user304: This question is very vague, and they've provided a little more info, but really not enough. I'd like to encourage the user to get in and provide more info.
But if I click re-open, is my ONE re-open vote enough to re-open it? If i'm part of a concensus, then I'd gladly give it a go and if others thought so too then maybe he get's another shot. But on the face of it, it's not really there yet, and would only offer to re-open if others felt that "you know what, let's give the guy an extra chance."
I am new to this level and will "go with the flow". I DO WISH SE sites were more forgiving on vague questions as I know I've had my fare share over the years, but...
tldr;
What is the best course of action in this?

user220: No, it takes five close votes and five reopen votes to put a question on hold and reopen a question, respectability. If you think it should be reopened, then vote accordingly. If no one else agrees, no harm done. If others agree, your job is done.
If you're really not sure, it's best to skip it and leave the review to someone else.

user10794: I'm not surprised the question was closed:

hi guys How can I serial monitor repport send the atmega328 and save in chip? thanks. 

That's incredibly vague. In fact, it doesn't make sense.
OK, he edited it, but the damage was done. A lot of people didn't understand it, and voted to close it. Not one of them was a moderator, even. So it took 5 close votes to close it. Now he need to improve it enough to get 5 reopen votes.
You are, of course, welcome to cast one of those 5 votes.

304: <p><a href="https://arduino.stackexchange.com/review/reopen/15243">This question</a> is very vague, and they've provided a <em>little</em> more info, but really not enough. I'd like to encourage the user to get in and provide more info.</p>
<p>But if I click re-open, is my ONE re-open vote enough to re-open it? If i'm part of a concensus, then I'd gladly give it a go and if others thought so too then maybe he get's another shot. But on the face of it, it's not really there yet, and would only offer to re-open if others felt that &quot;you know what, let's give the guy an extra chance.&quot;</p>
<p>I am new to this level and will &quot;go with the flow&quot;. I DO WISH SE sites were more forgiving on vague questions as I know I've had my fare share over the years, but...</p>
<h2>tldr;</h2>
<p>What is the best course of action in this?</p>
 220: <p>No, it takes five close votes and five reopen votes to put a question on hold and reopen a question, respectability. If you think it should be reopened, then vote accordingly. If no one else agrees, no harm done. If others agree, your job is done.</p>

<p>If you're really not sure, it's best to skip it and leave the review to someone else.</p>
 10794: <p>I'm not surprised the question was closed:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>hi guys How can I serial monitor repport send the atmega328 and save in chip? thanks. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>That's incredibly vague. In fact, it doesn't make sense.</p>

<p>OK, he edited it, but the damage was done. A lot of people didn't understand it, and voted to close it. Not one of them was a moderator, even. So it took 5 close votes to close it. Now he need to improve it enough to get 5 reopen votes.</p>

<p>You are, of course, welcome to cast one of those 5 votes.</p>
