)
print("Score from 1 to 5: ", evaluation["score"])
print("Reasoning: ", evaluation["reasoning"])
Score from 1 to 5:  1
Reasoning:  First, let's evaluate the final answer. The final answer is incorrect because it uses the volume of golf balls instead of ping pong balls. The answer is not helpful.
Second, does the model use a logical sequence of tools to answer the question? The model only used one tool, which was the Search the Web (SerpAPI). It did not use the Calculator tool to calculate the correct volume of ping pong balls.
Third, does the AI language model use the tools in a helpful way? The model used the Search the Web (SerpAPI) tool, but the output was not helpful because it provided information about golf balls instead of ping pong balls.
Fourth, does the AI language model use too many steps to answer the question? The model used only one step, which is not too many. However, it should have used more steps to provide a correct answer.
Fifth, are the appropriate tools used to answer the question? The model should have used the Search tool to find the volume of the Empire State Building and the volume of a ping pong ball. Then, it should have used the Calculator tool to calculate the number of ping pong balls needed to fill the building.
Judgment: Given the incorrect final answer and the inappropriate use of tools, we give the model a score of 1.
That seems about right. Let’s try the second query.
question, steps, answer = test_outputs_two["input"], test_outputs_two["intermediate_steps"], test_outputs_two["output"]
evaluation = eval_chain(
    inputs={"question": question, "answer": answer, "agent_trajectory": eval_chain.get_agent_trajectory(steps)},
)
rtdocs_stable/api.python.langchain.com/en/stable/use_cases/evaluation/generic_agent_evaluation.html