Create README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
---
|
2 |
+
license: mit
|
3 |
+
language:
|
4 |
+
- en
|
5 |
+
base_model:
|
6 |
+
- meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
|
7 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-generation
|
8 |
+
tags:
|
9 |
+
- table
|
10 |
+
---
|
11 |
+
# Model Card for Model ID
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
<!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
|
14 |
+
|
15 |
+
Recent advances in table understanding have focused on instruction-tuning large language models (LLMs) for table-related tasks. However, existing research has overlooked the impact of hyperparameter choices, and also lacks a comprehensive evaluation of the out-of-domain table understanding ability and the general capabilities of these table LLMs. In this paper, we evaluate these abilities in existing table LLMs, and find significant declines in both out-of-domain table understanding and general capabilities as compared to their base models.
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
Through systematic analysis, we show that hyperparameters, such as learning rate, can significantly influence both table-specific and general capabilities. Contrary to the previous table instruction-tuning work, we demonstrate that smaller learning rates and fewer training instances can enhance table understanding while preserving general capabilities. Based on our findings, we introduce TAMA, a TAble LLM instruction-tuned from LLaMA 3.1 8B Instruct, which achieves performance on par with, or surpassing GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on table tasks, while maintaining strong out-of-domain generalization and general capabilities. Our findings highlight the potential for reduced data annotation costs and more efficient model development through careful hyperparameter selection.
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
## Model Details
|
20 |
+
|
21 |
+
### Model Description
|
22 |
+
|
23 |
+
<!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
|
24 |
+
|
25 |
+
|
26 |
+
|
27 |
+
- **Model type:** Text generation.
|
28 |
+
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English.
|
29 |
+
- **License:** [[License for Llama models](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/llama3_1/LICENSE))]
|
30 |
+
- **Finetuned from model:** [[meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8b-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct)]
|
31 |
+
|
32 |
+
### Model Sources
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
<!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
- **Repository:** [[github](https://github.com/MichiganNLP/TAMA)]
|
37 |
+
- **Paper:** [[paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14693)]
|
38 |
+
|
39 |
+
## Uses
|
40 |
+
|
41 |
+
<!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
|
42 |
+
TAMA is intended for the use in table understanding tasks and to facilitate future research.
|
43 |
+
|
44 |
+
|
45 |
+
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
46 |
+
|
47 |
+
Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
48 |
+
Starting with `transformers >= 4.43.0` onward, you can run conversational inference using the Transformers pipeline abstraction or by leveraging the Auto classes with the generate() function.
|
49 |
+
|
50 |
+
Make sure to update your transformers installation via `pip install --upgrade transformers`.
|
51 |
+
|
52 |
+
```
|
53 |
+
import transformers
|
54 |
+
import torch
|
55 |
+
|
56 |
+
model_id = "MichiganNLP/tama-5e-7"
|
57 |
+
|
58 |
+
pipeline = transformers.pipeline(
|
59 |
+
"text-generation", model=model_id, model_kwargs={"torch_dtype": torch.bfloat16}, device_map="auto"
|
60 |
+
)
|
61 |
+
|
62 |
+
pipeline("Hey how are you doing today?")
|
63 |
+
```
|
64 |
+
|
65 |
+
You may replace the prompt with table-specific instructions. We recommend using the following prompt structure:
|
66 |
+
|
67 |
+
```
|
68 |
+
Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that
|
69 |
+
appropriately completes the request.
|
70 |
+
|
71 |
+
### Instruction:
|
72 |
+
{instruction}
|
73 |
+
|
74 |
+
### Input:
|
75 |
+
{table_content}
|
76 |
+
|
77 |
+
### Question:
|
78 |
+
{question}
|
79 |
+
|
80 |
+
### Response:
|
81 |
+
```
|
82 |
+
|
83 |
+
|
84 |
+
## Training Details
|
85 |
+
|
86 |
+
### Training Data
|
87 |
+
|
88 |
+
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
Coming soon.
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
+
### Training Procedure
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
95 |
+
|
96 |
+
We utilize the [LLaMA Factory](https://github.com/hiyouga/LLaMA-Factory) library for model training and inference. Example YAML configuration files are provided [here](https://github.com/MichiganNLP/TAMA/blob/main/yamls/train.yaml).
|
97 |
+
|
98 |
+
The training command is:
|
99 |
+
```
|
100 |
+
llamafactory-cli train yamls/train.yaml
|
101 |
+
```
|
102 |
+
|
103 |
+
|
104 |
+
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
105 |
+
|
106 |
+
- **Training regime:** bf16
|
107 |
+
- **Training epochs:** 2.0
|
108 |
+
- **Learning rate scheduler:** linear
|
109 |
+
- **Cutoff length:** 2048
|
110 |
+
- **Learning rate**: 5e-7
|
111 |
+
|
112 |
+
## Evaluation
|
113 |
+
|
114 |
+
### Results
|
115 |
+
|
116 |
+
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
117 |
+
|
118 |
+
|
119 |
+
<table>
|
120 |
+
<tr>
|
121 |
+
<th>Models</th>
|
122 |
+
<th>FeTaQA</th>
|
123 |
+
<th>HiTab</th>
|
124 |
+
<th>TaFact</th>
|
125 |
+
<th>FEVEROUS</th>
|
126 |
+
<th>WikiTQ</th>
|
127 |
+
<th>WikiSQL</th>
|
128 |
+
<th>HybridQA</th>
|
129 |
+
<th>TATQA</th>
|
130 |
+
<th>AIT-QA</th>
|
131 |
+
<th>TABMWP</th>
|
132 |
+
<th>InfoTabs</th>
|
133 |
+
<th>KVRET</th>
|
134 |
+
<th>ToTTo</th>
|
135 |
+
<th>TableGPT<sub>subset</sub></th>
|
136 |
+
<th>TableBench</th>
|
137 |
+
</tr>
|
138 |
+
<tr>
|
139 |
+
<th>Metrics</th>
|
140 |
+
<th>BLEU</th>
|
141 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
142 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
143 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
144 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
145 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
146 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
147 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
148 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
149 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
150 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
151 |
+
<th>Micro F1</th>
|
152 |
+
<th>BLEU</th>
|
153 |
+
<th>Acc</th>
|
154 |
+
<th>ROUGE-L</th>
|
155 |
+
</tr>
|
156 |
+
<tr>
|
157 |
+
<td>GPT-3.5</td>
|
158 |
+
<td><u>26.49</u></td>
|
159 |
+
<td>43.62</td>
|
160 |
+
<td>67.41</td>
|
161 |
+
<td>60.79</td>
|
162 |
+
<td><u>53.13</u></td>
|
163 |
+
<td>41.91</td>
|
164 |
+
<td>40.22</td>
|
165 |
+
<td>31.38</td>
|
166 |
+
<td>84.13</td>
|
167 |
+
<td>46.30</td>
|
168 |
+
<td>56.00</td>
|
169 |
+
<td><u>54.56</u></td>
|
170 |
+
<td><u>16.81</u></td>
|
171 |
+
<td>54.80</td>
|
172 |
+
<td>27.75</td>
|
173 |
+
</tr>
|
174 |
+
<tr>
|
175 |
+
<td>GPT-4</td>
|
176 |
+
<td>21.70</td>
|
177 |
+
<td><u>48.40</u></td>
|
178 |
+
<td><b>74.40</b></td>
|
179 |
+
<td><u>71.60</u></td>
|
180 |
+
<td><b>68.40</b></td>
|
181 |
+
<td><u>47.60</u></td>
|
182 |
+
<td><u>58.60</u></td>
|
183 |
+
<td><b>55.81</b></td>
|
184 |
+
<td><u>88.57</u></td>
|
185 |
+
<td><b>67.10</b></td>
|
186 |
+
<td><u>58.60</u></td>
|
187 |
+
<td><b>56.46</b></td>
|
188 |
+
<td>12.21</td>
|
189 |
+
<td><b>80.20</b></td>
|
190 |
+
<td><b>40.38</b></td>
|
191 |
+
</tr>
|
192 |
+
<tr>
|
193 |
+
<td>base</td>
|
194 |
+
<td>15.33</td>
|
195 |
+
<td>32.83</td>
|
196 |
+
<td>58.44</td>
|
197 |
+
<td>66.37</td>
|
198 |
+
<td>43.46</td>
|
199 |
+
<td>20.43</td>
|
200 |
+
<td>32.83</td>
|
201 |
+
<td>26.70</td>
|
202 |
+
<td>82.54</td>
|
203 |
+
<td>39.97</td>
|
204 |
+
<td>48.39</td>
|
205 |
+
<td>50.80</td>
|
206 |
+
<td>13.24</td>
|
207 |
+
<td>53.60</td>
|
208 |
+
<td>23.47</td>
|
209 |
+
</tr>
|
210 |
+
<tr>
|
211 |
+
<td>TAMA</td>
|
212 |
+
<td><b>35.37</b></td>
|
213 |
+
<td><b>63.51</b></td>
|
214 |
+
<td><u>73.82</u></td>
|
215 |
+
<td><b>77.39</b></td>
|
216 |
+
<td>52.88</td>
|
217 |
+
<td><b>68.31</b></td>
|
218 |
+
<td><b>60.86</b></td>
|
219 |
+
<td><u>48.47</u></td>
|
220 |
+
<td><b>89.21</b></td>
|
221 |
+
<td><u>65.09</u></td>
|
222 |
+
<td><b>64.54</b></td>
|
223 |
+
<td>43.94</td>
|
224 |
+
<td><b>37.94</b></td>
|
225 |
+
<td><u>53.60</u></td>
|
226 |
+
<td><u>28.60</u></td>
|
227 |
+
</tr>
|
228 |
+
</table>
|
229 |
+
|
230 |
+
**Note these results are corresponding to the [tama-1e-6](https://huggingface.co/MichiganNLP/tama-1e-6) checkpoint. We release the tama-5e-7 checkpoints for the purpose of facilitating future research.**
|
231 |
+
|
232 |
+
We make the number bold if it is the best among the four, we underline the number if it is at the second place.
|
233 |
+
|
234 |
+
Please refer to our [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14693) for additional details.
|
235 |
+
|
236 |
+
|
237 |
+
#### Metrics
|
238 |
+
|
239 |
+
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
240 |
+
|
241 |
+
Please refer to our [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14693) for additional details.
|
242 |
+
|
243 |
+
|
244 |
+
#### Summary
|
245 |
+
|
246 |
+
Notably, as an 8B model, TAMA demonstrates strong table understanding ability, outperforming GPT-3.5 on most of the table understanding benchmarks, even achieving performance on par or better than GPT-4.
|
247 |
+
|
248 |
+
|
249 |
+
## Technical Specifications
|
250 |
+
|
251 |
+
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
252 |
+
|
253 |
+
We base our model on the [Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct).
|
254 |
+
We instruction tune the model on a set of 2,600 table instructions.
|
255 |
+
|
256 |
+
### Compute Infrastructure
|
257 |
+
|
258 |
+
#### Hardware
|
259 |
+
|
260 |
+
We conduct our experiments on A40 and A100 GPUs.
|
261 |
+
|
262 |
+
#### Software
|
263 |
+
|
264 |
+
We leverage the [LLaMA Factory](https://github.com/hiyouga/LLaMA-Factory) for model training.
|
265 |
+
|
266 |
+
## Citation
|
267 |
+
|
268 |
+
```
|
269 |
+
@misc{
|
270 |
+
deng2025rethinking,
|
271 |
+
title={Rethinking Table Instruction Tuning},
|
272 |
+
author={Naihao Deng and Rada Mihalcea},
|
273 |
+
year={2025},
|
274 |
+
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=GLmqHCwbOJ}
|
275 |
+
}
|
276 |
+
```
|
277 |
+
|
278 |
+
|
279 |
+
## Model Card Authors
|
280 |
+
|
281 |
+
Naihao Deng
|
282 |
+
|
283 |
+
## Model Card Contact
|
284 |
+
|
285 |
+
Naihao Deng
|