Rates of block by procaine and benzocaine and the procaine-benzocaine interaction at the node of Ranvier.
1. Action potentials and their maximum rates of rise, VA, were measured in single myelinated nerve fibres of the frog, Rana esculenta at room temperature. 2. On applying 1 mM procaine (pH 7.2) at 20 Hz stimulus frequency, half of the final VA reduction was reached at ton = 0.27 s; on applying 0.5 mM benzocaine (pH 7,2) at 50 HZ, ton was 0.12 s. Increasing the stimulus frequency between 2 and 50 HZ increased the rate of block by procaine but not by benzocaine. 3. Recovery in Ringer solution (pH 7.2) from 30-s treatment with 1 mM procaine (pH 7.2), the equieffective 0.15 mM procaine (pH 8.9) and from 0.5 mM benzocaine (pH 7.2) was 54%, 31% and 70%, respectively, within 1 s. 4. Changing between alkaline Ringer solution (pH 8.9) and 1 mM procaine (pH 7.2) led to transitory excessive block. Changing between 1 mM procaine (pH 7.2) and acid Ringer solution (pH 6.0) and washing out 10 mM procaine (pH 5.5) with neutral Ringer solution also led to a non-monotonic change in VA. 5. If hyperpolarizing pulses (30 ms, 20 mV) preceded the stimuli, changing the frequency of the pulse pairs led to a gradual moderate relief of block in procaine, turning off prepulses (at 10 HZ) to a gradual increase of block. In benzocaine changing from 1 to 10 HZ had no effect but turning off prepulses led to a prompt large increase of block. In procaine + benzocaine the membrane responded much as in benzocaine alone. At 1 HZ (prepulses) VA in 0.4 mM procaine was smaller than in 0.4 mM procaine + 0.3 mM benzocaine. 6. These phenomena can be explained on the assumption of voltage-dependent binding of benzocaine and procaine to a common receptor. The rate of block appears to be limited by access to the receptor, more in the case of benzocaine than of procaine.
Rates of block by procaine and benzocaine and the procaine-benzocaine interaction at the node of Ranvier. 1. Action potentials and their maximum rates of rise, VA, were measured in single myelinated nerve fibres of the frog, Rana esculenta at room temperature. 2. On applying 1 mM procaine (pH 7.2) at 20 Hz stimulus frequency, half of the final VA reduction was reached at ton = 0.27 s; on applying 0.5 mM benzocaine (pH 7,2) at 50 HZ, ton was 0.12 s. Increasing the stimulus frequency between 2 and 50 HZ increased the rate of block by procaine but not by benzocaine. 3. Recovery in Ringer solution (pH 7.2) from 30-s treatment with 1 mM procaine (pH 7.2), the equieffective 0.15 mM procaine (pH 8.9) and from 0.5 mM benzocaine (pH 7.2) was 54%, 31% and 70%, respectively, within 1 s. 4. Changing between alkaline Ringer solution (pH 8.9) and 1 mM procaine (pH 7.2) led to transitory excessive block. Changing between 1 mM procaine (pH 7.2) and acid Ringer solution (pH 6.0) and washing out 10 mM procaine (pH 5.5) with neutral Ringer solution also led to a non-monotonic change in VA. 5. If hyperpolarizing pulses (30 ms, 20 mV) preceded the stimuli, changing the frequency of the pulse pairs led to a gradual moderate relief of block in procaine, turning off prepulses (at 10 HZ) to a gradual increase of block. In benzocaine changing from 1 to 10 HZ had no effect but turning off prepulses led to a prompt large increase of block. In procaine + benzocaine the membrane responded much as in benzocaine alone. At 1 HZ (prepulses) VA in 0.4 mM procaine was smaller than in 0.4 mM procaine + 0.3 mM benzocaine. 6. These phenomena can be explained on the assumption of voltage-dependent binding of benzocaine and procaine to a common receptor. The rate of block appears to be limited by access to the receptor, more in the case of benzocaine than of procaine.