Comparison of solubility properties of alpha-paramyosin, beta-paramyosin and acid-extracted paramyosin.
The solubility properties of paramyosin in the zones of pH and ionic strength in which aggregation occurs were initially studied using preparations isolated by a method originally described by Bailey (Bailey, K. (1956), Pubbl. Stn. Zool. Napoli 29, 26). Other preparations yielding apparently different protein components have been described by Hodge (Hodge, A.J. (1952), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 38, 850) using acid conditions, and Stafford and Yphantis (Stafford, W.F., AND Yphantis, D. (1972), Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 49, 848) have identified alpha-, beta-, and gamma-paramyosin using various times and temperatures of extraction with or without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. We have found that acid-extracted paramyosin is very similar if not identical to alpha-paramyosin, but that both acid and alpha forms differ considerably from beta- and gamma-paramyosin. Beta-Paramyosin precipitates abruptly from solution in narrow zone of pH below neutrality, and increases in ionic strength shift the zone of precipitation toward lower pH values. In contrast, both acid and alpha-paramyosin show gradual aggregation with changing pH at lowerionic strength (less than 0.3) but sharp transitions similar to beta-paramyosin at higher ionic strength (greater than 0.3). Transitions were also found at lower pH (ca. 4.0) which were not mirror images of transitions at higher pH (ca. 7.0). Viscosity measurements show that acid extracted paramyosin is close in behavior to a native extract obtained by extraction in mild, nondenaturing media containing mixed antibiotics. Each of these extracts differed considerably from beta-paramyosin. Mild, nonhydrolytic procedures employed by others to remove small, noncovalent bonded components or to separate protein complexes were not effective in converting alpha- to beta-paramyosin. Comparison of extraction procedures strongly supports the suggestion of Stafford and Yphantis that beta- and gamma-paramyosin are hydrolytic products of alpha-paramyosin and that the proteases responsible may be of bacterial origin.
Comparison of solubility properties of alpha-paramyosin, beta-paramyosin and acid-extracted paramyosin. The solubility properties of paramyosin in the zones of pH and ionic strength in which aggregation occurs were initially studied using preparations isolated by a method originally described by Bailey (Bailey, K. (1956), Pubbl. Stn. Zool. Napoli 29, 26). Other preparations yielding apparently different protein components have been described by Hodge (Hodge, A.J. (1952), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 38, 850) using acid conditions, and Stafford and Yphantis (Stafford, W.F., AND Yphantis, D. (1972), Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 49, 848) have identified alpha-, beta-, and gamma-paramyosin using various times and temperatures of extraction with or without ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. We have found that acid-extracted paramyosin is very similar if not identical to alpha-paramyosin, but that both acid and alpha forms differ considerably from beta- and gamma-paramyosin. Beta-Paramyosin precipitates abruptly from solution in narrow zone of pH below neutrality, and increases in ionic strength shift the zone of precipitation toward lower pH values. In contrast, both acid and alpha-paramyosin show gradual aggregation with changing pH at lowerionic strength (less than 0.3) but sharp transitions similar to beta-paramyosin at higher ionic strength (greater than 0.3). Transitions were also found at lower pH (ca. 4.0) which were not mirror images of transitions at higher pH (ca. 7.0). Viscosity measurements show that acid extracted paramyosin is close in behavior to a native extract obtained by extraction in mild, nondenaturing media containing mixed antibiotics. Each of these extracts differed considerably from beta-paramyosin. Mild, nonhydrolytic procedures employed by others to remove small, noncovalent bonded components or to separate protein complexes were not effective in converting alpha- to beta-paramyosin. Comparison of extraction procedures strongly supports the suggestion of Stafford and Yphantis that beta- and gamma-paramyosin are hydrolytic products of alpha-paramyosin and that the proteases responsible may be of bacterial origin.