Monoamine oxidase and catechol-O-methyl transferase activity in Tetrahymena.
Tetrahymena pyriformis strain HSM was found to have monomine oxidase (MAO) and a catechol-3-methyl transferase-like (COMT) activity. As in mammalian tissues, the MAO activity is predominantly localized in the mitochondrial pellet and COMT in the cytosol. The COMT-like activity was present in amounts comparable to several mouse tissues and was inhibited by tropolone. MAO activity was much lower than in any of the mouse tissues tested, and its activity varied greatly from preparation to preparation. The substrate preference of Tetrahymena MAO was tryptamine greater than serotonin greater than dopamine, and activity increased with increasing pH from pH 6.5 to pH 7.8, as does that of mouse liver MAO. Teh Km of Tetrahymena MAO for tryptamine was approximately 4 micrometer, an order of magnitude lower than that of mouse liver MAO. Sensitivity of inhibition by MAO inhibitors was variable. In some preparations, no inhibition was observed. In others clear inhibition was obtained, harmine and clorgyline being among the most potent inhibitors.
Monoamine oxidase and catechol-O-methyl transferase activity in Tetrahymena. Tetrahymena pyriformis strain HSM was found to have monomine oxidase (MAO) and a catechol-3-methyl transferase-like (COMT) activity. As in mammalian tissues, the MAO activity is predominantly localized in the mitochondrial pellet and COMT in the cytosol. The COMT-like activity was present in amounts comparable to several mouse tissues and was inhibited by tropolone. MAO activity was much lower than in any of the mouse tissues tested, and its activity varied greatly from preparation to preparation. The substrate preference of Tetrahymena MAO was tryptamine greater than serotonin greater than dopamine, and activity increased with increasing pH from pH 6.5 to pH 7.8, as does that of mouse liver MAO. Teh Km of Tetrahymena MAO for tryptamine was approximately 4 micrometer, an order of magnitude lower than that of mouse liver MAO. Sensitivity of inhibition by MAO inhibitors was variable. In some preparations, no inhibition was observed. In others clear inhibition was obtained, harmine and clorgyline being among the most potent inhibitors.