lived, which at first seems unlikely, but since nothing is known about surface structure on K giants this hypothesis cannot be summarily rejected." + The lifetime anc cohereney of the long-period RV. variations in. Xldebaran would normally argue in favour of a low-mass companion., The lifetime and coherency of the long-period RV variations in Aldebaran would normally argue in favour of a low-mass companion. + After all. one would expect changes in the amplitude anc phase of the variations if they were due to a surface structure," After all, one would expect changes in the amplitude and phase of the variations if they were due to a surface structure" +certain regions of our focal plane. leaving others relatively uncderpopulated.,"certain regions of our focal plane, leaving others relatively underpopulated." + We have simulated. the performance of our optimizations in real-life situations by making use of ealaxy mock catalogs extracted from the Bolshoi simulation (?).., We have simulated the performance of our optimizations in real-life situations by making use of galaxy mock catalogs extracted from the Bolshoi simulation \citep{Klypin2010}. + Important. for this work. the clustering properties of mock galaxies match those of real galaxies with gooc accuracy.," Important for this work, the clustering properties of mock galaxies match those of real galaxies with good accuracy." + The reason for using mock catalogs instead of real catalogs is that they provide us with more Iexibility when it comes to selecting dillerent samples with dilleren number densities., The reason for using mock catalogs instead of real catalogs is that they provide us with more flexibility when it comes to selecting different samples with different number densities. + We have performed a 2-D projection of a simulation box of 250 Mpe/h on a side situated at. redshift l onto our focal plane and used the circular. velocity of haloes as an empirical threshold. for selecting cilleren densities., We have performed a 2-D projection of a simulation box of 250 Mpc/h on a side situated at redshift 1 onto our focal plane and used the circular velocity of haloes as an empirical threshold for selecting different densities. + In order to allow for à fair comparison with the results presented in the previous sections. we have selecte catalogs with target-to-positioner ratios of ~ 0.5. 1. 3 ane 5.," In order to allow for a fair comparison with the results presented in the previous sections, we have selected catalogs with target-to-positioner ratios of $\sim$ 0.5, 1, 3 and 5." + Simulations were performed with 9 different realizations for each η. obtained by rotating the box In Fig. 6..," Simulations were performed with 9 different realizations for each $\eta$, obtained by rotating the box In Fig. \ref{fig:mocks}," + we show a portion of the focal plane of an instrument. represented by an array of patrol discs. in a sequence of the first tiles.," we show a portion of the focal plane of an instrument, represented by an array of patrol discs, in a sequence of the first tiles." + The over-plotted dots svmbolize he projected. positions of targets belonging to a mock galaxy catalog with yo3., The over-plotted dots symbolize the projected positions of targets belonging to a mock galaxy catalog with $\eta \sim 3$. + The first panel in this figure illustrates the initial situation where the entire sample of argets is to be observed., The first panel in this figure illustrates the initial situation where the entire sample of targets is to be observed. + Note that. as explained. above. argets on the focal plane of the spectrograph. rather than ing randomly distributed. accumulate in filaments.," Note that, as explained above, targets on the focal plane of the spectrograph, rather than being randomly distributed, accumulate in filaments." + The rest of the panels show the distribution of targets assigned o each tile by using the optimized. algorithm described in Section 4.., The rest of the panels show the distribution of targets assigned to each tile by using the optimized algorithm described in Section \ref{sec:draining}. + In. this example. ~75% of targets have been selected alter 3 The performance of our optimizations with mock galaxy catalogs is presented in the same format às in previous sections in Fable 3. and Fig. 7..," In this example, $\sim 75\%$ of targets have been selected after 3 The performance of our optimizations with mock galaxy catalogs is presented in the same format as in previous sections in Table \ref{tab:real} and Fig. \ref{fig:real}." + X direct consequence of the presence of clustering in our catalogs is that the fraction of targets assigned to each tile decreases significantly. as à comparison between Table 20 anc Table 3.7 demonstrates.," A direct consequence of the presence of clustering in our catalogs is that the fraction of targets assigned to each tile decreases significantly, as a comparison between Table \ref{tab:random} and Table \ref{tab:real} demonstrates." + ηνίαιν. the probability that a single positioner has to deal with several targets is now higher ancl. consequently. it becomes harder to move targets towards the first. tiles.," Trivially, the probability that a single positioner has to deal with several targets is now higher and, consequently, it becomes harder to move targets towards the first tiles." + As an example. with 51 and two tiles we could observe almost 94% of all targets in a random catalog. even whithout allowing for rotation of the focal plane.," As an example, with $\eta \sim 1$ and two tiles we could observe almost $94 \%$ of all targets in a random catalog, even whithout allowing for rotation of the focal plane." + In a real catalog we could only assign S54 of targets in. the same number of tiles., In a real catalog we could only assign $85 \%$ of targets in the same number of tiles. + Similarly. in areal catalog with 5 we would need 5in tiles to barely reach a completeness. of SOUL. at least S4 below our expectations from. random catalogs.," Similarly, in areal catalog with $\eta \sim 5$ we would need 5 tiles to barely reach a completeness of $80 \%$ , at least $8\%$ below our expectations from random catalogs." + Again. we refer the reader to Table 3. for the exact fractions of targets assigned with a random approach. with the draining algorithm alone and with the draining algorithm complemented. with rotation of the focal plane.," Again, we refer the reader to Table \ref{tab:real} for the exact fractions of targets assigned with a random approach, with the draining algorithm alone and with the draining algorithm complemented with rotation of the focal plane." + In order to analyze the performance of our optimizations as compared to à random approach we point the reader to Fig. 7.., In order to analyze the performance of our optimizations as compared to a random approach we point the reader to Fig. \ref{fig:real}. + This figure shows that the gain provided. by our optimizations as compare to à greedy approach when implemented in a real-life situation is consistent. with what we could infer from. random catalogs., This figure shows that the gain provided by our optimizations as compare to a greedy approach when implemented in a real-life situation is consistent with what we could infer from random catalogs. + X closer inspection. however. reveals that the gain provided by the draining algorithm alone is slightly smaller now. falling below 2%. whereas the gain achieved by combining this algorithm with a ROT optimization remains in the range of 56%.," A closer inspection, however, reveals that the gain provided by the draining algorithm alone is slightly smaller now, falling below $2\%$, whereas the gain achieved by combining this algorithm with a ROT optimization remains in the range of $5-6\%$." + I only slight rotations were allowed (ROT? optimization) we could still improve the eLllicieney of the process in 3.54.5%. Note that. as mentioned previously. the results shown in this work were obtained. ignoring Liber collisions. as the ellect of these depends on the geometry of the fiber positioning robot itself. and. therefore. cannot be extrapolated to any fiber-fed spectrograph of this kind.," If only slight rotations were allowed (ROT2 optimization) we could still improve the efficiency of the process in $3.5-4.5\%$ Note that, as mentioned previously, the results shown in this work were obtained ignoring fiber collisions, as the effect of these depends on the geometry of the fiber positioning robot itself, and, therefore, cannot be extrapolated to any fiber-fed spectrograph of this kind." + The tvpical number of these events obviously increases in mock ealaxy catalogs (and hence in real catalogs) due to the fact that objects are more clustered (the fraction of collisions is almost negligible in random catalogs)., The typical number of these events obviously increases in mock galaxy catalogs (and hence in real catalogs) due to the fact that objects are more clustered (the fraction of collisions is almost negligible in random catalogs). + Even in real catalogs the fraction of objects in conflict. remains small for SLOL: even for y=5., Even in real catalogs the fraction of objects in conflict remains small for SIDE: $\lesssim 1\%$ even for $\eta=5$. + However. an important advantage of the draining algorithm is that collisions can be solved optimally. and. additional methods. are not. needed.," However, an important advantage of the draining algorithm is that collisions can be solved optimally, and additional methods are not needed." + The results presented in Table 3.7 and Fig., The results presented in Table \ref{tab:real} and Fig. + 7 would. basically not change if collisions were taken into account., \ref{fig:real} would basically not change if collisions were taken into account. + Only very slight variations are expected in the very last tiles. which are not relevant in real-life observations.," Only very slight variations are expected in the very last tiles, which are not relevant in real-life observations." + The results. presented. in this section confirm. that. despite the physical restrictions of this state-of-the-art. fiber positioning robots. it is possible to optimize a survey strateew in a remarkable wav just by assigning targets to tiles and positioners conveniently.," The results presented in this section confirm that, despite the physical restrictions of this state-of-the-art fiber positioning robots, it is possible to optimize a survey strategy in a remarkable way just by assigning targets to tiles and positioners conveniently." + In addition. these results represent a strong support for allowing the focal plane of future instruments to rotate.," In addition, these results represent a strong support for allowing the focal plane of future instruments to rotate." + We have shown how even a slight rotation produces a remarkable optimization., We have shown how even a slight rotation produces a remarkable optimization. + In the next section we discuss on the implications of our results., In the next section we discuss on the implications of our results. + The results on the optimization of the fiber positioning process that we present in this work are valid for any focal plane consisting of an array of positioners as that described in Section 3.., The results on the optimization of the fiber positioning process that we present in this work are valid for any focal plane consisting of an array of positioners as that described in Section \ref{sec:robot}. . + To first order. therefore. our results are not dependent on the size ofthe tile or the number," To first order, therefore, our results are not dependent on the size ofthe tile or the number" +0.5 truecia The outer regions of M31 have become an increasingly complicated field of study as it has become clear in recent vears that the role of accretion in halo formation is of considerable importance.,0.5 truecm The outer regions of M31 have become an increasingly complicated field of study as it has become clear in recent years that the role of accretion in halo formation is of considerable importance. + present star-count maps showing what appear to be extensive tidal disturbances iu the halo of M1. including iu the vicinity of the massive elobular cluster Cl.," \citet{fer02} present star-count maps showing what appear to be extensive tidal disturbances in the halo of M31, including in the vicinity of the massive globular cluster G1." + Reitzel&Cuhathakurta(2002.hereafterRCGU2) find evidence for a subtle stream-like feature. in an outer halo field located 19 Ispc from the ceuter in projection along the southeastern ninor-axis. using a combination of kinematics and metallicity measuremeuts of red ejut brauch (RGB) stars;," \citet[][hereafter RG02]{rei02} find evidence for a subtle stream-like feature, in an outer halo field located 19 kpc from the center in projection along the southeastern minor-axis, using a combination of kinematics and metallicity measurements of red giant branch (RGB) stars." + Cuhbathakurta&Reitzel(2002) confirm that this feature continues along the nünor axis in two inner halo fields located near the globular clusters C312 and C302. located 11 and 7 kpe from the uucleus of M31 respectively near the southeastern minor axis.," \citet{guh02} + confirm that this feature continues along the minor axis in two inner halo fields located near the globular clusters G312 and G302, located 11 and 7 kpc from the nucleus of M31 respectively near the southeastern minor axis." + ΑΟ5 two closest satellites M32 aud NGC 205 are known to be undergoing tidal stripping (Choi.Culiathaurta.&Johustou2002):: vet there is no definite proposal for a companion that night have been responsible for the large-scale streams seen iu the halo., M31's two closest satellites M32 and NGC 205 are known to be undergoing tidal stripping \citep*{cho02}; yet there is no definite proposal for a companion that might have been responsible for the large-scale streams seen in the halo. + The area around Cl is a particularly interesting field to study; as this object has been proposed to be the core of a tidallv-disrupted dwarf galaxy (Alevlanetal.2001).," The area around G1 is a particularly interesting field to study, as this object has been proposed to be the core of a tidally-disrupted dwarf galaxy \citep{mey01}." +. Tf this is the case. one uüght expect to find the tidal debris surrouudiug the main body of the object with velocities and metallicites simular to Cl itself.," If this is the case, one might expect to find the tidal debris surrounding the main body of the object with velocities and metallicites similar to G1 itself." + In addition. the field around CU is expected to have roughly equal umubers of N31 halo aud disk stars so this eives us the opportunity to study the disk population of AD further out (0—31 kpe) than las been done to date.," In addition, the field around G1 is expected to have roughly equal numbers of M31 halo and disk stars \citep*{rei98,hod95} so this gives us the opportunity to study the disk population of M31 further out $r\sim34$ kpc) than has been done to date." + Ferguson&Johuson(2001). study a field 30 kpe from the nucleus of M31 along the NE major axis aud estimate a mean metallicity of [Fe/II|=0.7: they find that the population is mostly old (>8 Ctr) but there is evidence for an intermediate-age population as well., \citet{fer01} study a field 30 kpc from the nucleus of M31 along the NE major axis and estimate a mean metallicity of $\rm[Fe/H]\simeq-0.7$; they find that the population is mostly old $>8$ Gyr) but there is evidence for an intermediate-age population as well. + Iu a paper that accoupanics this work. Richetal.(2003) report evidence for an iutermediate-age population," In a paper that accompanies this work, \citet{ric03} report evidence for an intermediate-age population" +The discovery of these two brown dwarf events is remarkable because each event had a hieh magnification. aud therefore required a very small distance of closest approach.,"The discovery of these two brown dwarf events is remarkable because each event had a high magnification, and therefore required a very small distance of closest approach." + Such evenis are (herelore rare., Such events are therefore rare. + Each of the two events therefore represents a large number of additional brown-dwarf events of short duration., Each of the two events therefore represents a large number of additional brown-dwarf events of short duration. + It would be difficult to use the detection of these two events (to lormulate a realistic estimate of the total number of short-duration brown-dwarl-lens events presently expected., It would be difficult to use the detection of these two events to formulate a realistic estimate of the total number of short-duration brown-dwarf-lens events presently expected. + Nevertheless. these detections add plausibility to (he estimates we have mace above. based on rate calculations and the combined OGLE and MOA detection rates.," Nevertheless, these detections add plausibility to the estimates we have made above, based on rate calculations and the combined OGLE and MOA detection rates." + Figure 1 demonstrates (hat brown-dwarf events with τε in the range of 8—16 days can take place ab distances greater than a hundred pe for velocities in excess of ~50. km /., Figure 1 demonstrates that brown-dwarf events with $\tau_E$ in the range of $8-16$ days can take place at distances greater than a hundred pc for velocities in excess of $\sim 50~$ km $^{-1}$. + Note in addition. that the total volume. hence the number of possible lenses ancl the rate of lensing by anv given population of lenses. increases with distance from us. (," Note in addition, that the total volume, hence the number of possible lenses and the rate of lensing by any given population of lenses, increases with distance from us. (" +See. e.g.. DiStefano 2008a. 2003b for details.),"See, e.g., Stefano 2008a, 2008b for details.)" + Therefore the largest number of brown-dwarl lenses generating 8— 16-day events should have velocities 50 kms. + and be located at distances larger (han LOO pc., Therefore the largest number of brown-dwarf lenses generating $8-16$ -day events should have velocities $> 50~$ km $^{-1}$ and be located at distances larger than $100$ pc. + This is consistent with (he events observed to date., This is consistent with the events observed to date. + Consider a planetary svstem in which one planet serves as a lens. producing a event wilh a measured value of Te. Suppose Chat the star orbited by the planet lens is detected.," Consider a planetary system in which one planet serves as a lens, producing a short-duration event with a measured value of $\tau_E.$ Suppose that the star orbited by the planet lens is detected." + Suppose further. that a sequence of high-resolution measurements allows the geometric parallax. proper motion. aud Einstein angle of the star to be measured (see. e.g. Di Stefano 2009).," Suppose further, that a sequence of high-resolution measurements allows the geometric parallax, proper motion, and Einstein angle of the star to be measured (see, e.g., Di Stefano 2009)." +" The combination of Dj and 9,5, produces a high-precision value ol the gravitational mass. M,. of the star."," The combination of $D_L$ and $\theta_{E,\ast}$ produces a high-precision value of the gravitational mass, $M_\ast,$ of the star." + In general. the stellar mass is estimated based on spectral ancl flix information.," In general, the stellar mass is estimated based on spectral and flux information." + A direct measurement of the gravitational mass allows stellar models to be tested., A direct measurement of the gravitational mass allows stellar models to be tested. + In some cases. it max be possible to conduct subsequent transit or raclial-velocity studies to measure the gravitational mass of the star in a second wax. i.e. bv studsyiug the orbit of the planet that served as a lens and/or the orbits of other planets.," In some cases, it may be possible to conduct subsequent transit or radial-velocity studies to measure the gravitational mass of the star in a second way, i.e., by studying the orbit of the planet that served as a lens and/or the orbits of other planets." + Thus. for some stars orbited by planet lenses. we may be able to compare (he gravitational ass measured via lensing with the gravitational mass measured via orbital dvnamics.," Thus, for some stars orbited by planet lenses, we may be able to compare the gravitational mass measured via lensing with the gravitational mass measured via orbital dynamics." + Up to this point in our discussion. the planet has plaved only a peripheral role: (1) it produced a photometric event that alerted us to the possibility of measuring astrometric lensing by (he star. aud (2) it alerted us to (he presence of at least one planet orbiting the star. (hereby motivating subsequent transit and/or radial-velocity studies.," Up to this point in our discussion, the planet has played only a peripheral role: (1) it produced a photometric event that alerted us to the possibility of measuring astrometric lensing by the star, and (2) it alerted us to the presence of at least one planet orbiting the star, thereby motivating subsequent transit and/or radial-velocity studies." + The lensing event can of course leach us a good deal about the planet., The lensing event can of course teach us a good deal about the planet. + First. if finite-source-size elfects are detected. (hen 05prance can be directly measured.," First, if finite-source-size effects are detected, then $\theta_{E,planet}$ can be directly measured." + The distance to the planet is. to high precision. the same as the distance to the central star.," The distance to the planet is, to high precision, the same as the distance to the central star." +" The combination of 0,prone and Dj measures the mass of the planet."," The combination of $\theta_{E,planet}$ and $D_L$ measures the mass of the planet." + With the gravitational masses of both the planet and star measured. the mass ratio q can be computed.," With the gravitational masses of both the planet and star measured, the mass ratio $q$ can be computed." + If. in addition. the projected orbital separation. a. between the central star and planet lens is less than roughlv 3.5Hp. or if the event “repeats”. then q and a can both be estimated from a fit to the planet-lens light curve.," If, in addition, the projected orbital separation, $a,$ between the central star and planet lens is less than roughly $3.5\, R_{E,\ast},$ or if the event “repeats”, then $q$ and $a$ can both be estimated from a fit to the planet-lens light curve." + The value of 4 so measured can be checked [or consistency with the measured values of the planets and stars gravitational lüasses., The value of $q$ so measured can be checked for consistency with the measured values of the planet's and star's gravitational masses. +predominantly methanol.,predominantly methanol. + It is not easy. to untangle the blending and derive useful inlormation from the resulting line prolile., It is not easy to untangle the blending and derive useful information from the resulting line profile. +" Instead we opted to observe (wo positions south of IRc2 with declination offsets of aancd100"".. respectively."," Instead we opted to observe two positions south of IRc2 with declination offsets of and, respectively." + The two positions correspond to local maxima in the IC] map of OMC-L by Schilke.Phillips.&Wang(1995)., The two positions correspond to local maxima in the HCl map of OMC-1 by \citet{spw1995}. +. The (0. 60) position also coincides with the CS elump LSI (Mundyetal.1986).. and the (ο. 1007)) position Orion S. Figure 4 show the HC] J=1—0 spectra for the remaining sources in (he sample.," The (0, ) position also coincides with the CS clump LS1 \citep{mundy1986}, and the (0, ) position Orion S. Figure \ref{fig:spectra4} show the HCl $J=1-0$ spectra for the remaining sources in the sample." + The HC] hvperfine structure. resulting from the interaction between the electric [ield and chlorine nuclear spin. splits the J=1—0 transition into three components. with the outer (vo separated by —6.35 and 8.22 rrespectivelv from the strongest middle component for LICL.," The HCl hyperfine structure, resulting from the interaction between the electric field and chlorine nuclear spin, splits the $J=1-0$ transition into three components, with the outer two separated by $-6.35$ and 8.22 respectively from the strongest middle component for ." + ForCL. the separations are —5.05 aand 6.45|... respectively.," For, the separations are $-5.05$ and 6.45, respectively." + Statistical weights for the upper level of the hyperfine transitions dictate optically thin line strength ratio of 1:3:2., Statistical weights for the upper level of the hyperfine transitions dictate optically thin line strength ratio of 1:3:2. + In the observed sample. the (hree-component hvperline pattern is clearly seen in many sources. but (he components often do not conform to the optically thin ratio. indicating deviations rom the optically (hin limit or differences in excitation between (he three components.," In the observed sample, the three-component hyperfine pattern is clearly seen in many sources, but the components often do not conform to the optically thin ratio, indicating deviations from the optically thin limit or differences in excitation between the three components." + Under the assumption that the hvperfine components share the same excitation and kinematic characteristics. lits to the line profiles can independently provide the optical depth and excitation temperature (Xwan&Scoville1975).," Under the assumption that the hyperfine components share the same excitation and kinematic characteristics, fits to the line profiles can independently provide the optical depth and excitation temperature \citep{kwan1975}." +. Such a utility is readily available in CLASS. the spectral line data reduction package developed ancl maintained by IAM.," Such a utility is readily available in CLASS, the spectral line data reduction package developed and maintained by IRAM." + The HFS fit in CLASS provides four parameters: AT+Traine Vpsg. we the line width. ad Traine," The HFS fit in CLASS provides four parameters: $\Delta T\cdot\tau_{main}$, $V_{LSR}$, $w$ the line width, and $\tau_{main}$." + Tain Is the total opticaldepth from all hvperfine components of the line. and," $\tau_{main}$ is the total opticaldepth from all hyperfine components of the line, and" +for calibration‘ of the interferometer. pnphase. enhancing‘? the coherence time of the visibilities ‘and ‘allowing© the detection of fainter target,"for calibration of the interferometer phase, enhancing the coherence time of the visibilities and allowing the detection of fainter targets." + The typical s.one sigma image sensitivity. cerived [rom these datasets is approximately 1: mJv/beam., The typical one sigma image sensitivity derived from these datasets is approximately 1 mJy/beam. + The angular resolution varies with source declination but is tvpically approximately LOO mas., The angular resolution varies with source declination but is typically approximately 100 mas. + ligure 2 shows a typical e-VLBI image of one. of the sources in Table 1.. all of which were unresolved on scales of mamas or less.," Figure \ref{fig:J031010-573041} shows a typical e-VLBI image of one of the sources in Table \ref{table:observed_targets}, all of which were unresolved on scales of mas or less." + ‘Table 3 lists the maximum angular size of cach source as measured [from the images using the MIIRLAD task IMETE., Table \ref{table:position_and_size} lists the maximum angular size of each source as measured from the images using the MIRIAD task IMFIT. + Xn c-VLBI position is also listed for each source along with the flux density measured [rom the e-VLBL (~ O.Laaresee GCGllzbeam) and ΑΟ ( l5aaresec beam) images., An e-VLBI position is also listed for each source along with the GHz flux density measured from the e-VLBI $\sim0.1$ arcsec beam) and AT20G $\sim15$ arcsec beam) images. + Phe uncertainty in the the eVLBI positions is dominated by the phase referencing of the calibration source. and is typically muimas in RA and DEC.," The uncertainty in the the e-VLBI positions is dominated by the phase referencing of the calibration source, and is typically mas in RA and DEC." + Note that the [ANT20€C. and eVLBI Iux-density measurements are not simultaneous and. were made up to three vears apart., Note that the AT20G and e-VLBI flux-density measurements are not simultaneous and were made up to three years apart. + The mean Lux ratio (ονοι vrsuc) is 0.90 with a standard: deviation of 0.22., The mean flux ratio $_{\rm VLBI}$ $_{\rm AT20G}$ ) is 0.90 with a standard deviation of 0.22. + Howe exclude the source 255450. which appears to be variable (see SS44.1.2 below). the mean [lux ratio rises to 0.94 and the standard deviation drops to 0.15.," If we exclude the source $-$ 255450, which appears to be variable (see 4.1.2 below), the mean flux ratio rises to 0.94 and the standard deviation drops to 0.18." + These results suggest that (i) the nearby AT20G GPS sources are compact. with ~90% of their GGlIA emission arising on scales smaller than," These results suggest that (i) the nearby AT20G GPS sources are compact, with $\sim$ of their GHz emission arising on scales smaller than" +value of E/AM results in higher expausiou velocitics of the ejecta and hotter post-shock gas. and a lower equilibrium ionization parzuuoeter.,"value of $E/M$ results in higher expansion velocities of the ejecta and hotter post-shock gas, and a lower equilibrium ionization parameter." + However. the τοι! also decelerates more rapidly. causing Z to increase at a faster rate than for the η=12 case.," However, the remnant also decelerates more rapidly, causing $\Xi$ to increase at a faster rate than for the $n = 12$ case." + This ultimately lunders the formation of cool gas relative to the 12 case. and only a small amount is able to form (see Table 2)).," This ultimately hinders the formation of cool gas relative to the $n = 12$ case, and only a small amount is able to form (see Table \ref{tab:mass_cool_gas}) )." + Receutly. it is has become clear that there exists a class of type II supernova explosions which are under cuerectic(6.8... Zampier 2003)).," Recently, it is has become clear that there exists a class of type II supernova explosions which are under energetic, Zampieri \cite{Z2003}) )." + For two explosions examined in detail. Zampieri al.(2003)) found AZ=LIAL. and E060.9<10ere.," For two explosions examined in detail, Zampieri \cite{Z2003}) ) found $M \gtsimm 14 \Msol$ and $E \approx 0.6 - 0.9 \times 10^{51} \erg$." + We do uot expect remmauts with. such paraicters to evolve significantly differeutlv to our canonical models with Af=LOAL.. aud E=10ere., We do not expect remnants with such parameters to evolve significantly differently to our canonical models with $M = 10 \Msol$ and $E = 10^{51} \erg$. + We lave calculated svuthetic Lue profiles for ciission from the cooled eas, We have calculated synthetic line profiles for emission from the cooled gas. + The 2D axisviinietrie eric is rotated onto a 3D cartesian erid and the cussion from volume clemeuts containing cool gas was integrated udder the assmuption that it is optically thin and the volume emission rate varies as v7., The 2D axisymmetric grid is rotated onto a 3D cartesian grid and the emission from volume elements containing cool gas was integrated under the assumption that it is optically thin and the volume emission rate varies as $n^{2}$. + Since the gas is cool. thermal Doppler broadening is neslieible.," Since the gas is cool, thermal Doppler broadening is negligible." + A previous investigation (Dottorff 2000)) failed to reach aux strong couclisious concerning whether was favoured by observations. so it is not iucluded im our model.," A previous investigation (Bottorff \cite{BFBK2000}) ) failed to reach any strong conclusions concerning whether was favoured by observations, so it is not included in our model." + The cussion is blue- or redshifted according to the line of sight velocity of the eas., The emission is blue- or redshifted according to the line of sight velocity of the gas. + Absorption was also asstuned to be neelieible., Absorption was also assumed to be negligible. +fixed to 1.32. as reported by Capectal.(2007). from the ddata. eives a very poor result (42/5 = 897/16).,"fixed to 1.32, as reported by \citet{grupe07} from the data, gives a very poor result $\chi^2/\nu$ = 897/46)." + The fit cau be improved by leaving the decay slope as a free parameter refley its... model2)," The fit can be improved by leaving the decay slope as a free parameter \\ref{lc_fits}, model 2)." + Thisresultsinasingledecaugslopeofos = ].I5x00.010. but the light curve still deviates sieuificautlv a later times from this slope. resulting iu an unacceptable y2/r = 100/15.," This results in a single decay slope of $\alpha_3$ = 0.01, but the light curve still deviates significantly at later times from this slope, resulting in an unacceptable $\chi^2/\nu$ = 400/45." + A broken power law fit to the entire late-tine Πο curve (nodel 3) reveals a break at about 2 Ms after the burst: iu contrast to the result of Capeetal.(2007).. in which we could fit the late-tine ddata with just one decay slope. the addition of the 2007 data requires a break in the ddata.," A broken power law fit to the entire late-time light curve (model 3) reveals a break at about 2 Ms after the burst; in contrast to the result of \citet{grupe07}, in which we could fit the late-time data with just one decay slope, the addition of the 2007 data requires a break in the data." + The late decay slope. αι = 1.85. isdriven by the last two oobservations. while the \? is also strongly affected by two very ligh data points at ~2 MIs and ~5 Als. Makine the assumption that these two high points are late-time N-rav flares unrelated to the afterelow of the external shock. we removed them frou futher fits (sce models Laud 5).," The late decay slope, $\alpha_4$ = 1.85, isdriven by the last two observations, while the $\chi^2$ is also strongly affected by two very high data points at $\sim2$ Ms and $\sim5$ Ms. Making the assumption that these two high points are late-time X-ray flares unrelated to the afterglow of the external shock, we removed them from further fits (see models 4 and 5)." +" We then fit the data between LOO ks and 30 MIs with a broken power law Guodel6). obtaining a break of Diveak.3=1.01 MIs aud slopes of tlie(2132!dadete002 anda,=L61. ν"," We then fit the data between 100 ks and 30 Ms with a broken power law (model 6), obtaining a break time of $T_{\rm break,3} = 1.01^{+0.35}_{-0.22}$ Ms and slopes of $\alpha_3 = 1.32^{+0.02}_{-0.05}$ and $\alpha_4 = 1.61^{+0.10}_{-0.06}$." +αThis fit is plotted as d Jine iin m rofxravjc.., This fit is plotted as the dashed line in \\ref{xray_lc}. + The last two oobservatious deviate from this fit. sugecsting a break at about a vear after the burst.," The last two observations deviate from this fit, suggesting a break at about a year after the burst." + Because these last two points lave very few counts (and consequently large nucertaimtics). a broken power law fit to the late-time heht curve cannot constrain either the break time or the late-time decay slope a5 uuless at least one parameter is fixed.," Because these last two points have very few counts (and consequently large uncertainties), a broken power law fit to the late-time light curve cannot constrain either the break time or the late-time decay slope $\alpha_5$ unless at least one parameter is fixed." + We therefore approached the question of a final break in steps., We therefore approached the question of a final break in steps. +" A suele power law fit to the lieht curve for T>1.2 Ms refle pits. model7ygivesa, = 1.68400.08 aud ὧν = 12/15."," A single power law fit to the light curve for $T \geq 1.2$ Ms \\ref{lc_fits}, model 7) gives $\alpha_4$ = 0.08 and $\chi^2/\nu$ = 12/15." + Although this is already an acceptable fit. we investigated the possibility of a late-time break which is expected from CRB theory (c.f.ce.Zhangetal.2006for 30060).," Although this is already an acceptable fit, we investigated the possibility of a late-time break which is expected from GRB theory \citep[c.f. e.g.][]{zhang06, meszaros06}. ." +" At first we fitted the light curve 1.2 Ms xTzx 35 Ms with a single power law Guodel SN) which results in a, = 1.61IM and uvy = 6/13.", At first we fitted the light curve for $1.2$ Ms $\leq T \leq$ 35 Ms with a single power law (model 8) which results in $\alpha_4$ = $1.61^{+0.07}_{-0.13}$ and $\chi^2/\nu$ = 6/13. + We then fitted a broken power law model to the eutire heht curve with 7> 1.2 Ms with αι fixed at 1.61 (the best-fit result when the last two oobservations are excluded: model δ in refley/ts) jtodeterminewhetherthedatarcquirea ver ylatebredk Adthetigittdonce fHe," We then fitted a broken power law model to the entire light curve with $T +>$ 1.2 Ms with $\alpha_4$ fixed at 1.61 (the best-fit result when the last two observations are excluded; model 8 in \\ref{lc_fits}) ) to determine whether the data require a very late break in the light curve slope." +gits. c inodelüygieesTisa) = 43/22. Ms and ο”.=1.65ML with 4?/»=6/11.," This fit \\ref{lc_fits}, model 9) gives $T_{\rm break,4}$ = $^{+4.2}_{-5.1}$ Ms and $\alpha_5=4.65^{+2.05}_{-1.34}$, with $\chi^2/\nu=6/14$." + displavs the contour plot between the final break time and the final slope., \\ref{contour} displays the contour plot between the final break time and the final slope. + It shows that they are still not swelbconstrained., It shows that they are still not well-constrained. + Although the best-fit breax time is [1 Ms (2007 November). a break as carly as 26 Ms. with a late-time decay slope of a5 = 2.5. is consistent with the data at the lo level.," Although the best-fit break time is 41 Ms (2007 November), a break as early as $\sim 26$ Ms, with a late-time decay slope of $\alpha_5$ = 2.5, is consistent with the data at the $1 \sigma$ level." + Iu addition to the broken power law fits with a sharp break. the late-time light. curve was also fitted by the sincothed double-broken power law model defined bx Beucrimannetal.(1999).," In addition to the broken power law fits with a sharp break, the late-time light curve was also fitted by the smoothed double-broken power law model defined by \citet{beuermann99}." +. Tere we found decay. slopes a3=Ll.20400.07. ay=1.70400.05. and 0522. 1100.26 with break times at LO9ELTL.OL As and 20 Mx (fixed).," Here we found decay slopes $\alpha_3$ 0.07, $\alpha_4$ 0.05, and $\alpha_5$ 0.26 with break times at 1.01 Ms and 20 Ms (fixed)." + The smooth paramcter is fixed to 3.0 and 2.0 for the breaks at about 1 Ms and 20 Ms. respectively.," The smooth parameter is fixed to 3.0 and 2.0 for the breaks at about 1 Ms and 20 Ms, respectively." + This results in an acceptable fit with 42/» = 12/32., This results in an acceptable fit with $\chi^2/\nu$ = 42/32. + Possible interpretations of these temporal breaks are discussed iu rofdiscuss.., Possible interpretations of these temporal breaks are discussed in \\ref{discuss}. + Temporal breaks are often associated with spectral breaks (e.g.Sarictal.1998:MészárosotZhangetal.," Temporal breaks are often associated with spectral breaks \citep[e.g. ][]{sari98, meszaros98, zhang06}." +2006)..— τοςayrprdisplagstheSwift NNReountrateandh, \\ref{lc_cr_hr} displays the XRT count rate and hardness ratio light curves for the interval between 100 ks and 5 Ms after the burst. +ardnessratiolig, The hardness ratios are plotted segment by segment. +htearces forthe itercalbet ac 0.3. after the break the spectruu hardens to IIR. ~0.15 with even larder values at later times.," While the hardness ratios before the break at 1 Ms after the burst are of order HR $\sim 0.3$ , after the break the spectrum hardens to HR $\sim 0.45$ with even harder values at later times." + The spectrum before the 1. Ms break cau be fitted with asingle : absorbed power law with: Vy-=(31nmU.2655)«102!102 cm7 and an cucrey spectral slope 4 = L1s00.11 qev = Bl/s2)," The spectrum before the 1 Ms break can be fitted with a single absorbed power law with $N_{\rm H} = (1.34^{+0.27}_{-0.25})\times +10^{21}$ $^{-2}$ and an energy spectral slope $\beta_{\rm x}$ = 0.11 $\chi^2/\nu$ = 81/82)." + The spectrum after the 1 Ms break was also fitted by an absorbed single power law uodel., The spectrum after the 1 Ms break was also fitted by an absorbed single power law model. + Leaving the absorption column density as a free xwanmeter. however. results in an merease of the column deusitv. which does not secur plausible.," Leaving the absorption column density as a free parameter, however, results in an increase of the column density, which does not seem plausible." + Therefore we fixed the absorption column deusity to Ny=131«10?! cn7. the value. obtained before the break.," Therefore we fixed the absorption column density to $N_{\rm H} = 1.34\times 10^{21}$ $^{-2}$, the value obtained before the break." + This fit results in a slightly flatter cucrey spectral slope 3. = 8S9-EOO0.11., This fit results in a slightly flatter energy spectral slope $\beta_{\rm x}$ = 0.11. + These values were used in PIMMS to convert he AACTS-S count rates into the fluxes eiven in retsrav oyandplottedin re feraye., These values were used in PIMMS to convert the ACIS-S count rates into the fluxes given in \\ref{xray_log} and plotted in \\ref{xray_lc}. + The ddata μι be analyzed in the Poison Πιτ. coluplicating proper analysis of possible spectral various at vorv late times.," The data must be analyzed in the Poisson limit, complicating proper analysis of possible spectral variations at very late times." +" Usine the Bayesian approach described by Parkctal.(2006).. we estimated the harduess ratios in the aud their uncertainties. both before aud after the break at 38 Ms. We obtain mean values of 0.39 for the 2007 Marchli-June data (before the final break: 38 counts total) and 0.80 for the very late data (after the final break: δ counts total). with confidence lanits of IIR—0.60 to O17 and TR= L00to 0.58 respectively,"," Using the Bayesian approach described by \citet{park06}, we estimated the hardness ratios in the and their uncertainties, both before and after the break at 38 Ms. We obtain mean values of $-0.39$ for the 2007 March-June data (before the final break; 38 counts total) and $-0.80$ for the very late data (after the final break; 8 counts total), with confidence limits of $= -0.60$ to $-0.17$ and $= -1.00$ to $-0.58$ , respectively." + Although this is a suggestion of spectral softening across the final break. wecannot exclude (at the sos LTbes fyestiloblity that the μανάτος» ratio is constant.," Although this is a suggestion of spectral softening across the final break, wecannot exclude (at the confidence level) the possibility that the hardness ratio is constant." + Note that due to the different energv bands and detector response matrices it is not possible to compare the aud: hharducss ratios directly., Note that due to the different energy bands and detector response matrices it is not possible to compare the and hardness ratios directly. + Even though GRB 0607209 was one of the brightest bursts detected in X-rays. it is uot the brightest oue so," Even though GRB 060729 was one of the brightest bursts detected in X-rays, it is not the brightest one so" +"Using the K-S test, we find the likelihoods of 1x107+ and 0.016 that the OCDFs of the simulated HVSs are the same as those from observations for the first and second population of the detect HVSs, respectively.","Using the K-S test, we find the likelihoods of $1\times 10^{-4}$ and $0.016$ that the $\Theta$ CDFs of the simulated HVSs are the same as those from observations for the first and second population of the detect HVSs, respectively." +" Therefore, we conclude that the detected HVSs are highly unlikely to be produced from the tidal breakup of isotropically distributed progenitorial binary stars."," Therefore, we conclude that the detected HVSs are highly unlikely to be produced from the tidal breakup of isotropically distributed progenitorial binary stars." +" This further strengthens the conclusion obtained in Luetal. (2010),, i.e., the detected HVSs are probably originated from two thin disks with orientations similar to the CWS disk and the northern arm of the minispiral (or the warped outer part of the CWS disk) in the GC, respectively."," This further strengthens the conclusion obtained in \citet{Luetal10}, i.e., the detected HVSs are probably originated from two thin disks with orientations similar to the CWS disk and the northern arm of the minispiral (or the warped outer part of the CWS disk) in the GC, respectively." + Figure 13 shows the vCDFs for both the simulated HVSs (obtained from different models) and the observations., Figure \ref{fig:f13} shows the $v$ CDFs for both the simulated HVSs (obtained from different models) and the observations. +" Our numerical simulations show that the vCDF is almost independent of the thickness of the disk(s) where the HVS progenitors are originated, but it does depend on how close the stellar binaries can approach the MBH and on the initial distribution of the semimajor axes of the stellar binaries."," Our numerical simulations show that the $v$ CDF is almost independent of the thickness of the disk(s) where the HVS progenitors are originated, but it does depend on how close the stellar binaries can approach the MBH and on the initial distribution of the semimajor axes of the stellar binaries." + Different models produce quite different vCDFs., Different models produce quite different $v$ CDFs. +" In the “LP” models and the “UB” models, for example, more than of the resulted HVSs (with v92700kms!) have velocities larger than the maximum velocity of the detected HVSs (c1000km51), while the “RW” models can produce a steep vCDF which is quite similar to the observational ones."," In the “LP” models and the “UB” models, for example, more than of the resulted HVSs (with $v^{\infty}_{\rm ej}\ga700 \kms$ ) have velocities larger than the maximum velocity of the detected HVSs $\sim1000 \kms$ ), while the “RW” models can produce a steep $v$ CDF which is quite similar to the observational ones." +" The models with log-normal distributions of ap; produce less HVSs at the high-velocity end because of the fraction of stellar binaries with small ap; (i.e., <0.3AU) is substantially smaller compared with that in those models with the Oppik law."," The models with log-normal distributions of $a_{\rm b,i}$ produce less HVSs at the high-velocity end because of the fraction of stellar binaries with small $a_{\rm b,i}$ (i.e., $\la 0.3\AU$ ) is substantially smaller compared with that in those models with the Öppik law." +" For the first HVS population, our K-S tests find 2.7x1079 (7.9x107?) and 2.5x107 (1.3x1072) likelihoods that the vCDFs obtained from the “LP-1” (“UB-1”) model and the “LP-2” (“UB-2”) model are drawn from the same distribution as the observational ones, respectively, which suggests that the first HVS population is unlikely to be produced by either of the “LP” model and the “UB” model."," For the first HVS population, our K-S tests find $2.7\times 10^{-6}$ $7.9\times 10^{-3}$ ) and $2.5\times 10^{-4}$ $1.3\times +10^{-2}$ ) likelihoods that the $v$ CDFs obtained from the “LP-1” (“UB-1”) model and the “LP-2” (“UB-2”) model are drawn from the same distribution as the observational ones, respectively, which suggests that the first HVS population is unlikely to be produced by either of the “LP” model and the “UB” model." +" For the second HVS population, the K-S likelihood is 0.01 (0.05) and 0.06 (0.07) for the “LP-1” (“UB-1”) model and the “LP- (“UB-2”) model, respectively."," For the second HVS population, the K-S likelihood is $0.01$ $0.05$ ) and $0.06$ $0.07$ ) for the “LP-1” (“UB-1”) model and the ``LP-2'' (“UB-2”) model, respectively." +" These numbers suggest that the second population is not likely to be produced by the “LP” or “UB” models with an initial ap,; distribution of 1/ay,;; but it may not be inconsistent with the “LP” (or “UB”) models with a log-normal distribution of ay, (though with limited statistics)."," These numbers suggest that the second population is not likely to be produced by the “LP” or “UB” models with an initial $a_{\rm b,i}$ distribution of $1/a_{\rm b,i}$ but it may not be inconsistent with the “LP” (or “UB”) models with a log-normal distribution of $a_{\rm b,i}$ (though with limited statistics)." +" However, the vCDFs resulted from the “RW” models appear to be consistent with the observations as the K-S tests find the likelihoods of 0.52 and 0.43 (0.52) that the observational vCDFSs of the (0.13)first (second) HVS population are the same as that obtained from the “RW-1” model and the *RW-2"" model, respectively."," However, the $v$ CDFs resulted from the “RW” models appear to be consistent with the observations as the K-S tests find the likelihoods of 0.52 (0.13) and 0.43 (0.52) that the observational $v$ CDFs of the first (second) HVS population are the same as that obtained from the “RW-1” model and the ``RW-2'' model, respectively." + Adopting a different form of the Galactic potential may affect the estimation of the vCDF for the detected HVSs in Section 2 and the selection effects discussed in Section 4.1., Adopting a different form of the Galactic potential may affect the estimation of the $v$ CDF for the detected HVSs in Section 2 and the selection effects discussed in Section 4.1. +" For example, if adopting a simple Galactic potential model as that described by Equation (8) in Kenyonetal.(2008), the ug? of the detected HVSs ranges from 850kms! to 1200kms! and the slope of the vCDF is slightly flatter than that estimated in Section 2."," For example, if adopting a simple Galactic potential model as that described by Equation (8) in \citet{Kenyon08}, the $v^{\infty}_{\rm ej}$ of the detected HVSs ranges from $850 \kms$ to $1200 \kms$ and the slope of the $v$ CDF is slightly flatter than that estimated in Section 2." +" The simulated vCDFs from the models of “LP-1”, *LP-2"", “UB-1”, and “UB-2” are not likely to be consistent with the vCDF of the detected HVSs, while both the “RW-1” model and the “RW-2” model can produce a vCDF similar to that estimated for the detected HVSs according to the new Galactic potential."," The simulated $v$ CDFs from the models of “LP-1”, “LP-2”, “UB-1”, and “UB-2” are not likely to be consistent with the $v$ CDF of the detected HVSs, while both the “RW-1” model and the “RW-2” model can produce a $v$ CDF similar to that estimated for the detected HVSs according to the new Galactic potential." + Our main conclusion that the TBK mechanism can reproduce the detected vCDF made in this section is not affected by the choice of the Galactic potential (also see discussion in Sesanaetal.(2007) and Kenyon (2008)))., Our main conclusion that the TBK mechanism can reproduce the detected $v$ CDF made in this section is not affected by the choice of the Galactic potential (also see discussion in \citet{Sesana07} and \citet{Kenyon08}) ). +" 'To close this section, we note here that the fraction of stellar binaries resulting in ejection of HVSs with properties similar to the detected ones is around"," To close this section, we note here that the fraction of stellar binaries resulting in ejection of HVSs with properties similar to the detected ones is around" +a inagnetar progenitor. and hiehlights a discrepancy vetween the presence of RSCs in Wel aud the predictions of evolutionary models. which sugecst that tle most uunous RSCGs should evolve from siguificautlv lower isses.,"a magnetar progenitor, and highlights a discrepancy between the presence of RSGs in Wd1 and the predictions of evolutionary models, which suggest that the most luminous RSGs should evolve from significantly lower masses." + A first study of the binary fraction aunongst owoer-Iqnuinositvy ate-O II-III stars dno Wdl will be oreseuted. di ao subsequent paper iu this seres. but uaznyv binary svstenis are already available for follow-up study.," A first study of the binary fraction amongst lower-luminosity late-O II-III stars in Wd1 will be presented in a subsequent paper in this series, but many binary systems are already available for follow-up study." + These include short-period spectroscopic biuariesE32...W23003:: Paper D. eclipsing binaries within the WR. OD supereiant and main sequence populations (Bonanos2007).. and N-rav. aud racdio-selected collidius-wind binaries (Clarketal.2008:Dougherty2010).," These include short-period spectroscopic binaries,; Paper I), eclipsing binaries within the WR, OB supergiant and main sequence populations \citep{bonanos}, and X-ray and radio-selected colliding-wind binaries \citep{clark08, dougherty}." +. Consideration of these data will allow further dvuamiucal constraints to be placed ou the progenitor masses of the evolved stars within Wdl as well as the general mass i1uninositv relation for stars in the upper reaches of the IIR diagram ae the post-MS patlisvavs they follow., Consideration of these data will allow further dynamical constraints to be placed on the progenitor masses of the evolved stars within Wd1 as well as the general mass luminosity relation for stars in the upper reaches of the HR diagram and the post-MS pathways they follow. +" Moreover. hey will vield the first characterisation of the binary xoperties of a homogeneous population of massive stars. of critical importance for studies of both star aud cluster ornation and miuuerous hieh-energy phenomena such as ""üupernovae. enmlla-rav bursters and the formation of ugh mass X-ray binaries."," Moreover, they will yield the first characterisation of the binary properties of a homogeneous population of massive stars, of critical importance for studies of both star and cluster formation and numerous high-energy phenomena such as supernovae, Gamma-ray bursters and the formation of high mass X-ray binaries." +where Tarsens (Teen) Is the true optical depth of the strong (weak) component. 71. 7» are the observed (apparent) optical depths and ἐν. {ο are the observed residual intensitics (normalized. by the local continuum. lu) al the same velocity for the strong and weak component of the doublet. respectively.,"where $\tau_{\rm strong}$ $\tau_{\rm weak}$ ) is the true optical depth of the strong (weak) component, $\tau_1$, $\tau_2$ are the observed (apparent) optical depths and $I_1$, $I_2$ are the observed residual intensities (normalized by the local continuum, $I_0$ ) at the same velocity for the strong and weak component of the doublet, respectively." + If the lines are optically thin. then from these exact expressions the relation can be obtained which relates the covering factor to the observed residual intensities (Llamann Ferlanc 1999).," If the lines are optically thin, then from these exact expressions the relation can be obtained which relates the covering factor to the observed residual intensities (Hamann Ferland 1999)." + 1n what follows we shall use the label # to indicate a covering factor value obtained by means ofintensities., In what follows we shall use the label $R$ to indicate a covering factor value obtained by means of. + All lines lor which an adjustment of the zero levelhas been performed with acre listecl in ‘Table 1..., All lines for which an adjustment of the zero levelhas been performed with are listed in Table \ref{tab:adj}. + The Zero level adjustment. determined withVPELIT.. as a fraction of the continuum is eiven in column 7 and its le error in column 8.," The zero level adjustment, determined with, as a fraction of the continuum is given in column 7 and its $1\sigma$ error in column 8." + The covering actor determined. from.4... {μι for these lines is given in column 9 of the Table.," The covering factor determined from, $f_R$, for these lines is given in column 9 of the Table." + In principle. since the zero evel adjustment is introduced to compensate for an excess continuum Hux. the value for this adjustment should be in agreement with 1fn.," In principle, since the zero level adjustment is introduced to compensate for an excess continuum flux, the value for this adjustment should be in agreement with $1-f_R$." + Ehe last column in Table 1 shows he value of 1fe For all entries. fj. in column 9.," The last column in Table \ref{tab:adj} shows the value of $1-f_R$ for all entries, $f_R$, in column 9." + In other words. the last column can be thought of as giving an aadjustment based. on the residual. intensities.," In other words, the last column can be thought of as giving an adjustment based on the residual intensities." + In one hen compares corresponding entries in columns 7 (actual adjustment used) and 10 (expected adjustment from residual intensities). one may notice that these agree to within leo for line 17. to within zle for lines 1. 4 and 15. and to within 20 or more for the rest of the lines.," If one then compares corresponding entries in columns 7 (actual adjustment used) and 10 (expected adjustment from residual intensities), one may notice that these agree to within $1\sigma$ for line 17, to within $\approxgt 1\sigma$ for lines 1, 4 and 15, and to within $2\sigma$ or more for the rest of the lines." + We call this an It-tvpe comparison (see below) anc we shall return to this point later., We call this an R-type comparison (see below) and we shall return to this point later. + Further. from Equations 2. and 3.2 it is clear that the ratio of the observed optical depths. 7;/7». depends both on f and on the true optical depth for cach component. and thus. for given b. on the column density.," Further, from Equations \ref{equ:et1} and \ref{equ:et2} it is clear that the ratio of the observed optical depths, $\tau_1/\tau_2$, depends both on $f$ and on the true optical depth for each component, and thus, for given $b$, on the column density." + This.fheorcticad result is illustrated in for a line with b=10 aand clilferent values of the column density and covering factor., This result is illustrated in for a line with $b=10$ and different values of the column density and covering factor. + lt can be seen hat for low column densities and/or high covering factors. this ratio is close tο 2.," It can be seen that for low column densities and/or high covering factors, this ratio is close to 2." + This corresponds to the case where an ADR. is not οservable., This corresponds to the case where an ADR is not observable. + Llowever. for given f and b there is a threshold in column density. above which the ratio will deviate significantly from 2 and. depending on the SNR in the region of the line. it will not be possible to fit the line with a model Voigt profile (which assumes a ratio of 2) without obtaining large resicluals.," However, for given $f$ and $b$ there is a threshold in column density, above which the ratio will deviate significantly from 2 and, depending on the SNR in the region of the line, it will not be possible to fit the line with a model Voigt profile (which assumes a ratio of 2) without obtaining large residuals." + This elect is seen in1: relative to 75. τι is less than what eexpects and. hence. the fit appears markedly below the 1548 Iline ancl above the 1550 Iline.," This effect is seen in: relative to $\tau_2$, $\tau_1$ is less than what expects and, hence, the fit appears markedly below the 1548 line and above the 1550 line." + This discrepancy is due to excess flux. getting. through atthe velocity where a particular doublet: is observed., This discrepancy is due to excess flux getting through atthe velocity where a particular doublet is observed. + Lf the truce optical depth and the covering factor are known. the observed. continuum normalized. intensity is given by Equations 2. or 9 3..," If the true optical depth and the covering factor are known, the observed, continuum normalized intensity is given by Equations \ref{equ:et1} or \ref{equ:et2}. ." + Thus. although the continuum," Thus, although the continuum" +1984).. but. no previous X-ray spectral or timing analvsis studies have been carried out for it.,", but no previous X-ray spectral or timing analysis studies have been carried out for it." + In. order to ensure that these objects are not. intermediate: polars (APs) and to look for orbital ancl spin modulation in the data. the power spectra were calculated by using a Lomb- periodogram which is used for period analvsis of unevenly spaced data.," In order to ensure that these objects are not intermediate polars (IPs) and to look for orbital and spin modulation in the data, the power spectra were calculated by using a Lomb-Scargle periodogram which is used for period analysis of unevenly spaced data." + When searching over the [requeney range 0.00001.0.03 Lz. no significant periodicities were seen at the 99 per cent confidence level.," When searching over the frequency range 0.00001–0.03 Hz, no significant periodicities were seen at the 99 per cent confidence level." + We carried out X-ray spectral analysis in order to study the underlsing spectra of the source sample. ancl. ultimately. to caleulate the I[uxes and luminosities of the sources.," We carried out X-ray spectral analysis in order to study the underlying spectra of the source sample, and, ultimately, to calculate the fluxes and luminosities of the sources." + To employ. Gaussian statistics. the N-ray spectra were binned al 20 ct with and then fitted in1996).," To employ Gaussian statistics, the X-ray spectra were binned at 20 ct $^{-1}$ with and then fitted in." +. In CVs. the power source of X-ray. emission is known to be accretion onto the white dwarl.," In CVs, the power source of X-ray emission is known to be accretion onto the white dwarf." + Phe accreted material is shock-heated to high temperatures (ρω 10502003). and this material has to cool before settling onto the white cwarl surface.," The accreted material is shock-heated to high temperatures $\sim$ 10–50, and this material has to cool before settling onto the white dwarf surface." +" Thus. the cooling gas [low is assumed to consist of a range of temperatures which vary from the hot shock temperature 75,4 to the empoerature of the optically thin cooling material which eventually settles onto the surface. of the white cwarl1997)."," Thus, the cooling gas flow is assumed to consist of a range of temperatures which vary from the hot shock temperature $kT_{max}$ to the temperature of the optically thin cooling material which eventually settles onto the surface of the white dwarf." +. Thus. when fitting X-ray spectra of CVs. cooling How spectral models should. represent more ohvsically correct. picture of the cooling plasma. unlike single temperature. spectral models.," Thus, when fitting X-ray spectra of CVs, cooling flow spectral models should represent more physically correct picture of the cooling plasma, unlike single temperature spectral models." + Cooling Low naiocdels rave successfully been applied. to CV spectra in. previous studies by c.g. and., Cooling flow models have successfully been applied to CV spectra in previous studies by e.g. and. +(2003).. In this view. the multi-temperature characteristic is our motivation for emphasizing the cooling Low mocel in the rest of this work.," In this view, the multi-temperature characteristic is our motivation for emphasizing the cooling flow model in the rest of this work." +" The cdillerential emission measure GEMAE for an isobaric cooling How can be described. by where nm, is the mass of a proton. ji the mean molecular weight (~ 0.6). οςια) total emissivitv per volume in units oberg tem 7. M accretion rate. p. particle density. and & the Boltzmann constant."," The differential emission measure dEM/dT for an isobaric cooling flow can be described by where $m_{p}$ is the mass of a proton, $\mu$ the mean molecular weight $\sim$ 0.6), $\epsilon$ (T,n) total emissivity per volume in units of erg $^{-1}$ $^{-3}$, $\dot{M}$ accretion rate, $n$ particle density, and $k$ the Boltzmann constant." + The source of the N-rav. emission above the white dwarf illuminates the surface of the white dwarf and thus causes a reflection. which is seen as Fe hea iron Illuorescence line at 6.4 keV 1901).," The source of the X-ray emission above the white dwarf illuminates the surface of the white dwarf and thus causes a reflection, which is seen as Fe $\alpha$ iron fluorescence line at 6.4 keV ." +. According to George Fabian. an infinite slab reflector subtencding a total solid angle of$2 = 2: where the X-ray source is located right above the slab. produces an equivalent width of up to 150 eV for the 6.4 keV. Fe Ίνα fluorescence line.," According to George Fabian, an infinite slab reflector subtending a total solid angle of $\Omega$ = $\pi$ where the X-ray source is located right above the slab, produces an equivalent width of up to $\sim$ 150 eV for the 6.4 keV Fe $\alpha$ fluorescence line." + Ehe equivalent width of the 6.4 keV. iron line depends on the total abundance of the reflector1997).. the inclination angle between the surface of the rellector and the observer's line of sight. and the photon index of the spectrum of the X-ray emission source2009).," The equivalent width of the 6.4 keV iron line depends on the total abundance of the reflector, the inclination angle between the surface of the reflector and the observer's line of sight, and the photon index of the spectrum of the X-ray emission source." +. Even though we believe that the cooling How -tvpe multi-temperature model is the correct. description of the ηνμον of the cooling gas How in CVs. previous works have often used single temperature plasma moclels.," Even though we believe that the cooling flow -type multi-temperature model is the correct description of the physics of the cooling gas flow in CVs, previous works have often used single temperature plasma models." + Για». in order o compare the cllects of two cillerent spectral models on he spectral fit parameters. we fitted the spectra with 1) a single temperature optically thin thermal plasma moclel and 2) a cooling Low model (mkcflow)) whichJmews6. was originally. developed to cdeseribe the cooling flows in clusters of galaxies1988).. adding photoclectric absorption to both models.," Thus, in order to compare the effects of two different spectral models on the spectral fit parameters, we fitted the spectra with 1) a single temperature optically thin thermal plasma model and 2) a cooling flow model ) which was originally developed to describe the cooling flows in clusters of galaxies, adding photoelectric absorption to both models." + In order to investigate the equivalent. width of the 6.4 keV iron emission line. à Gaussian line was added. at 6.4 keV with a line width fixed at σξ 10 eV. The spectral fits did not necessarily require the 6.4 keV line. e.g. for SS Aur the ον = 0.96/629 when a Gaussian line at 6.4 keV. was not included.," In order to investigate the equivalent width of the 6.4 keV iron emission line, a Gaussian line was added at 6.4 keV with a line width fixed at $\sigma$ = 10 eV. The spectral fits did not necessarily require the 6.4 keV line, e.g., for SS Aur the $\chi^{2}_{\nu}$ $\nu$ = 0.96/629 when a Gaussian line at 6.4 keV was not included." + TheSusaku NIST and Χο. spectra were fitted simultaneously for each source as well as the GIS and SES spectra of Z Cam and. WZ See with the models mentioned above.," The XIS1 and XIS0,2,3 spectra were fitted simultaneously for each source as well as the GIS and SIS spectra of Z Cam and WZ Sge with the models mentioned above." + Some cata sets required additional components to improve the fits., Some data sets required additional components to improve the fits. + Three of the sources. IUE Cas. VS93 Seo and Z Cam. required. partial covering absorption model.pcfabs.. to reduce residuals in the [ow energv end (between ~ 0.62 keV).," Three of the sources, HT Cas, V893 Sco and Z Cam, required partial covering absorption model, to reduce residuals in the low energy end (between $\sim$ 0.6–2 keV)." + To reduce. residuals around 0.80. keV. in the SS Cvg spectrum. we added. a Gaussian line at 0:51 keV. with a line width of 0.24 keV letting the line energv and. width. both to vary free.," To reduce residuals around 0.80 keV in the SS Cyg spectrum, we added a Gaussian line at 0.81 keV with a line width of 0.24 keV letting the line energy and width both to vary free." + For U Gom. single absorbed: optically thin. thermal plasma model vielded a 7/79 = 2.23/403.," For U Gem, single absorbed optically thin thermal plasma model yielded a $\chi^{2}$ $\nu$ = 2.23/403." + Since thefit was not statistically satisfactory. we added a second. optically thin," Since thefit was not statistically satisfactory, we added a second optically thin" +which we actually use for computationalefficiency?.,which we actually use for computational. +". Finally, to complete the full specification of our chemical model, we need to estimate the column density of the molecular gas, Ny,, for the self-shielding factor given by Equation (ATi)."," Finally, to complete the full specification of our chemical model, we need to estimate the column density of the molecular gas, $N_\H2$, for the self-shielding factor given by Equation \ref{eq:sh2}) )." +" Unfortunately, we cannot simply use the Sobolev approximation to derive Ny, similar to the column density of dust in Equation (A9)), because H» absorption is concentrated in separate absorption lines and is sensitive to the internal velocity dispersion inside molecular clouds."," Unfortunately, we cannot simply use the Sobolev approximation to derive $N_\H2$ similar to the column density of dust in Equation \ref{eq:sd}) ), because $\H2$ absorption is concentrated in separate absorption lines and is sensitive to the internal velocity dispersion inside molecular clouds." +" These velocities are unresolved in our simulations, but can greatly reduce the self-shielding of molecular gas."," These velocities are unresolved in our simulations, but can greatly reduce the self-shielding of molecular gas." +" Dust, on the other hand, absorbs UV radiation in continuum and is thus not affected by velocity distribution of the gas."," Dust, on the other hand, absorbs UV radiation in continuum and is thus not affected by velocity distribution of the gas." +" Therefore, we introduce the following simple ansatz for the effective column density Ny, for Equation (ATI), where L, is the velocity coherence length of the molecular hydrogen inside molecular clouds."," Therefore, we introduce the following simple ansatz for the effective column density $N_\H2$ for Equation \ref{eq:sh2}) ), where $L_c$ is the velocity coherence length of the molecular hydrogen inside molecular clouds." +" Since we cannot deduce this quantity from observations or other calculations, we treat it as another parameter of our model."," Since we cannot deduce this quantity from observations or other calculations, we treat it as another parameter of our model." +" With the expressions for the shielding factors above, the only two parameters of our model are C, and L,."," With the expressions for the shielding factors above, the only two parameters of our model are $C_\rho$ and $L_c$." + These parameters can only be determined by comparing the simulation results to the observational data., These parameters can only be determined by comparing the simulation results to the observational data. +" As the primary data sets used to calibrate the model, we use the measurements of atomic and molecular gas surface densities in nearby spirals from and measurements of gas fractions along the lines of sight to individual stars for atomic and molecular gas in the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds(???)."," As the primary data sets used to calibrate the model, we use the measurements of atomic and molecular gas surface densities in nearby spirals from and measurements of gas fractions along the lines of sight to individual stars for atomic and molecular gas in the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds." +. We calibrate the two parameters of the model: the clumping factor and the molecular coherence length L.., We calibrate the two parameters of the model: the clumping factor $C_\rho$ and the molecular coherence length $L_c$. +" We find, however, that there is no unique best-fit set of parameters."," We find, however, that there is no unique best-fit set of parameters." +" Instead, any combinationC, of these two parameters that satisfy the constraint provides an acceptable fit to the observational constraints."," Instead, any combination of these two parameters that satisfy the constraint provides an acceptable fit to the observational constraints." +" As an example, we show on the left panel of Figure[AT]] fits to the measurements (averaged over all galaxies they observed) for three combinations of the parameters L, and C,."," As an example, we show on the left panel of Figure \ref{fig:asjust} fits to the measurements (averaged over all galaxies they observed) for three combinations of the parameters $L_c$ and $C_\rho$." +" In general, higher clumping factors result in the lower atomic contents at high surface densities, but the trend is too weak to be of any statistically significant constraining power."," In general, higher clumping factors result in the lower atomic contents at high surface densities, but the trend is too weak to be of any statistically significant constraining power." +" As a fiducial set of parameters we choose the combination L,=0.3pc and C,=30.", As a fiducial set of parameters we choose the combination $L_c=0.3\dim{pc}$ and $C_\rho=30$. +" This choice provides a marginally better overall fit to the observations, and is also consistent with estimates of the gas clumping factor deep inside molecular clouds(?)."," This choice provides a marginally better overall fit to the observations, and is also consistent with estimates of the gas clumping factor deep inside molecular clouds." +". The fiducial value of C, is somewhat larger than the estimates of the clumping factor from numerical simulations of turbulent molecular clouds, C,=eo, where σἹηρ31—1.5 is the dispersion of the lognormal density distribution inside the clouds."," The fiducial value of $C_\rho$ is somewhat larger than the estimates of the clumping factor from numerical simulations of turbulent molecular clouds, $C_\rho = e^{\sigma_{\ln\rho}^2}$, where $\sigma_{\ln\rho}\approx 1 - 1.5$ is the dispersion of the lognormal density distribution inside the clouds." +" However, the value of C,=10, which was used in and is more consistent with the numerical simulations of turbulent molecular clouds would provide an almost equally good to the existing observations, if it is used with L,~1pc."," However, the value of $C_\rho=10$, which was used in and is more consistent with the numerical simulations of turbulent molecular clouds would provide an almost equally good to the existing observations, if it is used with $L_c\approx1\dim{pc}$." +" Any sub-cell model would be of limited value, if it was only applicable to a narrow range of numerical resolutions."," Any sub-cell model would be of limited value, if it was only applicable to a narrow range of numerical resolutions." +" In order to test the range of spatial resolutions over which our model performs robustly, we have re-run a subset of our test simulations,"," In order to test the range of spatial resolutions over which our model performs robustly, we have re-run a subset of our test simulations," +We uote that dynamical [friction still operates in circtumstauces where mass accretion is [rustratecd.,We note that dynamical friction still operates in circumstances where mass accretion is frustrated. + For example. a wind-emitting star moving through a eas cloud experiences mass loss rather than ass gain.," For example, a wind-emitting star moving through a gas cloud experiences mass loss rather than mass gain." + Cloud gas inpacting the wind upstream is arrested or refracted in a bowshock. as analytically calculated by Wilkin(1996).," Cloud gas impacting the wind upstream is arrested or refracted in a bowshock, as analytically calculated by \citet{w96}." +. Downstream. the wind forms a supersonic jet.," Downstream, the wind forms a supersonic jet." +" As long as the upstream staudolL radius of the shock lies within r, aud the dowustreanr jet is relatively uarrow. the [ar-fielcl perturbatious are close to what we have obtained. aud equation (66)) lor F still applies."," As long as the upstream standoff radius of the shock lies within $r_s$ and the downstream jet is relatively narrow, the far-field perturbations are close to what we have obtained, and equation \ref{eqn:bondifric}) ) for $F$ still applies." + When the object is actually able to accept eas freely. dynamical friction arises in two pliysically distinct ways.," When the object is actually able to accept gas freely, dynamical friction arises in two physically distinct ways." + First. there is the gravitational tug from the wake.," First, there is the gravitational tug from the wake." + Secoucl. momenttun is transferre directly to the object by gas falling onto it.," Second, momentum is transferred directly to the object by gas falling onto it." + Our findiug that these two forces sum to AZV is at least roughly consistent with simulations.," Our finding that these two forces sum to ${\dot M}\,V$ is at least roughly consistent with simulations." + In a numerical study directed primarily at the mass accretion issue. Rullert(1996) explicitly determined both force coutributious ou accretors of various size inary gas.," In a numerical study directed primarily at the mass accretion issue, \citet{r96} explicitly determined both force contributions on accretors of various size in a gas." + For aud0.6.. the sitmulation ended before the flow reache steady-state (see his Fig.," For and, the simulation ended before the flow reached steady-state (see his Fig." + 2)., 2). + After initial transients clied out. the gravitational drag was steady unti fe13PFpg. where the Bondi-Hoyle time /pj is races.," After initial transients died out, the gravitational drag was steady until $t\approx 13\ t_{\rm BH}$, where the Bondi-Hoyle time $t_{\rm BH}$ is $r_{\rm acc}/c_{\rm s}$." + Therealter. this force component declined for the rest of the integration.," Thereafter, this force component declined for the rest of the integration." + At the end of the simulation =32 μι). the sum of the eravitationa t," At the end of the simulation $t = 32\ t_{\rm BH}$ ), the sum of the gravitational drag and momentum accretion forces was $1.2\ {\dot M}\,V$." +he two forces quickly leveled off. with a sum equal to 1.137V.," For and the same Mach number, the two forces quickly leveled off, with a sum equal to $1.4\ {\dot M}\,V$." + However. this simulation rau ouly until /=LO/py. so it is not clear whether the gravitational drag would Lave later declined. as iu the first case.," However, this simulation ran only until $t = 10\ t_{\rm BH}$, so it is not clear whether the gravitational drag would have later declined, as in the first case." + Following historical precedeut. we lave restricted our investigation to an isothermal gas.," Following historical precedent, we have restricted our investigation to an isothermal gas." + For an isentropic gas with 5>l. it seems likely that the friction force will still be given by AZV. as loug as the aceretor is moving subsonically.," For an isentropic gas with $\gamma > 1$, it seems likely that the friction force will still be given by $\dot{M}\, V$, as long as the accretor is moving subsonically." + Verifving this equality analytically would require a perturbation study analogous to the present one., Verifying this equality analytically would require a perturbation study analogous to the present one. + We leave such a project for future investigators., We leave such a project for future investigators. + Again the current body of numerical studies is in broad accord with our expectation., Again the current body of numerical studies is in broad accord with our expectation. + determined the total friction force on an accretor moving through a 5=5/3 gas., \citet{r94} determined the total friction force on an accretor moving through a $\gamma=5/3$ gas. + For and 3=0.6. the friction force was 1.1AV at |=70fq.," For and $\beta=0.6$, the friction force was $1.1\ \dot{M}\, V$ at $t=70\ t_{\rm BH}$." + For and the same Mach nuuber. the flow liad not achieved steady state by /=19fpy.," For and the same Mach number, the flow had not achieved steady state by $t=19\ t_{\rm BH}$." + The total force was 1.8MV. atthis time. but was falling rapidly.," The total force was $1.8\ \dot{M}\, V$ atthis time, but was falling rapidly." + A future project of interest would be to redo these M.imulations over a range of 5- aud 5-values. running the simlations long enough until a true steady state is reached.," A future project of interest would be to redo these simulations over a range of $\beta$ - and $\gamma$ -values, running the simulations long enough until a true steady state is reached." + For the more general isentropic case. AZ cau uo longer be approximated by equation (52)).," For the more general isentropic case, $\dot{M}$ can no longer be approximated by equation \ref{eqn:intermdot}) )." + Iustead the value of M at a given V. decreases with higher 5-values. as shown aualytically by [or V=0. aud as seen in the simulations of Bullert(199[.1995.1996) [or accretors moving relative to the background gas.," Instead the value of $\dot{M}$ at a given $V$ decreases with higher $\gamma$ -values, as shown analytically by \citet{b52} for $V=0$, and as seen in the simulations of \citet{r94,r95,r96} for accretors moving relative to the background gas." + Isentropie [lows are less compressible than isothermal ones. so the wake will be less cdeuse.," Isentropic flows are less compressible than isothermal ones, so the wake will be less dense." + As a result. the friction force will also be lower. presumably by tle same amount as the accretion rate AL.," As a result, the friction force will also be lower, presumably by the same amount as the accretion rate $\dot{M}$ ." + Iu the present investigation. we have been unable to tease apart analytically the two force," In the present investigation, we have been unable to tease apart analytically the two force" +he mereecdl product is a MS star with the stellar material completely mixed aud (b) uo mass is lost rou the system during the mereer process.,the merged product is a MS star with the stellar material completely mixed and (b) no mass is lost from the system during the merger process. + The no mass-loss assumptiou is based on the results ol SPH stimulations of MS-MS mereers(e.g... Sillsetal.2001)) but such calculations vield ouly a united amount of mixiug.," The no mass-loss assumption is based on the results of SPH simulations of MS-MS mergers, \citealt{sil2001}) ) but such calculations yield only a limited amount of mixing." + The rejuvenated age of the mereecd MS star is determiued clepeuding ou the amount of unburut hydrogen fuel gained by the hydrogen-burniug core as a result of the uixiug., The rejuvenated age of the merged MS star is determined depending on the amount of unburnt hydrogen fuel gained by the hydrogen-burning core as a result of the mixing. + Iun. case of a mass trausler across a MS-MS binary. clistinetion is mace between the cases when the original accretor MS star las a radiative or a couvective core.," In case of a mass transfer across a MS-MS binary, distinction is made between the cases when the original accretor MS star has a radiative or a convective core." + For a convective core. the core grows with the eain of mass and mixes with the uuburut bydrogen fuel so that the accreting MS star appears vounger.," For a convective core, the core grows with the gain of mass and mixes with the unburnt hydrogen fuel so that the accreting MS star appears younger." + For the case of a radiative core. the [Traction of the hydrogen burut in the hydrogeun-buruing core remains nearly unallectecl by the gain of mass so that the ellective age ol the MS star decreases.," For the case of a radiative core, the fraction of the hydrogen burnt in the hydrogen-burning core remains nearly unaffected by the gain of mass so that the effective age of the MS star decreases." + The ellective age is cleterminecl so as to keep the elapsed fraction of its MS lifetime unchauged., The effective age is determined so as to keep the elapsed fraction of its MS lifetime unchanged. + The initial cluster mass of A4(0)zzLO?AL. in our models correspouds to :N(0)=170667 stars., The initial cluster mass of $M_{cl}(0) \approx 10^5\Ms$ in our models corresponds to $N(0) = 170667$ stars. + To our knowledge. direct N-body computations with such a large μιαος of stars. where the clusters are fully inass-segregated aud all the massive stars are in binaries. are beiug reported [or the first time.," To our knowledge, direct N-body computations with such a large number of stars, where the clusters are fully mass-segregated and all the massive stars are in binaries, are being reported for the first time." + We evolve f initial models with the above NV(Q). generated using different raucom uumber seeds. until zz3 Myr.," We evolve 4 initial models with the above $N(0)$, generated using different random number seeds, until $\approx 3$ Myr." + We take this age as au upper limit of the age of R136 (Crowther 2010)..," We take this age as an upper limit of the age of R136 \citep{crw2010,pz2010}." +" We do all the computations on “NVIDIA [80 GTX"" GPU platforms.", We do all the computations on “NVIDIA 480 GTX” GPU platforms. + From the above computations. we trace the bodies that are ejected from the clusters curing their evolution (within z3 Myr).," From the above computations, we trace the bodies that are ejected from the clusters during their evolution (within $\approx 3$ Myr)." + We consider a single-star/binary/imultiplet to be a runaway member [rom its host cluster if it is found moving away from the cluster beyoud R>10 pe distance from the cluster's center of density., We consider a single-star/binary/multiplet to be a runaway member from its host cluster if it is found moving away from the cluster beyond $R>10$ pc distance from the cluster's center of density. + Although our primary focus is on the runaway VMS5s. we consider the whole mass spectrum of ejected stars as well.," Although our primary focus is on the runaway VMSs, we consider the whole mass spectrum of ejected stars as well." + Fig., Fig. + 2 shows the projected suapshots of the ruuaways with inasses AL>38M... combined from the 1 computatious. at /—1 Myr and 3 Myr evolutionary times.," \ref{fig:ejsnap} shows the projected snapshots of the runaways with masses $M>3\Ms$, combined from the 4 computations, at $t=1$ Myr and 3 Myr evolutionary times." + It cau be seen that by /23 Myr there are a siguificant. uumber of fast runaway VMSs with total (3-dimeusional) velocities upto se300 kins anc a lew fast VMSs are already present at /—1 Myr., It can be seen that by $t=3$ Myr there are a significant number of fast runaway VMSs with total (3-dimensional) velocities upto $\approx 300$ km $^{-1}$ and a few fast VMSs are already present at $t=1$ Myr. + All these runaways are on their MSs aud heuce are OB stars., All these runaways are on their MSs and hence are OB stars. + We note that the vast majority of the massive ejected members are sinele stars — only 2 of the massive ejecta [rom our computations are found in hard binaries., We note that the vast majority of the massive ejected members are single stars — only 2 of the massive ejecta from our computations are found in hard binaries. + We shall discuss the multiplicity properties of the ejected stellar population iu detail in a future paper., We shall discuss the multiplicity properties of the ejected stellar population in detail in a future paper. +" It. is worthwhile to note that although our adapted canonical IME has a 19041, upper limit. our models vield single-star runaways with masses upto zz220M... within /«3 Myr. cousicerably"," It is worthwhile to note that although our adapted canonical IMF has a $150\Ms$ upper limit, our models yield single-star runaways with masses upto $\approx 250\Ms$ within $t<3$ Myr, considerably" +"thin disc by 30—70 km s! (Gilmore, Wyse Norris 2002), with Viag=50 km s! usually taken as a canonical value (see also Vallenari et al.","thin disc by $30-70$ km $^{-1}$ (Gilmore, Wyse Norris 2002), with $V_{\rm + lag}=50$ km $^{-1}$ usually taken as a canonical value (see also Vallenari et al." + 2006)., 2006). +" On the other hand, in external galaxies the difference in rotation velocity of thin and thick discs appears to be diverse and strongly dependent on galaxy mass, with lower mass galaxies having larger differences between thin and thick velocities (Yoachim Dalcanton 2008)."," On the other hand, in external galaxies the difference in rotation velocity of thin and thick discs appears to be diverse and strongly dependent on galaxy mass, with lower mass galaxies having larger differences between thin and thick velocities (Yoachim Dalcanton 2008)." +" In terms of velocity dispersions, our results are in relatively good agreement with the observations of the Milky Way."," In terms of velocity dispersions, our results are in relatively good agreement with the observations of the Milky Way." + Vallenari et al. (, Vallenari et al. ( +2006) estimated the velocity dispersion ellipsoid of the thin and thick discs of our Galaxy.,2006) estimated the velocity dispersion ellipsoid of the thin and thick discs of our Galaxy. +" Their results for the thick disc are: (σ-,σφ,σε)~(74+11,507,38X7T) km s! at the solar radius."," Their results for the thick disc are: $(\sigma_r, \sigma_\phi, \sigma_z) \sim (74\pm 11, 50\pm 7, 38\pm 7)$ km $^{-1}$ at the solar radius." +" For the thin disc, they estimate the velocity ellipsoid dividing stars into four stellar age bins, finding (07,04,02)~(25—34,2032,1018)kms! (with errors < 15%)."," For the thin disc, they estimate the velocity ellipsoid dividing stars into four stellar age bins, finding $(\sigma_r, \sigma_\phi, \sigma_z) \sim (25-34, 20-32, 10-18)\,{\rm + km\, s}^{-1}$ (with errors $\lesssim 15\%$ )." +" As described above, the eight simulated galaxies are diverse and show a wide range in velocity dispersions that agree relatively well with these results (although we note that simulated galaxies are not expected to resemble the Milky Way in detail)."," As described above, the eight simulated galaxies are diverse and show a wide range in velocity dispersions that agree relatively well with these results (although we note that simulated galaxies are not expected to resemble the Milky Way in detail)." +" Finally, we note that the velocity structure of the simulated stellar components is complex, in general having important asymmetries."," Finally, we note that the velocity structure of the simulated stellar components is complex, in general having important asymmetries." + Fig., Fig. + 9 shows 2D face-on maps of tangential velocity for theeight simulations (including both disc and spheroid stars) within the inner 30 kpc., \ref{vtita_maps_stars} shows 2D face-on maps of tangential velocity for theeight simulations (including both disc and spheroid stars) within the inner $30$ kpc. +" From these plots we can read off the velocity structure of simulated galaxies, the sizes of bulges and discs, and we can also observe bar patterns, particularly in Aq-C-5, Aq-E-5 and Aq-G-5 (see also the next section)."," From these plots we can read off the velocity structure of simulated galaxies, the sizes of bulges and discs, and we can also observe bar patterns, particularly in Aq-C-5, Aq-E-5 and Aq-G-5 (see also the next section)." +" Aq-A-5, Aq-C-5, Aq-D-5 and Aq-E-5 have the largest tangential velocities, as expected since these are the most massive galaxies and therefore have higher circular velocities."," Aq-A-5, Aq-C-5, Aq-D-5 and Aq-E-5 have the largest tangential velocities, as expected since these are the most massive galaxies and therefore have higher circular velocities." +" In the case of the disc starts to dominate at a relatively large radius, showing a ring-like structure."," In the case of the disc starts to dominate at a relatively large radius, showing a ring-like structure." +" As we discuss below, the absence of a disc in Aq-F-5 is evident from this figure, and also the small disc component of Aq-H-5."," As we discuss below, the absence of a disc in Aq-F-5 is evident from this figure, and also the small disc component of Aq-H-5." + We find that the dynamical structure of discs found for our simulations is also present in the lower resolution runs., We find that the dynamical structure of discs found for our simulations is also present in the lower resolution runs. +" In all cases, the older stars define thicker discs compared to the younger populations."," In all cases, the older stars define thicker discs compared to the younger populations." +" In particular, Aq-E-5 and Aq-E-6b show very good agreement, as shown in Fig. 10.."," In particular, Aq-E-5 and Aq-E-6b show very good agreement, as shown in Fig. \ref{disk_dynamics_resolution}." +" In this case, differences in tangential velocities and velocity dispersions are always lower than 5%."," In this case, differences in tangential velocities and velocity dispersions are always lower than $5\%$." +" For the youngest stars (left-hand panel), tangential velocities are lower for Aq-E-6b than for Aq-E-5."," For the youngest stars (left-hand panel), tangential velocities are lower for Aq-E-6b than for Aq-E-5." +" Velocity dispersion are, regardless of stellar age, larger for the lower resolution run."," Velocity dispersion are, regardless of stellar age, larger for the lower resolution run." + We detect more significant differences for Aq-C-6 and AqE-6 with respect to Aq-C-5 and Aq-E-5 respectively., We detect more significant differences for Aq-C-6 and Aq-E-6 with respect to Aq-C-5 and Aq-E-5 respectively. +" In these cases, the tangential velocities are typically 15% lower in the low resolution runs, while velocity dispersions are ~50% larger."," In these cases, the tangential velocities are typically $15\%$ lower in the low resolution runs, while velocity dispersions are $\sim 50\%$ larger." + These results show that low resolution runs can artificially boost the degree of disc heating., These results show that low resolution runs can artificially boost the degree of disc heating. +" In this section, we discuss the structure of the inner and outer spheroids of our simulated galaxies."," In this section, we discuss the structure of the inner and outer spheroids of our simulated galaxies." + In Figs., In Figs. +" and 12,, we show maps of surface mass density for inner spheroids (up to 0.5X ropt) and outer spheroids (up to"," \ref{maps_innerspheroid} and \ref{maps_outerspheroid}, , we show maps of surface mass density for inner spheroids (up to $0.5\times +r_{\rm opt}$ ) and outer spheroids (up to" +inter-order gaps.,inter-order gaps. + Figure 11 shows a possible detection of one line., Figure \ref{f_n_8216_synthesis} shows a possible detection of one line. + The N abundance is log e(N)<7.1 but this might properly be considered an upper limit., The N abundance is $\log\epsilon$ $\leq 7.1$ but this might properly be considered an upper limit. +" 0.2 cm The gf-values for the permitted and forbidden lines are taken from Wiese, Fühhr Deter (1996)."," 0.2 cm The $gf$ -values for the permitted and forbidden lines are taken from Wiese, Fühhr Deter (1996)." +" On the McDonald spectrum, the forbidden oxygen lines at 5577A,, 6300 aand 6363 aare detected."," On the McDonald spectrum, the forbidden oxygen lines at 5577, 6300 and 6363 are detected." + Weak permitted lines of RMT 10 near aare also analyzed., Weak permitted lines of RMT 10 near are also analyzed. + Figure 12 shows the best-fitting synthetic spectrum for the O16156 rregion., Figure \ref{f_o_synthesis} shows the best-fitting synthetic spectrum for the 6156 region. + Forbidden and permitted lines give a very similar abundance., Forbidden and permitted lines give a very similar abundance. +" The strong triplet at 7774 aand the 8446 feature give an abundance about 1.5 dex higher abundance, a difference attributed to non-LTE effects."," The strong triplet at 7774 and the 8446 feature give an abundance about 1.5 dex higher abundance, a difference attributed to non-LTE effects." + 0.2 cm The g f-values are taken from the database., 0.2 cm The $gf$ -values are taken from the database. + Five lines were suitable for abundance analysis from the McDonald spectrum (Table 3)., Five lines were suitable for abundance analysis from the McDonald spectrum (Table 3). + RMT and 6 give somewhat different results but we assign all lines the 4same weight., RMT 4 and 6 give somewhat different results but we assign all lines the same weight. +deviation of the amisotropic amplitude posteriors should vary with multipoles ἐν as done by Grocuchoom&Evilk-sen (2009).,"deviation of the anisotropic amplitude posteriors should vary with multipoles $\ell$, as done by \cite{groeneboom:2008b}." + Before performing a full-scale analysis of sinulated polarized Planck data. we wish to validate our code.," Before performing a full-scale analysis of simulated polarized Planck data, we wish to validate our code." + We therefore simulate a low-resolution ως—32 map with E- mode data included., We therefore simulate a low-resolution $N_{\textrm{side}}=32$ map with E- mode data included. + Assuming an anisotropic amplitude of gy.=1.0. we perform both a brute-force and a ietropolis-hastings analysis of a full-xky map with uo beam nor noise.," Assuming an anisotropic amplitude of $g_*=1.0$, we perform both a brute-force and a metropolis-hastings analysis of a full-sky map with no beam nor noise." + The resulting posteriors for the TT-case and the TT|TEEE-case are shown in Figure. 1.., The resulting posteriors for the TT-case and the TT+TE+EE-case are shown in Figure \ref{fig:simulated_posteriors}. + It is worth to note that the posterior is more narrow when inchiding polarization data. as there is more data available.," It is worth to note that the posterior is more narrow when including polarization data, as there is more data available." + A typical posterior of the estimated direction n together with the input TT|EE ACW-sigual is secu in Fieure 5.., A typical posterior of the estimated direction $n$ together with the input TT+EE ACW-signal is seen in Figure \ref{fig:res_asymmetric}. + We now consider a Plauck simmlation., We now consider a Planck simulation. + We first simulate a temperature-only ACW-anisotropic map with, We first simulate a temperature-only ACW-anisotropic map with +2009).,. +". In this paper the vectors v. n,. and ng are delined in the spacecraft coordinate svstem."," In this paper the vectors $\bf v$ , $\bf n_{_A}$ , and $\bf n_{_B}$ are defined in the spacecraft coordinate system." +" The errors of line-oEsight (LOS) vector. An, and n. will produce à pseudo-dipole difference signal The dipoles for each observations have to be removed from the raw data before because their intensities are roughly 10 to 20 times greater than those of the CMD anisolropies."," The errors of line-of-sight (LOS) vector, $\Delta \bf{n}_{_A}$ and $\Delta \bf{n}_{_B}$, will produce a pseudo-dipole difference signal The dipoles for each observations have to be removed from the raw data before map-making because their intensities are roughly 10 to 20 times greater than those of the CMB anisotropies." + A small error of antenna direction will produce an error in. predicted dipole intensity and (hen cause a pseudo-dipole signal in the resulting CMD map more noticeably through the Doppler dipole subtraction ., A small error of antenna direction will produce an error in predicted dipole intensity and then cause a pseudo-dipole signal in the resulting CMB map more noticeably through the Doppler dipole subtraction . + For example. a LOS error of ~7. just about a hall-pixel in the WMAP resolution. can consequently catse the dipole signal to be deviated by dx. which can not be ignored compared to the very weak CAIB signal.," For example, a LOS error of $\sim7'$, just about a half-pixel in the WMAP resolution, can consequently cause the dipole signal to be deviated by $\mu$ K, which can not be ignored compared to the very weak CMB signal." + An asvnehronous betweenthe attitude and differential data can also produce the signal., An asynchronous betweenthe attitude and differential data can also produce the pseudo-dipole signal. +" The WALAP mission uses two separate clocks for the attitude data and science data respectively,", The WMAP mission uses two separate clocks for the attitude data and science data respectively. + Therelore. if (here is a small constant timing error. (here will be a constant direction difference between the “observed pixel” and the true pixel.," Therefore, if there is a small constant timing error, there will be a constant direction difference between the ""observed pixel"" and the true pixel." + This has the same ellect as a constant LOS error in spacecraft coordinates (Liu.Niong&Li2010)., This has the same effect as a constant LOS error in spacecraft coordinates \citep{liu10}. +. Another possible source of pseudo-dipole signal in released WALAP maps is the sidelobe signal contamination., Another possible source of pseudo-dipole signal in released WMAP maps is the sidelobe signal contamination. + Like all radio telescopes. the WAIAP antennas have both main beam response and sidelobe response.," Like all radio telescopes, the WMAP antennas have both main beam response and sidelobe response." + The WAIAP antenna sidelobe response was described by Barnesοἱal.(2003) and the corresponding data file is publiclyavailable?., The WMAP antenna sidelobe response was described by \citet{barnes03} and the corresponding data file is publicly. +. The data files are fits Format fall skv maps in spacecraft coordinates in which the sidelobe responses are given in normalized gain C. where the normalization rule is that the summation of all gains [or one antenna (including the main beam) equals to AN. the nmunber of pixels in themap.," The data files are fits format full sky maps in spacecraft coordinates in which the sidelobe responses are given in normalized gain $G$, where the normalization rule is that the summation of all gains for one antenna (including the main beam) equals to $N$, the number of pixels in themap." +Thus for. eachdifferential⋅⊳⋅ observation.⋅ the recorded difference⋅⊳ signal⋅ is⋅ 357⋏∖↓↽↿4(6;—GP)T;/pua- N.,"Thus for eachdifferential observation, the recorded difference signal is $\sum_{i=0}^{N-1} (G_i^A-G_i^B)T_i/N$ ." + Let, Let +"Here we use as additional constraints Li observations that we performed for a large sample of field red giant stars (subgiant, RGB, and early-AGB stars) with metallicities around solar.","Here we use as additional constraints Li observations that we performed for a large sample of field red giant stars (subgiant, RGB, and early-AGB stars) with metallicities around solar." + All sample stars have Hipparcos parallaxes so that their mass and evolutionary status could be relatively well determined (Charbonnel et al., All sample stars have Hipparcos parallaxes so that their mass and evolutionary status could be relatively well determined (Charbonnel et al. + in preparation)., in preparation). +" In Fig.14 they are distinguished with respect to their mass (less or more massive than 2 M, in the left and right panels respectively).", In \ref{fig:Lagardeetal_posterIAU268_figb} they are distinguished with respect to their mass (less or more massive than 2 $_{\odot}$ in the left and right panels respectively). +" Let us consider first the stars with initial masses lower than 2 Mc, whose Li properties are compared with predictions for the 1.5 and 2 Me models (left panel of Fig.14))."," Let us consider first the stars with initial masses lower than 2 $_{\odot}$, whose Li properties are compared with predictions for the 1.5 and 2 $_{\odot}$ models (left panel of \ref{fig:Lagardeetal_posterIAU268_figb}) )." + The theoretical Li behaviour is relatively straightforward., The theoretical Li behaviour is relatively straightforward. +" On the main sequence and on the early-RGB, rotation-induced mixing leads to stronger Li depletion than in the standard case (compare e.g. the red curve with the black one); in this mass range indeed standard models predict no Li depletion on the main sequence and a N(Li) of the order of 1.5 at the end of the first dredge-up, which is at odds with the data."," On the main sequence and on the early-RGB, rotation-induced mixing leads to stronger Li depletion than in the standard case (compare e.g. the red curve with the black one); in this mass range indeed standard models predict no Li depletion on the main sequence and a N(Li) of the order of 1.5 at the end of the first dredge-up, which is at odds with the data." +" After the end of the first dredge-up (Teff ~ 4800 K), the theoretical Li abundance remains temporarily constant as the convective envelope withdraws in mass."," After the end of the first dredge-up (Teff $\sim$ 4800 K), the theoretical Li abundance remains temporarily constant as the convective envelope withdraws in mass." +" When thermohaline mixing becomes efficient (Teff ~ 4200 K), the theoretical Li abundance drops again in drastic manner (while it would stay constant in the standard case)."," When thermohaline mixing becomes efficient (Teff $\sim$ 4200 K), the theoretical Li abundance drops again in drastic manner (while it would stay constant in the standard case)." +" After the star has reached the RGB tip its effective temperature increases (up to ~ 4800 K) as it settles on the clump, before decreasing again when the star starts climbing the early-AGB."," After the star has reached the RGB tip its effective temperature increases (up to $\sim$ 4800 K) as it settles on the clump, before decreasing again when the star starts climbing the early-AGB." + The second dredge-up that occurs then leads to a final decrease of N(Li)., The second dredge-up that occurs then leads to a final decrease of N(Li). +" On this graph we do not plot the Li increase that is predicted to occur during the TP-AGB phase at a Teff of ~ 3200 K due to thermohaline mixing, and which is discussed in 4.1.2."," On this graph we do not plot the Li increase that is predicted to occur during the TP-AGB phase at a Teff of $\sim$ 3200 K due to thermohaline mixing, and which is discussed in 4.1.2." +" As can be seen in Fig.14,, the present predictions are in perfect agreement with the data all along the evolutionary sequence and explain very well the upper limits observed for the brightest sample giant stars."," As can be seen in \ref{fig:Lagardeetal_posterIAU268_figb}, the present predictions are in perfect agreement with the data all along the evolutionary sequence and explain very well the upper limits observed for the brightest sample giant stars." + The observed Li dispersion at a given effective temperature reflects dispersion in the initial rotation velocity and in the initial stellar mass???)., The observed Li dispersion at a given effective temperature reflects dispersion in the initial rotation velocity and in the initial stellar mass. +". The case of the more massive stars, whose Li observational behaviour is compared to predictions for the 2.5 and 2.7 Me models (right panel of Fig.14)) is even more simple."," The case of the more massive stars, whose Li observational behaviour is compared to predictions for the 2.5 and 2.7 $_{\odot}$ models (right panel of \ref{fig:Lagardeetal_posterIAU268_figb}) ) is even more simple." +" In these objects indeed no thermohaline mixing occurs on the too short RGB, and rotation-induced mixing alone explains very well the data."," In these objects indeed no thermohaline mixing occurs on the too short RGB, and rotation-induced mixing alone explains very well the data." +" In all the models that we have computed along the TP-AGB, non negligible fresh lithium production is obtained, although"," In all the models that we have computed along the TP-AGB, non negligible fresh lithium production is obtained, although" +"the observed bispectrum in Eq. (17)), CtCes,","the observed bispectrum in Eq. \ref{eq:Dfnlanalyt}) ), $B^\mathrm{loc}_{\ell_1\ell_2\ell_3} / +C_{\ell_1}C_{\ell_2}C_{\ell_3}$," +" which rapidly increases with multipole Bi°%,0,/Ce,as the product of spectra decreases more quickly than the bispectrum.", which rapidly increases with multipole as the product of spectra decreases more quickly than the bispectrum. + This leads to a 1/C dependence in squeezed configurations and to a 1/C? dependence in equilateral configurations., This leads to a $1/C_\ell$ dependence in squeezed configurations and to a $1/C_\ell^2$ dependence in equilateral configurations. +" When the observed bispectrum is associated to CMB signal alone, its decrease cancels the increase of the weights so that the sum in Eq. (17))"," When the observed bispectrum is associated to CMB signal alone, its decrease cancels the increase of the weights so that the sum in Eq. \ref{eq:Dfnlanalyt}) )" + converges., converges. +" Conversely, the sum diverges when the observed bispectrum is associated with a non-CMB signal and does not decrease with 6 as fast as the CMB."," Conversely, the sum diverges when the observed bispectrum is associated with a non-CMB signal and does not decrease with $\ell$ as fast as the CMB." + The bias Aff is maximal at 30 GHz and rapidly decreases with frequency., The bias $\Delta f_\mathrm{NL}^\mathrm{RAD}$ is maximal at 30 GHz and rapidly decreases with frequency. + It slightly increases again at the two highest frequencies following the amplitude of the bispectrum in temperature units which is plotted in the upper panel of Fig. 4.., It slightly increases again at the two highest frequencies following the amplitude of the bispectrum in temperature units which is plotted in the upper panel of Fig. \ref{fig:amplRAD}. + The relative error of ΔΙΑ for Ímax=700 is of the order of independently of the frequency.," The relative error of $\Delta +f_\mathrm{NL}^\mathrm{RAD}$ for $\ell_{\mathrm{max}}=700$ is of the order of independently of the frequency." + It amounts to for €max=2048., It amounts to for $\ell_{\mathrm{max}}=2048$. + These errors bars were computed with simulations using the catalog of sources present in Sehgal et al., These errors bars were computed with simulations using the catalog of sources present in Sehgal et al. +"’s maps As shown in Table 1,, masking sources above the ERCSC flux limit proves very efficient to significantly decrease the radio contamination to /wr at all the frequencies.","'s maps As shown in Table \ref{fnlradtable}, masking sources above the ERCSC flux limit proves very efficient to significantly decrease the radio contamination to $f_\mathrm{NL}$ at all the frequencies." +" At a Planck-like resolution, £44.=2048, the bias AfR#? is reduced below unity above 150 GHz."," At a Planck-like resolution, $\ell_\mathrm{max}= 2048$, the bias $\Delta +f_\mathrm{NL}^\mathrm{RAD}$ is reduced below unity above 150 GHz." + It is of the order of Planck's expected error bars at 90 GHz., It is of the order of Planck's expected error bars at 90 GHz. + At 30 GHz the bias is still important., At 30 GHz the bias is still important. +" The bias due to IR sources Aft, is always negative, see Table 2.."," The bias due to IR sources $\Delta f_\mathrm{NL}^\mathrm{IR}$ is always negative, see Table \ref{fnlirtable}." +" As a matter of fact, we have shown that the IR bispectrum peaks in squeezed configurations just like the CMB bispectrum and these configurations thus dominate the sum in Eq. (17))."," As a matter of fact, we have shown that the IR bispectrum peaks in squeezed configurations just like the CMB bispectrum and these configurations thus dominate the sum in Eq. \ref{eq:Dfnlanalyt}) )." +" Moreover, in the squeezed limit the CMB bispectrum is negative while the IR bispectrum is positive."," Moreover, in the squeezed limit the CMB bispectrum is negative while the IR bispectrum is positive." +" For the same reason as for radio sources, the bias AfMi blows up at high multipoles."," For the same reason as for radio sources, the bias $\Delta +f_\mathrm{NL}^\mathrm{IR}$ blows up at high multipoles." +" This is particularly important at a Planck-like resolution, max=2048, where primordial NG tests will need to carefully handle the contamination by IR sources."," This is particularly important at a Planck-like resolution, $\ell_\mathrm{max}=2048$, where primordial NG tests will need to carefully handle the contamination by IR sources." + The IR sources emission plummets at radio frequencies so that Afl is completely negligible below 220 GHz.," The IR sources emission plummets at radio frequencies so that $\Delta +f_\mathrm{NL}^\mathrm{IR}$ is completely negligible below 220 GHz." + It becomes of the order of Planck's error bars at 277 GHz and it reaches WMAP’s central values for fri at 350 GHz., It becomes of the order of Planck's error bars at 277 GHz and it reaches WMAP's central values for $f_\mathrm{NL}$ at 350 GHz. + The relative error of Aft ranges between 6 and from 148 to 350 GHz for €max=700., The relative error of $\Delta f_\mathrm{NL}^\mathrm{IR}$ ranges between 6 and from 148 to 350 GHz for $\ell_{\mathrm{max}}=700$. + It ranges between 3 and for €max=2048. (, It ranges between 3 and for $\ell_{\mathrm{max}}=2048$. ( +These error bars were computed analytically with the weak NG approximation — see Appendix ??)) At higher frequencies the IR contamination to the bispectrum is likely larger but the contamination from our Galaxy needs to be taken into account as well.,These error bars were computed analytically with the weak NG approximation – see Appendix \ref{appendix:wngvar}) ) At higher frequencies the IR contamination to the bispectrum is likely larger but the contamination from our Galaxy needs to be taken into account as well. +Using observations of the and transitions ofII2CO.. we have successfully. coustrained the spatial deusities of a sample of ealactic star-forming reeious.,"Using observations of the and transitions of, we have successfully constrained the spatial densities of a sample of galactic star-forming regions." + Both trausitious were observed toward 15 sources with relative ease. requiring an average of 17 min of iuteeration time aud resulting in ouly 2 nonudoetectious in the J=1 transition.," Both transitions were observed toward 18 sources with relative ease, requiring an average of 17 min of integration time and resulting in only 3 nondetections in the $J=4$ transition." + Accurate of the spatial deusitv η) were mnade“---Dicamus for 13 objects and useful lanits were placed on the une a colmbination of Large Velocity Gradieut (LVG) aud Loca Thermodvuamic Equilibrimm (LTE) analyses., Accurate measurements of the spatial density )] were made for 13 objects and useful limits were placed on the remainder using a combination of Large Velocity Gradient (LVG) and Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE) analyses. + Molecular ivdrogeu densities iu the range of ane ortho-formaldehyde colin densities per unit Lue width )etween and are foun or most sources. m general agreement with previous neasurements.," Molecular hydrogen densities in the range of and ortho-formaldehyde column densities per unit line width between and are found for most sources, in general agreement with previous measurements." + Detailed analyses of the advantages and limitations o this «ο... technique have also been provided., Detailed analyses of the advantages and limitations to this densitometry technique have also been provided. + deusitometry proves to be best suited to objects with z 100 EK. above which the LVG models come relatively independent of kineticο teniperaturoe.," densitometry proves to be best suited to objects with $\gtrsim$ 100 K, above which the LVG models become relatively independent of kinetic temperature." + Compared with the similarly utilized aud ransitious. the 7—3 aud | A--doublets provide higher spatial resolution aud scusitivity to hot. deuse material. which makes them more efficieut probes of spatial density iu wnolecular cores.," Compared with the similarly utilized and transitions, the $J=3$ and 4 -doublets provide higher spatial resolution and sensitivity to hot, dense material, which makes them more efficient probes of spatial density in molecular cores." + However. beam widths comparable o the auticipated source sizes make source structure considerations iniportant.," However, beam widths comparable to the anticipated source sizes make source structure considerations important." + Since nappiig mneasurenments inve vet to be conducted for these trausifious. the correlation between the spatial extent traced bv the J—35 and | K-doublets aud that of other deuse gas racers Is uncertain. naking spatial assuniptious based on past nieasuremoeuts problematic.," Since mapping measurements have yet to be conducted for these transitions, the correlation between the spatial extent traced by the $J=3$ and 4 -doublets and that of other dense gas tracers is uncertain, making spatial assumptions based on past measurements problematic." + This work serves as asuccessful proof-of-concept for he J=3/J| K-doublet densitometry echuique. adding a useful new diagnostic to the study of deuse molecular cuvironiments.," This work serves as asuccessful proof-of-concept for the $J=3/J=4$ -doublet densitometry technique, adding a useful new diagnostic to the study of dense molecular environments." + The Green Bank Telescope (CBT) staff was characteristically helpful and coutributed significantly o the success of our observing program., The Green Bank Telescope (GBT) staff was characteristically helpful and contributed significantly to the success of our observing program. + The authors also thank the referee for several conuuenuts that ereatlv chhanced this work., The authors also thank the referee for several comments that greatly enhanced this work. + P. L M. would like to hank Tarold Dutuer aud the NRAOQ REU students of 2009 for their continued support., P. I. M. would like to thank Harold Butner and the NRAO REU students of 2009 for their continued support. + Funding for his project was provided bv the NSF through the NRAO REU Program (award No., Funding for this project was provided by the NSF through the NRAO REU Program (award No. + 0755390) aud vo NRÀO though an undereraduate internship. Fucilities::, 0755390) and by NRAO though an undergraduate internship. : + , +corona (e.g. see 9105. or refer to (he density profile in Figure 1 to be discussed in 833).,"corona (e.g. see SI05, or refer to the density profile in Figure 1 to be discussed in 3)." +" Roughly speaking. for ο=3xI0! km/s. lupSUH, when n>10°em ."," Roughly speaking, for $v_b=3\times 10^4$ km/s, $l_{\rm mfp} \lesssim H_\rho$ when $n>10^9$ $^{-3}$." + Therefore. we anticipate the inwarcd-propagating electron beam {ο heat up ambient media from the lower corona to the upper chromosphere.," Therefore, we anticipate the inward-propagating electron beam to heat up ambient media from the lower corona to the upper chromosphere." +" This allows us to assume that the incoming electron beam starts dissipating lrom μας=1.148. (lower corona) to ry,=1.0012. (upper chromosphere).", This allows us to assume that the incoming electron beam starts dissipating from $r_{\rm max} =1.1R_{\odot}$ (lower corona) to $r_{\rm min}=1.001R_{\odot}$ (upper chromosphere). + We model the energy flux of the beam to decrease inwardly according to where fis a parameter (hat describes (he spacial distribution of the heating., We model the energy flux of the beam to decrease inwardly according to where $k$ is a parameter that describes the spacial distribution of the heating. +" =1 corresponds to constant volumetric heating: namely, the heating rate per unit mass is higher in (he upper region (i.e. corona) than in the lower region (i.e. chromosphere)."," $k=1$ corresponds to constant volumetric heating; namely, the heating rate per unit mass is higher in the upper region (i.e. corona) than in the lower region (i.e. chromosphere)." + II 7=0.1. the heating rate per unit mass is more unilormlwv distributed.," If $k= 0.1$, the heating rate per unit mass is more uniformly distributed." + In (his work. we adopt =0.1 to resemble (he situation of a constant beam-heatine rate per unit mass.," In this work, we adopt $k=0.1$ to resemble the situation of a constant beam-heating rate per unit mass." +" We also assume (hat the momentum flux of the beam J, clissipates in (he same manner as that described bv eq. (5))", We also assume that the momentum flux of the beam $P_b$ dissipates in the same manner as that described by eq. \ref{eq:F_b_diss}) ) + for the energy flux., for the energy flux. +" This implies that although the beam velocity ορ does not decay in our dissipation model. the beam density p, declines. meaning that more and more beam electrons have been transformed into thermal electrons as the beam progresses downwids in (he dissipation region."," This implies that although the beam velocity $v_b$ does not decay in our dissipation model, the beam density $\rho_b$ declines, meaning that more and more beam electrons have been transformed into thermal electrons as the beam progresses downwards in the dissipation region." + The beam heating al the footpoint of one open [fiekl line occurs when the planet's nagnetosphere is crossing the field line., The beam heating at the footpoint of one open field line occurs when the planet's magnetosphere is crossing the field line. + ence. by means of eq. (1)).," Hence, by means of eq. \ref{eq:R_mp}) )," + the beam heating proceeds on the timescale The stellar atmosphere model is based on the 1-D magnetohydrocdvuamic simulation with radiative cooling and thermal conduction in an open flux tube (5105)., the beam heating proceeds on the timescale The stellar atmosphere model is based on the 1-D magnetohydrodynamic simulation with radiative cooling and thermal conduction in an open flux tube (SI05). + In the original simulation. the heating is given bv the nonlinear dissipation of the Alfvénn waves excited by (he eranulations at the photosphere.," In the original simulation, the heating is given by the nonlinear dissipation of the Alfvénn waves excited by the granulations at the photosphere." +" In (he case of D,=1 G. we set arms average amplitude «dome1.8 km/s al the photosphere. which is estimated from (he scaling with the surface convective flux (Suzuki 2007) [rom the Sun (S105)."," In the case of $B_*=1$ G, we set a rms average amplitude $ \sim 1.8$ km/s at the photosphere, which is estimated from the scaling with the surface convective flux (Suzuki 2007) from the Sun (SI05)." +" In the case of the stronger field D,=5 G. (the larger rms velocity fluctuation +\sim 3.6$ km/s is used for the experiment, which" +Ultra-high energv cosmic ravs (ULLIECIS) are energetic particles (2107 eV) that must originate in the most powerlul particle accelerators in. the Universe.,Ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) are energetic particles $> 10^{19}$ eV) that must originate in the most powerful particle accelerators in the Universe. + These extreme events have fascinatecl scientists from. the time of their ciscovery in. 1962 (Linsley19039).., These extreme events have fascinated scientists from the time of their discovery in 1962 \citep{linsley}. +. Since then. speculation about their origin has Llourishecl (Pierpaoli&Ferrar2005:Ghisellinietal.2008:Cuesta&Prada 2009).," Since then, speculation about their origin has flourished \citep{pierpaoli,ghise,cuesta}." +. Theoretically. active galactic nucle: (AGN) have long been awored as the best candidates for particle acceleration to hese extreme energies (Ginzburg&Svrovatskii1964:Lillas 1984).," Theoretically, active galactic nuclei (AGN) have long been favored as the best candidates for particle acceleration to these extreme energies \citep{ginzburg,hillas}." +. Unfortunately. no firm astrophysical association has »en established.," Unfortunately, no firm astrophysical association has been established." + Possibly the most intriguing suggestion of an association between VIECRs and AGN was put forward by he collaboration (Abrahametal.2004). that ound a possible correlation between the arrival direction of 27 events collected in their Southern Observatory ancl the »osition of nearby ας75 Alpe) ACN from the Verónn-C'etty catalog (Abrahamctal.2007)., Possibly the most intriguing suggestion of an association between UHECRs and AGN was put forward by the collaboration \citep{abraham} that found a possible correlation between the arrival direction of 27 events collected in their Southern Observatory and the position of nearby $\leq 75$ Mpc) AGN from the Verónn-Cetty catalog \citep{abraham2}. +. The correlation. remains out. has weakened. slightly. with the inclusion of additional ULLECTtU events (for a grand total of 58) collected between 2004 January and 2009 March (Abrahamctal.2009)., The correlation remains but has weakened slightly with the inclusion of additional UHECR events (for a grand total of 58) collected between 2004 January and 2009 March \citep{abraham3}. +. eonetheless. questions remain about the likelihood of the reported correlation (Abbasietal.2008a).," Nonetheless, questions remain about the likelihood of the reported correlation \citep{abbasi2}." +. Lt is expected that 1 AGN are responsible for ULIECας. these must be preferentially placed. within a distance of 100 Mpe (Abrahametal.2007).," It is expected that if AGN are responsible for UHECRs, these must be preferentially placed within a distance of 100 Mpc \citep{abraham2}." + Interactions with Cosmic Microwave: Background. (CALB) photons should starve UllEClis arriving [rom larger distances through the Cireisen-Zatsepin-Ixuzmin (GZIx) ΓΣ 1966:Zatsepin&Ixuzmin 1966)..," Interactions with Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) photons should starve UHECRs arriving from larger distances through the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin (GZK) effect \citep{greisen,zatse}." + In. fact. a combination of recent observations appear to corroborate the existence of a suppression of ULIECISs above 45107 eV. consistent with a GZlx horizon (Abbasictal.2008b:Abrahamet 2008h).," In fact, a combination of recent observations appear to corroborate the existence of a suppression of UHECRs above $4 \times 10^{19}$ eV consistent with a GZK horizon \citep{abbasi,abraham4}." +. It is important to note that recent results from theAuger collaboration point to a transition to heavier Composition with increasing energies (Unger2007).., It is important to note that recent results from the collaboration point to a transition to heavier composition with increasing energies \citep{unger}. + If indeed iron nuclei are the dominant component of CLUECRs. the large deviation angles expected. for heavy. nuclei would render the detection of astrophysical counterparts even the nearest ones nearly impossible (Abrahametal.2008a).," If indeed iron nuclei are the dominant component of UHECRs, the large deviation angles expected for heavy nuclei would render the detection of astrophysical counterparts even the nearest ones nearly impossible \citep{abraham5}." +. llere. we present a cross-correlation study of ας and the recently released: LLarge Area Telescope First Source Catalog (1EGL) in the 100 MeV. to 100 GeV energy range CXbdoetal.2010a).," Here, we present a cross-correlation study of UHECRs and the recently released Large Area Telescope First Source Catalog (1FGL) in the 100 MeV to 100 GeV energy range \citep{abdo}." +. In contrast with previous studies. our cross-correlation analvsis is unique in that the ceatalog comprises a wide range of particle accelerators with gamma-ray production above LOO MeV directed in the Earth's direction.," In contrast with previous studies, our cross-correlation analysis is unique in that the catalog comprises a wide range of particle accelerators with gamma-ray production above $100$ MeV directed in the Earth's direction." + The Large Area Telescope on board. olfers à major improvement in sensitivity over previous GeV. detectors (Atwood 2007).., The Large Area Telescope on board offers a major improvement in sensitivity over previous GeV detectors \citep{atwood}. . + In its survey observation, In its survey observation +of Perhuan et al. (,of Perlman et al. ( +"1996). also did not show a broad IL, coniponoent.",1996) also did not show a broad $\rm H_{\alpha}$ component. + Following Goodrich et al. (, Following Goodrich et al. ( +1990). the non-detection of a sieuificaut broad Ta euission liue suggests an extinction value of the Broad Line Region (BLR) of at least Ay = 3.7.,"1994), the non-detection of a significant broad $\alpha$ emission line suggests an extinction value of the Broad Line Region (BLR) of at least $\rm A_V$ = 3.7." + Near-infrared spectra of LES 1927|651 are required to estimate the upper limit of the extinction of the BLR by the detection of broad emission line componcuts at longer wavelength. e.g. at Dr 5 or Bra.," Near-infrared spectra of 1ES 1927+654 are required to estimate the upper limit of the extinction of the BLR by the detection of broad emission line components at longer wavelength, e.g. at Br $\gamma$ or $\alpha$." + The Ay values discussed above refer to the stm of the Galactic aud intrinsic extinction., The $\rm A_V$ values discussed above refer to the sum of the Galactic and intrinsic extinction. + The Galactic Ay value in the direction of LES 1927|65 Lis 0.291 as found iun NED., The Galactic $\rm A_V$ value in the direction of 1ES 1927+654 is 0.291 as found in NED. + Therefore. the corrected Ay for the Narrow Line Region iu the distant ACN is at most 1.71 (or slightly lower if we could correct for the underlying absorption line at /).," Therefore, the corrected $\rm A_V$ for the Narrow Line Region in the distant AGN is at most 1.71 (or slightly lower if we could correct for the underlying absorption line at $\beta$ )." + The rapid. giant and persistent X-ray variability. of LES 1927|651 detected with ROSAT aud coufirmed by Chandra point to a type P ACN classification. ic. we have a direct view to the central region.," The rapid, giant and persistent X-ray variability of 1ES 1927+654 detected with ROSAT and confirmed by Chandra point to a type 1 AGN classification, i.e. we have a direct view to the central region." + The optical spectra. however. give a Sevtert 2 classification with some contribution from the host ealaxyv.," The optical spectra, however, give a Seyfert 2 classification with some contribution from the host galaxy." + There secus to be a senificaut discrepancy (factor ~ 6) between the lower lait of the Ay value of 3.7 for the BLR. estimated from the optical spectrmu. auc the ιαπα Ay of 0.58 determined from the N-ray spectu.," There seems to be a significant discrepancy (factor $\sim$ 6) between the lower limit of the $\rm A_V$ value of 3.7 for the BLR, estimated from the optical spectrum, and the maximum $\rm A_V$ of 0.58 determined from the X-ray spectrum." + We note that if the dust is optically thin for N-vavs the intrinsic X-ray Ay cau not ereatlv exceed the observed value of 0.58. otherwise we would observe much strouger absorption edges as well as a lieher cuereyv soft X-ray cutoff.," We note that if the dust is optically thin for X-rays the intrinsic X-ray $\rm A_V$ can not greatly exceed the observed value of 0.58, otherwise we would observe much stronger absorption edges as well as a higher energy soft X-ray cutoff." + In this section we will discuss the possible scenarios resulting iu this unique colmbination of X-ray and optical properties., In this section we will discuss the possible scenarios resulting in this unique combination of X-ray and optical properties. + One possible explanation for the apparent disagreeineut i N-rav and optical properties ids an extremely underbhuuiuous. or even absent. BLR.," One possible explanation for the apparent disagreement in X-ray and optical properties is an extremely underluminous, or even absent, BLR." + The bhuuimositv derivec for the putative broad Πα component (see Fig., The luminosity derived for the putative broad $\alpha$ component (see Fig. + 10) is about LOeres.JH. whereas the total huninosity iu the optical B-haud is about 107erest.," 10) is about $\rm 10^{38} erg s^{-1}$, whereas the total luminosity in the optical $B$ -band is about $\rm 10^{43}\ erg\ s^{-1}$." + The typical ratio of cluission line to total B-baud huninosity iu Sevtert ealaxies is approximately 1 to 5 per ceut (Netzer. private commnimnuication). thus we would expect a line luninosity of about 104ere«| iu LES 19271651.," The typical ratio of emission line to total B-band luminosity in Seyfert galaxies is approximately 1 to 5 per cent (Netzer, private communication), thus we would expect a line luminosity of about $\rm 10^{41}\ erg\ s^{-1}$ in 1ES 1927+654." + This may be sugeestive of an underhuninous BLR., This may be suggestive of an underluminous BLR. + The true optical extinction might be larecr than that derived frou the optical spectrum., The true optical extinction might be larger than that derived from the optical spectrum. + It is possible hat. for exinuple. the dust erains in the absorbing matter could be individually thick to N-ravs (cf.," It is possible that, for example, the dust grains in the absorbing matter could be individually thick to X-rays (cf." + Fircuau 1971)., Fireman 1974). + In this case. the soft N-rav spectrum cutoff does not chanec with increasing BAy values. o. it remains constant in the rav observations.," In this case, the soft X-ray spectrum cutoff does not change with increasing $\rm A_V$ values, i.e. it remains constant in the X-ray observations." + Iu addition. we could have a large selfblauketiug factor. in which case the absorbed hWmuuinositv from the BLR Ιστ be even larger than the value derived in the case where the dust is optically thin to N-ravs.," In addition, we could have a large self-blanketing factor, in which case the absorbed luminosity from the BLR might be even larger than the value derived in the case where the dust is optically thin to X-rays." + We also can not exclude that LES 1927|651 exhibits a higher dust ο gas ratio than that of about 0.01 derived. from interstellar dust to gas ratios (CGorensteiu 1975)., We also can not exclude that 1ES 1927+654 exhibits a higher dust to gas ratio than that of about 0.01 derived from interstellar dust to gas ratios (Gorenstein 1975). +into three peaks. and that the 3.44 mm source detected by Hunteretal.(1999) actually consists of five millimeter sources.,"into three peaks, and that the 3.4 mm source detected by \citet{hunter1999} actually consists of five millimeter sources." +" Regarding the molecular outflow emission in. this region. Zhangetal.(2007) identify three molecular outflows in CO((2-1) and 65-5,. one of them coinciding with an ooutflow and the well-collimated SiO jet detected by Hunteretal. (1999)."," Regarding the molecular outflow emission in this region, \citet{zhang2007} identify three molecular outflows in (2–1) and $6_{5}$ $5_{4}$, one of them coinciding with an outflow and the well-collimated SiO jet detected by \citet{hunter1999}." +" All three outflows appear to originate from the dust condensation in a region of about 3"".", All three outflows appear to originate from the dust condensation in a region of about $3''$. + All this information indicates that active star formation in clustered mode ts taking place in 55142., All this information indicates that active star formation in clustered mode is taking place in 5142. + The dense gas emission in this region has been studied with single-dish telescopes inNH3..CS.. HCN. HCO™..CH;OH.. and (Verdes-Montenegroetal.1989:Estalella1993:Hunteretal.1995.1999;Cesaroni 1999)).," The dense gas emission in this region has been studied with single-dish telescopes in, HCN, and \citealt{verdes-montenegro1989,estalella1993,hunter1995,hunter1999,cesaroni1999}) )." + In particular. the dense gas emission traced by the mmolecule has been observed with high angular resolution using the VLA (Zhangetal.2002).," In particular, the dense gas emission traced by the molecule has been observed with high angular resolution using the VLA \citep{zhang2002}." + The high angular resolution eemission consists of a central and compact core associated with the dust condensation. harboring at least. three intermediate/high-mass young stars. surrounded by fainter ccores located in a more extended structure with no signs of stellar activity (no maser nor molecular outflow emission associated) indicating that the region may harbor cores in different evolutionary stages.," The high angular resolution emission consists of a central and compact core associated with the dust condensation, harboring at least three intermediate/high-mass young stars, surrounded by fainter cores located in a more extended structure with no signs of stellar activity (no maser nor molecular outflow emission associated) indicating that the region may harbor cores in different evolutionary stages." + The presence of cores contaming massive star(s) together with cores with no star-formation activity makes this region a good choice to study how the rratio behaves in high-massregions.., The presence of cores containing massive star(s) together with cores with no star-formation activity makes this region a good choice to study how the ratio behaves in high-mass. + In this paper we report CARMA observations of the continuum emission at 3.2 mm and the dense gas traced by .((1-0) toward 55142., In this paper we report CARMA observations of the continuum emission at 3.2 mm and the dense gas traced by (1–0) toward 5142. + The paper layout ts as follows: in .22 we summarize our observations and the data reduction process., The paper layout is as follows: in 2 we summarize our observations and the data reduction process. + In .33 we present the main results for the continuum and mmolecular line emission., In 3 we present the main results for the continuum and molecular line emission. + In .J4 we analyze the molecular emission of several species by computing their column density maps., In 4 we analyze the molecular emission of several species by computing their column density maps. + In .55 we show the mai results of the chemical model to qualitatively reproduce the abundances of the region., In 5 we show the main results of the chemical model to qualitatively reproduce the abundances of the region. + Finally. ins .66 we discuss our findings. and we list the main conclusions ins 77," Finally, in 6 we discuss our findings, and we list the main conclusions in 7." +", The Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave (CARMA) was used to observe the 3.2 mm continuum and the (1-0) emission toward AFGL 5142.", The Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave (CARMA) was used to observe the 3.2 mm continuum and the (1-0) emission toward AFGL 5142. + CARMA consists of six 10 m and nine 6 m antennas located at 2200 meters elevation at Cedar Flat in the Inyo Mountains of California., CARMA consists of six 10 m and nine 6 m antennas located at 2200 meters elevation at Cedar Flat in the Inyo Mountains of California. + The observations were carried out on 2007 February 4 and March 11 using the array in the C configuration with 14 antennas in the array., The observations were carried out on 2007 February 4 and March 11 using the array in the C configuration with 14 antennas in the array. +" The projected baselines ranged from 26 to 370 m. The phase center was set at &=0530""48:02, 0=-33747'54""747."," The projected baselines ranged from 26 to 370 m. The phase center was set at $\alpha=05^{\rm h}30^{\rm m}48\rm \fs02$, $\delta=+33\degr47\arcmin54\farcs47$." +" The FWHM of the primary beam at the frequency of the observations was 132"" for the 6 m antennas and 77"" for the 10 m antennas.", The FWHM of the primary beam at the frequency of the observations was $''$ for the 6 m antennas and $''$ for the 10 m antennas. + System temperatures were around 250 K during both The digital correlator was configured to observe simultaneously the continuum emission and the (1-0) group of the hyperfine transitions (93.176331. GHz. in the lower sideband).," System temperatures were around 250 K during both The digital correlator was configured to observe simultaneously the continuum emission and the (1–0) group of the hyperfine transitions (93.176331 GHz, in the lower sideband)." + The continuum data were recorded in, The continuum data were recorded in +"26,891 secure (95% or greater confidence) redshifts, while the VVDS and zCOSMOS data sets include only","$26,891$ secure $95\%$ or greater confidence) redshifts, while the VVDS and zCOSMOS data sets include only" +The starless cores owe their reputation as the sites of future star formation to the similarities they share with neighboring cores already in the pains of stellar birth.,The starless cores owe their reputation as the sites of future star formation to the similarities they share with neighboring cores already in the pains of stellar birth. +" Small (tenths of pe). dense (1g,~10? to 109 em?) dark clouds of a few solar masses. the starless cores contain no infrared sources above the sensitivity level of the IRAS satellite (about 0.1 L.. at the distance of Taurus)."," Small (tenths of pc), dense $n_{\rm H_2} \sim 10^3$ to $10^6$ $^{-3}$ ) dark clouds of a few solar masses, the starless cores contain no infrared sources above the sensitivity level of the IRAS satellite (about 0.1 $_\odot$ at the distance of Taurus)." + Mixed in with a population of cores. embedded infrared protostars. and young T-Tauri stars. the starless cores seem on the verge of issue. (Myersetal.1983:Bergin&Tafalla2007 ).," Mixed in with a population of cores, embedded infrared protostars, and young T-Tauri stars, the starless cores seem on the verge of issue. \citep{MyersLinkeBenson1983, MyersBenson1983, BensonMyers1989, Beichman1986, +DiFrancesco2007, Ward-Thompson2007,BerginTafalla2007}." +. The starless cores are remarkable in another sense., The starless cores are remarkable in another sense. + They may be the structures in the interstellar medium in quasi-static equilibriumonly with lifetimes longer than their sound-crossing times (Beichmanetal.1986;Jessop&Ward-Thompson2000:Kirketal.2005:Ward-Thompson 2007).," They may be the only structures in the interstellar medium in quasi-static equilibrium with lifetimes longer than their sound-crossing times \citep{Beichman1986,JessopWT2000,KirkWTAndre2005,Ward-Thompson2007}." +. Whereas all larger-scale clouds are better described as transient structures within a turbulent cascade (Fieldetal.2008).. the starless cores show observed densities that are consistently matched (Ward-etal.2005) by the truncated solutions of the isothermal Lane-Emden equation. re.. the Bonnor-Ebert (BE) spheres (Bonnor1956).," Whereas all larger-scale clouds are better described as transient structures within a turbulent cascade \citep{Field2008}, the starless cores show observed densities that are consistently matched \citep{Ward-Thompson1994,Andre1996,Ward-Thompson1999,Bacmann2000,Evans2001,AlvesLadaLada2001,Tafalla2002,Kandori2005,KirkWTAndre2005} + by the truncated solutions of the isothermal Lane-Emden equation, i.e., the Bonnor-Ebert (BE) spheres \citep{Bonnor1956}." +. These are self-gravitating spheres supported by thermal energy and bounded by an external pressure., These are self-gravitating spheres supported by thermal energy and bounded by an external pressure. + The source of the external pressure appears to depend upon the star forming region. though its necessity is well documented.," The source of the external pressure appears to depend upon the star forming region, though its necessity is well documented." + Within the Pipe nebula. the core energetics are consistent with a constant external pressure supplied by hotter. more rareified gas (Ladaetal.2008).," Within the Pipe nebula, the core energetics are consistent with a constant external pressure supplied by hotter, more rareified gas \citep{Lada2008}." +. In other regions. such as Lupus (Teixeiraetal.2005).. the cores appear to be surrounded by lower density molecular gas with observed molecular line widths =|] kms.," In other regions, such as Lupus \citep{Teixeira2005}, the cores appear to be surrounded by lower density molecular gas with observed molecular line widths $\geq 1$ kms." + Here and in similar regions small-scale (smaller than the observing beam) supersonic turbulence in the low-density molecular gas around the cores may supply the confining pressure., Here and in similar regions small-scale (smaller than the observing beam) supersonic turbulence in the low-density molecular gas around the cores may supply the confining pressure. + While a continuous extension to the larger-scale ISM prompts the question. of whether the cores are individual dynamical entities. a distinct boundary ts evident in several observations.," While a continuous extension to the larger-scale ISM prompts the question of whether the cores are individual dynamical entities, a distinct boundary is evident in several observations." + First. maps of dust absorption in the Taurus region (Bacmannetal.2000) often show sharp edges defining the core boundaries.," First, maps of dust absorption in the Taurus region \citep{Bacmann2000} often show sharp edges defining the core boundaries." + Second. around at least one core... a boundary is defined by a sharp transition (within less than an observing beam width) between subsonic and supersonic turbulence in the molecular gas (Pinedaetal.2010).," Second, around at least one core, a boundary is defined by a sharp transition (within less than an observing beam width) between subsonic and supersonic turbulence in the molecular gas \citep{Pineda2010}." +. Third. a boundary is a necessary feature in models of radiative cooling and UV heating (Evansetal.2001:Shirley2002:Zuc-etal.2004;Keto&Field2005) that use the basic BE structure and accurately predict the observed gas and dust temperatures (Ward-Thompsonetal.2002:Pagani2003.2004:Crapsietal. 2007).. the observed variation in the excitation of the CO molecule across the starless cores (Berginetal.2006:Schneeetal.2007;Keto&Caselli 2008).. and the observed brightness and profiles of molecular lines (Keto&Caselli2010).," Third, a boundary is a necessary feature in models of radiative cooling and UV heating \citep{ Evans2001,ShirleyEvansRawlings2002,Zucconi2001,StamatellosWhitworth2003,Goncalves2004,KetoField2005} + that use the basic BE structure and accurately predict the observed gas and dust temperatures \citep{Ward-Thompson2002,Pagani2003,Pagani2004,Crapsi2007}, the observed variation in the excitation of the CO molecule across the starless cores \citep{Bergin2006,Schnee2007,KetoCaselli2008}, and the observed brightness and profiles of molecular lines \citep{KetoCaselli2010}." +. The predictive success of models based on BE spheres (including a core boundary) implies that the starless cores are indeed individual dynamie entities in quasi-static equilibrium. balancing the forces of their own self-gravity. internal energy. and the larger-scale ISM.," The predictive success of models based on BE spheres (including a core boundary) implies that the starless cores are indeed individual dynamic entities in quasi-static equilibrium, balancing the forces of their own self-gravity, internal energy, and the larger-scale ISM." + In some cases. this equilibrium may be unstable. leading the core to contract. though their internal pressure ts sufficiently high to prevent free-fall.," In some cases, this equilibrium may be unstable, leading the core to contract, though their internal pressure is sufficiently high to prevent free-fall." + The hydrodynamic equations that describe the equilibrium configuration of both stars and the starless cores allow for perturbations in the form of sonic waves that may persist for many crossing times., The hydrodynamic equations that describe the equilibrium configuration of both stars and the starless cores allow for perturbations in the form of sonic waves that may persist for many crossing times. + Such oscillations are observed in the Sun. other main sequence stars. and white dwarfs. and given the turbulent state of the larger-scale ISM. should," Such oscillations are observed in the Sun, other main sequence stars, and white dwarfs, and given the turbulent state of the larger-scale ISM, should" +The Dedeliud tri-axial ellipsoids are an example of non-axisviunietric. but stationary solutions witlin Newtonian gravity.,"The Dedekind tri-axial ellipsoids are an example of non-axisymmetric, but stationary solutions within Newtonian gravity." + Duc to internal motions. hey are. m fact. stationary du an inertial frame.," Due to internal motions, they are, in fact, stationary in an inertial frame." + When addressing the question of whether or not stationary. but non-axisviunetrie solutions are oossible within General Relativity. this property uakes the Dedekind ellipsoids a natural choice upon which to base one's considerations.," When addressing the question of whether or not stationary, but non-axisymmetric solutions are possible within General Relativity, this property makes the Dedekind ellipsoids a natural choice upon which to base one's considerations." + It was. ii part. with this question in mind that 77? iuned their atteutious to the post-Newtonian (DN) approximation of the Dedekind ellipsoids.," It was, in part, with this question in mind that \citet{CE74, CE78_CE78} turned their attentions to the post-Newtonian (PN) approximation of the Dedekind ellipsoids." + Iu a paper from the same series. 7 µας already considered the axisvuuuetrce huit of the PN σιacobi ellipsoids at length and was able to show that it coincides with a certain PN Alaclaurin spheroid (just as thei Newtomlan counterparts coincide at the point of bifurcation).," In a paper from the same series, \citet{Chandrasekhar67c_C67} had already considered the axisymmetric limit of the PN Jacobi ellipsoids at length and was able to show that it coincides with a certain PN Maclaurin spheroid (just as their Newtonian counterparts coincide at the point of bifurcation)." + This is related to the fact that the PN figures were chosen to rotate uniforiiulv., This is related to the fact that the PN figures were chosen to rotate uniformly. + Ou the other haud. the PN velocity field chosen in ?/— excludes the possibility of uniform rotation in the axisvuuuetricliuit although it is possible iu the axisvunuetricc," On the other hand, the PN velocity field chosen in \cite{CE78_CE78} excludes the possibility of uniform rotation in the axisymmetric although it is possible in the axisymmetric." +"ase, This restriction seenis neither natural nor advisable iu the context of trving to settle the question as to the existence of relativistic. nou-axisviunuetrie. stationary solutions."," This restriction seems neither natural nor advisable in the context of trying to settle the question as to the existence of relativistic, non-axisymmetric, stationary solutions." + The naive expectation is that tle axisvuumetric PN Dedekind ellipsoids contain the PN Alaclaurin spheroids in the axisvuuuetric luit (up to arbitrary order)., The ve expectation is that the axisymmetric PN Dedekind ellipsoids contain the PN Maclaurin spheroids in the axisymmetric limit (up to arbitrary order). + Tn this article. we beein in 77 by examining the axisviuuetric case of a ecneralization to the solution prescuted in ?..," In this article, we begin in \ref{axisymm_point} by examining the axisymmetric case of a generalization to the solution presented in \citet{CE78_CE78}." + We proceed in 3 to consider a (continous) lit to axisvuuuctry., We proceed in \ref{axisymm_limit} to consider a (continuous) limit to axisymmetry. + In ?7 the connection to the post-Newtouian Maclamin spheroids is examiunect., In \ref{discussion} the connection to the post-Newtonian Maclaurin spheroids is examined. + We cousider a generalization of the PN Dedekiud ellipsoids preseuted in 7? (veferred to. from here on in as CETS) in which we add post-Newtoman terms to the velocity., We consider a generalization of the PN Dedekind ellipsoids presented in \citet{CE78_CE78} (referred to from here on in as CE78) in which we add post-Newtonian terms to the velocity. + We comply with the notation used in CET78 aud refer the reader to the definitions there for the various quautities., We comply with the notation used in CE78 and refer the reader to the definitions there for the various quantities. +there. forcing much of the enerey out at both longer aud shorter waveleugths.,"there, forcing much of the energy out at both longer and shorter wavelengths." + The dashed line iu Figure 12 shows the integrated flux as a function of wavelength for secondary. eclipse (blue dashed line. Figure 12)).," The dashed line in Figure \ref{energy} shows the integrated flux as a function of wavelength for secondary eclipse (blue dashed line, Figure \ref{energy}) )." + The flux from the planet iu the 1-15 juu rauge accounts for of the planct’s enmergeut enerev. wlüch makes this an especially Huportant waveleneth rauge for determining the atinospheric properties of €J136b.," The flux from the planet in the 1-15 $\mu$ m range accounts for of the planet's emergent energy, which makes this an especially important wavelength range for determining the atmospheric properties of GJ436b." + It is interesting to note the increased variability in the cuitted flix from the planet as a function of orbital position in the « solar case compared with the L< solar case in Figures 11 and 12.., It is interesting to note the increased variability in the emitted flux from the planet as a function of orbital position in the $\times$ solar case compared with the $\times$ solar case in Figures \ref{fluxes} and \ref{energy}. + The flux emitted from the 50. solar case at secondary eclipse (blue line. Figure 13) is lacking in many of the predoiinaut spectral features secu at other orbital phases. due toa shallower day-sicle temperature eradicut.," The flux emitted from the $\times$ solar case at secondary eclipse (blue line, Figure \ref{fluxes}) ) is lacking in many of the predominant spectral features seen at other orbital phases, due to a shallower day-side temperature gradient." +" The absorption features due to CIT, are much. weaker at secondary eclipse indicating a reduction in CIT, abundance on the dav-side compared to the iigbht-de which is seen during transit (orauge line. Figure 11))."," The absorption features due to $_4$ are much weaker at secondary eclipse indicating a reduction in $_4$ abundance on the day-side compared to the night-side which is seen during transit (orange line, Figure \ref{fluxes}) )." + Observing the flux emitted. from (100 as a fiction of wavelength at several different poiuts along its orbit could reveal a great deal about its overall chemical composition., Observing the flux emitted from GJ436b as a function of wavelength at several different points along its orbit could reveal a great deal about its overall chemical composition. + The atmospheric models presented here are not oulv useful for exploring circulation regimes. chemistry. and radiative transfer. but can also provide insight into current observations aud help euide future observations of €GJ136b.," The atmospheric models presented here are not only useful for exploring circulation regimes, chemistry, and radiative transfer, but can also provide insight into current observations and help guide future observations of GJ436b." + Figure 10 also juchides tle availableSpifzer secondary eclipse mncasurehicuts from ?.., Figure \ref{light_curves} also includes the available secondary eclipse measurements from \citet{ste10}. +" In. all metallicity cases, our predicted planct/star flux ratio falls short of the measured 2.6. 5.5. 8.0. 16.0. and 210 pau values and is higher than the observed 1.5 44 value."," In all metallicity cases, our predicted planet/star flux ratio falls short of the measured 3.6, 5.8, 8.0, 16.0, and 24.0 $\mu$ m values and is higher than the observed 4.5 $\mu$ m value." + However. it is useful to uote that < solar model plauct/star fux ratio comes inuch closer to matching the observations ναι the Ls solar model. which could lint at a lüeh metallicity as already sugeested by ?..," However, it is useful to note that $\times$ solar model planet/star flux ratio comes much closer to matching the observations than the $\times$ solar model, which could hint at a high metallicity as already suggested by \citet{ste10}." + Wiel metallicity solutions (030 « solar)are also favored bv 7. to match the 8 jaa observatious of GJ136b from ?.., High metallicity solutions $\sim$ $\times$ solar)are also favored by \citet{spi10} to match the 8 $\mu$ m observations of GJ436b from \citet{demi07}. . + The predicted plauct/star flux ratios im the 50. & solar case are within two sigma of the values measured by ?. at all bandpasses except 3.6 fan. Iun comparing our predicted planet/star flux ratios with those observed bv ο it is niportant to remember that we have not altered the teniperature or chemistry iu our models in an attempt to match observations., The predicted planet/star flux ratios in the 50 $\times$ solar case are within two sigma of the values measured by \citet{ste10} at all bandpasses except 3.6 $\mu$ m. In comparing our predicted planet/star flux ratios with those observed by \citet{ste10} it is important to remember that we have not altered the temperature or chemistry in our models in an attempt to match observations. + The interplay between the equilibriuni chemistry mining ratios. the absorption and emission of flix. aud the atmospheric dyaianuics dictates the temperature structure and cimerecut spectrum.," The interplay between the equilibrium chemistry mixing ratios, the absorption and emission of flux, and the atmospheric dynamics dictates the temperature structure and emergent spectrum." + As pointed out in ? it is likely that disequilibrimim chemistry plays a strong role in the atimosplicre of CJ0)., As pointed out in \citet{ste10} it is likely that disequilibrium chemistry plays a strong role in the atmosphere of GJ436b. +" They suggest a CO/CIE, ratio that is many orders of magnitude larger than what one would predict from an equilibrimm chemistry model.", They suggest a $_4$ ratio that is many orders of magnitude larger than what one would predict from an equilibrium chemistry model. +" Euhancement of CO at the expense of CTL, is well known in the atiuosplieres of the solar system's giant planets and brown dwarts, but not to such an extreme degree."," Enhancement of CO at the expense of $_4$ is well known in the atmospheres of the solar system's giant planets and brown dwarfs, but not to such an extreme degree." + Additionally. they suggest that the photochemical destruction of CIT; is Óuportaut to further lessen this molecule’s importance in the planet's atinospliere.," Additionally, they suggest that the photochemical destruction of $_4$ is important to further lessen this molecule's importance in the planet's atmosphere." + The carbon chemistry of an atmosphere will strongly affect flux iicasurements dn the 3.6. L5. 5.5.and Wm yma baudpasses.," The carbon chemistry of an atmosphere will strongly affect flux measurements in the 3.6, 4.5, 5.8,and 8.0 $\mu$ m bandpasses." +" As shown in Figure ll and discussed in Section ?7.. lowering the amount of CIE, in the atmosphere will increase the eiiergeut flux from the planet in the 3.6 aud 8.0 gan baudpasses."," As shown in Figure \ref{fluxes} and discussed in Section \ref{spec}, lowering the amount of $_4$ in the atmosphere will increase the emergent flux from the planet in the 3.6 and 8.0 $\mu$ m bandpasses." + Higher order hydrocarbons produced by mixiug aud photochemistry (7). such as Colo. Coll). and Collg. are also strong absorbers throughout the near- and mid-infrared.," Higher order hydrocarbons produced by mixing and photochemistry \citep{zah09_2}, such as $_2$ $_2$, $_2$ $_4$, and $_2$ $_6$, are also strong absorbers throughout the near- and mid-infrared." + Tucreasing the amount of CO». along with CO. in the atmosphere will decrease the eiuicrseut fiux frou. the planet in the £5 pau baudpass while at the sanie time iucroasius the cuiergeut fux at waveleneth ou either side of this bandpass. including the 3.6 aud 5.5 gma baudpasses.," Increasing the amount of $_2$, along with CO, in the atmosphere will decrease the emergent flux from the planet in the 4.5 $\mu$ m bandpass while at the same time increasing the emergent flux at wavelength on either side of this bandpass, including the 3.6 and 5.8 $\mu$ m bandpasses." + Althoughour models do not include disequilibriuu chemistry. they can provide au important coustraiut for disequilibrimu chemistry modelsnamely. estimates of dynamical timescales aud vertical mixing rates.," Although our models do not include disequilibrium chemistry, they can provide an important constraint for disequilibrium chemistry models—namely, estimates of dynamical timescales and vertical mixing rates." +" Disequilibrium chemistry is expected in all reeious of the atinosphere where dvuauiic timescales. 745,,. areshorter than clicmical tiniescales. Tobenm- "," Disequilibrium chemistry is expected in all regions of the atmosphere where dynamic timescales, $\tau_{dyn}$ , areshorter than chemical timescales, $\tau_{chem}$ ." +The chynaic timescale is elven sinplv by where Lo ds the relevant leneth scale iu the horizontal⋅ or vertical. direction. aud Wis2. horizoutal: or vertical⋅ wind⋅ speed., The dynamic timescale is given simply by where $L$ is the relevant length scale in the horizontal or vertical direction and $V$ is horizontal or vertical wind speed. + For one-dimensional⋅ photochemical, For one-dimensional photochemical + For one-dimensional⋅ photochemical⋅, For one-dimensional photochemical +a single point source was fitted to the visibility data for PKS 1718-649.,a single point source was fitted to the visibility data for PKS 1718–649. + The antenna phases were self-calibrated with a 10 s solution interval. and the model-fitting procedure was repeated.," The antenna phases were self-calibrated with a 10 s solution interval, and the model-fitting procedure was repeated." + The resulting flux density was recorded after three more iterations of self-calibration and model fitting., The resulting flux density was recorded after three more iterations of self-calibration and model fitting. + The two frequency bands were processed separately until this point., The two frequency bands were processed separately until this point. + The mean of the 8896 MHz time series was smaller than the mean of the 8640 MHz time series. as expected from the previously measured radio spectrum of the source (Tingay et 11997).," The mean of the 8896 MHz time series was smaller than the mean of the 8640 MHz time series, as expected from the previously measured radio spectrum of the source (Tingay et 1997)." + We increased the 8896 MHz flux densities by1.4%.. and then averaged the results of the two bands at each epoch.," We increased the 8896 MHz flux densities by, and then averaged the results of the two bands at each epoch." + The final light curve is shown in Figure 2a., The final light curve is shown in Figure 2a. + The error bars span the difference between the results of the two bands (after having normalized the 8896 MHz data)., The error bars span the difference between the results of the two bands (after having normalized the 8896 MHz data). + These error bars give an indication of the statistical noise in each measurement., These error bars give an indication of the statistical noise in each measurement. + The fluctuations of PKS 1718-649 are small. with an RMS variation of 29 mJy. or of the mean flux density of 4.04 Jy.," The fluctuations of PKS 1718–649 are small, with an RMS variation of 29 mJy, or of the mean flux density of 4.04 Jy." +" The local sidereal times of the epochs were strongly clustered around two values. 14:00 and 23:00 (hereafter. “early” and ""]ate). because of the preference for particular hour angles mentioned in 2.."," The local sidereal times of the epochs were strongly clustered around two values, 14:00 and 23:00 (hereafter, “early” and “late”), because of the preference for particular hour angles mentioned in \ref{sec:design}." + In Figure 2a. the open symbols represent data from the early LSTs. and the filled symbols represent data from the late LSTs.," In Figure 2a, the open symbols represent data from the early LSTs, and the filled symbols represent data from the late LSTs." + The different symbol shapes represent different array configurations., The different symbol shapes represent different array configurations. + The reason for encoding this, The reason for encoding this +study by virtually every. N-ray. satellite during the past decade.,study by virtually every X-ray satellite during the past decade. + Defined by their optical emission-line properties (FWIIM Ibs<2000 km | and ii| A5007/IL2 <3) NLSIs are different [rom type 2 Sevfert galaxies. which generally have ΟΠΗ>3 (Osterbrock Poegge 1985: Goodrich 1989).," Defined by their optical emission-line properties (FWHM $\beta < 2000$ km $^{-1}$ and ] $\lambda$ $\beta < 3$ ) NLS1s are different from type 2 Seyfert galaxies, which generally have $\beta > 3$ (Osterbrock Pogge 1985; Goodrich 1989)." + NLSIs usually have strong permitted lines of11. resembling the well-known prototvpe of their class. I Zw 1.," NLS1s usually have strong permitted lines of, resembling the well-known prototype of their class, I Zw 1." + The exireme N-rax properties ofNarrow-line Sevler( 1 galaxies are now well estabelished., The extreme X-ray properties of Narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies are now well estabelished. + Thev frequently show a strong soft excess component. their hard X-ray. spectrum tends (o be steeper (han in similar broad-lime Sevfert 1 galaxies. ancl thev show enhanced X-rav variability (e.g.. Leighlv 1999a.b and relerences (herein).," They frequently show a strong soft excess component, their hard X-ray spectrum tends to be steeper than in similar broad-line Seyfert 1 galaxies, and they show enhanced X-ray variability (e.g., Leighly 1999a,b and references therein)." + The most promising explanation Lor (his behavior is that NLSIs have a higher mass accretion rate wilh respect to the Eddington value (han ordinary Sevlert galaxies with broad optical lines (Laor2000)., The most promising explanation for this behavior is that NLS1s have a higher mass accretion rate with respect to the Eddington value than ordinary Seyfert galaxies with broad optical lines \citep{laor00}. +. This result is potentially very important: since AGN are believed in general to be powered by accretion. study of objects with the highest accretion rate may help us understand AGN accretion in general.," This result is potentially very important: since AGN are believed in general to be powered by accretion, study of objects with the highest accretion rate may help us understand AGN accretion in general." + Ark 564 (2—0.02468-:0.00007: HIuchra. Vogelev. Geller 1999) is an interesting object from the point of view that shows a peculiar emission line-like feature near 1 keV in low resolution spectra.," Ark 564 $=$ $\pm$ 0.00007; Huchra, Vogeley, Geller 1999) is an interesting object from the point of view that shows a peculiar emission line-like feature near 1 keV in low resolution spectra." + This emission line-like feature has been reported [rom various observations performed byROSAT. andBeppoSAN (Brandtetal.1994:Leiehly1999b:Turner.George.etal. 2001).," This emission line-like feature has been reported from various observations performed by, and \citep {bra94, lei99b, tur99, com01}." +. Turner et al. (, Turner et al. ( +1999) modeled the feature with a strong (equivalent width: EW~70 eV) and relatively broad (6—0.16 keV) line at n keV. assuming (hat spectra components are Galactic absorption. a power-law and a Gaussian line in (he energy band of 0.65.0 and 7.510 keV. Using the same data and the different continuummodel (Galactic absorbed a power-law plus a black body). Leighly (1999b) obtained weaker CEW=30 eV) line at η keV with o of 0.1 eV. Comastrietal.(2001) also reported that the mode dependent EW is as low as 2050 eV with the same model as Leighlvs from independent analvses.,"1999) modeled the feature with a strong (equivalent width: $\sim$ 70 eV) and relatively broad $\sigma$ =0.16 keV) line at $^{+0,02}_{-0.04}$ keV, assuming that spectral components are Galactic absorption, a power-law and a Gaussian line in the energy band of 0.6–5.0 and 7.5–10 keV. Using the same data and the different continuummodel (Galactic absorbed a power-law plus a black body), Leighly (1999b) obtained weaker $=30$ eV) line at $^{+0.024}_{-0.031}$ keV with $\sigma$ of 0.1 eV. \citet {com01} also reported that the model dependent EW is as low as 20–50 eV with the same model as Leighly's from independent analyses." + In theBeppoS observation. a line-like feature around 1 keV is clearly visible (Comastrietal.2001).," In the observation, a line-like feature around 1 keV is clearly visible \citep {com01}." +. Still the origin of (his feature was far [rom being unambiguously identified., Still the origin of this feature was far from being unambiguously identified. + In order to identify (his feature. we carried out an observation with the IWhieh Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (ILETGS).," In order to identify this feature, we carried out an observation with the High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (HETGS)." + Observed with higher energy resolution. some possible origins for this feature. such as blends of narrow emission lines. can be investigated.," Observed with higher energy resolution, some possible origins for this feature, such as blends of narrow emission lines, can be investigated." + If. we can identilv (his feature. it may. enable us to investigate (he physical conditions such as ionization state of the surrounding matter of the AGN.," If we can identify this feature, it may enable us to investigate the physical conditions such as ionization state of the surrounding matter of the AGN." +" Ark 564 is one of the brightest narrow-line Sevlert 1: galaxies in the hard X-ray band and the 2.10 keV [αν is a few times Hergem7s J|, so a erating observation using Chendrais clearly feasible."," Ark 564 is one of the brightest narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies in the hard X-ray band and the 2–10 keV flux is a few times $^{-11}~{\rm erg~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$ , so a grating observation using is clearly feasible." +is mareinally significant evidence that +A has à low spectral index compared to the cloud.,is marginally significant evidence that 4A has a low spectral index compared to the cloud. + There is also strong evidence that the region associated with the 4X. outflow as a low spectral index., There is also strong evidence that the region associated with the 4A outflow has a low spectral index. + Various possible causes of this were discussed., Various possible causes of this were discussed. + “Phere is no evidence suggesting tha he emission is optically thick at either. wavelength., There is no evidence suggesting that the emission is optically thick at either wavelength. + The apparentlv low spectral index of 4X was dependent on emperature assumptions. but the outllow region shoulc not be systematically cooler than the surrounding cloud. so this is unlikely to provide an explanation.," The apparently low spectral index of 4A was dependent on temperature assumptions, but the outflow region should not be systematically cooler than the surrounding cloud, so this is unlikely to provide an explanation." + We considere 1e possibility that molecular line emission could. manifes unself as a region of low spectral index by contaminating the DTlux density., We considered the possibility that molecular line emission could manifest itself as a region of low spectral index by contaminating the flux density. + Based on the measured. line strengths. [rom BSDGALA. this explanation seemed. unlikely to be the sole ause. although it could constitute a partial cause.," Based on the measured line strengths from BSDGMA, this explanation seemed unlikely to be the sole cause, although it could constitute a partial cause." + Le was ierefore concluded that the low spectral index of 4A was most likely an indication of cust grain growth in the dense circumstellar disks., It was therefore concluded that the low spectral index of 4A was most likely an indication of dust grain growth in the dense circumstellar disks. + Εις grain growth then appears to be more advanced in 4X than in 4D or 4C. We have seen an area of low spectral index running through LRASLA. in the position of the molecular outLow seen by XSDGAMALA.," This grain growth then appears to be more advanced in 4A than in 4B or 4C. We have seen an area of low spectral index running through IRAS4A, in the position of the molecular outflow seen by BSDGMA." + This ridge is seen on both sides of IRASLA. and is clearly distinct from IRAS 4€ to the Northeast.," This ridge is seen on both sides of IRAS4A, and is clearly distinct from IRAS 4C to the Northeast." + We argued in Section 5 that contamination from molecular line Hus is probably not sullicient to explain this., We argued in Section \ref{lines} that contamination from molecular line flux is probably not sufficient to explain this. + We suggest the possibility that dust. from the vicinity of IRASLA is being swept up and entrained in the outflow., We suggest the possibility that dust from the vicinity of IRAS4A is being swept up and entrained in the outflow. + ‘This suggests models in which the driving mechanism for the outflow is a jet embedded in the protostellar core itself (see e.g. Masson Chernin 1993: Chernin et al 1994: Raga Cabrit. 1993)-," This suggests models in which the driving mechanism for the outflow is a jet embedded in the protostellar core itself (see e.g. Masson Chernin 1993; Chernin et al 1994; Raga Cabrit, 1993)." + AM£ this explanation is correct. the main issues for outllow theories would seem to be that the driving mechanism should not be so violent that dust &rains. are destroved in larec numbers. and that significant amounts of dust material should occupy the outflow cavity after the main jet working surfaces have passed through.," If this explanation is correct, the main issues for outflow theories would seem to be that the driving mechanism should not be so violent that dust grains are destroyed in large numbers, and that significant amounts of dust material should occupy the outflow cavity after the main jet working surfaces have passed through." + The JCMT is operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre. on behalf of the Wis Particle Physies and Astronomy Research Council. the Netherlands Organization lor Pure Rescarch. and the National Research Council of Canada.," The JCMT is operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre, on behalf of the UK Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council, the Netherlands Organization for Pure Research, and the National Research Council of Canada." + The authors thank James Deane and Jane Greaves for helpful ciseussions ancl advice., The authors thank James Deane and Jane Greaves for helpful discussions and advice. +of the hiehly reddened CA. ~ 8.18.9) CO stu. DCls. is. displaved in Fig. l..,"of the highly reddened $A_{\rm v}$ $\sim$ 8.4–8.9) G9 star, DC48, is displayed in Fig. \ref{zams}." + We tested all of the TTS for Nav. variability using the methods described in Wambarvanetal.(1999)., We tested all of the TTS for X-ray variability using the methods described in \cite{ham99}. +. The oulv E Tauri Star which showed N-vav variability is the newly identified star RXJ0255.5|2005 that was detected both in the RASS and in theROSAT pointed observation and flared diving the pointed observation (see the light curve displayed in Fig. 6))., The only T Tauri Star which showed X-ray variability is the newly identified star RXJ0255.5+2005 that was detected both in the RASS and in the pointed observation and flared during the pointed observation (see the light curve displayed in Fig. \ref{lc}) ). + The peak N-rav count rate duiug the flare increased by ore than a factor of 6 from the pre-flare count rate., The peak X-ray count rate during the flare increased by more than a factor of 6 from the pre-flare count rate. + Although: we do no have, Although we do no have +The results of the above procedure applied to our four quasar fields are presented in Table 10.,The results of the above procedure applied to our four quasar fields are presented in Table 10. + In rows 1-2 we list the R.A. anc Deel., In rows 1-2 we list the R.A. and Decl. + corrections to our measured. PAL to account for the rotation of the plane of the LMC. aud in rows 3-1. the correspondiug corrected PAL values. in equatorial coordinates. as viewed by an observer located at the center of the LAIC.," corrections to our measured PM to account for the rotation of the plane of the LMC, and in rows 3-4, the corresponding corrected PM values, in equatorial coordinates, as viewed by an observer located at the center of the LMC." + Ln rows 5-8 we give calculated PAL values relative to the GRE. both in equatorial aud. galactic coordinates.," In rows 5-8 we give calculated PM values relative to the GRF, both in equatorial and galactic coordinates." + These values correspond. to the LMC's PAL as seen by an observer located at the Sun. with the contributious to the PM. from the peculiar solar motion aud from the LSR’s motion. removecl.," These values correspond to the LMC's PM as seen by an observer located at the Sun, with the contributions to the PM, from the peculiar solar motion and from the LSR's motion, removed." + In rows 9-11 we give the IL. O aud Z components of the space velocity in a rectangular cartesian coordinate system centered ou the LMC (as cefinecl by Schweitzer et al.," In rows 9-11 we give the $\Pi$ , $\Theta$ and $Z$ components of the space velocity in a rectangular cartesian coordinate system centered on the LMC (as defined by Schweitzer et al.," + 1995. for the Sculptor dSphli).," 1995, for the Sculptor dSph)." + The Ll component is parallel to the projection outo the Galactic plane of the radius vector rou the center of the Galaxy to the center of the LNIC. aud is positive when it poiuts racdially away form the Galactic center.," The $\Pi$ component is parallel to the projection onto the Galactic plane of the radius vector from the center of the Galaxy to the center of the LMC, and is positive when it points radially away form the Galactic center." + The Θ component is perpeucicular to the LL component. parallel to he Galactic plane. aud poiuts iu the direction of rotation of the Galactic disk.," The $\Theta$ component is perpendicular to the $\Pi$ component, parallel to the Galactic plane, and points in the direction of rotation of the Galactic disk." + The Z component »oiuts in the direction of the Galactic uorth pole., The $Z$ component points in the direction of the Galactic north pole. + These three componeuts are [ree from the Suns »eculiar motion aud LSR motion., These three components are free from the Sun's peculiar motion and LSR motion. +" ln rows 12-13 we give the LNICs radial aud transverse space velocities. as seen by an hypothetical observer located at the center of the Galaxy. aud at rest witli 'espect to the Calactic All of the above calculations were carried out asstuning a distance of 50.1 kpe of the LMC from the Sun. a distance of 8.5 kpe of the Sun from the Galactic center. a 220 kins | circular velocity oL the LSR aud a peculiar velocity of the Sun relative to the LSR of (i. vow.) = (—10.5.25. 7.17) km | (Dehnen Binney 1998). These components are positive if u. pointsracially away [roin the Galactic center. v... points in the direction of Galactic rotation aud w.. is directed towards the Galactic north Although the matter was not addressed here. the values presented in table 10 can be used to determine the orbit of the LMC aud therefore study possible past aud future interactions of the LMC with other Local Group If we assume that the LMC is eravitationally bound to. aud in an elliptical orbit. arouud the Galaxy. aud that the mass of the Galaxy is coutaied within 50 kpc of the galactic center. we cau iuake an estimate of the lower limit of its mass through the expression: where r, is the Γλ1Οs apogalacticon distance aud rige dts present distauce."," In rows 12-13 we give the LMC's radial and transverse space velocities, as seen by an hypothetical observer located at the center of the Galaxy, and at rest with respect to the Galactic All of the above calculations were carried out assuming a distance of 50.1 kpc of the LMC from the Sun, a distance of 8.5 kpc of the Sun from the Galactic center, a 220 km $^{-1}$ circular velocity of the LSR and a peculiar velocity of the Sun relative to the LSR of $_{\sun}$ $_{\sun}$ $_{\sun}$ ) = $-$ 10,5.25,7.17) km $^{-1}$ (Dehnen Binney 1998), These components are positive if $_{\sun}$ pointsradially away from the Galactic center, $_{\sun}$ points in the direction of Galactic rotation and $_{\sun}$ is directed towards the Galactic north Although the matter was not addressed here, the values presented in table 10 can be used to determine the orbit of the LMC and therefore study possible past and future interactions of the LMC with other Local Group If we assume that the LMC is gravitationally bound to, and in an elliptical orbit, around the Galaxy, and that the mass of the Galaxy is contained within 50 kpc of the galactic center, we can make an estimate of the lower limit of its mass through the expression: where $_{\rm a}$ is the LMC's apogalacticon distance and $_{\rm LMC}$ its present distance." +" Forr, = 300 kpc (Lin et al.", For$_{\rm a}$ = 300 kpc (Lin et al. + 1995) we obtain Me: values of : (8.2 = 1.3). (9.04 1.6). (3.0 + ," 1995) we obtain $\rm M_{G}$ values of : (8.2 $\pm$ 1.3), $\pm$ 1.6), (3.0 $\pm$ " +we will address the case of rotating winds which iav be applicable to classical Be stars as these stars do secu to have simall 1ias-lIoss rates.,we will address the case of rotating winds which may be applicable to classical Be stars as these stars do seem to have small mass-loss rates. + JMDP is supported by a PPARC postdoctoral research assistantship., JMP is supported by a PPARC postdoctoral research assistantship. + The referee. Dr. S.P. Osvocki is thauked for constructive suggestionsOO which improved this paper.," The referee, Dr. S.P. Owocki is thanked for constructive suggestions which improved this paper." +Sagittarius2.. A (Ser. A) is. an extremely bright. radio. source situated. at theCentre.,Sagittarius A (Sgr A) is an extremely bright radio source situated at the. +" At its. core is- Ser . i.a region. which. harbours a supermassive. black hole with. a mass o[23 10"" ML Genzel 2000)."," At its core is Sgr $^*$, a region which harbours a supermassive black hole with a mass of 2–3 $\times 10^6$ $_{\sun}$ Genzel 2000)." + Many reviews have acdressed the variety of structures. which are apparent on a wide. range of spatial. scales. and the complex web of interactions which characterise this region Yusel-Zadeh 2000: FalekeFe 1999: Mezger.Mezeer. Duschl: Zvlkalk 1996).," Many reviews have addressed the variety of structures, which are apparent on a wide range of spatial scales, and the complex web of interactions which characterise this region Yusef-Zadeh 2000; Falcke 1999; Mezger, Duschl Zylka 1996)." + sThe Ser: A complex consists. of ⋅↴Ser A West⇁ and, The Sgr A complex consists of Sgr A West and. + Ser ;XWest: includess Ser A‘. XI.a threc-armii spiral-likespir: structure (the mini-spiral) in orbit around Ser A. and the central star cluster (H5 16).," Sgr AWest includes Sgr $^*$, a three-arm spiral-like structure (the mini-spiral) in orbit around Sgr $^*$, and the central star cluster (IRS 16)." + On the plane of the sky. the radio source encompasses Ser A West and has à non-thermal shell-like structure (Ekersetal.1975).," On the plane of the sky, the radio source encompasses Sgr A West and has a non-thermal shell-like structure \cite{Ekers1975}." + This morphology has been explained in terms of a supernova remnant (SNR) SNR COO10.0: Jones 1974: Ekers 1983: Creen 20013., This morphology has been explained in terms of a supernova remnant (SNR) SNR G0.0+0.0; Jones 1974; Ekers 1983; Green 2001). + Llowever. alternative and niore exotic interpretations have also been. proposed. this is the remnant of an outllow triggered by an explosion in Ser A*.," However, alternative and more exotic interpretations have also been proposed, this is the remnant of an outflow triggered by an explosion in Sgr $^*$." + ]t is certainly the case that if has a direct physical link to Sgr X West and Ser X. then its study is particularly interesting. in. the context of. past activityun of the central supermassive. black hole.," It is certainly the case that if has a direct physical link to Sgr A West and Sgr $^*$, then its study is particularly interesting in the context of past activity of the central supermassive black hole." + ;But equally well. if.n is simply an SNR. then its study should lead us to a better unclerstancling of the special interstellar environment of theCentre region.," But equally well, if is simply an SNR, then its study should lead us to a better understanding of the special interstellar environment of the region." + Phe non-thermal shell of is elongated nearly parallel to the Galactic plane with an overall size scale of 275 6 pew inLor a 8.0 kpe distance)., The non-thermal shell of is elongated nearly parallel to the Galactic plane with an overall size scale of $\times$ 5 $\times$ 6 $^2$ for a 8.0 kpc distance). +| Lt is surrounded by ⇁⊳a dust ringTne (AlezgerwoopοἱOfal.+1980).OKC and.κ in.: projection.went] overlaps with the giant molecular clouds 0.07 (the 50 km molecular cloud: Serabvn. Lacy Achtermann 1992) and 0.08 (the 20 kms P cloud: Mezger 1986).," It is surrounded by a dust ring \cite{Mezger1989} and, in projection, overlaps with the giant molecular clouds $-$ $-$ 0.07 (the 50 km $^{-1}$ molecular cloud; Serabyn, Lacy Achtermann 1992) and $-$ $-$ 0.08 (the `20 km $^{-1}$ ' cloud; Mezger 1986)." + Phe morphology. of the dust ring and the cloud 0.07. as well as the detection of coincident OL maser emission. (Yusel-Zadeh 1996. 1999). stronely suggests that the non-thermal shell physically interacts with the dust ring and. cloud.," The morphology of the dust ring and the cloud $-$ $-$ 0.07, as well as the detection of coincident OH maser emission (Yusef-Zadeh 1996, 1999), strongly suggests that the non-thermal shell physically interacts with the dust ring and cloud." + Dased on this observational result. Yusef-Zadeh Morris (1987) proposed a model in which a supernova occurred inside the molecular cloud. ancl created the shell.," Based on this observational result, Yusef-Zadeh Morris (1987) proposed a model in which a supernova occurred inside the molecular cloud and created the shell." + More recently Yusef-Zadeh (2000) have outlined a picture in which Ser A West is embedded in the frontmost. region, More recently Yusef-Zadeh (2000) have outlined a picture in which Sgr A West is embedded in the frontmost region +The synthetic spectrum from slit position 6 reproduces the rec-shiftecl velocity ellipse. which is present in the sspectrum.,"The synthetic spectrum from slit position 6 reproduces the red-shifted velocity ellipse, which is present in the spectrum." + The svnthetic spectrum. extracted: from. slit position S successfully reproduces. the incomplete. blue-shifted velocity cllipse., The synthetic spectrum extracted from slit position 8 successfully reproduces the incomplete blue-shifted velocity ellipse. + In general. the svnthetic spectra extracted. from. the model viewed at 15 (Fig. 5))," In general, the synthetic spectra extracted from the model viewed at $^{\circ}$ (Fig. \ref{modelcomp}) )" + resemble the observed velocity trends in the NEP longslit spectra more closely than the 107 model., resemble the observed velocity trends in the NTT longslit spectra more closely than the $^{\circ}$ model. + At this inclination. the svnthetie spectrum from slit position 3 rellects the tilted structure observed in the sspectrum and the svnthetie spectrum from slit. position 4 demonstrates a greater olfset between the bright red- and bluc-shifted filaments. which is in close agreement with the sspectrum.," At this inclination, the synthetic spectrum from slit position 3 reflects the tilted structure observed in the spectrum and the synthetic spectrum from slit position 4 demonstrates a greater offset between the bright red- and blue-shifted filaments, which is in close agreement with the spectrum." + Only the synthetic spectrum from slit. position 6 fails to convincingly model the observed spectrum at an inclination of 15: the synthetic spectrum does not form a complete rec-shiftect velocity ellipse as seen in the NTT spectrum., Only the synthetic spectrum from slit position 6 fails to convincingly model the observed spectrum at an inclination of $^{\circ}$; the synthetic spectrum does not form a complete red-shifted velocity ellipse as seen in the NTT spectrum. + Overall. both ancl models satisfactorily reproduce the observed. images and. spectra. with the nmiocel providing a better fit to the spectroscopy and the model a better fit to the imagery.," Overall, both and models satisfactorily reproduce the observed images and spectra, with the model providing a better fit to the spectroscopy and the model a better fit to the imagery." + We. therefore. favour a nebular inclination between15.," We, therefore, favour a nebular inclination between." + Comparison of both models with the observations shows no evidence for deviation from homologous expansion (Llubble-type How) nor for anv additional turbulent broadening in the nebular shell., Comparison of both models with the observations shows no evidence for deviation from homologous expansion (Hubble-type flow) nor for any additional turbulent broadening in the nebular shell. + The modelling clearly proves that Sp 1 exhibits an hourglass-like morphology with a well-defined. waist - no other morphology. would. be consistent with both the spectroscopy and imagery. presented here., The modelling clearly proves that Sp 1 exhibits an hourglass-like morphology with a well-defined waist - no other morphology would be consistent with both the spectroscopy and imagery presented here. + The racial velocities produced by both the aand sspatio-kinematical models accurately rellect those observed in the longslit spectra., The radial velocities produced by both the and spatio-kinematical models accurately reflect those observed in the longslit spectra. + This suggests that the adopted maximum expansion velocities of 55 for the ellipsoids and 20. for the faint. surrounding sphere are νον σου approximations.," This suggests that the adopted maximum expansion velocities of 55 for the ellipsoids and 20 for the faint, surrounding sphere are very good approximations." + “Phe heliocentric systemic velocity of he model PN is. IS+5Lo somewhat at odds with he value of 3143 ddetermined. by 2...," The heliocentric systemic velocity of the model PN is $-18 \pm 5$, somewhat at odds with the value of $-31\pm3$ determined by \citet{meatheringham88}." + No reasonable explanation could. be ound for this discrepancy - spectra. from slits 3 ane 5. which cross the nebular centre. were collapsed ancl then itted with a gaussian profile following the method. of ? determining a value consistent with that taken from the spatio-kinematical modelling.," No reasonable explanation could be found for this discrepancy - spectra from slits 3 and 5, which cross the nebular centre, were collapsed and then fitted with a gaussian profile following the method of \citet{meatheringham88} determining a value consistent with that taken from the spatio-kinematical modelling." + To ensure that this was not an instrumental issue. the svstemic velocity was confirmed using two UCLISS spectra (Section 2.2)). again following the same method used by 2..," To ensure that this was not an instrumental issue, the systemic velocity was confirmed using two UCLES spectra (Section \ref{sec:AAT}) ), again following the same method used by \citet{meatheringham88}." + The angular extent of the svnthetic spectra is consistent with the observed. spectra. which suggests the adopted ecometrical dimensions in the model are also very good approximations.," The angular extent of the synthetic spectra is consistent with the observed spectra, which suggests the adopted geometrical dimensions in the model are also very good approximations." + The angular distance between the ends of both lobes is ((Fig., The angular distance between the ends of both lobes is $\sim$ (Fig. + 4bb)., \ref{ellipse_model}b b). + Adopting a distance to Sp 1 of 1.5 kpe (?) gives a physical distance between the ends of both lobes of 0.5 parsees and a kinematical age of ~STOO vears., Adopting a distance to Sp 1 of 1.5 kpc \citep{sabbadin86} gives a physical distance between the ends of both lobes of 0.5 parsecs and a kinematical age of $\sim$ 8700 years. + Ligh spatial and spectral resolution long-slit sspectra have been obtained. from the Fine Ring Nebula. Sp 1l.," High spatial and spectral resolution long-slit spectra have been obtained from the Fine Ring Nebula, Sp 1." + These spectra. together with deep narrow-band imagery. have been used to derive a spatio-kinematic mocel of the nebula proving its. bipolar nature.," These spectra, together with deep narrow-band imagery, have been used to derive a spatio-kinematic model of the nebula proving its bipolar nature." +" The spatio- model of Sp 1 fits with the classical ""butterfly? morphology for a PN defined in the classification scheme of ?..", The spatio-kinematical model of Sp 1 fits with the classical `butterfly' morphology for a PN defined in the classification scheme of \citet{balick87}. + The svmmetry axis of the nebula is inclined. almost iong the line of sight (10727:157)., The symmetry axis of the nebula is inclined almost along the line of sight $10\degr\geq i \geq 15\degr$ ). + A Hubble-tvpe How is assumed. with an equatorial expansion velocity of ~25 JL. consistent with typical PNe expansion. velocities.," A Hubble-type flow is assumed with an equatorial expansion velocity of $\sim$ 25, consistent with typical PNe expansion velocities." + Vhe heliocentric velocity of the PN was found to be 155+., The heliocentric velocity of the PN was found to be $-18 \pm 5$. + The kinematical age of Sp 1. at a cistance of 1.5 kpe (ο). is found to be “S700 vears - well within the range of typical PN ages.," The kinematical age of Sp 1, at a distance of 1.5 kpc \citep{sabbadin86}, is found to be $\sim$ 8700 years - well within the range of typical PN ages." + Sp 1. does exhibit an exceptional morphology amongst the known sample of PNe with close-binary central stars., Sp 1 does exhibit an exceptional morphology amongst the known sample of PNe with close-binary central stars. + “Phe bipolar structure of the main nebula is fairly prevalent amongst other PNe with binary central stars that have also been subjected to. detailed: spatio-kinematical modelling (??)..," The bipolar structure of the main nebula is fairly prevalent amongst other PNe with binary central stars that have also been subjected to detailed spatio-kinematical modelling \citep{jones11a,jones11b}." + Phe faint sphere of material which surrounds the bipolar shell. referred to in the text as a “halo”. does not encompass the entire inner nebula. appearing mainlv outside the waist of the bipolar shell.," The faint sphere of material which surrounds the bipolar shell, referred to in the text as a “halo”, does not encompass the entire inner nebula, appearing mainly outside the waist of the bipolar shell." + It is. therefore. possible that the “halo” is more akin to an equatorial enhancement (such as the one in seen in Lar 4. 7)) than to the extended haloes found in some PNe (?)..," It is, therefore, possible that the “halo” is more akin to an equatorial enhancement (such as the one in seen in HaTr 4, \citealp{tyndall11b}) ) than to the extended haloes found in some PNe \citep{corradi03}." +" Equatorial enhancements have been identified as prevalent in the morphologies of PNe with close-binary central stars. which could be indicative that the formation of the ""halo"" in Sp Lis in some way connected with the shedcding of the CE (as is suspected. for more markedly toroidal structures. 7) 2... ?.. ?. ? ?22))"," Equatorial enhancements have been identified as prevalent in the morphologies of PNe with close-binary central stars, which could be indicative that the formation of the “halo” in Sp 1 is in some way connected with the shedding of the CE (as is suspected for more markedly toroidal structures, \citealp{miszalski09b}) \citealp{mitchell07b}, \citealp{jones10b}, \citealp{hillwig10}, \citealp{huckvale11} \citealp{tyndall11a,tyndall11b})" +" Equatorial enhancements have been identified as prevalent in the morphologies of PNe with close-binary central stars. which could be indicative that the formation of the ""halo"" in Sp Lis in some way connected with the shedcding of the CE (as is suspected. for more markedly toroidal structures. 7) 2... ?.. ?. ? ?22))."," Equatorial enhancements have been identified as prevalent in the morphologies of PNe with close-binary central stars, which could be indicative that the formation of the “halo” in Sp 1 is in some way connected with the shedding of the CE (as is suspected for more markedly toroidal structures, \citealp{miszalski09b}) \citealp{mitchell07b}, \citealp{jones10b}, \citealp{hillwig10}, \citealp{huckvale11} \citealp{tyndall11a,tyndall11b})" +"highlighting the proximity of the downflows and the chromospheric enhancements, it does not provide information about whether the spatial correspondence between the two endures with time.","highlighting the proximity of the downflows and the chromospheric enhancements, it does not provide information about whether the spatial correspondence between the two endures with time." +" In order to separate the short lived enhancements from the persistent ones, event maps were constructed from the time sequence of Ca filtergrams acquired the SP scans in the following manner."," In order to separate the short lived enhancements from the persistent ones, event maps were constructed from the time sequence of Ca filtergrams acquired before/during the SP scans in the following manner." +" First, a small before/duringquiet Sun region was selected to determine the time averaged chromospheric intensity for each of the sequences."," First, a small quiet Sun region was selected to determine the time averaged chromospheric intensity for each of the sequences." + This value was then used to normalize the intensity of the individual filtergrams., This value was then used to normalize the intensity of the individual filtergrams. + A histogram of the intensities in the AR was derived to determine a suitable threshold value., A histogram of the intensities in the AR was derived to determine a suitable threshold value. +" From the trailing part of the histogram, threshold values of 0.9, 1.0 and 2.0 were chosen for the three ARs respectively."," From the trailing part of the histogram, threshold values of 0.9, 1.0 and 2.0 were chosen for the three ARs respectively." +" Using these values, a binary image was created for each individual image in the time sequence, where all pixels with an intensity above the threshold were set to one and the rest to zero."," Using these values, a binary image was created for each individual image in the time sequence, where all pixels with an intensity above the threshold were set to one and the rest to zero." +" The binary maps were then added in time, yielding at the end, a map with pixels having values indicating the number of chromospheric events."," The binary maps were then added in time, yielding at the end, a map with pixels having values indicating the number of chromospheric events." + 'The resulting event maps are shown in Figure 8.., The resulting event maps are shown in Figure \ref{event}. + The map constructed for AR. 10923 displays two large patches on the penumbral filaments at the site of the downflows., The map constructed for AR 10923 displays two large patches on the penumbral filaments at the site of the downflows. + They are labeled as BE in the top panel of Figure 7.., They are labeled as BE in the top panel of Figure \ref{ca-vel}. + The counts at those locations indicate that brightness enhancements persisted for nearly one-third of the 1 hr sequence., The counts at those locations indicate that brightness enhancements persisted for nearly one-third of the 1 hr sequence. +" There are no obvious signatures of the MJs, reflecting the transient nature and weakness of these events."," There are no obvious signatures of the MJs, reflecting the transient nature and weakness of these events." + The strongest and long-lived chromospheric brightenings observed in AR 10953 are confined to a region between the two downflowing patches., The strongest and long-lived chromospheric brightenings observed in AR 10953 are confined to a region between the two downflowing patches. + AR 10953 produced several chromospheric enhancements from April 29 to the end of May 1 (Louisetal.2008;Shimizuetal. 2009).," AR 10953 produced several chromospheric enhancements from April 29 to the end of May 1 \citep{Rohan2008,Shimizu2009}." +. Some of them were co-spatial with supersonic downflows observed in the light bridge nearly 10 hours earlier than the downflows reported here (Louisetal. The 2009).., Some of them were co-spatial with supersonic downflows observed in the light bridge nearly 10 hours earlier than the downflows reported here \citep{Rohan2009}. . +bottom panel of Figure 8 shows the event map corresponding to AR 11029., The bottom panel of Figure \ref{event} shows the event map corresponding to AR 11029. + The Ca filtergrams were acquired during the SP scan with alow cadence of 5, The Ca filtergrams were acquired during the SP scan with alow cadence of 5 +CL and [XP cases. or a modified: non-standard svnchrotron spectrum model should work better.,"CI and KP cases, or a modified non-standard synchrotron spectrum model should work better." + In order to explain such disagreement between the predicted. anc observed. X-ray spectrum in AIST jet. knots. several possible solutions to this problem. are proposed.," In order to explain such disagreement between the predicted and observed X-ray spectrum in M87 jet knots, several possible solutions to this problem are proposed." + For example. if considering svnchrotron cooling as well as electron. acceleration processes in a non-uniform magnetic field. Bicknell&Beeclman(1996) suggest. it ds. possible to achieve a larger break in spectral index than standard CL model. ic. Ae70.5.," For example, if considering synchrotron cooling as well as electron acceleration processes in a non-uniform magnetic field, \citet{Bicknell96} + suggest it is possible to achieve a larger break in spectral index than standard CI model, i.e. $\Delta\alpha>0.5$." + With a similar scenario. Honda&Llonda(2007) obtain à modified. N-rav. spectral index consistent with observations of MIST knot A. During the preparation of this paper. we also notice the latest result of Liu&Shen(2007).," With a similar scenario, \citet{Honda07} obtain a modified X-ray spectral index consistent with observations of M87 knot A. During the preparation of this paper, we also notice the latest result of \citet{Liu07}." +. μον propose a moclified Ο model to explain the racdio-to-N-rav continua in six knots of AIST jet., They propose a modified CI model to explain the radio-to-X-ray continua in six knots of M87 jet. + Considering the thin acceleration. region (i.e. shock front) locating at the immediately upstream. of the, Considering the thin acceleration region (i.e. shock front) locating at the immediately upstream of the +"a representative sample of 63 galaxies with ΛιW1.5x10A, and spatially-resolved kinematics derived from FLAMES/GIRAFFE observations at the VLT.","a representative sample of 63 galaxies with $M_{stellar} \geq 1.5\times +10^{10} M_\odot$ and spatially-resolved kinematics derived from FLAMES/GIRAFFE observations at the VLT." + They found that of z~0.6 intermediate-mass galaxies (1.e.. the progenitors of local spirals). have chaotic velocity fields inconsistent with expectations from pure rotating disks.," They found that of $\sim$ 0.6 intermediate-mass galaxies (i.e., the progenitors of local spirals), have chaotic velocity fields inconsistent with expectations from pure rotating disks." + Subsequent analyzes suggest that most of them are likely associated with major mergers (Hammer 2009b)., Subsequent analyzes suggest that most of them are likely associated with major mergers \citep{hammer09b}. +. Mergers are also found to be a good driver for the large scatter seen in the distant Tully-Fisher relation (Puechetal.2010a:Covingtonetal.2010) .," Mergers are also found to be a good driver for the large scatter seen in the distant Tully-Fisher relation \citep{puech09b,covington10}." + Actually. the remarkable co-evolution of the morphology. kinematics. star formation density. metal density. and stellar mass density. all could find a common and natural explanation in the frame of the spiral rebuilding scenario. according to which 50 to of present-day spiral disks were rebuilt after a major merger since ΖΞ1. as proposed by Hammeretal.(200.," Actually, the remarkable co-evolution of the morphology, kinematics, star formation density, metal density, and stellar mass density, all could find a common and natural explanation in the frame of the spiral rebuilding scenario, according to which 50 to of present-day spiral disks were rebuilt after a major merger since z=1, as proposed by \cite{hammer05}." +M To this respect. the Milky Way appears to be exceptional. w a remarkable quite past history compared to other local spiral galaxies (Hammeretal.2007).," To this respect, the Milky Way appears to be exceptional, with a remarkable quite past history compared to other local spiral galaxies \citep{hammer07}." +. There is now a growing body of evidence suggesting that disk rebuilding indeed took place at zxl. which makes it as a viable driver for galaxy evolution at these epochs.," There is now a growing body of evidence suggesting that disk rebuilding indeed took place at $\leq$ 1, which makes it as a viable driver for galaxy evolution at these epochs." + On the theoretical side. numerical simulations showed how gas can be expelled in tidal tailsduring such mergers. and how it can be subsequently re-accreted (Barnes2002).," On the theoretical side, numerical simulations showed how gas can be expelled in tidal tailsduring such mergers, and how it can be subsequently re-accreted \citep{barnes02}." +. This re-accreted gas is expected to cool down and form new stars. re-building a new disk around a spheroidal remnant (Springel&Hernquist2005:Robertsonetal.2006).. which might correspond to morphologies as late as Sb galaxies (Lotzetal.2008:Hopkinsetal. 2009c).," This re-accreted gas is expected to cool down and form new stars, re-building a new disk around a spheroidal remnant \citep{springel05, robertson06}, which might correspond to morphologies as late as Sb galaxies \citep{lotz08,hopkins09c}." +. Recent theoretical developments jive shed light on the underlying process. which appears to be surely gravitational (Hopkinsetal.2009).," Recent theoretical developments have shed light on the underlying process, which appears to be purely gravitational \citep{hopkins09}." +. The requirement for a major merger to rebuild a new disk depends mainly on the gas fraction during the final coalescence. which needs to be at east (Robertsonetal.2006).," The requirement for a major merger to rebuild a new disk depends mainly on the gas fraction during the final coalescence, which needs to be at least \citep{robertson06}." +. Cosmological simulations are now also producing such re-processed disks at z«l. although the role of cosmological gas accretion is not totally understood. but aking this process into account could result in a lower gas fraction hreshold for rebuilding a new disk (Governatoetal.2009).," Cosmological simulations are now also producing such re-processed disks at $<$ 1, although the role of cosmological gas accretion is not totally understood, but taking this process into account could result in a lower gas fraction threshold for rebuilding a new disk \citep{governato08}." +. On he observational side. first examples of rebuilt disks were recently detected at z~0.6 (Puechetal.2009:Hammer2009)... and he auto-consistency of the disk rebuilding process starts being investigated. both theoretically (Hopkinsetal.2009b:al.2009:Hopkinset20€S and observationally (HammeretCompanyetal.2010," On the observational side, first examples of rebuilt disks were recently detected at $\sim$ 0.6 \citep{puech09,hammer09}, and the auto-consistency of the disk rebuilding process starts being investigated, both theoretically \citep{hopkins09b,stewart09,hopkins09c} and observationally \citep{hammer09b,kannappan09,bundy09,huertas10}." +) If the spiral rebuilding scenario appears to achieve encouraging successes in describing galaxy evolution at zl. some points still need to be investigated.," If the spiral rebuilding scenario appears to achieve encouraging successes in describing galaxy evolution at $<$ 1, some points still need to be investigated." + In particular. the impact of the expected numerous mergers on the survival of thin disks is still deb: (Toth&OstrikerMNHopkinsetal.2008:Pur- 2009b).," In particular, the impact of the expected numerous mergers on the survival of thin disks is still debated \citep{toth92,hopkins08,purcell09,moster09b}." +. Furthermore. Luminous InfraRed Galaxies (LIRGs) account for about of the star formation density reported at z&l (Hammeretal.2005).. but their morphologies reveal that only half of 220.5 LIRGs are compatible with mergers. while in the other half appear to be spiral (Melbourneetdensityal.2005).," Furthermore, Luminous InfraRed Galaxies (LIRGs) account for about of the star formation density reported at $\leq$ 1 \citep{hammer05}, but their morphologies reveal that only half of $>$ 0.5 LIRGs are compatible with mergers, while those in the other half appear to be spiral \citep{melbourne05}." +.oM thoseLIRGsMarcillacetal.(2006). showed that the large number at these epochs suggests that they could experience between two and four star formation bursts until 2Ξ0. with typical timescales of «0.1 Gyr. which is not consistent with a simply continuous star formation history.," \cite{marcillac06} showed that the large number density of LIRGs at these epochs suggests that they could experience between two and four star formation bursts until z=0, with typical timescales of $\sim$ 0.1 Gyr, which is not consistent with a simply continuous star formation history." + They concluded that minor mergers. tidal interactions. or gas accretion remain plausible triggering mechanisms in distant LIRGs harboring a spiral morphology.," They concluded that minor mergers, tidal interactions, or gas accretion remain plausible triggering mechanisms in distant LIRGs harboring a spiral morphology." + Interestingly. of local LIRGs are barred. which could play a role in regulating star formation in such objects (Wangetal.2006).," Interestingly, of local LIRGs are barred, which could play a role in regulating star formation in such objects \citep{wang06}." +. At higher redshifts (.e.. z> 1). the co-moving density of galaxy appears to be dominated by clumpy irregular galaxies (Elmegreenetal.2007).," At higher redshifts (i.e., $>$ 1), the co-moving density of galaxy appears to be dominated by clumpy irregular galaxies \citep{elmegreen07}." +". Interest for such objects dates back to Cowieetal.(1995)... who first noticed the unusual aspects of some high- galaxies. dubbed as “chain galaxies"" and described as “linearly organized giant star-forming regions""."," Interest for such objects dates back to \cite{cowie95}, who first noticed the unusual aspects of some high-z galaxies, dubbed as “chain galaxies” and described as “linearly organized giant star-forming regions”." + The large occurrence of blue star-forming knots in less edge-on objects was also later recognized as a general and intriguing feature of distant galaxies. orobably linked to an early phase in the formation of local spiral galaxies (Cowieetal.1995:vandenBergh 1996).. and were atter referred to as “clump clusters” by Elmegreenetal.(2004).," The large occurrence of blue star-forming knots in less edge-on objects was also later recognized as a general and intriguing feature of distant galaxies, probably linked to an early phase in the formation of local spiral galaxies \citep{cowie95,vandenbergh96}, , and were latter referred to as “clump clusters” by \cite{elmegreen04}." +. The improved spatial resolution provided by the HST/ACS re-invigorated the interest for these objects. which were all suggested o be different incarnations of the same underlying population viewed along different inclination angles (O'Neiletal.2000:Elmegreenetal. 2004b).," The improved spatial resolution provided by the HST/ACS re-invigorated the interest for these objects, which were all suggested to be different incarnations of the same underlying population viewed along different inclination angles \citep{oneil00,elmegreen04b}." +". Both kind of objects are therefore often referred to as “clumpy galaxies"".", Both kind of objects are therefore often referred to as “clumpy galaxies”. +" They are found to be typically made of 5-10 kpe-sized clumps with stellar masses ~107"" M. G.e.. «100 times more massive than the largest star complexes in present-day spiral galaxies). and they typically account for one third of the total galaxy emission (Elmegreen&Elmegreen2005)"," They are found to be typically made of 5-10 kpc-sized clumps with stellar masses $\sim 10^{7-9}$ $_\odot$ (i.e., $\sim$ 100 times more massive than the largest star complexes in present-day spiral galaxies), and they typically account for one third of the total galaxy emission \citep{elmegreen05}." + Such clumps are thought to be linked to the formation of disks. as suggested by the increase of the inter-clump surface density. and the decrease of the mass surface density contrast between the clumps and the inter-clump regions. when going from clumpy galaxies with no evident inter-clump emission to clumpy galaxies with faint rec disks. and spiral galaxies (Elmegreenetal.2009b).," Such clumps are thought to be linked to the formation of disks, as suggested by the increase of the inter-clump surface density, and the decrease of the mass surface density contrast between the clumps and the inter-clump regions, when going from clumpy galaxies with no evident inter-clump emission to clumpy galaxies with faint red disks, and spiral galaxies \citep{elmegreen09b}." +. What is driving the formation of these clumps has been the subject of many attentions during the past decade., What is driving the formation of these clumps has been the subject of many attentions during the past decade. + Numerica simulations suggested that clumps might originate from the loca gravitational instability of very gas-rich disks of young galaxies (Noguchi1998:Immelietal.2004).," Numerical simulations suggested that clumps might originate from the local gravitational instability of very gas-rich disks of young galaxies \citep{noguchi98,immeli04}." +.. Due to their large masses. he clumps would experience strong dynamical friction and spira owards the galaxy center within a few Gyr. which might lead to the ormation of a bulge (Noguchi1999:Elmegreenetal.2008.2009).. as well as a stellar disk through strong stellar scattering (BournaudetMal.t2009b).," Due to their large masses, the clumps would experience strong dynamical friction and spiral towards the galaxy center within a few Gyr, which might lead to the formation of a bulge \citep{noguchi99,elmegreen08,elmegreen09}, as well as a thick stellar disk through strong stellar scattering \citep{bournaud09b}." +. ονSimulated clumps are found to show woperties similar to (Immelietal.20040:Bournaudetal. 2007).," Simulated clumps are found to show properties similar to observations \citep{immeli04b,bournaud07}." +. The lifetime of these clumps is so short and the Traction of clumpy galaxies at zl so high. that making the clumpy phase a long-term phenomenon requires a continuous and rapid resh supply of cold gas in order to feed the disk and regenerate new clumps (Dekeletal. 2009b)..," The lifetime of these clumps is so short and the fraction of clumpy galaxies at $>$ 1 so high, that making the clumpy phase a long-term phenomenon requires a continuous and rapid fresh supply of cold gas in order to feed the disk and regenerate new clumps \citep{dekel09b}. ." + Theoretical developments indeed suggested that early galaxy formation is fed by cold streams venetrating through dark matter halos (Dekeletal.2009)., Theoretical developments indeed suggested that early galaxy formation is fed by cold streams penetrating through dark matter halos \citep{dekel09}. +. These cold streams are expected to maintain a dense disk that can undergo gravitational fragmentation into several giant clumps (Dekeletal. 2009b)., These cold streams are expected to maintain a dense disk that can undergo gravitational fragmentation into several giant clumps \citep{dekel09b}. +. This possible link between high-z clumpy galaxies and the cosmological context was strengthened both by recent cosmological numerical simulations (Agertzetal.2009:Ceverinoetal. 20001. and semi-analytic models (Khochfar&Silk2009).," This possible link between high-z clumpy galaxies and the cosmological context was strengthened both by recent cosmological numerical simulations \citep{agertz09,ceverino09}, and semi-analytic models \citep{khochfar08}." +. Alternatively. it was proposed that clumps could also result from on-going mergers or interactions (Taniguchi&Sh- ," Alternatively, it was proposed that clumps could also result from on-going mergers or interactions \citep{taniguchi01,overzier08,dimatteo08}. ." +Discriminating between the merger and fragmentation scenarii is not straightforward because it requires high-resolution integral feld spectroscopy in high-z galaxies., Discriminating between the merger and fragmentation scenarii is not straightforward because it requires high-resolution integral field spectroscopy in high-z galaxies. + Indeed. as stated by Noguchi (1999).. the most straightforward and powerful test for discriminating between the two hypothesis is to examine the Kinematicsof the clumps: in the mergerscenario. a random," Indeed, as stated by \cite{noguchi99}, , the most straightforward and powerful test for discriminating between the two hypothesis is to examine the kinematicsof the clumps: in the mergerscenario, a random" +of narrow dust lanes and emission-line gas in nearby galaxies.,of narrow dust lanes and emission-line gas in nearby galaxies. + The technique is based on the Richardson-Lucy (R-L) image restoration algorithm. which uses the PSF to identify structure to enhance as part of the deconvolution process.," The technique is based on the Richardson-Lucy (R-L) image restoration algorithm, which uses the PSF to identify structure to enhance as part of the deconvolution process." + Mathematicallv. a structure map 5 is defined as: ∖∖⇁↥∐↲↕⋅≼↲∫↕⋟∖⊽⊔∐↲∪↕⋅↕≸↽↔↴↕↕⋯⊔∐↓≀↕↴≸≟↩⋅∫∍↕⋟∖⊽⊔∐↲↕∐⋟∖⊽⊔⋅∏∐∐↲↕∐↕↴⊳↔⊲⇪⋖⋡≺∢∪∐⋟∖⊽⊔⋅∏≺∢∩↲≼⇂∖∖⇁↕⊔↥⊔∐↲↴⊺↕∐⋡∖↽↴⊺↕∐↓ ⋟∖⊽∩∐∖∖⊽≀↧↴↕⋅≼↲∪↓≯↕∖⊽∏⊳∖⇁↥≪↽∖↽∐∪∪↳↽⊋∩∩⊥⋝⋅⋅∫∍∣↕⊳∖⇁⊔∐↲∏⋅≀↧↴∐⊳∖⇁↕↽≻∪⊳∖⊽≼↲∪↓⋟⊔∐↲↕↴⊳↔⊲⇪≀↧↴∐≼⇂∶↽↕↕⋝∖⊽⊔∐↲≺∢∪∐∖↽∪↥∏∐∪∐ ∪↕↽≻≼↲↕⋅≀↧↴↥∪↕⋅≼⋝⊳∖⇁≼↲≼," Mathematically, a structure map $S$ is defined as: where $I$ is the original image, $P$ is the instrument PSF \citep[constructed +with the TinyTim software of][]{krist04}, $P^t$ is the transpose of the PSF and $\otimes$ is the convolution operator \citep[see][]{pogge02}." +↲↥↴∪≸≟≸≟≼↲≪↽∖↽⇀∖↕≀↧↴↕⋅∐∐↕∃∩∪∃↕⋝⋅⋅ ↴∏∐↲⋟∖⊽⊔⋅∏≺∢⊓∐⋅≼↲∐⋯↕↽≻∩↲≺∢∐∐↕≺⇂⋯↲↕⋅≼↲≺∢∪∖↽≼↲↕⋅⋟∖⊽⋟∖⊽↕∐↓∐≀↧↴↕⋅↕∐↓⋟∪↕⋅∐↓≀↕↴∐∪∐↥∪⊔∐↲∐↓∪↕⋅≼↲⊔⋅≀↧↴≼∐∐∪↕⋯↥∐∐↲⊔↥⋯⇂⋟∖⊽ ∪↓⋟≺∢∪∐⊔⋅≀↧⊔∖⊽↥≼↲∐∐≀↧↴∐≺∢≼↲∐∐↲↕∐⋅⋟∖⊽∏≺∢∐≀↧⊍∖⊽⇂∎↓⊔↕∐≸↽↔↴≀↧↴∐≺⇂⋟∖⊽∏∣↽≻⊔⋅≀↕↴≺∢∐∐≸≟≼↲∐↕↕↽≻∐≺∢≀↧↴↥↕⋟," The structure map technique recovers similar information to the more traditional methods of contrast enhancement, such as fitting and subtracting elliptical isophotes and construction of color maps, but offers several advantages." +∖⊽∪↕↽≻∐∪∩↲⋟∖⊽≀↧↴∐≼⇂≺∢∪∐⋟∖⊽∏⋅∏≺∢∐∪∐ ∪↓⋟≺∢∪↥∪↕⋅∐↓≀↧↴↕↽≻⋟∖⇁⋅∣↽≻⋯∪∐⋡≼↲↕⋅⋟∖⊽⋟∖⊽≼↲∖↽≼↲↕⋅≀↧↴↥≀↧↴≼⇂∖↽≀↧↴↕∐≀↧↴≸↽↔↴≼↲⋟∖⊽⋅⊟≻↕⋅≼↲⇀↸≀↕↴∐↓↕↽≻↥≼↲⋅⊔∐↲∐⊔↕∐↖≺↽↔↴≀↧↴∐≺⇂⋟∖⇁∏∣↽≻⊔⋅≀↧↴≺∢∐∪∐∪↓⋟ ≼↲∐↕↕↽≻⋟∖⊽≼," For example, the fitting and subtraction of ellipses can lead to artificial features in the presence of strong brightness discontinuities or isophotal twists in the images." +↲⋟∖⊽≺∢≀↧↴∐↥≼↲≀↧↴≺⇂↥∪≀↧↴↕⋅↥∐∎↓≺∢↕≀↧↴↥↓⋟≼↲≀↧↴��∐⋅≼↲⋟∖⊽↕∐⊔∐↲↕↽≻↕⋅≼↲⋟∖⊽≼↲∐≺∢≼↲∪↓⋟⋟∖⊽∏⋅∪∐↖≺≟∣↽≻↕⋅↕≸↽↔↴↥∐∐≼↲⋟∖⋱∖⊽≼∐⋟," In the case of color maps, there are simply not as many galaxies with observations in two filters as in one." +∖⊽≺∢∪∐∐∐∏↕∐≼↲⋟∖⊽∪↕⋅ ↕⋝∖⊽∪↕↽≻∐∪↥≀↧↴↥↥∖∖⊽↕⊳∖⊽↥⊳∖⊽↕∐⊔∐↲↥∐⋯≸≟≼↲⋝∖⊽⋅↕∐⊔∐↲≺∢≀↧↪∖⇁≼↲∪↓⋟≺∢∪↥∪↕⋅∐↓≀↧↴↕↽≻⊳∖⊽⋅⊔∐↲↕⋅≼↲≀↧↴↕⋅≼↲⊳∖⊽↕∐↓↕, Possible mismatches between the PSFs in the two bands could also introduce artificial features in color maps. +↽≻↥∡∖↽∐∪↥≀↧↴⊳∖⊽∐↓≀↧↴∐∡∖↽ ≸↽↔↴≀↧↴↥≀↧↴⇀↸↕≼↲⊳∖⊽∖∖↽↥⊔↥∪∣↽≻⊳∖⊽≼↲↕⋅∖↽≀↧↴∐∪∐⋝∖⊽↕∐↥∖∖↽∪⇂∎↓∐≼↲↕⋅⋝∖⊽≀↧⊔∖⊽↕∐∪∐≼↲⋅↥↴∪⋝∖⊽⊳∖⇁↕∣↽≻↥≼↲↕∐↕⊳∖⇁∐↓≀↧↴∩∢∐≼↲⊳∖⇁∣↽≻≼↲↥∖∖↽≼↲≼↲∐⊔∐↲↥↴⊳↔⊲⊟∖⊽↕∐ ⊔∐↲↥∖∖⇁∪∣↽≻≀↧↴∐≺⇂⋟∖⊽≺∢∪∏∐≀↕⊥∖⊽∪↕∐⊔⋅⋯⇂∏≺∢≼↲≀↕↴↕⋅↥∐∎↓≺∢↕≀↧↴↥↓⋟≼↲≀↕↴⊓∐⋅≼↲⋟∖⊽↕∐≺∢∪↥∪↕⋅∐↓≀↧↴↕↽≻⋟∖⊽⋅↴⊺∐≼↲⋟∖⊽≼↲↕↽≻↕⋅∪∣↽≻↥≼↲∐↓⋟∖⊽≀↧↴↕⋅≼↲≀↧↴∐ avoided with the use of structure maps. although some spurious features can still appear.," These problems are all avoided with the use of structure maps, although some spurious features can still appear." + For exaniple. overexposed pixels can produce dark rings that mimic absorption features. while dead pixels can appear as false bright spots in the images.," For example, overexposed pixels can produce dark rings that mimic absorption features, while dead pixels can appear as false bright spots in the images." + Nevertheless. such cases were easily identified and did not affect our analysis.," Nevertheless, such cases were easily identified and did not affect our analysis." + After constructing structure maps. we then visually inspected each galaxy to determine if dust structures were present. and measured (he spatial extent of anv dust.," After constructing structure maps, we then visually inspected each galaxy to determine if dust structures were present and measured the spatial extent of any dust." + We also noted the presence of emission features Chat seem to be nuclear stellar disks (see discussion below) and measured the projected racial extent of these features., We also noted the presence of emission features that seem to be nuclear stellar disks (see discussion below) and measured the projected radial extent of these features. + οἱαπο maps for all our galaxies are shown in Figures 3. to 1.., Structure maps for all our galaxies are shown in Figures \ref{fig-stmap1} to \ref{fig-stmap7}. + Figure 3. present structure maps of each earlv-tvpe (7x 0). AGN host next to its inactive. control galaxy for the matched sample.," Figure \ref{fig-stmap1} present structure maps of each early-type $T \leq 0$ ), AGN host next to its inactive, control galaxy for the matched sample." + Each galaxy pair has the active galaxy on the left and (he inactive ealaxy on (he right., Each galaxy pair has the active galaxy on the left and the inactive galaxy on the right. + These (wo figures illustrate the most striking result of this paper. namely that all of the earlv-tvpe active galaxies possess circumnuclear dust while only (7 of 26) of the earlv-tvpe inactive galaxies possess cireumnuclear dust.," These two figures illustrate the most striking result of this paper, namely that all of the early-type active galaxies possess circumnuclear dust while only (7 of 26) of the early-type inactive galaxies possess circumnuclear dust." + Figure 2. demonstrates (hat (his result also holds when we include the extended sample. specifically all of the early-tvpe active galaxies have circumnuclear dust and only (9 of 34) of the inactive galaxies in the extended sample have circumnuclear dust.," Figure \ref{fig-stmap4} demonstrates that this result also holds when we include the extended sample, specifically all of the early-type active galaxies have circumnuclear dust and only (9 of 34) of the inactive galaxies in the extended sample have circumnuclear dust." + This result also holds if we exclude lenticulars anc, This result also holds if we exclude lenticulars and + This result also holds if we exclude lenticulars ancl, This result also holds if we exclude lenticulars and +(2000a.b) results in (ely.Buse29) = (7.6x10P. 0.35. 2.07. 1.77) for 3=146 and AnaBuneteS)=(02x10P. 145. 2.13. 142) for d—LT for LTld. the variable threshold solution is not well-constrained.," At $z > 1$, the variable threshold solution is not well-constrained." + Jackknile experiments indicate (hat (his is due the objects 0743-6719 and 0302-2223. namely the highest. ως} absorption lines in each of their spectra. (," Jackknife experiments indicate that this is due the objects 0743-6719 and 0302-2223, namely the highest $\omega(z)$ absorption lines in each of their spectra. (" +6) Allowing for a cosmology in which (Q4.4)=(0.3.0.7). rather than (1..0.),"6) Allowing for a cosmology in which $(\Omega_{\rm M},\Omega_{\Lambda}) = (0.3,0.7)$, rather than (1.,0.)" + has no significant effect on the value of (274) derived from these data. (, has no significant effect on the value of $J(\nu_{0})$ derived from these data. ( +7) The z«1 result is in agreement with the range of values of the mean intensity of the hvdrogen-ionizing background allowed by a variety of local estimates. including [a imaging and modeling of galaxy IHE disk truncations.,"7) The $z < 1$ result is in agreement with the range of values of the mean intensity of the hydrogen-ionizing background allowed by a variety of local estimates, including $\alpha$ imaging and modeling of galaxy HI disk truncations." + To within the uneertainty in the measurement. (his result agrees wilh the one previous proximity effect measurement of the low redshift UV background (IXF93).," To within the uncertainty in the measurement, this result agrees with the one previous proximity effect measurement of the low redshift UV background (KF93)." + These results are consistent wilh calculated models based upon the integrated emission from QSOs alone (11396) and with models which include both QSOs and starburst galaxies (Shull et 11999)., These results are consistent with calculated models based upon the integrated emission from QSOs alone (HM96) and with models which include both QSOs and starburst galaxies (Shull et 1999). + The uncertainties do not make a distinction between these (wo models possible. (, The uncertainties do not make a distinction between these two models possible. ( +8) The results presented here tentatively confir the IGM evolution scenario provided by large scale hydrodynamie simulations (Davé et 11999).,8) The results presented here tentatively confirm the IGM evolution scenario provided by large scale hydrodynamic simulations (Davé et 1999). + This scenario. which is successful in describing many observed properlies of the low redshilt IGM. is dependent upon an evolving J(44) which decreases from 2= 2(0z=0.," This scenario, which is successful in describing many observed properties of the low redshift IGM, is dependent upon an evolving $J(\nu_{0})$ which decreases from $z = 2$ to $z = 0$." + However. the low redshift UV background required to match the observations of the evolution of the Ly-a. forest line density is larger than found from the data. indicating Chat structure formation is plaving a role in this evolution as well.," However, the low redshift UV background required to match the observations of the evolution of the $\alpha$ forest line density is larger than found from the data, indicating that structure formation is playing a role in this evolution as well." + Our results and the work of others are summarized in Figure 16.., Our results and the work of others are summarized in Figure \ref{fig:allzcomp}. + We find some evidence of evolution in (19). though it appears that even larger data sets. especially ab z«1 and/or improved proximity effect ionization models will be required to improve the significance.," We find some evidence of evolution in $J(\nu_{0})$, though it appears that even larger data sets, especially at $z < 1$ and/or improved proximity effect ionization models will be required to improve the significance." + The authors thank (he anonymous releree for a careful review of the paper and for helpful sugeestions., The authors thank the anonymous referee for a careful review of the paper and for helpful suggestions. + This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. California Institute. of Technology. under contract with the National Aeronautics aud Space Acdministration.," This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration." + This project was supported bv STScI erant AAR-05785.02-944 and STSel grant GGO 0660601954. JS acknowledges support of the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and the Zonta Foundation Amelia Earhart Fellowship., This project was supported by STScI grant AR-05785.02-94A and STScI grant GO 066060195A. JS acknowledges support of the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and the Zonta Foundation Amelia Earhart Fellowship. + JS. JD. and MM received. financial support [rom NSF grant AST-9617060D. AD acknowledges support from NASA Contract," JS, JB, and MM received financial support from NSF grant AST-9617060B. AD acknowledges support from NASA Contract" +The photometry of GS 000 variable stars in the LMC was performed. by the OGLE team and recently published by Zeebrun et al. (,The photometry of 68 000 variable stars in the LMC was performed by the OGLE team and recently published by Żeebruń et al. ( +2001).,2001). + Unfortunately. cue to the [act that OGLE searches for. microlensing phenomena. the vast majoritv of their cata is collected in. the £-band.," Unfortunately, due to the fact that OGLE searches for microlensing phenomena, the vast majority of their data is collected in the $I$ -band." + Adcditionalls. the exposure times are too short to produce very high quality data on RI Lyr variables.," Additionally, the exposure times are too short to produce very high quality data on RR Lyr variables." + Phe photometry described. by Zeebruá οἱ al. (, The photometry described by Żeebruń et al. ( +2001) was collected in 21 fields and for most of them the number of V-band frames was arounel 30-40.,2001) was collected in 21 fields and for most of them the number of $V$ -band frames was around 30-40. + Only four fields. namely SCR. 8€. SC4 and SC. were observed. over 50 times in V and thus the," Only four fields, namely SC2, SC3, SC4 and SC5, were observed over 50 times in $V$ and thus the" + ↕↓↕↓⊰↓⊰∟∙∖⇁↓⋅↿∖∺∠∢⋅⋠⊔∐↓≤⋗⊤≼∩↦↓⊰∐≺∶∢⋅⊔↓∖∺∢↗⊔⇂∪↓⋅⊳∺∠⋖⊾⊀⊔∐⊾∖↽↼∣⊔↓⋅≼⋱∖⊲↓↳ ⇉∪∪⊤⊐↦⇀∖∠≺⊲∙∖⇁⋏∙≟↿∖,"in RR Lyr \citep{rrl}, RR Gem \citep{rrgII}, , XZ Cyg \citep{xzc} and CZ Lac \citep{czl}." +∟⋜↧≺⊲↓⊔∙∖⇁∠⋖↗⋅∢⊾⇂⋜↧↓⊳⇉∪⊔∃⋜⋯∠⊔⊲∠∟⋯∼↿∖∺∢↗⊔⇂∪↓⋅ ⋖⋅⇂⋜↧↓⊳⇉∪∐∩↦↓⊔⋃∢⊾⊳∖⋖⋅⊳∖⇂⋜⊔⋅⊳∖↿↓↕∢⋅⊳∖↿↓⋅⋖⊾⊔⋏∙≟↿↓↥⊳∖∪⇂⋅↿↓↕∢⊾⋜⋯↓↓≻∐⊓⊔⇂∢⋅ ⋜⋯∠⇂↿↓↥⋖⋅↓≻↓⋯⊳∖∢⋅⊔↓⋯⇂⊔↓⋜∐⊀↓∪⊔⊳∖⋜↧⊳∖∖∖⊽∢⋅⇂⋜↧⊳∖⇂↓↕⋖⋅↓≻⇂⇂↓≻⋜↧⇂↕∢≱↓↥⋜↧↓↥∠⇂ he modulation periods vary., In these stars the strengths of the amplitude and the phase modulations as well as the pulsation and the modulation periods vary. + These changes are. probably connected either to multi-periodicity of the modulation or o abrupt and continuous changes of the pulsation period., These changes are probably connected either to multi-periodicity of the modulation or to abrupt and continuous changes of the pulsation period. + In Table 2 we summarize the detected changes in the pulsation and the modulation. periods for all those variables. which rave data at least for two dillerent epochs.," In Table \ref{bllong} we summarize the detected changes in the pulsation and the modulation periods for all those variables, which have data at least for two different epochs." + We note. however. hat in those cases when the observed. period changes have »en determined Lor several epochs (c.g. XZ Dra. XZ (νο. UV Dra. RY UMa). no strict relation between the pulsation- and the mocdulation-period changes of the variables holds.," We note, however, that in those cases when the observed period changes have been determined for several epochs (e.g. XZ Dra, XZ Cyg, RW Dra, RV UMa), no strict relation between the pulsation- and the modulation-period changes of the variables holds." + The connection between the period. changes reflects. some endency rather than an exact relation., The connection between the period changes reflects some tendency rather than an exact relation. + Vherelore. results obtained from two-epoch data have to be taken with caution.," Therefore, results obtained from two-epoch data have to be taken with caution." + The columns of Table 2. give the pulsation and. the modulation periods. the absolute values of their changes calculated from the periods given in Table 1. or taken from he literature. the normalized relative period variations. and the relative period. and frequcney variations for seven AI5 and six field RRab stars. listed in order of increasing »ulsation period.," The columns of Table \ref{bllong} give the pulsation and the modulation periods, the absolute values of their changes calculated from the periods given in Table \ref{bltab} or taken from the literature, the normalized relative period variations, and the relative period and frequency variations for seven M5 and six field RRab stars, listed in order of increasing pulsation period." + IEExamining these data we failed to find any regular pattern. but some general trends are evident.," Examining these data we failed to find any regular pattern, but some general trends are evident." + First. it seems that in general. there is an anticorrelation between he directions of the pulsation and the modulation. period changes. Le. à negative sign of c1 is more common han a positive one.," First, it seems that in general, there is an anticorrelation between the directions of the pulsation and the modulation period changes, i.e. a negative sign of ${{\rm d}P_{\mathrm{Bl}}/{\rm d}P_0}$ is more common than a positive one." +" Secondly. it can be noticed. that the relative period variations (P5 /d4/,) and their normalized values tend to have larger absolute values for variables with onger pulsation periods than for shorter period ones."," Secondly, it can be noticed that the relative period variations ${{\rm d}{P_{\mathrm{Bl}}}/{{\rm d} {P_{0}}}}$ ) and their normalized values tend to have larger absolute values for variables with longer pulsation periods than for shorter period ones." + The pulsation-period variation of one of the Blazhko stars. V56. can be described: with a long. periodic/evclic variation.," The pulsation-period variation of one of the Blazhko stars, V56, can be described with a long, periodic/cyclic variation." + This gives a unique possibility to test the binary origin of the long-period O—C' variation., This gives a unique possibility to test the binary origin of the long-period $O-C$ variation. + Lf this were caused by the light-time elfect the pulsation and modulation periods should have to show similar variation. because NPP is the function of the elements of the orbit for any periodic signal (Coutts1971a).," If this were caused by the light-time effect the pulsation and modulation periods should have to show similar variation, because $\Delta P/P$ is the function of the elements of the orbit for any periodic signal \citep{co71}." +. The observed. normalised relative period variation of the pulsation and the modulation periods of V56 is. however. much larger than |. it is SLO contracdicting the orbital origin of the evelic. long-period variation.," The observed normalised relative period variation of the pulsation and the modulation periods of V56 is, however, much larger than 1, it is 840 contradicting the orbital origin of the cyclic, long-period variation." + However. keeping in mind that random variations in the modulation periods may override the supposed svnchronous variations of the pulsation and the modulation periods. this result is not in fact conclusive.," However, keeping in mind that random variations in the modulation periods may override the supposed synchronous variations of the pulsation and the modulation periods, this result is not in fact conclusive." + Although Blazhko stars are usually numerous in. globular clusters. which are rich in RR Lyrae stars. we hardly know anvthing about their properties because of a lack of data suitable. for studying them.," Although Blazhko stars are usually numerous in globular clusters, which are rich in RR Lyrae stars, we hardly know anything about their properties because of a lack of data suitable for studying them." + Results have been restricted to deriving the Blazhko periods. but even they have been successfully obtained only in a few cases. e.&. in M3 (Benkóetal. 2006).," Results have been restricted to deriving the Blazhko periods, but even they have been successfully obtained only in a few cases, e.g. in M3 \citep{m3}." +. In. this paper the Πλας population of M5 are reviewed using all the available photometric data of the variables. in order to identify the Blazhko stars and to study their behaviour.," In this paper the RRab population of M5 are reviewed using all the available photometric data of the variables, in order to identify the Blazhko stars and to study their behaviour." + Modulation periods were determined for 13 out of the 20 Blazhko stars that were identified., Modulation periods were determined for 13 out of the 20 Blazhko stars that were identified. + The long time base of the observations also made it possible to record changes in the observed. properties of some of the Blazhko stars., The long time base of the observations also made it possible to record changes in the observed properties of some of the Blazhko stars. + The most important results of this study can be summarized as follows: Finally. we note that. the possibilities of. studying elobular-cluster. Blazhko stars are still unexploited.," The most important results of this study can be summarized as follows: Finally, we note that the possibilities of studying globular-cluster Blazhko stars are still unexploited." + Although these. studies would neec relatively large observational ellorts. the homogeneity of such samples would be helpful for determining what properties of the It Lyrac stars predestine them to become Blazhko variables.," Although these studies would need relatively large observational efforts, the homogeneity of such samples would be helpful for determining what properties of the RR Lyrae stars predestine them to become Blazhko variables." + The constructive. helpful comments of the referee. Ixatrien Ixolenberg are much appreciated.," The constructive, helpful comments of the referee, Katrien Kolenberg are much appreciated." + Lhe financial support of OTIAX erant Ix-068626 is acknowledged., The financial support of OTKA grant K-068626 is acknowledged. + €. Clement thanks the Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada for financial support., C. Clement thanks the Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada for financial support. + Zs., Zs. +" H. thanks the ""Lendüllet program ofthe Hungarian Academy of Sciences for supporting his work.", H. thanks the `Lendüllet' program ofthe Hungarian Academy of Sciences for supporting his work. +where Foo. Fog flew and qnos are the observed. and corrected values of the elfective racius (in arcsec) and. of the mean ellective surface brightness (in magaresec27). respectively. and eb is the major-to-minor axis ratio.,"where $r_{e,o}$ $r_{e,c}$ , $\mu_{e,o}$ and $\mu_{e,c}$ are the observed and corrected values of the effective radius (in arcsec) and of the mean effective surface brightness (in $\rm mag~arcsec^{-2}$ ), respectively, and $a/b$ is the major-to-minor axis ratio." +" Total magnitudes are corrected for internal extinction as follows (CGavazzi Doselli 1996): where nrp, and nmep, are the observed: ancl corrected values. whatever the Hubble-tvpe is."," Total magnitudes are corrected for internal extinction as follows (Gavazzi Boselli 1996): where $m_{T,o}$ and $m_{T,c}$ are the observed and corrected values, whatever the Hubble-type is." + In fact. Gavazzi 3oselli cid not. find. anv morphological dependence of the corrections of total magnitudes for internal extinction in the near-IHi. pass-bands. as opposed to the optical ones.," In fact, Gavazzi Boselli did not find any morphological dependence of the corrections of total magnitudes for internal extinction in the near-IR pass-bands, as opposed to the optical ones." + Fig., Fig. + 1l shows the distribution of the sample galaxies in a three-dimensional fold-out of. the ποπ &-space., 1 shows the distribution of the sample galaxies in a three-dimensional fold-out of the near-IR $\kappa$ -space. + Llere we group the sample galaxies in ellipticals (19) plus lenticulars (SO). SO0a galaxies. anc giant spirals (SaSc) plus late-spirals/la/yBCDs (Scd.lfBCD) and generic irregular/peculiar galaxies.," Here we group the sample galaxies in ellipticals (E) plus lenticulars (S0), S0a galaxies, and giant spirals (Sa–Sc) plus late-spirals/Im/BCDs (Scd–Im/BCD) and generic irregular/peculiar galaxies." + I2|80. 50a. SabufBCD galaxies plus generic irregular/peculiar galaxies are represented with filled circles. asterisks ancl empty circles. respectively. in Fig.," E+S0, S0a, Sa–Im/BCD galaxies plus generic irregular/peculiar galaxies are represented with filled circles, asterisks and empty circles, respectively, in Fig." + 1., 1. + We assume characteristic cumulative uncertainties OW;=ÓWoOsaOL. consistent with typical uncertainties in the observables (ef," We assume characteristic cumulative uncertainties $\delta \kappa_1 = \delta \kappa_2 = \delta \kappa_3 = 0.1$, consistent with typical uncertainties in the observables (cf." + Sect., Sect. + 3)., 3). + The magnitudes of these 10 errors are reproduced in each panel of Fig., The magnitudes of these 1 $\rm \sigma$ errors are reproduced in each panel of Fig. + 1., 1. + We also reproduce the increase in all the three &s- coordinates due to the increase ofthe dynamical mass when the potential contribution of rotational velocity to the total kinetic energy of the ellipticals is taken into account (cl., We also reproduce the increase in all the three $\kappa$ -space coordinates due to the increase of the dynamical mass when the potential contribution of rotational velocity to the total kinetic energy of the ellipticals is taken into account (cf. + Sect., Sect. + 2)., 2). + Llere we need to say that the impact of the extinction corrections on the distribution of the late-tvpe galaxies in the near-H. &-3pace is small but the fact that the average elfective mass-to-light ratio of these galaxies increases bv when extinction corrections are applied., Here we need to say that the impact of the extinction corrections on the distribution of the late-type galaxies in the near-IR $\kappa$ -space is small but the fact that the average effective mass-to-light ratio of these galaxies increases by when extinction corrections are applied. + In the next subsections we analyse the galaxy distribution in each projection of the &-space as a function of morphology., In the next subsections we analyse the galaxy distribution in each projection of the $\kappa$ -space as a function of morphology. + Fherefore. in Fig.," Therefore, in Fig." + 2. we reproduce the three-dimensional fold-out. of the near-H1t. &-space for these four eroups of Hubble types: We adopt this classification from BBEN (except for the eeneric irregular/peculiar galaxies)," 2, we reproduce the three-dimensional fold-out of the near-IR $\kappa$ -space for these four groups of Hubble types: We adopt this classification from BBFN (except for the generic irregular/peculiar galaxies)." + In each panel of Fig., In each panel of Fig. +" 2. we reproduce the Fundamental Plane relation in the &, a plane (see Sect."," 2, we reproduce the Fundamental Plane relation in the $\kappa_1$ $\kappa_3$ plane (see Sect." + 4.1.1). the distribution of the I2]SO galaxies. within £1σ from the mean. inthe &o 5; plane (see Sect.," 4.1.1), the distribution of the E+S0 galaxies, within $\rm \pm 1~\sigma$ from the mean, in the $\kappa_2$ $\kappa_3$ plane (see Sect." +" 4.2.1) and the borderline of the ""Zone of IExcelusion in the &j πο plane (see Sect.", 4.2.1) and the borderline of the “Zone of Exclusion” in the $\kappa_1$ $\kappa_2$ plane (see Sect. + 1.3.1)., 4.3.1). + The distribution. of the elliptical and lenticular galaxies in the 5j 5 projection of the &-space confirms that the dvnanücal mass-to-near-Hi lisht ratio increases with the dynamical mass (ef, The distribution of the elliptical and lenticular galaxies in the $\kappa_1$ $\kappa_3$ projection of the $\kappa$ -space confirms that the dynamical mass-to-near-IR light ratio increases with the dynamical mass (cf. + PDdC€) as found in the optical (Bender. δισοι Faber 1992: Burstein et al.," PDdC) as found in the optical (Bender, Burstein Faber 1992; Burstein et al." + 1995: DDEN)., 1995; BBFN). + This result. was expected from the existence of the Fundamental Plane relation in its canonical notation (Pahre. de Carvalho Djorgovski 19908: S98).," This result was expected from the existence of the Fundamental Plane relation in its canonical notation (Pahre, de Carvalho Djorgovski 1998; S98)." +" A linear fit to the data which minimizes the dispersion in both axes gives: The 4ope of the L-band FP (in &-space notation) that we derive corresponds to the sealing relations Al./L,xALOΟΣΕ απά ALL,LOPLEOS qu ", A linear fit to the data which minimizes the dispersion in both axes gives: The slope of the H-band FP (in $\kappa$ -space notation) that we derive corresponds to the scaling relations $M_e/L_e \propto M_e^{0.296 \pm 0.027}$ and $M_e/L_e \propto L_e^{0.421 \pm 0.055}$. +(he K-band PDdC obtained. AMμυο ancl AL/L.OxLUCDYZTUQU1S-- '. τ, In the K-band PDdC obtained $M_e/L_e \propto M_e^{0.147 \pm 0.011}$ and $M_e/L_e \propto L_e^{0.172 \pm 0.013}$ . +οThe originel5 o⋅ the significantenlD cliscrepancyR between these two sets of near-Lt scaling relations is twofold: the incompleteness bias and dillerences in data analysis., The origin of the significant discrepancy between these two sets of near-IR scaling relations is twofold: the incompleteness bias and differences in data analysis. + First we note that both these analyses rest on uncomplete samples. so that the derived. sealing relations are biased.," First we note that both these analyses rest on uncomplete samples, so that the derived scaling relations are biased." + The PDC sample is more than twice in size than ours. containing 251 elliptical ancl lenticular galaxies. selected wimarily from 13 nearby rich clusters (but. also from loose eroups and the general field). whose distribution in redshift velocity brackets the redshift velocities of Virgo and Coma. he main contributors of objects in our study.," The PDdC sample is more than twice in size than ours, containing 251 elliptical and lenticular galaxies, selected primarily from 13 nearby rich clusters (but also from loose groups and the general field), whose distribution in redshift velocity brackets the redshift velocities of Virgo and Coma, the main contributors of objects in our study." + According to he study of the incompleteness bias by Teerikorpi (1987. 1900). we may allow that. in our sample. the fraction of low-luminosity (and. low-mass) objects is skew towards ugher luminosities (ancl masses) than in the PDdC sample. so that a steeper relation between mass-to-light ratio and mass may be expected.," According to the study of the incompleteness bias by Teerikorpi (1987, 1990), we may allow that, in our sample, the fraction of low-luminosity (and low-mass) objects is skew towards higher luminosities (and masses) than in the PDdC sample, so that a steeper relation between mass-to-light ratio and mass may be expected." + Nonetheless. svstematic differences in the cata analysis between us anc PDdC€ probably have a larger impact on the obtained sealing relations.," Nonetheless, systematic differences in the data analysis between us and PDdC probably have a larger impact on the obtained scaling relations." + While the seeing corrections adopted by us and PDdC are consistent (cf., While the seeing corrections adopted by us and PDdC are consistent (cf. + Pahre 1999). the elfective radii and mean surface brightnesses are derived in two dillerent ways.," Pahre 1999), the effective radii and mean surface brightnesses are derived in two different ways." + We obtain these effective parameters from. isophotal. elliptical surface photometry (ef," We obtain these effective parameters from isophotal, elliptical surface photometry (cf." + Sect., Sect. + 3.1). while PDdC determined them from circular aperture photometry. in agreement with previous optical studies.," 3.1), while PDdC determined them from circular aperture photometry, in agreement with previous optical studies." + As discussed by Pahre (1999). the isophotal estimate of the elfective radius is. on average. slightlv [larger than its circular. aperture estimate. and. conversely.the isophotalestimate of the elfective intensity is lower than the corresponding circular aperture estimato.," As discussed by Pahre (1999), the isophotal estimate of the effective radius is, on average, slightly larger than its circular aperture estimate, and, conversely,the isophotalestimate of the effective intensity is lower than the corresponding circular aperture estimate." + This was already proposed. by SOS in. order to. explain the diserepaney. between the H-band and. the Ix-band. EP, This was already proposed by S98 in order to explain the discrepancy between the H-band and the K-band FP +2 absorption edges/lines to the power law continuum.,2 absorption edges/lines to the power law continuum. +" A narrow emission line at 5.59+0.07 keV (rest frame 6.42+0.07 keV) was only marginally significant in the combined data set, with an EW of 754-50 eV and a small improvement in the fit from x? of 269/228 to x? of 264/226."," A narrow emission line at $\pm$ 0.07 keV (rest frame $\pm$ 0.07 keV) was only marginally significant in the combined data set, with an EW of $\pm$ 50 eV and a small improvement in the fit from $\chi^2$ of 269/228 to $\chi^2$ of 264/226." +" An absorption line at 6.8840.05 keV (rest frame 7.91+0.05 keV), of width σ.»100 eV and EW 360+50 eV, produced a larger improvement, to x? of 236/223."," An absorption line at $\pm$ 0.05 keV (rest frame $\pm$ 0.05 keV), of width $\sigma$$\sim$ 100 eV and EW $\pm$ 50 eV, produced a larger improvement, to $\chi^2$ of 236/223." +" Finally, an absorption edge at Τ.6--0.2 keV (rest frame 8.7+0.2 keV), optical depth 7 of 0.30.1, further improved the fit to x? of 228/221."," Finally, an absorption edge at $\pm$ 0.2 keV (rest frame $\pm$ 0.2 keV), optical depth $\tau$ of $\pm$ 0.1, further improved the fit to $\chi^2$ of 228/221." + We defer further discussion of these features to Section 5.3., We defer further discussion of these features to Section 5.3. +" The marginal detection of low energy absorption in the original oobservation of 0918+2117M (Wilkes 22002) was a surprise, given that iis a highly reddened object."," The marginal detection of low energy absorption in the original observation of M (Wilkes 2002) was a surprise, given that is a highly reddened object." +" On the basis of the follow-up oobservations it now seems that the intermediate flux level oobservation may have been confused by the presence of a soft emission component, seen more clearly in the low flux state oobservation in 2003."," On the basis of the follow-up observations it now seems that the intermediate flux level observation may have been confused by the presence of a soft emission component, seen more clearly in the low flux state observation in 2003." +" We now find, in the 2005 high state spectrum, clear evidence for low energy absorption corresponding to a line-of-sight column Ng-4x10?! ?."," We now find, in the 2005 high state spectrum, clear evidence for low energy absorption corresponding to a line-of-sight column $_{H}$$\sim$ $\times 10^{21}$ $^{-2}$." +" With the low ionisation parameter and a 'normal dust to gas ratio, that absorbing column is consistent with the additional optical reddening (i.e. above that of an unobscured QSO; Barkhouse and Hall 2001) of J-K;~0.4 seen in 09184-2117M. Our analysis suggests that the spectral change between the 2003 and 2005 oobservations was dominated by a change in the X-ray power law continuum, with absorption in a column of Ny~4x 10?! cm""? of ‘cold’ or weakly ionised gas present in both cases."," With the low ionisation parameter and a `normal' dust to gas ratio, that absorbing column is consistent with the additional optical reddening (i.e. above that of an unobscured QSO; Barkhouse and Hall 2001) of $_{s}$$\sim$ 0.4 seen in M. Our analysis suggests that the spectral change between the 2003 and 2005 observations was dominated by a change in the X-ray power law continuum, with absorption in a column of $_{H}$$\sim$ $\times 10^{21}$ $^{-2}$ of `cold' or weakly ionised gas present in both cases." +" As noted in W05, inclusion of such absorption in modelling the 2003 sspectrum, in addition to strong cold reflection, would allow the underlying continuum to assume a ‘normal’ photon index, in the range predicted by Comptonisation models (eg Haardt 11997)."," As noted in W05, inclusion of such absorption in modelling the 2003 spectrum, in addition to strong cold reflection, would allow the underlying continuum to assume a `normal' photon index, in the range predicted by Comptonisation models (eg Haardt 1997)." +" Variability of the primary power law continuum has been identified as the dominant component in X-ray spectral changes in several well studied AGN (Fabian and Vaughan 2003, Pounds 22004)."," Variability of the primary power law continuum has been identified as the dominant component in X-ray spectral changes in several well studied AGN (Fabian and Vaughan 2003, Pounds 2004)." + It appears that iis a further example of that situation., It appears that is a further example of that situation. +" While we have no direct information on the location of the absorbing gas, it is probably not very close to the central source unless in sufficiently dense clouds to avoid evaporation."," While we have no direct information on the location of the absorbing gas, it is probably not very close to the central source unless in sufficiently dense clouds to avoid evaporation." +" However, the intermediate type 1.5 classification of ssuggests some absorbing matter is located at a radius comparable with the BLR."," However, the intermediate type 1.5 classification of suggests some absorbing matter is located at a radius comparable with the BLR." + Future observations to check for variability of the absorbing column and/or ionisation parameter should clarify that issue., Future observations to check for variability of the absorbing column and/or ionisation parameter should clarify that issue. + It is interesting to speculate on the nature of the soft X-ray, It is interesting to speculate on the nature of the soft X-ray +from OB associations.,from OB associations. + PDRs exposed to weak FUV radiation fields have been studied in a few sources using i]] emission (e.g.?2?) but never observed with velocity—resolved m]] before Herschel/HIFI.," PDRs exposed to weak FUV radiation fields have been studied in a few sources using ] emission \citep[e.g.][]{Maezawa1999,Bensch06,Pineda07a} but never observed with velocity–resolved ] before Herschel/HIFI." +" ? suggested that most of the m]] in our Galaxy originates from a clumpy medium exposed to a FUV field of yo 10-5, which is larger than the upper limit determined for the majority of the observed components."," \citet{Cubick2008} suggested that most of the ] in our Galaxy originates from a clumpy medium exposed to a FUV field of $\chi_0=10^{1.8}$ , which is larger than the upper limit determined for the majority of the observed components." +" Note, however, that their model does not consider emission arising from diffuse clouds."," Note, however, that their model does not consider emission arising from diffuse clouds." +" From our observed LOSs, we find that about of the total detected m]] emission arises from low-column density regions (without significant 1900 emission; ??)) while is emitted from dense PDRs."," From our observed LOSs, we find that about of the total detected ] emission arises from low–column density regions (without significant $^{13}$ CO emission; \citealt{Langer2010,Velusamy2010}) ) while is emitted from dense PDRs." +" Nevertheless, the moderate FUV field predicted by ? might suggest that the predominance of low-FUV radiation field regions observed in our limited sample (covering less than of the entire survey) might hold for the entire Galaxy."," Nevertheless, the moderate FUV field predicted by \citet{Cubick2008} might suggest that the predominance of low–FUV radiation field regions observed in our limited sample (covering less than of the entire survey) might hold for the entire Galaxy." + We found two regions where our analysis suggests high densities (>105 ccm?) and strong FUV fields (between Xo=10 and 10°).," We found two regions where our analysis suggests high densities $>10^5$ $^{-3}$ ) and strong FUV fields (between $\chi_{\rm 0} = +10^4$ and $10^6$ )." + These regions are likely associated with massive star formation., These regions are likely associated with massive star formation. + This conclusion is a result of the elevated u]]/CO ratio observed towards these regions., This conclusion is a result of the elevated ]/CO ratio observed towards these regions. + This identification suggests that the n]]/CO ratio is good tracer of the location of massive star formation regions in the galaxy. 1], This identification suggests that the ]/CO ratio is good tracer of the location of massive star formation regions in the galaxy. ] +] observations will therefore provide an alternative method to determine the distribution of massive star forming regions in the galaxy (e.g.?).., observations will therefore provide an alternative method to determine the distribution of massive star forming regions in the galaxy \citep[e.g.][]{Bronfman2000}. + Note that velocity resolved observations are crucial for the interpretation of the m]]/CO ratio., Note that velocity resolved observations are crucial for the interpretation of the ]/CO ratio. + In our observed LOSs we have found velocity components showing [Cu]] emission but no CO as well as components showing CO but no rj]., In our observed LOSs we have found velocity components showing ] emission but no CO as well as components showing CO but no ]. + Velocity unresolved observations would have given a distorted value of the m]]/CO ratio that would result in an incorrect interpretation of the physical conditions of the line-emitting gas., Velocity unresolved observations would have given a distorted value of the ]/CO ratio that would result in an incorrect interpretation of the physical conditions of the line–emitting gas. +thickuess does not depeud ou the upstream magnetic field streugth.,thickness does not depend on the upstream magnetic field strength. + From the examples shown iu Fig., From the examples shown in Fig. + 2 and 3.. we can see that although the zeroeth-orcler solution follows the geueral behavior of C shocks. it is not accurate for strougly-1uaguetized cases (Fig. 3)).," \ref{ana_thick1} and \ref{ana_thick2}, we can see that although the zeroeth-order solution follows the general behavior of C shocks, it is not accurate for strongly-magnetized cases (Fig. \ref{ana_thick2}) )." + Compared with the dataset of exact solutions discussed in previous section. the RMS value of (Lexact—Leerocih)/Lexact is 0.355. and the range of (Lesaet—Leerveth}/Lexact is —0.8 to 0.28.," Compared with the dataset of exact solutions discussed in previous section, the RMS value of $(L_\mathrm{exact}-L_\mathrm{zeroeth})/L_\mathrm{exact}$ is $0.355$ , and the range of $(L_\mathrm{exact}-L_\mathrm{zeroeth})/L_\mathrm{exact}$ is $-0.8$ to $0.28$." + The depeudence ou the velocity. tou density. aud. collision coellicient in Equation (31)) cau be uuderstood in terms of the drag force between ious aud neutrals.," The dependence on the velocity, ion density, and collision coefficient in Equation \ref{thick_ana}) ) can be understood in terms of the drag force between ions and neutrals." + The total momentum flux iu ueutrals enteringH the shock isH poco., The total momentum flux in neutrals entering the shock is $\rho_0{v_0}^2$. +> The mean drag forceH per volume isη ~apopi;gco.," The mean drag force per volume is $\sim\alpha\rho_0\rho_{i,0}v_0$." + The ration ofn these quantities. which is the characteristic distance over which momentum excliaugetakes place. is This depenclence is similar to Equation (3.12) in Draine&Mclxee(1993) ifthe Alfvéun speed in the fluid is similar to the upstream velocity. ονey.," The ratio of these quantities, which is the characteristic distance over which momentum exchangetakes place, is This dependence is similar to Equation (3.12) in \cite{1993ARA&A..31..373D} if the Alfvénn speed in the fluid is similar to the upstream velocity, $v_\mathrm{A}\sim v_0$." + Although they obtained an estimate usine different assumptions aud approximations. the basic idea that the momentum trausfer rate determines the shock thickuess is similar.," Although they obtained an estimate using different assumptions and approximations, the basic idea that the momentum transfer rate determines the shock thickness is similar." +" To obtain a more accurate estimate of the C shock thickness. we return to the clillerential equation (9a)) for neutral momentum flux. makine use of Equation (21)) aud the ionization equilibrium condition r;=ry> We integratee this equation. usiugOm constant. values on the rielt-lauc-siclee where the minimum value of r,/rg can be derived explicitly[rom Equation (16)) as This yieldsa quadratic for rj as a fuuction of vr:"," To obtain a more accurate estimate of the C shock thickness, we return to the differential equation \ref{momN}) ) for neutral momentum flux, making use of Equation \ref{constD}) ) and the ionization equilibrium condition $r_i = r_n^{1/2}$ , We integrate this equation, using constant values on the right-hand-side where the minimum value of $r_n/r_B$ can be derived explicitlyfrom Equation \ref{rB}) ) as This yieldsa quadratic for $r_n$ as a function of $x$ :" +errors.,errors. + The 2dEPGIBS has a brighter A by 0.05 mae. and a brighter pj by 0.85 mag ," The 2dFGRS has a brighter $M^*$ by 0.05 mag, and a brighter $\mu_e^*$ by 0.85 mag $^{-2}$." +‘Taking into account the elfects of bulges and inclination as mentioned above. the 2dGIU distribution has become 0.15 mag brighter than the de Jong Lacey distribution and has a brighter pi by 0.3 mag ο7.," Taking into account the effects of bulges and inclination as mentioned above, the 2dFGRS distribution has become 0.15 mag brighter than the de Jong Lacey distribution and has a brighter $\mu_e^*$ by 0.3 mag $^{-2}$." + Considering that [ate-tvpe galaxies tend to be fainter and lower surface brightness. these results appear fully consistent.," Considering that late-type galaxies tend to be fainter and lower surface brightness, these results appear fully consistent." +" Our value of 3,I can be converted. to a. Iuminositv- ≱∖⋯↓⋖⋅⊳∖⊀↓∠⋖⋅⋏∙≟↓⋅⋯⋠⊓⋅⊔↿⊰∣∣∶∪⋅∶∫≻≼≨∪∶∶∪⋅⋈⊔⊳⇀∖↓↿↓↥∪"," Our value of $\beta_{\mu}$ can be converted to a luminosity-scale size gradient $\beta_{r_e}=-0.360 +\pm 0.004$." +⊔⋏∙≟↓↕↿↓↥⊲↓⊳∖ ∠⇂⊲↓∐⋅⋖⋅↓⋅⊳∖∐⋅∪⊔↓↿↓∐⋅∠⇂⋖⋅↼∣∪⊔⋏↳⊓∖↽∟⋯∼∢⊾∙∖⇁⊔∪⋈∩∖⇁⋜↧⇂⋯⋅⊳⊀↓⊔∩⋅↓⋅∢⊾⊳∖↿⊀↓⊔⋏∙≟↓∙∖⇁⊳ it agrees more closely. with their theoretical. prediction. of Ei (see de Jong Lacey 2000).," Although this differs from the de Jong Lacey (2000) value, interestingly, it agrees more closely with their theoretical prediction of $\beta_{r_e}=-\frac{1}{3}$ (see de Jong Lacey 2000)." +" One possible reason for the variation in 3),i nav be a correlation between ≼∙∪⇂∪⊔↓⋅⋜⋯∠⋜↧∣⋡≱∖∪↓⋯∢⊾⊔↓⋜↧⋏∙≟⊔", One possible reason for the variation in $\beta_{\mu}$ may be a correlation between colour and absolute magnitude. +⊀↓⊓⊔⇂⋖⊾⊳∐↓⋜⋯↿∪⊔∢⊾, Blanton et al. ( +"⇂⋜↧↓⊳⊔↭⊔∐⊔∠⇂ a strong correlation. between. (g*ry colour ancl M, brighter ealaxies are redder. fainter galaxies are blucr.","2001) find a strong correlation between $(g^*-r^*)$ colour and $M_{r^*}$: brighter galaxies are redder, fainter galaxies are bluer." + Alaking estimates of the colour-magnitude correlation from Fig., Making estimates of the colour-magnitude correlation from Fig. + 13 of Blanton et al. (, 13 of Blanton et al. ( +"2001). we find that Al,»=S7545(go8)αι δες.","2001), we find that $M_{r^*}=-8.75\pm_2^4(g^*-r^*) +-14.88\pm_2^1$ ." + Using a mean b;5=11 (calculated from Fukugita. Shimasaku Ichikawa 1995 and Alacldox. Efstathiou Sutherland 1990). and assuming that the additional colour term. (b;p)=(qqry we calculate that the expected ἐξ0.36+0.23.," Using a mean $b_j-r^*=1.1$ (calculated from Fukugita, Shimasaku Ichikawa 1995 and Maddox, Efstathiou Sutherland 1990), and assuming that the additional colour term $\Delta(b_j-r^*)=\Delta(g^*-r^*)$ we calculate that the expected $\beta_{\mu,r^*}=0.36\pm0.23$." + The value estimated. from Fig., The value estimated from Fig. + 10 of Blanton et al. (, 10 of Blanton et al. ( +2001) is «των= O.50405. ,"2001) is $\beta_{\mu,r^*}=0.50\pm_{0.1}^{0.2}$ ." +Thus the +! band: Iuminositv-surface. brightness correlation appears steeper than the b; band. Iuminosity-surface brightness correlation., Thus the $r^*$ band luminosity-surface brightness correlation appears steeper than the $b_j$ band luminosity-surface brightness correlation. + A similar colour-magnituce correlation in (b;—£) could explain the discrepancy between our result and de Jong Lacey (2000) result., A similar colour-magnitude correlation in $(b_j-I)$ could explain the discrepancy between our result and de Jong Lacey (2000) result. + The general good overall agreement between these substantially cifferent surveys is an important vinelication of both results., The general good overall agreement between these substantially different surveys is an important vindication of both results. + Cross et al. (, Cross et al. ( +2001) has extended the de Jong Lacey conclusions to the full range of galaxy types with M€16.,2001) has extended the de Jong Lacey conclusions to the full range of galaxy types with $M<-16$. + However. the different values obtained. for the luminosity surface brightness correlation may rellect a colour or morphologically dependent Iuminositv-surface brightness correlation.," However, the different values obtained for the luminosity surface brightness correlation may reflect a colour or morphologically dependent luminosity-surface brightness correlation." + Dlanton et al. (, Blanton et al. ( +2001) seem to have found similar results. but have not fitted a [function or tabulated their results.,"2001) seem to have found similar results, but have not fitted a function or tabulated their results." + As for the Schechter function it is trivial to calculate the luminosity density. j. by integrating the product. of the BBF and the luminosity over the complete range of surface brightness ancl absolute magnitucle.," As for the Schechter function it is trivial to calculate the luminosity density, j, by integrating the product of the BBF and the luminosity over the complete range of surface brightness and absolute magnitude." + ‘The solution is the same as the solution to the integral obtained [rom the Schechter function., The solution is the same as the solution to the integral obtained from the Schechter function. +" When caleulated using the best fit parameters. the value of the luminosity density. j,,=(2.160.14)-1075EL. Mpcju"," When calculated using the best fit parameters, the value of the luminosity density, $j_{b_j}=(2.16\pm0.14)\times10^8h\,L_{\odot}$ $^{-3}$." + In Blanton et al. (, In Blanton et al. ( +2001). the Sloan team get a 40% ugher value for the luminosity density in the 6; filter than he 2dbORS team.,"2001), the Sloan team get a $40\%$ higher value for the luminosity density in the $b_j$ filter than the 2dFGRS team." + Does this mean that 2dCUS is missing some galaxies. or at least underestimating their luxes?," Does this mean that 2dFGRS is missing some galaxies, or at least underestimating their fluxes?" + For a start. the values of AZ are consistent. suggesting that th surveys are correcting magnitudes properly.," For a start the values of $M^*$ are consistent, suggesting that both surveys are correcting magnitudes properly." + However he measurement of ó* is over higher in Blanton ct al. (, However the measurement of $\phi^*$ is over higher in Blanton et al. ( +2001).,2001). + X more recent paper (Yasuda ct al., A more recent paper (Yasuda et al. + 2001) revises he SDSS luminosity density of Blanton et al.," 2001) revises the SDSS luminosity density of Blanton et al.," + to js;=2.45t0.21107h? 3., to $j_{b_j}=2.43\pm0.21\times10^{-2}h^3$ $^{-3}$. + ιν revision is based on a fit o the galaxy number counts. suggesting that the Blanton et al.," This revision is based on a fit to the galaxy number counts, suggesting that the Blanton et al." + region was overdense by30%., region was overdense by. +. The revised ó. value (=:.2.05£0.12oU.4551024875 By 7) is now consistent. with our measurement of ó*=2.060.00«10.24? 7. in the 6; band.," The revised $\phi^*$ value $\phi^*=2.05 \pm 0.12 +^{+0.66}_{-0.28}\times10^{-2}h^3$ $^{-3}$ ) is now consistent with our measurement of $\phi^*=2.06 \pm 0.09\times10^{-2}h^3$ $^{-3}$, in the $b_j$ band." + Given this revised. value of 6°. the Blanton result. is still higher. but Blanton used a colour term b;=B.:L5(D VV). whereas the correct colour term for the ADM. tested using ELS data is b;=DO.28(2V) (Peacock. private communication).," Given this revised value of $\phi^*$, the Blanton result is still higher, but Blanton used a colour term $b_j=B-0.35(B-V)$ , whereas the correct colour term for the APM, tested using EIS data is $b_j=B-0.28(B-V)$ (Peacock, private communication)." + When these two factors are taken into account. the luminosity densities are entirely consistent.," When these two factors are taken into account, the luminosity densities are entirely consistent." + As demonstrated in Cross ct al. (, As demonstrated in Cross et al. ( +2001) the peak of the luminosity density lies well inside the selection boundaries.,2001) the peak of the luminosity density lies well inside the selection boundaries. +" When the function is integrated over the range —24ςAlox 15.5. 20.1.«qn.s241. the value. obtained is Jo,=244LhkL. ? as compared to the summed BBD which gives: jp,=(241£0.20).105L. %."," When the function is integrated over the range $-24 Note that in Cross et al. (," We take into account the overestimate in $\mu_e^*$ by 0.55 mag $^{-2}$ , derivedin Appendix A, and use a value of $\mu_e^*=22.45$ mag $^{-2}$ [Note that in Cross et al. (" +2001) we used a less sophisticated: method to estimate,2001) we used a less sophisticated method to estimate +" Typ, < 109 (?)..", $_{eff}$ $<$ $^6$ \citep{paquette86}. + 2107 material(???)..," $\gg$ $^{8}$ \citep{dupuis93b,dupuis92,dupuis93a}." + <70 problematic(???).. (??).. (2).. binaries(?)..," $<$ \citep{aannestad93,zuckerman98,zuckerman03}. \citep{koester05,koester06}. \citep{alcock86}. \citep{zuckerman87,koester97,holberg97,debes02,gianninas04}. \citep{zuckerman03}." +By including the effect of the external electric field. the mean value of the LPAI Irequencey can be expressed as In (he absence of the electric field the dependence of the LPAI critical frequency on the surface potential of the quark star is (eppay)V. while in the presence of the electric field we have a logarithmic dependence on (he quark star potential.,"By including the effect of the external electric field, the mean value of the LPM frequency can be expressed as In the absence of the electric field the dependence of the LPM critical frequency on the surface potential of the quark star is $\left\langle \omega _{LPM}\right\rangle \sim V_{q}^{4}$, while in the presence of the electric field we have a logarithmic dependence on the quark star potential." + The dependence of (he mean LPAI critical frequency (eypay) on the quark star surface potential V;. in the low temperature limit and with ancl without the presence of an external electric field is represented in Fig.," The dependence of the mean LPM critical frequency $\left\langle \omega _{LPM}\right\rangle $ on the quark star surface potential $V_q$, in the low temperature limit and with and without the presence of an external electric field is represented in Fig." + 4., 4. + In order to calculate the spectral distribution of the intensity of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by an electron in the dense laver of the electrosphere of a quark star. by taking into account the effect of the multiple collisions and of the electric field. we use Eqs. (17—-21)).," In order to calculate the spectral distribution of the intensity of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by an electron in the dense layer of the electrosphere of a quark star, by taking into account the effect of the multiple collisions and of the electric field, we use Eqs. \ref{fin1}- \ref{fin2}) )." + The variation of the probability of emission of a photon by an electron moving in the electrosphere of the quark star is represented. for two sets of values of the quark star surface electric potential. in Fie.," The variation of the probability of emission of a photon by an electron moving in the electrosphere of the quark star is represented, for two sets of values of the quark star surface electric potential, in Fig." + 5., 5. + The mean value of the total intensity of the radiation. (Z(4)) is represented in Fig.," The mean value of the total intensity of the radiation, $\left\langle I(\omega )\right\rangle $ is represented in Fig." + 6., 6. +" An important parameter describing the radiation properties of an electron gas is the plasma frequency «jy. defined as wy,=y4zenc(z.T)/p(2.T). and which is related to the medium permitüvityv 2(w) bv (ae)£21—wfar. 122ey (Jackson1999).."," An important parameter describing the radiation properties of an electron gas is the plasma frequency $\omega _p$, defined as $\omega _{p}=\sqrt{4\pi en_{e}(z,T)/\mu _{e}(z,T)}$, and which is related to the medium permittivity $\varepsilon \left( \omega +\right) $ by $\varepsilon \left( \omega \right) \approx 1-\omega +_{p}^{2}/\omega ^{2}$, $\omega >>\omega _{p}$ \citep{Ja75}." + The polarization of the electrosphere of the quark stars also strongly influences the radiation processes. and photons with frequency w5«WETSRy,ergs+. or a statiouary-fraue injection power/ D2L/>10!"" eres Ἐν"," This implies a comoving injection power in the knot $L^\prime \gtrsim 5\times 10^{44} +W^{\prime}_{56}/R_{kpc} \,\rm erg \, s^{-1}$, or a stationary-frame injection power $\Gamma^2 L^\prime \gtrsim 10^{47}$ ergs $^{-1}$." + In fact. taking iuto account contribution of protons. Tavecchioetal.(2000) require a power of 3«107 cress1! to model the spectral energy distribution (SED) of knot WIx7.5 of PISS 0637-752 with the EC inodel.," In fact, taking into account contribution of protons, \citet{tav00} require a power of $3\times 10^{48}$ ergs $^{-1}$ to model the spectral energy distribution (SED) of knot WK7.8 of PKS 0637-752 with the EC model." + Although they areuc that this is consistent with total kinetic power of jets inferred to power the eiat radio lobes of ra10 galaxies. the largest jet power in the sample of Rawhlnes&Sauuders(1991). hardly exceeds 10 eres f.," Although they argue that this is consistent with total kinetic power of jets inferred to power the giant radio lobes of radio galaxies, the largest jet power in the sample of \citet{rs91} hardly exceeds $10^{47}$ ergs $^{-1}$." +" This power also is 12 orders of maenitude ereater than the maximum peak οταν lunimosities inferred frou, EGRET observations of blazars. talàug iuto account the likely beaming factor of ~15 (Mukherjee&Chiang1999)."," This power also is 1–2 orders of magnitude greater than the maximum peak $\gamma$ -ray luminosities inferred from EGRET observations of blazars, taking into account the likely beaming factor of $\sim 1$ \citep{mc99}." +. It should be noted here that in principal it is possible to satisfv the equipartition condition also for a given size R=Lkpe of the knot WIS. increasing the Doppler factor 6 further to ~20 (DerimeraudAtovan2001).," It should be noted here that in principal it is possible to satisfy the equipartition condition also for a given size $R=1 \,\rm kpc$ of the knot WK7.8, increasing the Doppler factor $\delta$ further to $ \simeq 20$ \citep{da04}." +. This will also ininimize reducing) the power requirements for the EC model (CduisclliniaudCelotti2001:DenieraudAtovan 2001).," This will also minimize ) the power requirements for the EC model \citep{gc01,da04}." +. However. this is possible oulv if the jet inclination angle is further decreased to <3°.," However, this is possible only if the jet inclination angle is further decreased to $\leq 3^\circ$." + Although this cannot be excluded for a particular source. such angles would be problematic to assunae for niauv sources. ax We discuss in Section...," Although this cannot be excluded for a particular source, such angles would be problematic to assume for many sources, as we discuss in Section 4." + Iu the EC/CAIBR aodel. N-vavs are produced w clectrous with στο~LO? in the stationary rae.," In the EC/CMBR model, X-rays are produced by electrons with $\gamma_{\rm C}\sim 10^3 $ in the stationary frame." + They cool ou the CAIBR only ou Cor nuescales το]=te of ({1)). unless their overall cooling is dominated by svuclirotron losses. which would then overproduce the observed racio Hux at low frequencies.," They cool on the CMBR only on Gyr timescales $t_{cool} \simeq t_{C}$ of \ref{tC}) ), unless their overall cooling is dominated by synchrotron losses, which would then overproduce the observed radio flux at low frequencies." + Since the photon target or the Compton process does not degrade at aly distance + fromthe parent ACN. the strong facing of the N-rav. knots and jet generally (outside the shots) with r iu many FR2 quasars. such as in SC 2732001).. PISS 1127-115 (Sictuieginowskaetal.2002).. or Pictor A (Wilsouetal.2001).. iuplies either a fast decrease of the total πο of electrons with 5~5c or a decline of the jet Doppler factor.," Since the photon target for the Compton process does not degrade at any distance $r$ from the parent AGN, the strong fading of the X-ray knots and jet generally (outside the knots) with $r$ in many FR2 quasars, such as in 3C 273, PKS 1127-145 \citep{siem02}, or Pictor A \citep{wys01}, implies either a fast decrease of the total number of electrons with $\gamma \sim +\gamma_{\rm C}$ or a decline of the jet Doppler factor." + Because the observed radio clussion is produced bv clectrous with σαν lavger than 2c ouly by a factor =10. both assumptions would imply a rapid facing of the| radio briehtuess with distauce as well.," Because the observed radio emission is produced by electrons with $\gamma_{syn}$ larger than $\gamma_{\rm C}$ only by a factor $\lesssim 10$, both assumptions would imply a rapid fading of the radio brightness with distance as well." + Meauchile. exactly the opposite radio brightuess profiles are observed.," Meanwhile, exactly the opposite radio brightness profiles are observed." + Secondly. because the cooling time is shorter for radio than for Corupton ταν cutting electrons. oue should also expect that the N-ray knots in the EC model wemud be more diffuse than the radio or optica knots.," Secondly, because the cooling time is shorter for radio than for Compton X-ray emitting electrons, one should also expect that the X-ray knots in the EC model would be more diffuse than the radio or optical knots." + Again. this predictiou Is in disagreenieliowith observations.," Again, this prediction is in disagreement with observations." + Note in this regard that the adiabatic cooling of N-rav cluitting clectrous due to ast expansion of X-ray knots. as proposed receutlv (Taveccliio.Ctdis-ellinui.aud.Celotti2003) for the iuterpretation of facing of the N-vav brielitucss outside ιο knots. would also equally iupact the radio-ocuittiug clectrous (Stawarzctal.2001).," Note in this regard that the adiabatic cooling of X-ray emitting electrons due to fast expansion of X-ray knots, as proposed recently \citep{tgc03} for the interpretation of fading of the X-ray brightness outside the knots, would also equally impact the radio-emitting electrons \citep{sta04}." +. Therefore this scenario would uot resolve either of these two discrepancies between the N-rav aud the radio brightuess patterns., Therefore this scenario would not resolve either of these two discrepancies between the X-ray and the radio brightness patterns. +" One more diffiailty for the Compton interpretation arises for those jets where the spectral indices & (for the spectral flux £F,xvr "") are significantly different at racio and N-rav frequencies.", One more difficulty for the Compton interpretation arises for those jets where the spectral indices $\alpha$ (for the spectral flux $F_{\nu} \propto \nu^{-\alpha} $ ) are significantly different at radio and X-ray frequencies. +" As also cliscussecl earlier. ooree, by IurisandNKrawezvu-ski (2002).. spectral profiles steeper in N-ravs thui in radio.withn ayD0, aud especially jets/knot:J4. in a nuniber of FRI galaxies where ayz 1. represent strong evidence for the svuchrotron origin of the X-rav flux. nuplviug acceleration of electrons with VeFouqnrLOfων,-2)e120= in the kuots of τικο jets."," As also discussed earlier, g., by \citet{hk02}, spectral profiles steeper in X-rays than in radio,with $\alpha_X > \alpha_r$, and especially jets/knots in a number of FR1 galaxies where $\alpha_{X} \gtrsim 1$ , represent strong evidence for the synchrotron origin of the X-ray flux, implying acceleration of electrons with $\gamma^\prime \gg +10^7\sqrt{E_{keV}(1+z)/\delta_{10}B_{30}}$ in the knots of radio jets." +" This also is the case for many terminal hot spots. such as the western hot spot of Pictor DÀ with a,zO7L aud ay=1.07x0.11 (Wilsonetal.2001)."," This also is the case for many terminal hot spots, such as the western hot spot of Pictor A with $\alpha_{r} \approx 0.74 $ and $\alpha_X = 1.07 \pm 0.11$ \citep{wys01}." +. It should be pointoc out here that these difüculties with he interpretation of iffereut spectral aud opposite spatial profiles oei radio and Nay patterus of jets relate not ouly to EC models. but equalv to SSC models.," It should be pointed out here that these difficulties with the interpretation of different spectral and opposite spatial profiles in radio and X-ray patterns of jets relate not only to EC models, but equally to SSC models." + The N-rav flux in SSC inodeIs is Likewise produced bv low- electrons fiat cuit the svuchrotron racio photous forsubseqnent Compton interactions. aud the density of this arect docs not decline. aud may," The X-ray flux in SSC models is likewise produced by low-energy electrons that emit the synchrotron radio photons forsubsequent Compton interactions, and the density of this target does not decline, and may" + το.b 2—1 ἐν1). , $z\sim1$ $z\sim1$ $z\ga 1$ +Noting that the 0.80.9 keV feature could be due to an II-like oxveen VIII Ix edge (at resi. [rame energy of 0.87 keV. seen in many Sevlert 1: sources (seee.g.Revnolds1997) due lo presence of ionized gas in (he line of sight). we next attempt to test if this feature (present onlv during the low phase) could indeed be due to the oxvgen absorption edge.,"Noting that the 0.8–0.9 keV feature could be due to an H-like oxygen VIII K edge (at rest frame energy of 0.87 keV, seen in many Seyfert 1 sources \citep[see e.g.][]{reynolds1997} due to presence of ionized gas in the line of sight), we next attempt to test if this feature (present only during the low phase) could indeed be due to the oxygen absorption edge." + For this we included a multiplicative component to our models., For this we included a multiplicative component to our models. + The best-fit values after including an edge in both Mhi_bbbhi and AMhi256poi are given in Table I.., The best-fit values after including an edge in both $Mhi\_bb\_bkn$ and $Mhi\_2bb\_pow$ are given in Table \ref{tab:fits}. . + The improvement in X? Π statistic [or model Mo.bbblnedge between 7=0 (no edge) and 7=0.29 (best fit) isNA?=19.4. implving a single parameter confidence limitof 4.40.," The improvement in $\chi^2$ fit statistic for model $Mlo\_bb\_bkn\_edge$ between $\tau=0$ (no edge) and $\tau=0.29$ (best fit) is$\Delta\chi^2=19.4$, implying a single parameter confidence limitof $4.4\sigma$." + The improvement in 4? fit statistic [or Mo.2bbpowedge between 7=0 (no edge) and 7=0.23 (best fit) is NA?=16.6. implving a single parameter confidence limit of 4.076.," The improvement in $\chi^2$ fit statistic for $Mlo\_2bb\_pow\_edge$ between $\tau=0$ (no edge) and $\tau=0.23$ (best fit) is $\Delta\chi^2=16.6$, implying a single parameter confidence limit of $4.07\sigma$." + Thus both low phase models need an edee al 4c level. strongly. suggesting that the edee is present in the data.," Thus both low phase models need an edge at $>$ $\sigma$ level, strongly suggesting that the edge is present in the data." + While fits to both models. A/fo_bb_bhn ancl Affo2hb_pouw are formally acceptable. there remain hints of some svstematic trend in the residuals shown in Fig.," While fits to both models $Mlo\_bb\_bkn$ and $Mlo\_2bb\_pow$ are formally acceptable, there remain hints of some systematic trend in the residuals shown in Fig." + 4 at lower energies., \ref{f:lo_renorm} at lower energies. + This is discussed in greater detail in refconchision., This is discussed in greater detail in \\ref{conclusion}. + The 0.255 keV [lux in the low phase spectrum is (1.14€0.1)x10H Cnr> /s., The 0.25–5 keV flux in the low phase spectrum is $(1.14\pm0.1)\times10^{-11}$ $^2$ /s. + Next we attempted (o estimate the strength of the same OVI absorption edge in the hieh phase data. by adding an edge to both the models M.bbbli and Mhi200pow ancl recloing the fits.," Next we attempted to estimate the strength of the same OVIII absorption edge in the high phase data, by adding an edge to both the models $Mhi\_bb\_bkn$ and $Mhi\_2bb\_pow$ and redoing the fits." + We found (hat inclusion of the edee did not improve the statistical quality of the fits., We found that inclusion of the edge did not improve the statistical quality of the fits. + The OVIII edge could not be detected (at >36 level) in the data using either of the continuum models. and this confirms (that the optical depth of the edge varied significantly between the high ancl low phases.," The OVIII edge could not be detected (at $>3\sigma$ level) in the data using either of the continuum models, and this confirms that the optical depth of the edge varied significantly between the high and low phases." + Next we modeled the edge in the low phase somewhat more physically using the NSTAR photoionization code (Ixallman&Battista2001)., Next we modeled the edge in the low phase somewhat more physically using the XSTAR photoionization code \citep{xstar}. +".. A grid of XSTAR models was created from the following variables: (1) the column density CVj. allowed range LO?"" 107 7). (2) ionization parameter (/og(£)=log(L/(n1)). allowed range 24). (3) oxvgen abundance (relative to solar. allowed range 0.14). (4) neon abundance (relative to solar. allowed range 0.11)."," A grid of XSTAR models was created from the following variables: (1) the column density $N_H$, allowed range $10^{20}$ – $10^{23}$ $^{-2}$ ), (2) ionization parameter $log(\xi)=log(L/(nR^2))$, allowed range 2–4), (3) oxygen abundance (relative to solar, allowed range 0.1–4), (4) neon abundance (relative to solar, allowed range 0.1–1)." + A multiplicative table model was ereated from this multidimensional grid., A multiplicative table model was created from this multidimensional grid. + Turbulent velocities of 300 km/s ancl above cause absorption lines to become more prominent. and lower turbulent velocities are required to fit the data well.," Turbulent velocities of 300 km/s and above cause absorption lines to become more prominent, and lower turbulent velocities are required to fit the data well." + The best-fit parameters to the low phase data using this model in conjunction with a continuum model composed of law suggest - :Vj/(107!E EN7) = 44 1. UN log(£)—3.2a0.2 (jj. and a relatively. high oxygen abundance (2.1 (2).," The best-fit parameters to the low phase data using this model in conjunction with a continuum model composed of double-blackbody+power law suggest $N_H$ $^{21}$$^{-2}$ ) = $4\pm1$ , $\xi$ $ 3.2 _{-0.1}^{+0.2}$ , and a relatively high oxygen abundance $ 2.1 _{-0.5}^{+0.8} $ )." + A sub-solar neon abundance (0.13) is preferred by the best-fit solution but its error-bar could not be constrained., A sub-solar neon abundance (0.13) is preferred by the best-fit solution but its error-bar could not be constrained. + See Table 1. for the detailed [it, See Table \ref{tab:fits} for the detailed fit +part of the spectrum gets significantly. modified due to the general rclativisitic effects.,part of the spectrum gets significantly modified due to the general relativisitic effects. + A computation similar to that of Ebisawa et al. (, A computation similar to that of Ebisawa et al. ( +1991). for Galactic black hole cancliclates. Bas been done by Asaoka (1989) using the Ixerr metric.,"1991), for Galactic black hole candidates, has been done by Asaoka (1989) using the Kerr metric." + However. our work incorporating both: the full general. relativistic ellects. of rapid. rotation. as well as realistic equations of state describing neutron star interiors. using an appropriate metric is the first calculation for rotating neutron stars.," However, our work incorporating both: the full general relativistic effects of rapid rotation, as well as realistic equations of state describing neutron star interiors, using an appropriate metric is the first calculation for rotating neutron stars." + In the present work we ignore the elfects of the stellar magnetic field. so our results are applicable to weakly magnetised neutron stars.," In the present work we ignore the effects of the stellar magnetic field, so our results are applicable to weakly magnetised neutron stars." + The structure of the paper is as follows., The structure of the paper is as follows. + In section 2. we describe a framework for the caleulation of neutron star structure. disc temperature profile and observed spectrum.," In section 2, we describe a framework for the calculation of neutron star structure, disc temperature profile and observed spectrum." + We also comment here on the the chosen equations of state., We also comment here on the the chosen equations of state. + We describe the numerical procedure for spectrum calculation in section 3., We describe the numerical procedure for spectrum calculation in section 3. + The results. of the spectrum calculation are clisplaved in section d., The results of the spectrum calculation are displayed in section 4. + We summarise the conclusions in section. 5 and. enlist some relevant mathematical expressions in the Appendix., We summarise the conclusions in section 5 and enlist some relevant mathematical expressions in the Appendix. + We calculate the structure of a rapidly rotating neutron star for realistic IOS mocdels. using the same procedure as Cook et al. (," We calculate the structure of a rapidly rotating neutron star for realistic EOS models, using the same procedure as Cook et al. (" +1994) (see also Datta et al 1998).,1994) (see also Datta et al 1998). +" With the assumption that the star is rigidly rotating and a perfect Ελα, we take a stationary. axisvnunetric. asvmptoticallv [at and rellection-symmetric (about the equatorial plane) metric. given by where the metric potentials 5.9.0 and the angular speed. (a) of zero-angular-momoentum-observer. (ZAALO) with respect to infinity. are all functions of the quasi-isotropic radial coordinate (r) ancl polar angle (80)."," With the assumption that the star is rigidly rotating and a perfect fluid, we take a stationary, axisymmetric, asymptotically flat and reflection-symmetric (about the equatorial plane) metric, given by where the metric potentials $\gamma, \rho, \alpha$ and the angular speed $\omega$ ) of zero-angular-momentum-observer (ZAMO) with respect to infinity, are all functions of the quasi-isotropic radial coordinate $\bar r$ ) and polar angle $\theta$ )." + Thequantity. 7 ds. related to the Sehiwarzschild-like racial coordinate (r) by the equation rr—rePES AVG , Thequantity $\bar r$ is related to the Schwarzschild-like radial coordinate $r$ ) by the equation $r = \bar r e^{\rm {(\gamma - \rho)/2}}$. +use the geometric units e=61 in this paper., We use the geometric units $c = G = 1$ in this paper. + We solve Einstein's field equations and the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium self-consistentlyancl numerically from the centre of the star upto infinity to obtain +.p.a. and © (angular speed of neutron star with respect to infinity) as functions of r and 8.," We solve Einstein's field equations and the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium self-consistentlyand numerically from the centre of the star upto infinity to obtain $\gamma, \rho, \alpha, \omega$ and $\Omega$ (angular speed of neutron star with respect to infinity) as functions of $\bar r$ and $\theta$." + This is done for a particular LOS and assumed. values of central density ancl ratio of polar to equatorial radii., This is done for a particular EOS and assumed values of central density and ratio of polar to equatorial radii. + The obtained numerical equilibrium solutions of the metric enable us to caleulate bulk structure parameters. such as gravitational mass (AL). cquatorial radius (2). angular momentum (./) etc.," The obtained numerical equilibrium solutions of the metric enable us to calculate bulk structure parameters, such as gravitational mass $M$ ), equatorial radius $R$ ), angular momentum $J$ ) etc." + of the neutron star., of the neutron star. +" We also calculate the radius (75,405) of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO). specific energy GE) and specific angular momentum (/) of a test. particle in a Ixeplerian orbit and the Ixeplerian angular speed. (Qi) (see Phampan Datta 1998 for a detailed. description of the method of calculation)"," We also calculate the radius $r_{\rm orb}$ ) of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO), specific energy $\tilde E$ ) and specific angular momentum $\tilde l$ ) of a test particle in a Keplerian orbit and the Keplerian angular speed $\Omega_{\rm K}$ ) (see Thampan Datta 1998 for a detailed description of the method of calculation)." + The neutron star structure parameters are quite sensitive to the chosen EOS., The neutron star structure parameters are quite sensitive to the chosen EOS. + In the literature. there exist a large number of EOS ranging from very soft to very stil.," In the literature, there exist a large number of EOS ranging from very soft to very stiff." + For the purpose of a general studs. we have chosen four EOS. of which one is soft. (EOS: X. Panclharipande (1979). (bvperons)). one is intermediate (EOS: D. Baldo. Bombaci Durgio (1997) (AV14|8b0)) in stilffness and two are still (EOS: €. Walecka (1974) and EOS: D. Sahu. Dasu Datta (1993)).," For the purpose of a general study, we have chosen four EOS, of which one is soft (EOS: A, Pandharipande (1979) (hyperons)), one is intermediate (EOS: B, Baldo, Bombaci Burgio (1997) (AV14+3bf)) in stiffness and two are stiff (EOS: C, Walecka (1974) and EOS: D, Sahu, Basu Datta (1993))." + Of these EOS: D is the stillest., Of these EOS: D is the stiffest. + The structure of a neutron star for a given. EOS is described: uniquely by two parameters he gravitational mass (AJ) and the angular speed (Q)., The structure of a neutron star for a given EOS is described uniquely by two parameters: the gravitational mass $M$ ) and the angular speed $\Omega$ ). + For cach chosen EOS. we construct constant AL equilibrium sequences with O varving from the non-rotating case upto the centrifugal mass shed limit (rotation rate at which inwardly directed eravitational forces are balanced by outwardly directed centrifugal forces).," For each chosen EOS, we construct constant $M$ equilibrium sequences with $\Omega$ varying from the non-rotating case upto the centrifugal mass shed limit (rotation rate at which inwardly directed gravitational forces are balanced by outwardly directed centrifugal forces)." +" Depending on O. AZ and the EOS model. neutron stars may have 2roa, or? mrugas"," Depending on $\Omega$ , $M$ and the EOS model, neutron stars may have $R>r_{\rm orb}$ or $R r_{\rm orb}$, then the disc will touch the star and we take $r_{\rm in} = R$ ." + Otherwise. Mu= Morn.," Otherwise, $r_{\rm in} = r_{\rm orb}$ ." + The temperature profile. of the accretion disc calculated as described. in this and the previous subsections is à function ofAL and © of the central star for any. adopted EOS.," The temperature profile, of the accretion disc calculated as described in this and the previous subsections is a function of$M$ and $\Omega$ of the central star for any adopted EOS." +whether they also merge with the primary protostar. or whether they survive as secondary companions.,"whether they also merge with the primary protostar, or whether they survive as secondary companions." + Fig., Fig. + S shows velocity vectors superimposed on false-colour images of the density field in 1H0XU«140AU slices through the first fragment to form.," 8 shows velocity vectors superimposed on false-colour images of the density field in $140\,{\rm AU}\times 140\,{\rm AU}$ slices through the first fragment to form." + Densities and. velocities are computed as in Fig., Densities and velocities are computed as in Fig. + 2. but using co-ordinates measured relative to the centre of mass of the fragment.," 2, but using co-ordinates measured relative to the centre of mass of the fragment." + We see that the fragment is surrounded by a well-defined. rotationally supported: cireum-fragmentarvy disc (CED).," We see that the fragment is surrounded by a well-defined, rotationally supported circum-fragmentary disc (CFD)." + Very similar cdises are found around the other fragments., Very similar discs are found around the other fragments. + Typically they have radiibetween ~40AU and ~GOAL.," Typically they have radiibetween $\sim 40\,{\rm AU}$ and $\sim 60\,{\rm AU}$." + Although most of the core mass infalls directly onto the disc. the spiral arms in the disc are effective. at transporting angular momentum outwards. by means of gravitational torques. thereby allowing material to spiral inwarcs ancl accrete onto he primary protostar.," Although most of the core mass infalls directly onto the disc, the spiral arms in the disc are effective at transporting angular momentum outwards, by means of gravitational torques, thereby allowing material to spiral inwards and accrete onto the primary protostar." + Fragmentation further enhances the ransport of angular momentum., Fragmentation further enhances the transport of angular momentum. + This is because CEDs rotate in the same sense as the mother cise., This is because CFDs rotate in the same sense as the mother disc. + Consequently. on the inside of a CED (i.e. the side closest to the primary ootostar) the shear between the material in the CFD and he material in the mother disc acts to slow down the material in the mother disc. thereby. reducing its angular momentum.," Consequently, on the inside of a CFD (i.e. the side closest to the primary protostar) the shear between the material in the CFD and the material in the mother disc acts to slow down the material in the mother disc, thereby reducing its angular momentum." + Conversely. on the outside of the CEL (ie. urther from the primary protostar) the shear between the material in the CED and the material in the mother disc acts to speed up the material in the mother disc. thereby increasing its angular momentun.," Conversely, on the outside of the CFD (i.e. further from the primary protostar) the shear between the material in the CFD and the material in the mother disc acts to speed up the material in the mother disc, thereby increasing its angular momentum." + Efficient transport of angular momentum by the CED may cause a fragment to spiral inwards and merge with the primary protostar., Efficient transport of angular momentum by the CFD may cause a fragment to spiral inwards and merge with the primary protostar. + However. it is possible that the inspiral is being artificially accelerated. by our imposition of adiabaticitv at. densities pc10Lgcm since this forces a fragment. anc its CED to remain hot. extended and therefore. very dissipative. rather than allowing them to continue contracting towards protostellar densities.," However, it is possible that the inspiral is being artificially accelerated by our imposition of adiabaticity at densities $\rho>10^{-13}\,{\rm g}\,{\rm cm}^{-3}$, since this forces a fragment and its CFD to remain hot, extended and therefore very dissipative, rather than allowing them to continue contracting towards protostellar densities." + Whereas in Run 7 the azimuthallv averaged disc temperature never rises above ~200k. in Run 1 it rises above ~2001. and locally i0. reaches SOOM. sullicienthy high to produce crystalline. silicates.," Whereas in Run 7 the azimuthally averaged disc temperature never rises above $\sim 200\,{\rm K}$, in Run 1 it rises above $\sim 500\,{\rm K}$, and locally it reaches $\sim 800\,{\rm K}$, sufficiently high to produce crystalline silicates." +" Thus we might expect ervstalline silicates to be present in discs forming from low-(3, cores. and hence to give rise to characteristic features in the SEDs of single protostars."," Thus we might expect crystalline silicates to be present in discs forming from $\Omega_{_{\rm O}}$ cores, and hence to give rise to characteristic features in the SEDs of single protostars." +" Conversely. we might expect crystalline silicates to be rare in the cold. extended. disces forming from high-,, cores. and hence their characteristic features should be weak in or even absent from — the SEDs of multiple protostars."," Conversely, we might expect crystalline silicates to be rare in the cold, extended discs forming from $\Omega_{_{\rm O}}$ cores, and hence their characteristic features should be weak in – or even absent from – the SEDs of multiple protostars." + The existence of a link between the amount of crvstalline dust. which can be found in protoplanctary disces ancl the initial conditions within the parental molecular cloud core has already been suggested by 7.., The existence of a link between the amount of crystalline dust which can be found in protoplanetary discs and the initial conditions within the parental molecular cloud core has already been suggested by \citet{Dullemond2006}. +" Referring now to the complete ensemble of Runs (1 to 7). we note that. as £2, increases. there is an essentially monotonic shift in the outcome: small departures from monotonicity at high values of €,TUO) can be attributed to the stochastic nature of fragmentation."," Referring now to the complete ensemble of Runs (1 to 7), we note that, as $\Omega_{_{\rm O}}$ increases, there is an essentially monotonic shift in the outcome; small departures from monotonicity at high values of $\Omega_{_{\rm O}}$ can be attributed to the stochastic nature of fragmentation." + Wey parameters are presented in Table 1., Key parameters are presented in Table 1. +" For low O,,.350. a substantial primary protostar is formed. surrounded by a compact. thick. hot disc: the disc is unable to fragment. and simply accretes onto the primary protostar."," For low $\Omega_{_{\rm O}}$, a substantial primary protostar is formed, surrounded by a compact, thick, hot disc; the disc is unable to fragment, and simply accretes onto the primary protostar." +" As ο, is Increased. the growth rate of the primary protostar decreases. not least because it acquires an increasing fraction of its mass via the disc (rather than by cürect infall)."," As $\Omega_{_{\rm O}}$ is increased, the growth rate of the primary protostar decreases, not least because it acquires an increasing fraction of its mass via the disc (rather than by direct infall)." + At the same time the dise becomes more massive. more extended and. cooler.," At the same time the disc becomes more massive, more extended and cooler." +" Eventually. for ,,m135510Ds* (Runs 5. 6 and 7). the disc becomes unstable against fragmentation. ie. it satisfies both the Toomre and. Canimie conditions (?2).."," Eventually, for $\Omega_{_{\rm O}}>1.35\times 10^{-13}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ (Runs 5, 6 and 7), the disc becomes unstable against fragmentation, i.e. it satisfies both the Toomre and Gammie conditions \citep{1964Toomre,Gammie2001}." + We are unable to ascertain whether all the resulting fragments meree with the primary protostar. or whether some of them survive as secondary companions.," We are unable to ascertain whether all the resulting fragments merge with the primary protostar, or whether some of them survive as secondary companions." +" As ©, increases. the time. /,,. at which the primary formis increases. and its subsequent growth rate. AL. protostardecreases."," As $\Omega_{_{\rm O}}$ increases, the time, $t_{_{\rm O}}$, at which the primary protostar forms increases, and its subsequent growth rate, $\dot{M}_\star$ , decreases." + Consequently. the overall pattern of accretion shifts from one in whieh the primary protostar formis first.," Consequently, the overall pattern of accretion shifts from one in which the primary protostar forms first," +U1.28 and ULL respectively.,U1.28 and U1.11 respectively. + Clearly these are very. large sizes. placing these two LOCs among the largest features so [ar seen in the carly universe.," Clearly these are very large sizes, placing these two LQGs among the largest features so far seen in the early universe." + For comparison. Yacayctal.(2010) eive an idealised limit to the scale of homogeneity in the concordance Cosmology as 870 Alpe: it should. not be possible to find departures from homogeneity above this scale.," For comparison, \citet{Yadav2010} give an idealised limit to the scale of homogeneity in the concordance cosmology as $\sim$ 370 Mpc: it should not be possible to find departures from homogeneity above this scale." + The LOCs appear to be only marginally consistent with this scale of homogeneity., The LQGs appear to be only marginally consistent with this scale of homogeneity. + Calculation of the inertia tensor for these two LOCs shows a ratio 2.5 for the longest and shortest. principal axes in both cases., Calculation of the inertia tensor for these two LQGs shows a ratio $\sim 2.5$ for the longest and shortest principal axes in both cases. + They are therefore. substantially elongated., They are therefore substantially elongated. + By this measure. the longest axes are ~ 630 anc 78O Alpe for UL2s8 anc ULL respectively., By this measure the longest axes are $\sim$ 630 and 780 Mpc for U1.28 and U1.11 respectively. + Their morphologics appear to be markedly oblate. like a thick lens. each with two comparably laree long axes ancl a short axis that is smaller by the factor ~2.5.," Their morphologies appear to be markedly oblate, like a thick lens, each with two comparably large long axes and a short axis that is smaller by the factor $\sim 2.5$." + Clearly the long axes do exceed the expected scale of homogencity., Clearly the long axes do exceed the expected scale of homogeneity. +" The estimated overdensitics are 6,=dp,/py0.83. 0.55 lor U1.28 and ULL respectively."," The estimated overdensities are $\delta_q = \delta \rho_q / \rho_q = 0.83$, $0.55$ for U1.28 and U1.11 respectively." + These overdensities are substantially lower than those found by Pilipenko(2007) and a little higher than those found by Milleretal.(2004)., These overdensities are substantially lower than those found by \citet{Pilipenko2007} and a little higher than those found by \citet{Miller2004}. +. The occurrence of structure on à. particular scale is naturally taken to mean that the universe is. not homogeneous on that scale., The occurrence of structure on a particular scale is naturally taken to mean that the universe is not homogeneous on that scale. + These two LOQGs. UL.28 and UI.ll. as overdensities of the amplitudes ancl scales indicated. thus raise a question of compatibility with the scale of homogeneity in the concordance cosmology. if the Yadayvctal.(2010) fractal caleulations are adopted as reference.," These two LQGs, U1.28 and U1.11, as overdensities of the amplitudes and scales indicated, thus raise a question of compatibility with the scale of homogeneity in the concordance cosmology, if the \citet{Yadav2010} fractal calculations are adopted as reference." + A counter argument. could be made that these LOCs are chance associations of groups on sub-homogencity, A counter argument could be made that these LQGs are chance associations of groups on sub-homogeneity +with measured masses ranging [rom a few 107M. to a [ow 10 (Magorrian. 1998). ancl predicted. X-ray luminosities (Gf the accretion. occurs at. the Dondi rate with a standard raciative ellieiencv) four to five orders of magnitude greater than is observed (Di Matteo 19992).,with measured masses ranging from a few $10^8 \Msun$ to a few $10^9$ (Magorrian 1998) and predicted X-ray luminosities (if the accretion occurs at the Bondi rate with a standard radiative efficiency) four to five orders of magnitude greater than is observed (Di Matteo 1999a). + The central cluster galaxies provide an extreme illustration of the phenomenon of quiescent black holes., The central cluster galaxies provide an extreme illustration of the phenomenon of quiescent black holes. + Beside possessing FR-Ltivpe radio sources anc very large lack hole masses. these galaxies exist in extremely. gas-rich environments in cooling Hows at the centres of clusters. ancl are therefore ideal sources in whieh to study he physics of low-raciative efficiency. accretion.," Beside possessing FR-I-type radio sources and very large black hole masses, these galaxies exist in extremely gas-rich environments in cooling flows at the centres of clusters, and are therefore ideal sources in which to study the physics of low-radiative efficiency accretion." + However. hese same reasons also imply that these galaxies are by no means tvpical.," However, these same reasons also imply that these galaxies are by no means typical." + Despite exhibiting lower luminosities. the »operties of the other three ellipticals in our sample. which do not exist in such preferential locations. may be more easily generalized. to other systems.," Despite exhibiting lower luminosities, the properties of the other three ellipticals in our sample, which do not exist in such preferential locations, may be more easily generalized to other systems." + These three galaxies nave also been studied at high radio frequencies anc sub-mm wavelengths (Di Matteo 19998) and. when coupled with the reduced. jet-racio-activity in these svstems (and he ASCA data. presented. in this paper). provide further crucial constraints on the primary accretion mechanisms in he nuclei of elliptical ealaxies.," These three galaxies have also been studied at high radio frequencies and sub-mm wavelengths (Di Matteo 1999a) and, when coupled with the reduced jet-radio-activity in these systems (and the ASCA data presented in this paper), provide further crucial constraints on the primary accretion mechanisms in the nuclei of elliptical galaxies." + The ASCA (CTanaka. Inoue Holt. 1994) observations were mace over a two-and-a-half vear period between 1993 June and 1995. December.," The ASCA (Tanaka, Inoue Holt 1994) observations were made over a two-and-a-half year period between 1993 June and 1995 December." + The ASCA X-ray telescope array (NIE) consists of four nested-foil telescopes. cach focussed onto one of four detectors: two X-ray CCD cameras. the Solid-state Imaging Spectrometers (SIS: S0 and SL) and two Gas scintillation Imaging Spectrometers (Cbs: G2 and C3).," The ASCA X-ray telescope array (XRT) consists of four nested-foil telescopes, each focussed onto one of four detectors; two X-ray CCD cameras, the Solid-state Imaging Spectrometers (SIS; S0 and S1) and two Gas scintillation Imaging Spectrometers (GIS; G2 and G3)." + The XIXE. provides a spatial resolution of 3 arcmin (Llalf Power Diameter) in the energy range 0.510 keV. The SIS detectors provide excellent spectral resolution A/E=.02(£/5.9keV)TRE ] over a −−−−22 aremirSo field of Znview.," The XRT provides a spatial resolution of $\sim 3$ arcmin (Half Power Diameter) in the energy range $0.5 - 10$ keV. The SIS detectors provide excellent spectral resolution $\Delta E/E = 0.02(E/5.9 {\rm +keV})^{-0.5}$ ] over a $22 \times 22$ $^2$ field of view." + yThe GIS detectors provide poorer energy resolution AL/E=OSCE/5.9keV) ud but cover a larger circular field of view of ~50 arcmin diameter.," The GIS detectors provide poorer energy resolution $\Delta E/E = 0.08(E/5.9 +{\rm keV})^{-0.5}$ ] but cover a larger circular field of view of $\sim +50$ arcmin diameter." + For our analysis of the ος. cata we have used he screened. event Lists from. the τον». processing. of he data sets available on the Coddard-Space Flight Center (GSFC) ASCA archive (for details sce the ASCA Data Recluetion Guide. published. by GSEC.)," For our analysis of the ASCA data we have used the screened event lists from the rev2 processing of the data sets available on the Goddard-Space Flight Center (GSFC) ASCA archive (for details see the ASCA Data Reduction Guide, published by GSFC.)" + The data were reduced using the E'POOLS software. (version 4.1) rom within the NSELEC'T environment. (version 1.4)., The data were reduced using the FTOOLS software (version 4.1) from within the XSELECT environment (version 1.4). + Further data-cleaning procedures as recommended. in the ASCA Data Reduction Guide. including appropriate grade selection. gain corrections and. manual screening based. on the individual instrument light curves. were followed.," Further data-cleaning procedures as recommended in the ASCA Data Reduction Guide, including appropriate grade selection, gain corrections and manual screening based on the individual instrument light curves, were followed." + A full summary of the observations is given in Table 1., A full summary of the observations is given in Table 1. + Spectra were extracted. [rom all four SCA detectors. except for NGC 4696 for which the S0 and G8 data exhibited residual calibration errors and so were excluded. from the analvsis.," Spectra were extracted from all four ASCA detectors, except for NGC 4696 for which the S0 and G3 data exhibited residual calibration errors and so were excluded from the analysis." + Phe spectra were extracted from. cireular regions. centred on the peaks of the X-ray emission from the galaxies.," The spectra were extracted from circular regions, centred on the peaks of the X-ray emission from the galaxies." + For the SIS data. the radii of the regions. studied: were selected to minimize the number of chip boundaries crossed (thereby minimizing the systematic uncertainties introduced bv such crossings) whilst covering as large a region of the ealaxies as possible.," For the SIS data, the radii of the regions studied were selected to minimize the number of chip boundaries crossed (thereby minimizing the systematic uncertainties introduced by such crossings) whilst covering as large a region of the galaxies as possible." + Data from the regions between the chips were masked out and excluded., Data from the regions between the chips were masked out and excluded. + The final extraction raclit for the SIS data are summarized in Fable 2., The final extraction radii for the SIS data are summarized in Table 2. + Also noted are the chip modes used for the observations and the number of chips from which the extracted data were drawn., Also noted are the chip modes used for the observations and the number of chips from which the extracted data were drawn. + For the CIS data. a fixed extraction radius of 6 aremin was adopted.," For the GIS data, a fixed extraction radius of 6 arcmin was adopted." + Background subtraction was carried out using the, Background subtraction was carried out using the +"of the protoplanctary atmosphere) and metal-free (4.6. containing ouly IT aud We) atinosphlieres aud fouud values of Mj lower by up to an order of maguitude (as low as 2 M in the metal-free case for M=109 AL, vo) than in the dusty case.",of the protoplanetary atmosphere) and metal-free (i.e. containing only H and He) atmospheres and found values of $M_{crit}$ lower by up to an order of magnitude (as low as $2$ $_\odot$ in the metal-free case for $\dot M=10^{-6}$ $_\odot$ $^{-1}$ ) than in the dusty case. + It would certainly be iuterestiug to repeat calculations done in 5 aud Appendix À for the case of dust- atmosphere to see how this extreme reduction of opacity would extend the radial rauge available for CT.," It would certainly be interesting to repeat calculations done in \\ref{sect:mcrit}, \ref{sect:constr} and Appendix \ref{app:zeta} for the case of dust-free atmosphere to see how this extreme reduction of opacity would extend the radial range available for CI." +" Iu practice. we cannot do such calculation at present since it is not possible to calibrate M, against the results of Tori Dsoma (2010) as we did in equations (L1)}-(17)) and Appendix A.."," In practice, we cannot do such calculation at present since it is not possible to calibrate $M_{atm}$ against the results of Hori Ikoma (2010) as we did in equations \ref{eq:Matm}) \ref{eq:zeta}) ) and Appendix \ref{app:zeta}." + This is because in the isence of dust & is a function uot only of gas temperature but also of gas density., This is because in the absence of dust $\kappa$ is a function not only of gas temperature but also of gas density. + As demonstrated iu ROG in this case AL. is no louger -independent 6: the ambicut temperature Ty aud density py of the uchula as the original analyses of Mizuno (1980) and Stevenson (1982) sugeest., As demonstrated in R06 in this case $M_{crit}$ is no longer independent of the ambient temperature $T_0$ and density $\rho_0$ of the nebula as the original analyses of Mizuno (1980) and Stevenson (1982) suggest. +" Iustead oue finds that M4,X EEO where q=ὃνοΠερ (ROG)."," Instead one finds that $M_{atm}\propto (\rho_0/T_0^3)^{q/(1+q)}$ , where $q\equiv \partial\ln\kappa/\partial\ln\rho$ (R06)." + Obviously. ALi then also depend ou py aud Ty. and the knowledge 6 this dependence is verv nportaut for obtainiug Xii and η iu the dust-free case.," Obviously, $M_{crit}$ then also depend on $\rho_0$ and $T_0$, and the knowledge of this dependence is very important for obtaining $\Sigma_{lim}$ and $a_{lim}$ in the dust-free case." + Unfortunately. we do not possess this knowledge frou. first priuciples as opacity calculations are rather complicated. aud m anv case we cannot currently calibrate Mg as functions of AM. Ty and py against uuuercal results because calculations of Wo DTsoma (2010) were done for a single value of the planetary semui-1najor axis Gucaning fixed values of Ty and py). while AL was varied.," Unfortunately, we do not possess this knowledge from first principles as opacity calculations are rather complicated, and in any case we cannot currently calibrate $M_{crit}$ as functions of $M_c$, $T_0$ and $\rho_0$ against numerical results because calculations of Hori Ikoma (2010) were done for a single value of the planetary semi-major axis (meaning fixed values of $T_0$ and $\rho_0$ ), while $\dot M$ was varied." +" The scaling of Ms, and £4; with Ty and py and its implication for the possibility of the CI thus remain worthwhile issues for future investigation.", The scaling of $M_{atm}$ and $M_{crit}$ with $T_0$ and $\rho_0$ and its implication for the possibility of the CI thus remain worthwhile issues for future investigation. + We can still ect a qualitative idea of how αν changes in the clust-free case by setting opacity in equation (30)) at the verv low level cousisteut with pure gas opacity. ee we=10 Pons] gt ," We can still get a qualitative idea of how $a_{lim}$ changes in the dust-free case by setting opacity in equation \ref{eq:a_lim}) ) at the very low level consistent with pure gas opacity, e.g. $\kappa=10^{-4}$ $^2$ $^{-1}$." +"Wo then find aiezosü AU compared to LL AU that equation (30)) predicts for ky=OL en? Ἡ,", We then find $a_{lim}^{MMSN}\approx 80$ AU compared to $44$ AU that equation \ref{eq:a_lim}) ) predicts for $\kappa=0.1$ $^2$ $^{-1}$. + Thus. opacity reduction due to sedimentation and coagulation of dust erams iu the protoplanctary atinosphere nav help in exteudiug the range of distances in which the CI is possible.," Thus, opacity reduction due to sedimentation and coagulation of dust grains in the protoplanetary atmosphere may help in extending the range of distances in which the CI is possible." + Despite the robustuess of our argunients it is nof inconceivable that some additional factors can weaken them aucdimake eiat planet formation by the CT possible even bevond the limits represeuted bv equations (23]) and (30))., Despite the robustness of our arguments it is not inconceivable that some additional factors can weaken them and make giant planet formation by the CI possible even beyond the limits represented by equations \ref{eq:Sig_lim}) ) and \ref{eq:a_lim}) ). + Alternatively. if is quite possible that some of the asstuuptions used iu deriviug these results are too extreme and one can get even better constraints by focussing ou less dramatic assuniptious.," Alternatively, it is quite possible that some of the assumptions used in deriving these results are too extreme and one can get even better constraints by focussing on less dramatic assumptions." + Below we review factors that can work one wav or another., Below we review factors that can work one way or another. + Oue possible way to facilitate CT and increase η is to consider possibility of planetesinial accretion at ratescceccdimg Monae., One possible way to facilitate CI and increase $a_{lim}$ is to consider possibility of planetesimal accretion at rates $\dot M_{max}$. + This is very difficult (since there are many factors that tend to reduce Ar conrpared to HAM SEC refsubsect:strenethen)) but may be possible if ee. one takes into account the increase of planetesimal capture cross-section bv the core caused by its extended. dense atinosplere.," This is very difficult (since there are many factors that tend to reduce $\dot M$ compared to $\dot M_{max}$, see \\ref{subsect:strengthen}) ) but may be possible if e.g. one takes into account the increase of planetesimal capture cross-section by the core caused by its extended, dense atmosphere." + This effect has Όσοι previously investigated by Inaba Tkoma (2003) who demonstrated that au increase of AL by a factor of ~10 compared to the value computed without atmosphere is possible., This effect has been previously investigated by Inaba Ikoma (2003) who demonstrated that an increase of $\dot M$ by a factor of $\sim 10$ compared to the value computed without atmosphere is possible. + According to equation (30)) such an cuhancement of AL (incorporated v increasing X) would boost a?72457 by a factor of ~LL , According to equation \ref{eq:a_lim}) ) such an enhancement of $\dot M$ (incorporated by increasing $\chi$ ) would boost $a_{lim}^{MMSN}$ by a factor of $\sim 4$. +Our preseut caleulatious asstme that the core is accreting planetesinals coutinnously until the xotoplanetary nebula dissipates this is nuportant at arge a since Massive core requires long time to be built., Our present calculations assume that the core is accreting planetesimals continuously until the protoplanetary nebula dissipates — this is important at large $a$ since massive core requires long time to be built. + But one may wonder if building smaller core im shorter iue aud then cutting off subsequent plauctesimal accretion (and energy release at the core surface. which supports atinosphere against eoiug uustable) completely uav still lead to the CI and potentially extend it to argor seni-niajor axes.," But one may wonder if building smaller core in shorter time and then cutting off subsequent planetesimal accretion (and energy release at the core surface, which supports atmosphere against going unstable) completely may still lead to the CI and potentially extend it to larger semi-major axes." + Such accretion scenario has been adopted bv e.g. Pollack (1996)., Such accretion scenario has been adopted by e.g. Pollack (1996). + The problem iu js case is that even if M=0 dt still takes loug time or the atinosphere around the core to grow to the mass comparable to AZ..., The problem in this case is that even if $\dot M=0$ it still takes long time for the atmosphere around the core to grow to the mass comparable to $M_c$. + INEO show that this process occurs on rermmal timescale of the atmosphere aud typically takes uillious of vears., INE0 show that this process occurs on thermal timescale of the atmosphere and typically takes millions of years. + Sinilaur problemi is also encouutered in a scenario where re core erows rapidly bw planetesimal accretion iu ie juner regions of protoplanetary disk aud then sets scattered out to large radii by some massive perturber., Similar problem is also encountered in a scenario where the core grows rapidly by planetesimal accretion in the inner regions of protoplanetary disk and then gets scattered out to large radii by some massive perturber. + One might expect that after the orbit of the scattered core cireularizes bv dynamical friction the core would eradually accrete massive atuosphere and undergo CT at sole poit., One might expect that after the orbit of the scattered core circularizes by dynamical friction the core would gradually accrete massive atmosphere and undergo CI at some point. + Caven that both the orbit circularization aud euvelope accretion are likely to take long time it is nof at all obvious whether the CT could be achieved in this scenario witlin several Myrs., Given that both the orbit circularization and envelope accretion are likely to take long time it is not at all obvious whether the CI could be achieved in this scenario within several Myrs. + There are nau factors that can potentially reduce (tim compared to LL AU estimated in equation (30))., There are many factors that can potentially reduce $a_{lim}$ compared to 44 AU estimated in equation \ref{eq:a_lim}) ). +" For example. there are several reasons why it may nof (e possible for M. to reach the maximuun rate M,,,,."," For example, there are several reasons why it may not be possible for $\dot M$ to reach the maximum rate $\dot M_{max}$." + First. the erowine core may clear out a gap 1u dlanctesimal disk around its orbit. thus siguificautlv reducing AL (Tanaka Ida 1997: Rafikov 2001: 2003a).," First, the growing core may clear out a gap in planetesimal disk around its orbit, thus significantly reducing $\dot M$ (Tanaka Ida 1997; Rafikov 2001; 2003a)." + Iu our previous calculations we implicitly assumed. this [unot to happen e.g. because of the core migration through ie disk. which allows fresh planctesimal material to »© Constantly supplied for core accretion (Alibert Ww051.," In our previous calculations we implicitly assumed this not to happen e.g. because of the core migration through the disk, which allows fresh planetesimal material to be constantly supplied for core accretion (Alibert 2005)." + Second. as we mentioned ii retsectiacer.. a known pathway to AL&ων is via the erowth of the core to the size at which it starts dominating dvuamical evolution of nearby planuctesimals and trigecrs thei efiicicut collisional fragmentation (Rafikoy 2001).," Second, as we mentioned in \\ref{sect:accr}, a known pathway to $\dot M\approx\dot M_{max}$ is via the growth of the core to the size at which it starts dominating dynamical evolution of nearby planetesimals and triggers their efficient collisional fragmentation (Rafikov 2004)." + However. there is a «ποιο implicit assunption in this scenario that the core cau reach this critical size within the nebula lifetime.," However, there is a strong implicit assumption in this scenario — that the core can reach this critical size within the nebula lifetime." + Ra&ükov (2003)) has shown that ata30010 AU advnamically dominant core would need to have mass of order 1074 ο and would require on the order of 10100 Myr to grow in the MAISN., Rafikov (2003b) has shown that at $a\sim 30-40$ AU adynamically dominant core would need to have mass of order $10^{24}$ g and would require on the order of $10-100$ Myr to grow in the MMSN. + This time scale is apparently in conflict witli the typical dissipation times of protoplauetary disks., This time scale is apparently in conflict with the typical dissipation times of protoplanetary disks. + Thus. oue may need to either require a more massive disk at these radii or to iud other patlavays for accretion," Thus, one may need to either require a more massive disk at these radii or to find other pathways for accretion" +magnitude selected sample. evolving the magnitude cut-olf based. on accurate measurements of galaxy evolution.,"magnitude selected sample, evolving the magnitude cut-off based on accurate measurements of galaxy evolution." + We have presented results of the fitting of analytical halo models. incorporating simple LOD mocels with minimal number of free parameters. to cata (in this case the projected 2-point correlation. function) from the VVDS survey.," We have presented results of the fitting of analytical halo models, incorporating simple HOD models with minimal number of free parameters, to data (in this case the projected 2-point correlation function) from the VVDS survey." + This allowed us to study the evolution of the average number weighted halo mass and satellite fraction., This allowed us to study the evolution of the average number weighted halo mass and satellite fraction. + On cillerent scales there are contributions from central-satellite. satellite-satellite. anc central-central pairs of galaxies to the correlation function. thereby provicling constraints on the evolution of the galaxy satellite fraction.," On different scales there are contributions from central-satellite, satellite-satellite, and central-central pairs of galaxies to the correlation function thereby providing constraints on the evolution of the galaxy satellite fraction." + The evolution was obtained from data observed in the same restframe band. and. provides for simpler interpretations as compared to previous studies using data from clillerent restframe bands.," The evolution was obtained from data observed in the same restframe band, and provides for simpler interpretations as compared to previous studies using data from different restframe bands." + Various luminosity threshold. samples. at different redshifts were selected and the corresponding best-fit HOD parameters for two similar HOD mocdels obtained., Various luminosity threshold samples at different redshifts were selected and the corresponding best-fit HOD parameters for two similar HOD models obtained. + This is done in order to single out. possible degeneracies and inconsistencies with the fitting procedure at high redshifts., This is done in order to single out possible degeneracies and inconsistencies with the fitting procedure at high redshifts. + On the whole. both models are in agreement with cach other and show similar trends in evolution.," On the whole, both models are in agreement with each other and show similar trends in evolution." + The impact of our selection on the average halo mass is addressed: using the Millennium simulation., The impact of our selection on the average halo mass is addressed using the Millennium simulation. +" We find that a erowth in halo mass as seen in the data could rather be an underestimation of 10% to what is seen in an ""ideal sample containing all the descendants.", We find that a growth in halo mass as seen in the data could rather be an underestimation of $\sim 10\%$ to what is seen in an 'ideal' sample containing all the descendants. + Pherefore a measure in the growth of mass of a halo can be mainly attributed to the hierarchical formation of structure ancl not due to the typology of the selection., Therefore a measure in the growth of mass of a halo can be mainly attributed to the hierarchical formation of structure and not due to the typology of the selection. + We find that the number-weightec average halo mass erows by ~90% [rom redshift 1.0 to 0.5., We find that the number-weighted average halo mass grows by $\sim 90 \%$ from redshift 1.0 to 0.5. + This. is the first time à growth in the underlying halo mass has been measured within a single data survey. and provides evidence for the rapid. accretion phase of massive halos.," This is the first time a growth in the underlying halo mass has been measured within a single data survey, and provides evidence for the rapid accretion phase of massive halos." + The mass accretion history follows the form. given in Wechsler et al. (, The mass accretion history follows the form given in Wechsler et al. ( +2002) with AZ(2)=Moe7. where joLOT+0.57(1.540.13) when only the VVDS points were used and i~1.04EO.10(2.090.04) after including the SDSS data as reference points at low recdshift and depending on the model used to obtain the best fits.,"2002) with $M(z) = M_0 e^{-\beta z}$, where $\beta \sim 1.07 \pm 0.57 (1.54 \pm 0.13)$ when only the VVDS points were used and $\beta \sim 1.94 \pm 0.10 (2.09 \pm 0.04)$ after including the SDSS data as reference points at low redshift and depending on the model used to obtain the best fits." + Phe addition of the low redshift SDSS points adds complications due to the addition of possible svstematics hy comparing data from two cillerent rest-frame bands. even after conversion to à common fiducial band.," The addition of the low redshift SDSS points adds complications due to the addition of possible systematics by comparing data from two different rest-frame bands, even after conversion to a common fiducial band." + We adopt the average value of jo1340.30 from the VVDS 1points when discussing8 a erowth in halo mass. and found to be slightly higher than the results from N-body simulations.," We adopt the average value of $\beta \sim 1.3 \pm 0.30$ from the VVDS points when discussing a growth in halo mass, and found to be slightly higher than the results from N-body simulations." + If we express this result in terms of the expected halo mass at present times. Alyc 100575134.. such halos appear to acerete m 0.25 Aly between redshifts of 0.5 and 1.0.," If we express this result in terms of the expected halo mass at present times, $M_0 \simeq$ $10^{13.5} h^{-1}M_\odot$, such halos appear to accrete $m \sim$ 0.25 $M_0$ between redshifts of 0.5 and 1.0." + Stewart et al. (, Stewart et al. ( +2007) have shown that (S0%)) of Alb=1075!AL. halos experienced an mc0.3Λο (mz 0.LMo) merger event in the last LO Cor. this would translate into a m20.LMo merger event over the redshift range z=0.5-1.0] for the high mass halos here.,"2007) have shown that $\sim$ ) of $M_0=10^{13} h^{-1}M_\odot$ halos experienced an $m > 0.3 M_0$ $m > 0.1 M_0$ ) merger event in the last 10 Gyr, this would translate into a $m > 0.1 M_0$ merger event over the redshift range z=[0.5-1.0] for the high mass halos here." + From merger rate studies one finds that of the stellar mass of massive galaxies with LOMAL.. generally increases with the luminosity threshold of the sample. with a very mild hint of a decreasing galaxy satellite fraction.," For samples at similar redshifts we see that the average halo mass, $$, generally increases with the luminosity threshold of the sample, with a very mild hint of a decreasing galaxy satellite fraction." + This implies that galaxies in the faint sample show a stronger probability of being satellites, This implies that galaxies in the faint sample show a stronger probability of being satellites +starburst ealaxics Meurer ct al.,starburst galaxies Meurer et al. + use a galaxw spectrum obtained from a coustaut star formation rate for at most 105 years whereas we use eunpirical broadband spectra: the contribution of the old evolved stars to dust heating js certainly lavecr in our approach leading to a OWCL UV extinction. for the same amount of dust emission., use a galaxy spectrum obtained from a constant star formation rate for at most $10^8$ years whereas we use empirical broadband spectra: the contribution of the old evolved stars to dust heating is certainly larger in our approach leading to a lower UV extinction for the same amount of dust emission. + Another major difference is the treatineut of ecometrical effects., Another major difference is the treatment of geometrical effects. + Moeurer et al;, Meurer et al. + use a screen model aud we caleulate the extinction with a radiation fransfer model im au infinite plane parallel ecometry where dust aud stars are uniformly distributed and which accounts for scattering effects aud disk inclination (Nu Buat 1995))., use a screen model and we calculate the extinction with a radiation transfer model in an infinite plane parallel geometry where dust and stars are uniformly distributed and which accounts for scattering effects and disk inclination (Xu Buat \cite{xubu}) ). + Finally we asstuue a Milkv Way extinction curve whereas Meurer et al., Finally we assume a Milky Way extinction curve whereas Meurer et al. + adopt a uniform UV extinction for the entire spectrum of the starburst., adopt a uniform UV extinction for the entire spectrum of the starburst. + Therefore. our model i$ probably nore appropriate for uormal star-forming sSalaxies and the entire disk of starburst ealaxies whereas the calculations of Meurer et al.," Therefore, our model is probably more appropriate for normal star-forming galaxies and the entire disk of starburst galaxies whereas the calculations of Meurer et al." + are made for starburst regious., are made for starburst regions. + Civen these fuudiaimoeuta differences aud the rather large uncertainties on the corrections for extinction the two methods are in reasonable aerecimneut., Given these fundamental differences and the rather large uncertainties on the corrections for extinction the two methods are in reasonable agreement. + The FIR to UV flux ratio appears relatively iuscusitive to the dust characteristics (type. distribution) and the stars/dust ecometry.," The FIR to UV flux ratio appears relatively insensitive to the dust characteristics (type, distribution) and the stars/dust geometry." + This has been confirmed by the recent study of Witt Gordon (1999)) who explore various dust distributions (homogencous or clumpy). extinction properties (Milky Wav or Small. Magellanic Cloud) and stars/dust distributions ( uuifoxuuu mixture or shells).," This has been confirmed by the recent study of Witt Gordon \cite{witt}) ) who explore various dust distributions (homogeneous or clumpy), extinction properties (Milky Way or Small Magellanic Cloud) and stars/dust distributions ( uniform mixture or shells)." + Such a robustness makes the FIR to UV. flux ratio a reliable quantitative tracer of the dust attenuation im star forming ealaxies., Such a robustness makes the FIR to UV flux ratio a reliable quantitative tracer of the dust attenuation in star forming galaxies. + One basic difficultv of these studies based on individual ealaxies is that the samples used are all biased and soletimes in a very complicated seuse., One basic difficulty of these studies based on individual galaxies is that the samples used are all biased and sometimes in a very complicated sense. + The diagnostics ou the UV slope of nearby galaxies all derive from the compilation of Iimuey et al. (1993)), The diagnostics on the UV slope of nearby galaxies all derive from the compilation of Kinney et al. \cite{kinney}) ) + of IUE observations of starburst galaxies which is not complete m any seuse., of IUE observations of starburst galaxies which is not complete in any sense. + Duat aud Xu (1996)) have used samples of star forming ealaxies selected on their UVand FIR emissions leadiug ο very complicated biases., Buat and Xu \cite{buxu}) ) have used samples of star forming galaxies selected on their UV FIR emissions leading to very complicated biases. + Whereas the use of sample of ealaxies which may be strougly biased is probably not a Huitation to calibrate the plivsical link between the FIR ο UV flux ratio and the extinction. he presence of these jdases must be accounted for when generic properties of oealaxies are deduced from these samples.," Whereas the use of sample of galaxies which may be strongly biased is probably not a limitation to calibrate the physical link between the FIR to UV flux ratio and the extinction, the presence of these biases must be accounted for when generic properties of galaxies are deduced from these samples." + Ou purpose is to use our FIR selected galaxy sample o test the influence of such a selection on the deduced value of the FIR to UV ratio., Our purpose is to use our FIR selected galaxy sample to test the influence of such a selection on the deduced value of the FIR to UV ratio. + We will consider both fluxcs at GO jan and in the range. 10-120 4422. the so-called FIR Hux.," We will consider both fluxes at 60 $\mu$ m and in the range 40-120 $\mu$ m, the so-called FIR flux." + Each oue has its own advantages: ou one haud more ealaxies have a measured flux at GO jan than at 100421. and the luninosity fuuction has been derived at 60. un. onan other haud the FIR cussion over the range 10.120 jaa ds iore easily related to the total emission of the dust rence to the amount of extinction than a single baud Iu," Each one has its own advantages: on one hand more galaxies have a measured flux at 60 $\mu$ m than at $\mu$ m and the luminosity function has been derived at 60 $\mu$ m, on an other hand the FIR emission over the range 40–120 $\mu$ m is more easily related to the total emission of the dust and hence to the amount of extinction than a single band flux." + this section. we ouly discuss the observational biases herefore use the data at 60 gn. In figure 2 is reported the ratio of fluxes at GO jan and 0.2 pau. Foy/Fy2 as a Muction of the flux aud luuinosity of the galaxies at 60 Foy and Fy.» are of the form Fy=Acἓν where fq is à flux per uni waveleusth.," In this section, we only discuss the observational biases and therefore use the data at 60 $\mu$ m. In figure 2 is reported the ratio of fluxes at 60 $\mu$ m and 0.2 $\mu$ m, $\rm F_{60}/F_{0.2}$ as a function of the flux and luminosity of the galaxies at 60 $\mu$ m. $\rm F_{60}$ and $\rm F_{0.2}$ are of the form $\rm +F_\lambda = \lambda \cdot f_\lambda $ where $\rm f_{\lambda}$ is a flux per unit wavelength." + The figure 2a with the fiux of the galaxies can be used to study the selection bias iu liuüted flux samples., The figure 2a with the flux of the galaxies can be used to study the selection bias in limited flux samples. + The figureOo 2b where are reported the —ninosities ofthe galaxies is useful to discuss the intrinsic properties of the galaxies., The figure 2b where are reported the luminosities of the galaxies is useful to discuss the intrinsic properties of the galaxies. + There is a clear trend in both figures in the seuse of a larger Fou/Fy.2 ratio for brighter galaxies at GO san. The tail found in figure 2a at large 60 yan flux toward low Fou/Fy.2 ratios is due to very nearby galaxies.," There is a clear trend in both figures in the sense of a larger $\rm +F_{60}/F_{0.2}$ ratio for brighter galaxies at 60 $\mu$ m. The tail found in figure 2a at large 60 $\mu$ m flux toward low $\rm F_{60}/F_{0.2}$ ratios is due to very nearby galaxies." + This effect of distance disappears when the huuinositv is considered (fieure 2b)., This effect of distance disappears when the luminosity is considered (figure 2b). + In order to lighheht the ecneral trend we have calculated a moving median on the sample., In order to highlight the general trend we have calculated a moving median on the sample. + The data are sorted according to the 60 422 luminosity. then a mecdian is calculated for bius of 11 objects each time shifted by 5 objects.," The data are sorted according to the 60 $\mu$ m luminosity, then a median is calculated for bins of 11 objects each time shifted by 5 objects." + The result is shown in figure 3., The result is shown in figure 3. + As expected the moving median has reduced the dispersion of the data aud flattened the dispersed trend of the figure 2h., As expected the moving median has reduced the dispersion of the data and flattened the dispersed trend of the figure 2b. + A linear fit elves These figures illustrate the bias introduced by a FIR selection., A linear fit gives These figures illustrate the bias introduced by a FIR selection. + As we consider galaxies with an increasing 60 jan flux or luninosity. their FoyΕνω ratio also increases andl is less aud less representative of the mean properties of the local Universe as we will see below.," As we consider galaxies with an increasing 60 $\mu$ m flux or luminosity, their $\rm +F_{60}/F_{0.2}$ ratio also increases and is less and less representative of the mean properties of the local Universe as we will see below." + The case of these galaxies is especially interesting since they are good candidates for very obscured galaxies., The case of these galaxies is especially interesting since they are good candidates for very obscured galaxies. + Nevertheless their low number (5 cases. section 2.2) makes them having5 no or little influence on the statistical properfies discussed in this paper.," Nevertheless their low number (5 cases, section 2.2) makes them having no or little influence on the statistical properties discussed in this paper." + Moreover. little information is known about these objects.," Moreover, little information is known about these objects." + Onlv one ealaxv (F12212)0919) has a known redshift in the NED database., Only one galaxy (F12242+0919) has a known redshift in the NED database. + The ΈσΕνω ratio of cach object is reported iu able 2 and plotted in figure 2a., The $\rm F_{60}/F_{0.2}$ ratio of each object is reported in table 2 and plotted in figure 2a. +" The ""upper linuits ound for these galaxies are compatible with the values ond for some galaxies of the TRAS/FOCA sample but heir location in the figure is surprising since they do rot follow the general (although dispersed) trend of a arecr Foy fux for a larger Fouξυυ ratio."," The upper limits found for these galaxies are compatible with the values found for some galaxies of the IRAS/FOCA sample but their location in the figure is surprising since they do not follow the general (although dispersed) trend of a larger $\rm F_{60}$ flux for a larger $\rm +F_{60}/F_{0.2}$ ratio." + However. oulv he fleure 2b where the huninosity of the galaxies are reported has a pliysical meaning and unfortunately only one object (F12212|0919) has a measured redshift.," However, only the figure 2b where the luminosity of the galaxies are reported has a physical meaning and unfortunately only one object (F12242+0919) has a measured redshift." + Since F12235|0911 aud FI2259|11tL are classified by. Yuan, Since F12235+0914 and F12259+1141 are classified by Yuan +Classification with Bayes’ rule niiunuizes the total umber of uuisclassificatious. if the true distribution of class- probabilities p(x[Q;) is used (?7)..,"Classification with Bayes' rule minimizes the total number of misclassifications, if the true distribution of class-conditional probabilities $p(\vec{x}|\Omega_i)$ is used \citep{Hand:1981,Anderson:1984}." + Using Bayes’ theorem. posterior probabilities P(Q;|a) can be calculated.," Using Bayes' theorem, posterior probabilities $P(\Omega_i|\vec{x})$ can be calculated." + A spectrum of unknown class. with given feature vector a. can then be classified using Baves” rule: Tn inost of the classification problems arising iu the IES it ix desired. to eather a sample of objects of a specific class. or a specific set of classes.," A spectrum of unknown class, with given feature vector $\vec{x}$, can then be classified using Bayes' rule: In most of the classification problems arising in the HES it is desired to gather a sample of objects of a specific class, or a specific set of classes." + In these cases. Bayes’ rule is not appropriate. because we do not want to miuinize he total uunber of misclassificatious. but the musclassificatious between the desired classtes) ofobjects. aud the remiaiuiug classes.," In these cases, Bayes' rule is not appropriate, because we do not want to minimize the total number of misclassifications, but the misclassifications between the desired class(es) of objects, and the remaining classes." + Suppose we have three classes. A-. F-. aud C-type stars. and we want to eather a complete sample of A-tvpe stars.," Suppose we have three classes, A-, F-, and G-type stars, and we want to gather a complete sample of A-type stars." + Then oulv iisclassificatious between A-type stars and F- aud C-type stars (aud vice versa) are of interest., Then only misclassifications between A-type stars and F- and G-type stars (and vice versa) are of interest. + More specifically. misclassificatious of A-type stars to F- and C-type stars (leadiug to incompleteness) are least desirable when a complete sample shall be gathered. aud erroneous classification of F- and C-type stars as A-type stars (resulting in sample contanunation) cau be accepted at a amocderate rate.," More specifically, misclassifications of A-type stars to F- and G-type stars (leading to incompleteness) are least desirable when a complete sample shall be gathered, and erroneous classification of F- and G-type stars as A-type stars (resulting in sample contamination) can be accepted at a moderate rate." + Misclassificatious between F- aud C-ype stars can be totally ignored. because the target object ype is not involved.," Misclassifications between F- and G-type stars can be totally ignored, because the target object type is not involved." + Classification aims like this can be realized by using a Μπα cost rule., Classification aims like this can be realized by using a minimum cost rule. + Cost factors rj4. with allow to assign relative weights o individual types of wisclassifications.," Cost factors $r_{hk}$, with allow to assign relative weights to individual types of misclassifications." +" The cost factor ry, is the relative weight of a uuisclassification from class 95 to class ο.", The cost factor $r_{hk}$ is the relative weight of a misclassification from class $\Omega_h$ to class $\Omega_k$. + Sppose we have au object of uuknown class. with cature vector à.," Suppose we have an object of unknown class, with feature vector $\vec{x}$." +" We ask how large the cost is if it belougs ο class O,. and would be assigned to class ο. hzkb."," We ask how large the cost is if it belongs to class $\Omega_h$, and would be assigned to class $\Omega_k$, $h\not= k$." + The cost CjGe) dx: Tn the last step we have used the abbreviations Γον)=ay and pla|Qn)=pla)., The cost $C_{h\to k}(\vec{x})$ is: In the last step we have used the abbreviations $P(\Omega_h)=a_h$ and $p(\vec{x}|\Omega_h)=p_h(\vec{x})$. + We do uot kuow to which of the possible classes O5. /=1.....Πρι the object actually belongs.," We do not know to which of the possible classes $\Omega_h$ , $h = 1,\dots,n_c$, the object actually belongs." +" Therefore. we estimate the expected cost κα)[ for assigningeuim an object with feature vector x to the class O,. by computing the following suuni of costs: Now we can formulate the imuunuuni cost rule. which nudinizes the total cost (?2).."," Therefore, we estimate the expected cost $C_k(\vec{x})$ for assigning an object with feature vector $\vec{x}$ to the class $\Omega_k$ by computing the following sum of costs: Now we can formulate the minimum cost rule, which minimizes the total cost \citep{Hand:1981}." +" Tf the cost factors are chosen such that ry),= the iain. cost rule classification is identical to classification using Dawes rule."," If the cost factors are chosen such that $r_{hk}\equiv\delta_{hk}$ , the minimum cost rule classification is identical to classification using Bayes' rule." +" Tn this case hne cost for assigning the class O, to a spectrum with feature vector x is the probability that the object belongs to one of the other classes fizKk.", In this case the cost for assigning the class $\Omega_k$ to a spectrum with feature vector $\vec{x}$ is the probability that the object belongs to one of the other classes $h\not= k$. + This follows inunediatelv from Eq. C)., This follows immediately from Eq. \ref{V_k}) ). +" Tf rn,mὃν. the total πο of musclassifications is miuimuizel. so that he quality of a nini cost rule classification has to he evaluated by other criteria."," If $r_{hk}\not=\delta_{hk}$, the total number of misclassifications is minimized, so that the quality of a minimum cost rule classification has to be evaluated by other criteria." + For auv given classification aim. one can divide the cost factors to be chosen iuto three sets: Since seauple completeness and contamination are interdependent. in. practice only the relative value has to be adjusted.," For any given classification aim, one can divide the cost factors to be chosen into three sets: Since sample completeness and contamination are interdependent, in practice only the relative value has to be adjusted." + For this purpose. the classification results as ai function of are evaluated.," For this purpose, the classification results as a function of are evaluated." + The expected error rates; estimated e.g. with the ‘leaving one out method (see Sect.," The expected error rates, estimated e.g. with the “leaving one out” method (see Sect." + ?? below). tell which level of completeness aud sample contamination will be achieved.," \ref{Sect:Evalu} below), tell which level of completeness and sample contamination will be achieved." + ?. preseuted a software tool for a convenieut choice of cost factors., \cite{ncADASSVII} presented a software tool for a convenient choice of cost factors. + Nowinathematically speaking. Bayes” rule assigus the class with the lighest relative resemblance to cach spectitun to be classified.," Non-mathematically speaking, Bayes' rule assigns the class with the highest relative resemblance to each spectrum to be classified." + However. it is ignorant of the absolute rescmblance: A spectrum with feature vector x inav be assigned to a cass with very low posterior wobability. p(9;aw). if p(Q;α) Is even lower for all other classes.," However, it is ignorant of the absolute resemblance: A spectrum with feature vector $\vec{x}$ may be assigned to a class with very low posterior probability $p(\Omega_i|\vec{x})$, if $p(\Omega_i|\vec{x})$ is even lower for all other classes." +" This mecaus that a class is assigned to all spectra. even to ""earbase spectra” which are disturbed. or instance. bv plate artifacts."," This means that a class is assigned to all spectra, even to “garbage spectra” which are disturbed, for instance, by plate artifacts." + Therefore. it is useful to apply a rejection rule in addition to either the Daves rule or theminium cost rule.," Therefore, it is useful to apply a rejection rule in addition to either the Bayes rule or theminimum cost rule." + The rejection rule cau also ο used “stand alone for he identification of peculiar objects. e.g. quasars.," The rejection rule can also be used “stand alone” for the identification of peculiar objects, e.g., quasars." +ALACPOP REN for financial support.,MAGPOP RTN for financial support. +where VoSl. NLumucquivfrac2x(35 Recent high resolution numerical studies of pre-galactie objects indicate that massive stars (~LOO AL.) Dorm at the centers of progenitor dark matter halos atredshifts :=15—20 (Abel. Drvan. Norman 2000. 2001).,"where v_s^2 _s; Recent high resolution numerical studies of pre-galactic objects indicate that massive stars $\sim 100 \ M_{\odot}$ ) form at the centers of progenitor dark matter halos atredshifts $z=15-20$ (Abel, Bryan, Norman 2000, 2001)." + Subsequent evolution will end in supernovae on Myr timescales. leaving a populationof remnant (50 M.) seed black holes. long before the first galactic mass dark halos have formed. (Alaclan Rees 2001).," Subsequent evolution will end in supernovae on Myr timescales, leaving a populationof remnant $\sim 50 \ M_{\odot}$ ) seed black holes, long before the first galactic mass dark halos have formed (Madau Rees 2001)." + Fherelore. the material that accretes and merges to form galactic mass dark halos will be well seeded with black holes already. accreting dark matter on dvnamical timescales shorter than the timescale for SIDA collisional evolution.," Therefore, the material that accretes and merges to form galactic mass dark halos will be well seeded with black holes already accreting dark matter on dynamical timescales shorter than the timescale for SIDM collisional evolution." + Following Ostriker (2000). we consider the quasi-spherical accretion ol dark matter onto a single seed black hole at the center of a galactic dark matter halo.," Following Ostriker (2000), we consider the quasi-spherical accretion of dark matter onto a single seed black hole at the center of a galactic dark matter halo." + Clearly. (he assumption of a single seed black hole al the halo center is an over-simplification.," Clearly, the assumption of a single seed black hole at the halo center is an over-simplification." + llowever. given the rapid phase of initial growth (see below). one black hole is likely to dominate and will eat or eject the others. so that this complication should not alter our estimates of the final black hole mass.," However, given the rapid phase of initial growth (see below), one black hole is likely to dominate and will eat or eject the others, so that this complication should not alter our estimates of the final black hole mass." +" The dark matter is treated as an adiabatic gas. which is valid provided the optical depth diverges lor r««r, (an assumption we check below)."," The dark matter is treated as an adiabatic gas, which is valid provided the optical depth diverges for $r<