<human>: Does the sentence "In the 1927 case Olmstead v. United States, in which a bootlegger was caught through telephone tapping, the United States Supreme Court ruled that FBI wiretaps did not violate the Fourth Amendment as unlawful search and seizure, as long as the FBI did not break into a person's home to complete the tapping." answer the question "What is now necessary to tap someone's telephone?"

OPTIONS:
- yes
- no
<bot>: no